On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I noticed that 3.1.0's tag in svn is
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_3_1. Should it
not be http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_3_1_0? At
least, that's what's specified
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I noticed that 3.1.0's tag in svn is
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_3_1. Should it
not be
On Apr 1, 2011, at 8:31 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
Hi
I noticed that 3.1.0's tag in svn is
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_3_1. Should it
not be http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_3_1_0? At
least, that's what's specified under Publishing
The branch is ok -- 3_1 branch is intended for 3.1.x future releases indeed.
If we can commit to releasing 3.2 instead of 3.1.1 in case only bug fixes
are present, then I'm ok with it. We'd also need to commit, in general, to
release more often. So if we decide to release say every 3 months, then
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
The branch is ok -- 3_1 branch is intended for 3.1.x future releases indeed.
If we can commit to releasing 3.2 instead of 3.1.1 in case only bug fixes
are present, then I'm ok with it. We'd also need to commit, in general, to
Hi Shai,
On 4/1/2011 at 8:32 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
Also, the common-build.xml under the tag and the downloaded sources
specifies version to be 3.1-SNAPSHOT. On the ReleaseTodo I found
this: ... and the default version in lucene/common-build.xml on
the branch to X.Y (remove the -SNAPSHOT
: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Steven A Rowe [mailto:sar...@syr.edu]
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 3:19 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Questions about 3.1.0 release, SVN and common-build.xml
Hi Shai,
On 4/1/2011 at 8:32 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
Also
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Questions about 3.1.0 release, SVN and common-build.xml
Ok, we can keep SNAPSHOT. I was just thinking it'll be nice if the tag
sets the right version, for convenience. It's not so hard to do.
BTW, I don't build the code, just run jar-src so I can attach the
source
[mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 11:12 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Questions about 3.1.0 release, SVN and common-build.xml
Ok, we can keep SNAPSHOT. I was just thinking it'll be nice if the tag
sets the right version, for convenience. It's not so hard to do
-core-3.1.0-sources.jar
-Original Message-
From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 11:12 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Questions about 3.1.0 release, SVN and common-build.xml
Ok, we can keep SNAPSHOT. I was just thinking it'll be nice
10 matches
Mail list logo