Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

[Ignacio Vera]

+1

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 3:34 PM Benjamin Trent 
wrote:

> +1
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 8:54 AM Adrien Grand  wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:54 PM Uwe Schindler  wrote:
>> >
>> > Here is my +1
>> >
>> > Uwe
>> >
>> > Am 23.02.2024 um 12:24 schrieb Chris Hegarty:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is
>> winding down, let's hold a vote on this important change.
>> > >
>> > > Once bumped, the next major release of Lucene (whenever that will be)
>> will require a version of Java greater than or equal to Java 21.
>> > >
>> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (and allow some
>> additional time for the weekend) i.e. until 2024-02-28 12:00 UTC.
>> > >
>> > > [ ] +1  approve
>> > > [ ] +0  no opinion
>> > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>> > >
>> > > Here is my +1
>> > >
>> > > -Chris.
>> > > -
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> > >
>> > --
>> > Uwe Schindler
>> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>> > https://www.thetaphi.de
>> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>> >
>> >
>> > -
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Adrien
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.9.2 RC1

[Ignacio Vera]

+1

SUCCESS! [0:54:32.772088]

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:23 PM Uwe Schindler  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> +1 to release.
>
> Tested smoketester with Java 11 and 17; results:
> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/31/console
>
> Uwe
>
> Am 25.01.2024 um 12:57 schrieb Chris Hegarty:
> > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.9.2
> >
> > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.9.2-RC1-rev-a2939784c4ca60bc28bf488b5479c02fc2e5e22c
> >
> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >
> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.9.2-RC1-rev-a2939784c4ca60bc28bf488b5479c02fc2e5e22c
> >
> > The vote will be open for 96 hours ( allowing some additional time for
> weekend span) i.e. until 2024-01-29 12:00 UTC.
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Here is my +1
> >
> > Draft release notes can be found at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/ReleaseNote9_9_2
> >
> > -Chris.
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
> --
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> https://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.9.0 RC2

[Ignacio Vera]

SUCCESS! [1:20:23.570231]


+1

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 6:55 AM Shyamsunder Mutcha  wrote:

> SUCCESS! [0:38:41.054860]
> +1
>
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 9:59 PM Nhat Nguyen 
> wrote:
>
>> SUCCESS! [1:22:43.808415]
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 6:09 PM Christian Moen  wrote:
>>
>>> SUCCESS! [1:49:26.873909]
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 3:09 AM Chris Hegarty
>>>  wrote:
>>>
 Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.9.0


 The artifacts can be downloaded from:


 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.9.0-RC2-rev-06070c0dceba07f0d33104192d9ac98ca16fc500


 You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:


 python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \


 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.9.0-RC2-rev-06070c0dceba07f0d33104192d9ac98ca16fc500


 The vote will be open for at least 72 hours, and given the weekend in
 between, let’s keep it open until 2023-12-04 12:00 UTC.

 [ ] +1  approve

 [ ] +0  no opinion

 [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)


 Here is my +1


 -Chris.

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.9.0 RC1

[Ignacio Vera]

SUCCESS! [0:52:59.891964]


+1

On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 12:42 PM Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:

> +1 to release.
>
> I hit a corner-case test failure and opened a PR to fix it:
> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12859
>
> I don't think this should block the release? -- it looks exotic.
>
> Thanks Chris!
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 1:16 AM Patrick Zhai  wrote:
>
>> SUCCESS! [1:03:54.880200]
>>
>> +1. Thank you Chris!
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 8:45 PM Nhat Nguyen
>>  wrote:
>>
>>> SUCCESS! [1:11:30.037919]
>>>
>>> +1. Thanks, Chris!
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 8:53 AM Chris Hegarty
>>>  wrote:
>>>
 Hi,


 Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.9.0


 The artifacts can be downloaded from:


 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.9.0-RC1-rev-92a5e5b02e0e083126c4122f2b7a02426c21a037


 You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:


 python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \


 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.9.0-RC1-rev-92a5e5b02e0e083126c4122f2b7a02426c21a037


 The vote will be open for at least 72 hours, and given the weekend in
 between, let’s it open until 2023-12-04 12:00 UTC.


 [ ] +1  approve

 [ ] +0  no opinion

 [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)


 Here is my +1


 Draft release highlights can be viewed here (comments and feedback
 welcome):
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/ReleaseNote9_9_0

 -Chris.

>>>

Re: Welcome Patrick Zhai to the Lucene PMC

[Ignacio Vera]

Welcome Patrick!

On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 3:29 PM Uwe Schindler  wrote:

> Welcome Patrick!
>
> Uwe
>
>
> Am 10. November 2023 21:04:32 MEZ schrieb Michael McCandless <
> luc...@mikemccandless.com>:
>
>> I'm happy to announce that Patrick Zhai has accepted an invitation to
>> join the Lucene Project Management Committee (PMC)!
>>
>> Congratulations Patrick, thank you for all your hard work improving
>> Lucene's community and source code, and welcome aboard!
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
> --
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
> https://www.thetaphi.de
>

Re: Lucene 9.7 release

[Ignacio Vera]

+1

On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 6:20 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe 
wrote:

> +1
> Thanks Adrien
>
> On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 9:19 AM Michael McCandless <
> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
>> +1, thanks Adrien!
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 12:11 PM Patrick Zhai  wrote:
>>
>>> +1, thank you Adrien!
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 9, 2023, 09:08 Adrien Grand  wrote:
>>>
 Hello all,

 There is some good stuff that is scheduled for 9.7 already, I found the
 following changes in the changelog that look especially interesting:
  - Concurrent query rewrites for vector queries.
  - Speedups to vector indexing/search via integration of the Panama
 vector API.
  - Reduced overhead of soft deletes.
  - Support for update by query.

 I propose we start the process for a 9.7 release, and I volunteer to be
 the release manager. I suggest the following schedule:
  - Feature freeze on June 16th, one week from now. This is when the 9.7
 branch will be cut.
  - Open a vote on June 21st, which we'll possibly delay if blockers get
 identified.

 --
 Adrien

>>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.6.0 RC2

[Ignacio Vera]

+1

SUCCESS! [0:42:35.102645]

On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 12:45 PM Alan Woodward  wrote:

> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.6.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.6.0-RC2-rev-f94cd1750d198cd0294fb1d967c4e511a7035f1e
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.6.0-RC2-rev-f94cd1750d198cd0294fb1d967c4e511a7035f1e
>
> Given weekends and UK holidays, the vote will be open until next Monday,
> i.e. until 2023-05-08 11:00 UTC.
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here is my +1
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.6.0 RC1

[Ignacio Vera]

+1

SUCCESS! [2:07:32.970671]

On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 5:08 AM Nhat Nguyen 
wrote:

> +1. Thanks Alan!
>
> SUCCESS! [0:48:46.465752]
>
> On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 11:33 AM Alan Woodward 
> wrote:
>
>> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.6.0
>>
>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.6.0-RC1-rev-246ac4bcbe6c0ea7bebcc4f90b2be0536f00d842
>>
>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>
>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.6.0-RC1-rev-246ac4bcbe6c0ea7bebcc4f90b2be0536f00d842
>>
>> It is another long holiday weekend here in the UK, so the vote is likely
>> to be held open until at least Monday.
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Here is my +1
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>

Re: Lucene 9.6 release

[Ignacio Vera]

+1

Thanks Alan!

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 1:27 PM Alan Woodward  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> It’s been a while since our last release, and we have a number of nice
> improvements and optimisations sitting in the 9x branch.  I propose that we
> start the process for a 9.6 release, and I will volunteer to be the release
> manager.  If there are no objections, I will cut a release branch one week
> today, April 26th.
>
> - Alan
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: Welcome Ben Trent as Lucene committer

[Ignacio Vera]

Congratulations Ben!

On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 5:08 PM Luca Cavanna  wrote:

> Welcome Ben, congratulations!
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 4:27 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Welcome and congratulations, Ben!
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 8:48 PM Adrien Grand  wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm pleased to announce that Ben Trent has accepted the PMC's
>> > invitation to become a committer.
>> >
>> > Ben, the tradition is that new committers introduce themselves with a
>> > brief bio.
>> >
>> > Congratulations and welcome!
>> >
>> > --
>> > Adrien
>> >
>> > -
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> >
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.5.0 RC1

[Ignacio Vera]

+1

SUCCESS! [0:44:15.998020]

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 9:19 AM Jan Høydahl  wrote:

> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [0:36:32.191785]
>
> Jan
>
> 25. jan. 2023 kl. 19:43 skrev Luca Cavanna :
>
> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.5.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.5.0-RC1-rev-13803aa6ea7fee91f798cfeded4296182ac43a21
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.5.0-RC1-rev-13803aa6ea7fee91f798cfeded4296182ac43a21
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2023-01-28 19:00
> UTC.
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here is my +1
>
>
>

Re: Lucene 9.5.0 release

[Ignacio Vera]

+1

On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 12:58 PM Alan Woodward  wrote:

> +1, thanks Luca!
>
> On 13 Jan 2023, at 09:54, Luca Cavanna  wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I'd like to propose that we release Lucene 9.5.0. There is a decent amount
> of changes that would go into it looking at the github milestone:
> https://github.com/apache/lucene/milestone/4 . I'd volunteer to be the
> release manager. There is one PR open listed for the 9.5 milestone:
> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11873 . Is this something that we
> do want to address before we release? Is anybody aware of outstanding work
> that we would like to include or known blocker issues that are not listed
> in the 9.5 milestone?
>
> Cheers
> Luca
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.4.2 RC1

[Ignacio Vera]

SUCCESS! [0:46:39.842784]


+1

On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 3:18 PM Adrien Grand  wrote:

> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.4.2
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.2-RC1-rev-858d9b437047a577fa9457089afff43eefa461db
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.2-RC1-rev-858d9b437047a577fa9457089afff43eefa461db
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2022-11-20 15:00
> UTC.
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here is my +1.
>
> --
> Adrien
>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucene 9.4.1 released

[Ignacio Vera]

Thanks Uwe! I don't remember seeing that step on the release manager, I
wonder if it is missing.

On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 4:32 PM Uwe Schindler  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I just pressed the release button next to the Tag on Github. You missed to
> do that. Now it shows 9.4.1 on Github's Lucene homepage.
>
> Uwe
>
> Am 24.10.2022 um 14:30 schrieb Ignacio Vera:
>
> The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 9.4.1.
>
>
> Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured search engine library
> written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly any
> application that requires structured search, full-text search, faceting,
> nearest-neighbor search across high-dimensionality vectors, spell
> correction or query suggestions.
>
>
> This release contains numerous bug fixes, optimizations, and improvements,
> some of which are highlighted below. The release is available for immediate
> download at:
>
>
>   <https://lucene.apache.org/core/downloads.html>
>
>
> ### Lucene 9.4.1 Release Highlights:
>
>
>  * When reading large segments, the kNN vectors format could fail with a
> validation error, preventing further writes or searches on the index. This
> bug is now fixed. Only version 9.4.0 was affected, so it is recommended to
> skip 9.4.0 if you are using kNN vectors.
>
>
> Please read CHANGES.txt for a full list of changes:
>
>
>   <https://lucene.apache.org/core/9_4_1/changes/Changes.html>
>
>
>
> Note: The Apache Software Foundation uses an extensive mirroring network
> for
>
> distributing releases. It is possible that the mirror you are using may
> not have
>
> replicated the release yet. If that is the case, please try another mirror.
>
> This also applies to Maven access.
>
> --
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremenhttps://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Check-9.4 - Build # 509 - Failure!

[Ignacio Vera]

I think the problem here is that at the point of running those commands I
had lost trust in the release wizard and I was running the commands
manually. The instructions for those steps do not contain running tidy
(maybe we should add them there too).

One of the problems at the moment in the release wizard is that any step
that involves running a gradle task on main branch fails because it
requires java 17 and we run all commands with java 11. I think that should
be addressed, those steps were missing for the 9.4.0 release and I fixed
them too.

On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 7:57 PM Dawid Weiss  wrote:

>
> What's weird is that tidy should have been called from within the release
> wizard - it was added in this issue.
>
> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11748
>
> Have I missed something obvious here?
>
> Dawid
>
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 5:28 PM Ignacio Vera  wrote:
>
>> I pushed a fix for this spotless error.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 4:17 PM Apache Jenkins Server <
>> jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Build: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Lucene/job/Lucene-Check-9.4/509/
>>>
>>> All tests passed
>>>
>>> Build Log:
>>> [...truncated 1292 lines...]
>>> BUILD FAILED in 19m 30s
>>> 797 actionable tasks: 797 executed
>>> Build step 'Invoke Gradle script' changed build result to FAILURE
>>> Build step 'Invoke Gradle script' marked build as failure
>>> Archiving artifacts
>>> Recording test results
>>> [Checks API] No suitable checks publisher found.
>>> Email was triggered for: Failure - Any
>>> Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: builds-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: builds-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Check-9.4 - Build # 509 - Failure!

[Ignacio Vera]

I pushed a fix for this spotless error.

On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 4:17 PM Apache Jenkins Server <
jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote:

> Build: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Lucene/job/Lucene-Check-9.4/509/
>
> All tests passed
>
> Build Log:
> [...truncated 1292 lines...]
> BUILD FAILED in 19m 30s
> 797 actionable tasks: 797 executed
> Build step 'Invoke Gradle script' changed build result to FAILURE
> Build step 'Invoke Gradle script' marked build as failure
> Archiving artifacts
> Recording test results
> [Checks API] No suitable checks publisher found.
> Email was triggered for: Failure - Any
> Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: builds-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: builds-h...@lucene.apache.org

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucene 9.4.1 released

[Ignacio Vera]

The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 9.4.1.


Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured search engine library
written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly any
application that requires structured search, full-text search, faceting,
nearest-neighbor search across high-dimensionality vectors, spell
correction or query suggestions.


This release contains numerous bug fixes, optimizations, and improvements,
some of which are highlighted below. The release is available for immediate
download at:


  


### Lucene 9.4.1 Release Highlights:


 * When reading large segments, the kNN vectors format could fail with a
validation error, preventing further writes or searches on the index. This
bug is now fixed. Only version 9.4.0 was affected, so it is recommended to
skip 9.4.0 if you are using kNN vectors.


Please read CHANGES.txt for a full list of changes:


  



Note: The Apache Software Foundation uses an extensive mirroring network for

distributing releases. It is possible that the mirror you are using may not
have

replicated the release yet. If that is the case, please try another mirror.

This also applies to Maven access.

Re: Bugfix release Lucene 9.4.1

[Ignacio Vera]

I push the following commit to the lucene-site which seems to fix the
issue. New versions of Markdown seem to break the build.

https://github.com/apache/lucene-site/commit/dc74048f65395ce853a7d93d9b4750db073973df

On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 1:19 PM Ignacio Vera  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I am currently stuck on the release on the lucene site. I think I have
> everything in place but it seems it is not building properly so when I look
> into staging I see nothing:
>
> https://lucene.staged.apache.org/
>
> I have tried to build it locally without success and have no clue how to
> debug it further. Hopefully someone can help here. I see in the logs many
> failures like:
>
> WARNING: Feeds generated without SITEURL set properly may not be valid
> ERROR: Could not process
> pylucene/pylucene_news/2020-04-29-8-3-0-available.md
> | module 'markdown' has no attribute 'version_info'
> ERROR: Could not process core/core_news/2018-06-27-7-4-0-available.md
> | module 'markdown' has no attribute 'version_info'
> ERROR: Could not process core/core_news/2014-04-15-4-7-2-available.md
> | module 'markdown' has no attribute 'version_info'
> ERROR: Could not process core/core_news/2020-03-24-8-5-0-available.md
> | module 'markdown' has no attribute 'version_info'
> ERROR: Could not process core/core_news/2020-10-07-8-6-3-available.md
> | module 'markdown' has no attribute 'version_info'
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ignacio
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 4:14 PM Ignacio Vera  wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I spoke with Julie and I agree to take over the release manager duties
>> for this release. I will shortly astart the vote.
>>
>> In the meanwhile, here are the release notes that Julie had already
>> prepared for review:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+9.4.1
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 8:54 PM Julie Tibshirani 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_9_4
>>>
>>> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>>>
>>> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
>>>   why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
>>> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 9.4.1
>>>   in GitHub, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as
>>> Blocker
>>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
>>>   to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>>>   the current release branch.
>>> * Only issues with Milestone version 9.4.1 and priority "Blocker" will
>>> delay
>>>   a release candidate build.
>>>
>>> As I mentioned yesterday, I plan to merge this important fix into
>>> branch_9_4: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11861. I didn't hear
>>> from people about other changes that were important to backport and
>>> release. So my plan is to start building a release candidate
>>> soon, hopefully having it ready in a few hours, by the end of my day.
>>>
>>> Julie
>>>
>>

Re: Bugfix release Lucene 9.4.1

[Ignacio Vera]

Hello,

I am currently stuck on the release on the lucene site. I think I have
everything in place but it seems it is not building properly so when I look
into staging I see nothing:

https://lucene.staged.apache.org/

I have tried to build it locally without success and have no clue how to
debug it further. Hopefully someone can help here. I see in the logs many
failures like:

WARNING: Feeds generated without SITEURL set properly may not be valid
ERROR: Could not process
pylucene/pylucene_news/2020-04-29-8-3-0-available.md
| module 'markdown' has no attribute 'version_info'
ERROR: Could not process core/core_news/2018-06-27-7-4-0-available.md
| module 'markdown' has no attribute 'version_info'
ERROR: Could not process core/core_news/2014-04-15-4-7-2-available.md
| module 'markdown' has no attribute 'version_info'
ERROR: Could not process core/core_news/2020-03-24-8-5-0-available.md
| module 'markdown' has no attribute 'version_info'
ERROR: Could not process core/core_news/2020-10-07-8-6-3-available.md
| module 'markdown' has no attribute 'version_info'


Thanks,

Ignacio






On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 4:14 PM Ignacio Vera  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I spoke with Julie and I agree to take over the release manager duties for
> this release. I will shortly astart the vote.
>
> In the meanwhile, here are the release notes that Julie had already
> prepared for review:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+9.4.1
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 8:54 PM Julie Tibshirani 
> wrote:
>
>> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_9_4
>>
>> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>>
>> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
>>   why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
>> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 9.4.1
>>   in GitHub, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as
>> Blocker
>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
>>   to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>>   the current release branch.
>> * Only issues with Milestone version 9.4.1 and priority "Blocker" will
>> delay
>>   a release candidate build.
>>
>> As I mentioned yesterday, I plan to merge this important fix into
>> branch_9_4: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11861. I didn't hear
>> from people about other changes that were important to backport and
>> release. So my plan is to start building a release candidate
>> soon, hopefully having it ready in a few hours, by the end of my day.
>>
>> Julie
>>
>

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.4.1 RC1

[Ignacio Vera]

It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:


+1  6  (6 binding)

 0  0

-1  0


This vote has PASSED

[VOTE] Release Lucene 9.4.1 RC1

[Ignacio Vera]

Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.4.1


The artifacts can be downloaded from:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.1-RC1-rev-810817993e0956e63e29906e78a245949501b77d


You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:


python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.1-RC1-rev-810817993e0956e63e29906e78a245949501b77d


The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2022-10-23 15:00 UTC.


[ ] +1  approve

[ ] +0  no opinion

[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)


Here is my +1

Re: Bugfix release Lucene 9.4.1

[Ignacio Vera]

Hello,

I spoke with Julie and I agree to take over the release manager duties for
this release. I will shortly astart the vote.

In the meanwhile, here are the release notes that Julie had already
prepared for review:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+9.4.1

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 8:54 PM Julie Tibshirani 
wrote:

> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_9_4
>
> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>
> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
>   why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 9.4.1
>   in GitHub, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as
> Blocker
> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
>   to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>   the current release branch.
> * Only issues with Milestone version 9.4.1 and priority "Blocker" will
> delay
>   a release candidate build.
>
> As I mentioned yesterday, I plan to merge this important fix into
> branch_9_4: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11861. I didn't hear
> from people about other changes that were important to backport and
> release. So my plan is to start building a release candidate
> soon, hopefully having it ready in a few hours, by the end of my day.
>
> Julie
>

Re: Welcome Luca Cavanna as Lucene committer

[Ignacio Vera]

Welcome Luca!

On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 11:31 AM Bruno Roustant 
wrote:

> Welcome!
>
> Le jeu. 6 oct. 2022 à 11:20, Michael Sokolov  a
> écrit :
>
>> Welcome Luca!
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2022, 1:05 AM 陆徐刚  wrote:
>>
>>> Welcome！
>>>
>>> Xugang
>>>
>>> https://github.com/LuXugang
>>>
>>> On Oct 6, 2022, at 13:59, Mikhail Khludnev  wrote:
>>>
>>> 
>>> Welcome, Luca.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 8:04 PM Adrien Grand  wrote:
>>>
 I'm pleased to announce that Luca Cavanna has accepted the PMC's
 invitation to become a committer.

 Luca, the tradition is that new committers introduce themselves with a
 brief bio.

 Congratulations and welcome!

 --
 Adrien

>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sincerely yours
>>> Mikhail Khludnev
>>>
>>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.4.0 RC3

[Ignacio Vera]

+1 (binding)


SUCCESS! [0:53:18.788514]

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 6:50 AM Patrick Zhai  wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> SUCCESS! [0:57:17.821452]
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 3:32 PM Michael McCandless <
> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
>> +1, smoke tester:
>>
>> SUCCESS! [0:26:01.696388]
>>
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 3:45 PM Anshum Gupta 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> Smoketester is happy!
>>> SUCCESS! [0:54:06.589484]
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 6:15 AM Michael Sokolov 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene 9.4.0

 The artifacts can be downloaded from:

 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.0-RC3-rev-d2e22e18c6c92b6a6ba0bbc26d78b5e82832f956

 You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:

 python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \

 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.0-RC3-rev-d2e22e18c6c92b6a6ba0bbc26d78b5e82832f956

 The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2022-09-30 14:00
 UTC.

 [ ] +1  approve
 [ ] +0  no opinion
 [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

 Here is my +1

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org


>>>
>>> --
>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.4.0 RC2

[Ignacio Vera]

Thank you Mike, sorry for all the extra work!

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 3:14 PM Michael Sokolov  wrote:

> OK, well I am glad we were able to fix quickly.
>
> This vote is failed; I've re-spun RC3 and will start a new vote thread
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 5:52 AM Uwe Schindler  wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I also added the small build system changes and the localSettings fix
> for Smoketester to make Robert happy with validating release :-)
> >
> > Uwe
> >
> > Am 27.09.2022 um 10:59 schrieb Ignacio Vera:
> >
> > I pushed a fix to all relevant branches:
> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11825
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 10:44 AM Anshum Gupta 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks Ignacio for noticing and reporting that. I agree with Uwe, it
> makes sense to cancel this vote and get the fix in.
> >>
> >> Thank you for being patient, Mike :)
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 1:20 AM Uwe Schindler  wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> that's too bad! As not many have ran smoke tester, I think it may be a
> good idea to now stop the release.
> >>>
> >>> If we respin, I will backport some small build system fixes like
> support for Eclipse and Smoketester bootup (regarding MR-JAR) also to the
> 9.4 branch. But that's not urgent.
> >>>
> >>> Uwe
> >>>
> >>> Am 27.09.2022 um 10:01 schrieb Ignacio Vera:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I just noticed an important regression on polygon queries using the
> LatLonPoint field, see https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11824.
> >>>
> >>> It feels like an important regression so it might be worth a
> respinning.  Sorry about that.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 10:30 PM Anshum Gupta 
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 (binding)
> >>>>
> >>>> Smoke tests passed and I tried out basic indexing and search.
> >>>> SUCCESS! [0:59:09.751008]
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for your effort Mike, and everyone else.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 8:47 AM Michael Sokolov 
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.4.0
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> >>>>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.0-RC2-rev-0384b4fcad7856ddc574c8b994c814a568ce6d0a
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> >>>>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.0-RC2-rev-0384b4fcad7856ddc574c8b994c814a568ce6d0a
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2022-09-29
> 16:00 UTC.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [ ] +1  approve
> >>>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
> >>>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Here is my +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Anshum Gupta
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Uwe Schindler
> >>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> >>> https://www.thetaphi.de
> >>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Anshum Gupta
> >
> > --
> > Uwe Schindler
> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> > https://www.thetaphi.de
> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.4.0 RC2

[Ignacio Vera]

I pushed a fix to all relevant branches:
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11825



On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 10:44 AM Anshum Gupta 
wrote:

> Thanks Ignacio for noticing and reporting that. I agree with Uwe, it makes
> sense to cancel this vote and get the fix in.
>
> Thank you for being patient, Mike :)
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 1:20 AM Uwe Schindler  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> that's too bad! As not many have ran smoke tester, I think it may be a
>> good idea to now stop the release.
>>
>> If we respin, I will backport some small build system fixes like support
>> for Eclipse and Smoketester bootup (regarding MR-JAR) also to the 9.4
>> branch. But that's not urgent.
>>
>> Uwe
>> Am 27.09.2022 um 10:01 schrieb Ignacio Vera:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just noticed an important regression on polygon queries using the
>> LatLonPoint field, see https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11824.
>>
>> It feels like an important regression so it might be worth a respinning.
>> Sorry about that.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 10:30 PM Anshum Gupta 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> Smoke tests passed and I tried out basic indexing and search.
>>> SUCCESS! [0:59:09.751008]
>>>
>>> Thanks for your effort Mike, and everyone else.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 8:47 AM Michael Sokolov 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.4.0
>>>>
>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.0-RC2-rev-0384b4fcad7856ddc574c8b994c814a568ce6d0a
>>>>
>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>
>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.0-RC2-rev-0384b4fcad7856ddc574c8b994c814a568ce6d0a
>>>>
>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2022-09-29 16:00
>>>> UTC.
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>
>>>> Here is my +1
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>
>> --
>> Uwe Schindler
>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremenhttps://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>>
>>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.4.0 RC2

[Ignacio Vera]

Hi,

I just noticed an important regression on polygon queries using the
LatLonPoint field, see https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11824.

It feels like an important regression so it might be worth a respinning.
Sorry about that.


On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 10:30 PM Anshum Gupta 
wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Smoke tests passed and I tried out basic indexing and search.
> SUCCESS! [0:59:09.751008]
>
> Thanks for your effort Mike, and everyone else.
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 8:47 AM Michael Sokolov 
> wrote:
>
>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.4.0
>>
>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.0-RC2-rev-0384b4fcad7856ddc574c8b994c814a568ce6d0a
>>
>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>
>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.0-RC2-rev-0384b4fcad7856ddc574c8b994c814a568ce6d0a
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2022-09-29 16:00
>> UTC.
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Here is my +1
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.4.0 RC1

[Ignacio Vera]

+1


SUCCESS! [0:46:00.508949]

On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 9:53 AM Adrien Grand  wrote:

> +1 SUCCESS! [0:45:35.275017]
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 9:19 PM Michael McCandless <
> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> SUCCESS! [0:27:16.514391]
>>
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 2:32 PM Dawid Weiss 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> +1.
>>> SUCCESS! [0:53:33.891603]
>>>
>>>
 Ran the smoketester with both java 11 and 17:

 SUCCESS! [2:41:19.024193]

 On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 10:10 PM Michael Sokolov 
 wrote:
 >
 > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.4.0
 >
 > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
 >
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.0-RC1-rev-f5d0646daa5651f2192282ac85551bca667e34f9
 >
 > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
 >
 > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
 >
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.0-RC1-rev-f5d0646daa5651f2192282ac85551bca667e34f9
 >
 > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2022-09-24
 02:00 UTC.
 >
 > [ ] +1  approve
 > [ ] +0  no opinion
 > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
 >
 > Here is my +1
 >
 > -
 > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
 > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
 >

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org


>
> --
> Adrien
>

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Check-9.3 - Build # 72 - Failure!

[Ignacio Vera]

I fixed this. The script that adds new versions to addVersions.java is
generating code that makes spotless nhappy.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 3:36 PM Apache Jenkins Server <
jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote:

> Build: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Lucene/job/Lucene-Check-9.3/72/
>
> All tests passed
>
> Build Log:
> [...truncated 1296 lines...]
> BUILD FAILED in 20m 47s
> 796 actionable tasks: 796 executed
> Build step 'Invoke Gradle script' changed build result to FAILURE
> Build step 'Invoke Gradle script' marked build as failure
> Archiving artifacts
> Recording test results
> [Checks API] No suitable checks publisher found.
> Email was triggered for: Failure - Any
> Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: builds-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: builds-h...@lucene.apache.org

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucene 9.3.0 released

[Ignacio Vera]

29 July 2022 - Apache Lucene™ 9.3.0 available

The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 9.3.0.

Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured search engine library
written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly any
application that requires structured search, full-text search, faceting,
nearest-neighbor search across high-dimensionality vectors, spell
correction or query suggestions.

This release contains numerous bug fixes, optimizations, and improvements,
some of which are highlighted below. The release is available for immediate
download at:
https://lucene.apache.org/core/downloads.html

Lucene 9.3.0 Release Highlights:
• Merge on full flush is enabled now by default with a timeout of
500ms.
• Add getAllChildren functionality to facets.
• Added facetsets module for high dimensional (hyper-rectangle)
faceting.
• Top-level two-clause disjunctions sorted by score now use the
block-max MAXSCORE algorithm.
• When running KnnVectorQuery with a filter, reuse the cached
filter bit set.

Please read CHANGES.txt for a full list of new features and changes:

https://lucene.apache.org/core/9_3_0/changes/Changes.html

Note: The Apache Software Foundation uses an extensive mirroring network for
distributing releases. It is possible that the mirror you are using may not
have
replicated the release yet. If that is the case, please try another mirror.
This also applies to Maven access.

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.3.0 RC1

[Ignacio Vera]

Hi Uwe,

Yes, I closed the vote already and I followed the instructions in the
release manager. One of the instructions is to delete the artifacts from
the staging area so I'm not sure why those are still there.
I have already pushed the artifacts to maven for publishing. I am very
sorry that Policeman Jenkins did not have the time to run.

Cheers,

Ignacio


On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 5:56 PM Uwe Schindler  wrote:

> It was late, but the folders of previous releases are still there, the
> last one disappeared from servers, while previous ones are still here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.3.0-RC1-rev-d25cebcef7a80369f4dfb9285ca7360a810b75dc>
>
>
> Uwe
>
>
> Am 28.07.2022 um 17:42 schrieb Uwe Schindler:
>
> Was the vote already over, because Policeman Jenkins failed to check?
>
> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/18/console
> Am 25.07.2022 um 13:12 schrieb Ignacio Vera:
>
> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.3.0
>
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.3.0-RC1-rev-d25cebcef7a80369f4dfb9285ca7360a810b75dc
>
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.3.0-RC1-rev-d25cebcef7a80369f4dfb9285ca7360a810b75dc
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2022-07-28 12:00
> UTC.
>
>
> [ ] +1  approve
>
> [ ] +0  no opinion
>
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Here is my +1
>
> --
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremenhttps://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
> --
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremenhttps://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.3.0 RC1

[Ignacio Vera]

It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:


+1  7  (6 binding)

 0  0

-1  0


This vote has PASSED

Re: Welcome Vigya Sharma as Lucene committer

[Ignacio Vera]

Congratulations and welcome Vigya!

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:34 AM Adrien Grand  wrote:

> I'm pleased to announce that Vigya Sharma has accepted the PMC's
> invitation to become a committer.
>
> Vigya, the tradition is that new committers introduce themselves with a
> brief bio.
>
> Congratulations and welcome!
>
> --
> Adrien
>

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Lucene 9.3.0

[Ignacio Vera]

Thanks Adrien! It sounds much more exciting indeed.

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 6:35 PM Adrien Grand  wrote:

> Thanks Ignacio! I tried to iterate on some release highlights to make them
> sound more exciting.
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:05 PM Ignacio Vera  wrote:
>
>> Ignacio Vera 
>> Jul 20, 2022, 1:41 PM (5 days ago)
>> to dev
>> Adrien told me that I sent the wrong link, I thought I could share the
>> draft before publishing.
>> Here  the draft for the release highlights. I have probably missed things
>> that should be included so please feel free to add them.
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+9.3
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 9:22 AM Ignacio Vera  wrote:
>>
>>> No worries Greg, I approved the change so feel free to push it whenever
>>> you have time.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Ignacio
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 1:22 AM Greg Miller  wrote:
>>>
>>>> OK, as frustrating as this is, it looks like there was still another
>>>> bug in this same test uncovered last night. I have another PR open to
>>>> patch this into 9.3 here: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1044
>>>>
>>>> I also reopened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10659 as
>>>> a proposed 9.3 block to pick up this fix. If the test remains
>>>> problematic after this patch, I'll just revert it out of 9.3 until it
>>>> proves more stable. Apologies.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> -Greg
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 7:59 AM Greg Miller  wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Ack, thanks Ignacio for the quick approval. Just merged the fix onto
>>>> > the 9.3 branch.
>>>> >
>>>> > Cheers,
>>>> > -Greg
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 12:32 AM Ignacio Vera 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Hi Greg,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Yes please fix the test in branch 9.3, I have approved the PR.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 12:08 AM Greg Miller 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Thanks Ignacio! I just created
>>>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10659 as a proposed
>>>> > >> blocker for 9.3. It's a small bug fix for a unit test I recently
>>>> > >> introduced on the 9x branch (one of the last things to get pulled
>>>> into
>>>> > >> the 9.3 candidate). I think we ought to fix this test before
>>>> cutting a
>>>> > >> 9.3 release. There's a PR associated with the issue already (the
>>>> > >> change is already patched into main/branch_9x).
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Cheers,
>>>> > >> -Greg
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 4:42 AM Ignacio Vera 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> > Please find here the draft for the release highlights. I have
>>>> probably missed things that should be included so please feel free to add
>>>> them.
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> >
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=217391905
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 10:17 AM Ignacio Vera 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >> >>
>>>> > >> >> NOTICE:
>>>> > >> >>
>>>> > >> >>
>>>> > >> >> Branch branch_9_3 has been cut and versions updated to 9.4 on
>>>> stable branch.
>>>> > >> >>
>>>> > >> >>
>>>> > >> >> Please observe the normal rules:
>>>> > >> >>
>>>> > >> >>
>>>> > >> >> * No new features may be committed to the branch.
>>>> > >> >>
>>>> > >> >> * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes
>>>> may be
>>>> > >> >>
>>>> > >> >>   committed to the branch. However, you should submit all
&g

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Lucene 9.3.0

[Ignacio Vera]

Ignacio Vera 
Jul 20, 2022, 1:41 PM (5 days ago)
to dev
Adrien told me that I sent the wrong link, I thought I could share the
draft before publishing.
Here  the draft for the release highlights. I have probably missed things
that should be included so please feel free to add them.

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+9.3


On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 9:22 AM Ignacio Vera  wrote:

> No worries Greg, I approved the change so feel free to push it whenever
> you have time.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ignacio
>
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 1:22 AM Greg Miller  wrote:
>
>> OK, as frustrating as this is, it looks like there was still another
>> bug in this same test uncovered last night. I have another PR open to
>> patch this into 9.3 here: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1044
>>
>> I also reopened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10659 as
>> a proposed 9.3 block to pick up this fix. If the test remains
>> problematic after this patch, I'll just revert it out of 9.3 until it
>> proves more stable. Apologies.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -Greg
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 7:59 AM Greg Miller  wrote:
>> >
>> > Ack, thanks Ignacio for the quick approval. Just merged the fix onto
>> > the 9.3 branch.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > -Greg
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 12:32 AM Ignacio Vera 
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi Greg,
>> > >
>> > > Yes please fix the test in branch 9.3, I have approved the PR.
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 12:08 AM Greg Miller 
>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks Ignacio! I just created
>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10659 as a proposed
>> > >> blocker for 9.3. It's a small bug fix for a unit test I recently
>> > >> introduced on the 9x branch (one of the last things to get pulled
>> into
>> > >> the 9.3 candidate). I think we ought to fix this test before cutting
>> a
>> > >> 9.3 release. There's a PR associated with the issue already (the
>> > >> change is already patched into main/branch_9x).
>> > >>
>> > >> Cheers,
>> > >> -Greg
>> > >>
>> > >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 4:42 AM Ignacio Vera 
>> wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Please find here the draft for the release highlights. I have
>> probably missed things that should be included so please feel free to add
>> them.
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=217391905
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 10:17 AM Ignacio Vera 
>> wrote:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> NOTICE:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Branch branch_9_3 has been cut and versions updated to 9.4 on
>> stable branch.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Please observe the normal rules:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> * No new features may be committed to the branch.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes may
>> be
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>   committed to the branch. However, you should submit all patches
>> you
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>   want to commit to Jira first to give others the chance to review
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>   and possibly vote against the patch. Keep in mind that it is our
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>   main intention to keep the branch as stable as possible.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be
>> committed
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>   to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then
>> into
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>   the current release branch.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> * Normal unstable and stable branch development may continue as
>> usual.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>   However, if you plan to commit a big change to the unstable
>> branch
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>   while the branch feature freeze is in effect, think twice:
>> can't the
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>   addition wait a couple more days? Merges of bug fixes into the
>> branch
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>   may become more difficult.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 9.3 and priority "Blocker"
>> will delay
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>   a release candidate build.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> The only step missing is to add the Jenkins job on the release
>> branch which is something I don't really know how to do it, hopefully
>> someone can help here.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> I am planning to build the first RC next Monday if there are no
>> issues.
>> > >>
>> > >> -
>> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> > >>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>

[VOTE] Release Lucene 9.3.0 RC1

[Ignacio Vera]

Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.3.0


The artifacts can be downloaded from:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.3.0-RC1-rev-d25cebcef7a80369f4dfb9285ca7360a810b75dc


You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:


python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.3.0-RC1-rev-d25cebcef7a80369f4dfb9285ca7360a810b75dc


The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2022-07-28 12:00 UTC.


[ ] +1  approve

[ ] +0  no opinion

[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)


Here is my +1

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Lucene 9.3.0

[Ignacio Vera]

No worries Greg, I approved the change so feel free to push it whenever you
have time.

Cheers,

Ignacio

On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 1:22 AM Greg Miller  wrote:

> OK, as frustrating as this is, it looks like there was still another
> bug in this same test uncovered last night. I have another PR open to
> patch this into 9.3 here: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1044
>
> I also reopened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10659 as
> a proposed 9.3 block to pick up this fix. If the test remains
> problematic after this patch, I'll just revert it out of 9.3 until it
> proves more stable. Apologies.
>
> Cheers,
> -Greg
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 7:59 AM Greg Miller  wrote:
> >
> > Ack, thanks Ignacio for the quick approval. Just merged the fix onto
> > the 9.3 branch.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > -Greg
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 12:32 AM Ignacio Vera  wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Greg,
> > >
> > > Yes please fix the test in branch 9.3, I have approved the PR.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 12:08 AM Greg Miller 
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Thanks Ignacio! I just created
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10659 as a proposed
> > >> blocker for 9.3. It's a small bug fix for a unit test I recently
> > >> introduced on the 9x branch (one of the last things to get pulled into
> > >> the 9.3 candidate). I think we ought to fix this test before cutting a
> > >> 9.3 release. There's a PR associated with the issue already (the
> > >> change is already patched into main/branch_9x).
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> -Greg
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 4:42 AM Ignacio Vera 
> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > Please find here the draft for the release highlights. I have
> probably missed things that should be included so please feel free to add
> them.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=217391905
> > >> >
> > >> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 10:17 AM Ignacio Vera 
> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> NOTICE:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Branch branch_9_3 has been cut and versions updated to 9.4 on
> stable branch.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Please observe the normal rules:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> * No new features may be committed to the branch.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes may be
> > >> >>
> > >> >>   committed to the branch. However, you should submit all patches
> you
> > >> >>
> > >> >>   want to commit to Jira first to give others the chance to review
> > >> >>
> > >> >>   and possibly vote against the patch. Keep in mind that it is our
> > >> >>
> > >> >>   main intention to keep the branch as stable as possible.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be
> committed
> > >> >>
> > >> >>   to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then
> into
> > >> >>
> > >> >>   the current release branch.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> * Normal unstable and stable branch development may continue as
> usual.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>   However, if you plan to commit a big change to the unstable
> branch
> > >> >>
> > >> >>   while the branch feature freeze is in effect, think twice: can't
> the
> > >> >>
> > >> >>   addition wait a couple more days? Merges of bug fixes into the
> branch
> > >> >>
> > >> >>   may become more difficult.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 9.3 and priority "Blocker"
> will delay
> > >> >>
> > >> >>   a release candidate build.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> The only step missing is to add the Jenkins job on the release
> branch which is something I don't really know how to do it, hopefully
> someone can help here.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I am planning to build the first RC next Monday if there are no
> issues.
> > >>
> > >> -
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> > >>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: Lucene 9.3.0 release

[Ignacio Vera]

indeed, just waiting for him to do the honours and push the PR.

On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 12:30 PM Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:

> Greg fixed a test failure that impacts 9.3, and opened a PR and blocker
> issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10659
>
> I think we should merge it for 9.3.0?
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 7:43 PM Julie Tibshirani 
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Mayya, I can share my view. Strictly speaking, we only need a new
>> codec version if the on-disk format changes for some type (like kNN vectors
>> in this case). Otherwise we can just evolve the logic in the same way we do
>> with other code, making the improvements in-place. Alessandro's PR is a
>> good example of this -- it's a refactor that happens to touch the
>> vectors reader code. It doesn't require a totally new codec version.
>>
>> With your PR for LUCENE-10592, I don't think we technically need a new
>> codec for it, because the on-disk format remains the same. But since it's
>> such a big change that deeply affects the vectors writing logic, it feels
>> convenient that we're making it in a new format (maybe feels a bit clearer/
>> safer).
>>
>> Julie
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 4:21 PM Mayya Sharipova
>>  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Julie,
>>> thanks for raising this point, I was also thinking about it.
>>> I think it would be valuable to clarify what constitutes the format
>>> changes. Is on disk changes a necessary requirement for it? Or is it enough
>>> that codec readers and writers change their behaviour?
>>>
>>> For example, for LUCENE-10592, there are extensive changes about how
>>> codec readers and writers behave, while the format on disk stays the same.
>>> Specifically for the release 9.3, Alessandro also introduced some
>>> changes  <https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/926>to codec readers
>>> while the format on disk stayed the same.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 4:22 PM Julie Tibshirani 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>
>>>> We had preemptively created a Lucene93Codec to support the vector
>>>> search changes (Mike's work in LUCENE-10577, Mayya's work in LUCENE-10592).
>>>> However neither of these changes made it for 9.3, so there have not been
>>>> any real format changes-- Lucene93Codec is the same as Lucene92Codec.
>>>> Should we remove Lucene93Codec on branch_9_3 (effectively reverting
>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/924) ?
>>>>
>>>> Julie
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 11:02 AM Mayya Sharipova
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Adrien, it is indeed a big change, also would be nice to see
>>>>> benchmarks after it is merged.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, Ignacio, please don't wait for LUCENE-10592, we will not be able
>>>>> to make it for tomorrow.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 10:38 AM Adrien Grand 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> While I can understand the excitement about LUCENE-10592, it's also a
>>>>>> big change, maybe we should not even try to get it in before cutting the
>>>>>> branch?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 4:09 PM Mayya Sharipova
>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for the reminder about the release, Ignacio!
>>>>>>> About LUCENE-10592
>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10592>  I will see
>>>>>>> what progress we can make today, and will let you know before Wednesday 
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> 9:00 CEST.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 7:12 AM Michael Sokolov 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for checking, but please don't wait for LUCENE-10577. It's
>>>>>>>> not clear when that might get resolved
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022, 10:42 AM Ignacio Vera 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just a quick reminder I plan to cut the 9.3 branch this Wednesday
>>>>>>>>> at 9:00 CEST. Let me know if there is any issue.

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Lucene 9.3.0

[Ignacio Vera]

Hi Greg,

Yes please fix the test in branch 9.3, I have approved the PR.

On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 12:08 AM Greg Miller  wrote:

> Thanks Ignacio! I just created
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10659 as a proposed
> blocker for 9.3. It's a small bug fix for a unit test I recently
> introduced on the 9x branch (one of the last things to get pulled into
> the 9.3 candidate). I think we ought to fix this test before cutting a
> 9.3 release. There's a PR associated with the issue already (the
> change is already patched into main/branch_9x).
>
> Cheers,
> -Greg
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 4:42 AM Ignacio Vera  wrote:
> >
> > Please find here the draft for the release highlights. I have probably
> missed things that should be included so please feel free to add them.
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=217391905
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 10:17 AM Ignacio Vera  wrote:
> >>
> >> NOTICE:
> >>
> >>
> >> Branch branch_9_3 has been cut and versions updated to 9.4 on stable
> branch.
> >>
> >>
> >> Please observe the normal rules:
> >>
> >>
> >> * No new features may be committed to the branch.
> >>
> >> * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes may be
> >>
> >>   committed to the branch. However, you should submit all patches you
> >>
> >>   want to commit to Jira first to give others the chance to review
> >>
> >>   and possibly vote against the patch. Keep in mind that it is our
> >>
> >>   main intention to keep the branch as stable as possible.
> >>
> >> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
> >>
> >>   to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
> >>
> >>   the current release branch.
> >>
> >> * Normal unstable and stable branch development may continue as usual.
> >>
> >>   However, if you plan to commit a big change to the unstable branch
> >>
> >>   while the branch feature freeze is in effect, think twice: can't the
> >>
> >>   addition wait a couple more days? Merges of bug fixes into the branch
> >>
> >>   may become more difficult.
> >>
> >> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 9.3 and priority "Blocker" will
> delay
> >>
> >>   a release candidate build.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The only step missing is to add the Jenkins job on the release branch
> which is something I don't really know how to do it, hopefully someone can
> help here.
> >>
> >>
> >> I am planning to build the first RC next Monday if there are no issues.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Lucene 9.3.0

[Ignacio Vera]

Please find here the draft for the release highlights. I have probably
missed things that should be included so please feel free to add them.

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=217391905

On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 10:17 AM Ignacio Vera  wrote:

> NOTICE:
>
>
> Branch branch_9_3 has been cut and versions updated to 9.4 on stable
> branch.
>
>
> Please observe the normal rules:
>
>
> * No new features may be committed to the branch.
>
> * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes may be
>
>   committed to the branch. However, you should submit all patches you
>
>   want to commit to Jira first to give others the chance to review
>
>   and possibly vote against the patch. Keep in mind that it is our
>
>   main intention to keep the branch as stable as possible.
>
> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
>
>   to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>
>   the current release branch.
>
> * Normal unstable and stable branch development may continue as usual.
>
>   However, if you plan to commit a big change to the unstable branch
>
>   while the branch feature freeze is in effect, think twice: can't the
>
>   addition wait a couple more days? Merges of bug fixes into the branch
>
>   may become more difficult.
>
> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 9.3 and priority "Blocker" will delay
>
>   a release candidate build.
>
>
>
> The only step missing is to add the Jenkins job on the release branch
> which is something I don't really know how to do it, hopefully someone can
> help here.
>
>
> I am planning to build the first RC next Monday if there are no issues.
>

New branch and feature freeze for Lucene 9.3.0

[Ignacio Vera]

NOTICE:


Branch branch_9_3 has been cut and versions updated to 9.4 on stable branch.


Please observe the normal rules:


* No new features may be committed to the branch.

* Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes may be

  committed to the branch. However, you should submit all patches you

  want to commit to Jira first to give others the chance to review

  and possibly vote against the patch. Keep in mind that it is our

  main intention to keep the branch as stable as possible.

* All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed

  to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into

  the current release branch.

* Normal unstable and stable branch development may continue as usual.

  However, if you plan to commit a big change to the unstable branch

  while the branch feature freeze is in effect, think twice: can't the

  addition wait a couple more days? Merges of bug fixes into the branch

  may become more difficult.

* Only Jira issues with Fix version 9.3 and priority "Blocker" will delay

  a release candidate build.



The only step missing is to add the Jenkins job on the release branch which
is something I don't really know how to do it, hopefully someone can help
here.


I am planning to build the first RC next Monday if there are no issues.

Re: Lucene 9.3.0 release

[Ignacio Vera]

Just a quick reminder I plan to cut the 9.3 branch this Wednesday at 9:00
CEST. Let me know if there is any issue.

@Mike: I see that LUCENE-10577
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10577> is still under API
discussions, Do you think it will make it to the release? LUCENE-10592
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10592>  seems to have made
good progress, would you think it will be ready?
@Nick: I gave you feedback on the PR. I think it is way too risky to add an
encoding in a rush. I recommend adding the change in the sandbox if you
want to iterate in there or wait for another release where there is more
time to think through the encoding.

Cheers,

Ignacio

On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 2:09 AM Nicholas Knize  wrote:

> I'd like to get ShapeDocValuesField in for the 9.3 release (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10654). It's a nice feature
> for enabling facets and aggregations over XYShape and LatLonShape field
> types and could make for a good 9.3 geo highlight.
>
> Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP
> Principal Engineer - Search  |  Amazon
> Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer
> nkn...@apache.org
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 2:50 PM Ignacio Vera  wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the heads up, I am planning to cut the brunch middle next
>> week, Wednesday July 20th.
>> Let me know at the beginning of next week if there is any issue from your
>> side.
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> Ignacio
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 4:21 PM Michael Sokolov 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to see if we can get
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10577 in. It is working
>>> and gives nice gains, but there is some controversy about the API. If
>>> we can't get it sorted out this week(?) it can certainly slip to the
>>> next revision. I know that
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10592 is also baking and
>>> has a PR that seems to be progressing rapidly.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 10:03 AM Ignacio Vera  wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hello!
>>> >
>>> > Lucene 9.2.0 was released around 2 months ago and we are accumulating
>>> a good bunch of new features, optimizations and bug fixes. Would there be
>>> support for releasing Lucene 9.3 soon?
>>> >
>>> > I am happy being the release manager. I did not see any issues marked
>>> "blocker", but please let me know if there are any.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> >
>>> >  Ignacio
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>

Re: Lucene 9.3.0 release

[Ignacio Vera]

Thanks for the heads up, I am planning to cut the brunch middle next week,
Wednesday July 20th.
Let me know at the beginning of next week if there is any issue from your
side.

cheers,

Ignacio

On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 4:21 PM Michael Sokolov  wrote:

> I would like to see if we can get
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10577 in. It is working
> and gives nice gains, but there is some controversy about the API. If
> we can't get it sorted out this week(?) it can certainly slip to the
> next revision. I know that
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10592 is also baking and
> has a PR that seems to be progressing rapidly.
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 10:03 AM Ignacio Vera  wrote:
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > Lucene 9.2.0 was released around 2 months ago and we are accumulating a
> good bunch of new features, optimizations and bug fixes. Would there be
> support for releasing Lucene 9.3 soon?
> >
> > I am happy being the release manager. I did not see any issues marked
> "blocker", but please let me know if there are any.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >  Ignacio
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Lucene 9.3.0 release

[Ignacio Vera]

Hello!

Lucene 9.2.0 was released around 2 months ago and we are accumulating
 a good
bunch of new features, optimizations and bug fixes. Would there be support
for releasing Lucene 9.3 soon?

I am happy being the release manager. I did not see any issues marked
"blocker", but please let me know if there are any.

Thanks,

 Ignacio

Re: Welcome Greg Miller to the Lucene PMC

[Ignacio Vera]

Welcome Greg!

On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 1:40 PM 陆徐刚  wrote:

> Congratulations, Greg.
>
> Xugang
>
> > 在 2022年6月7日，17:48，Dawid Weiss  写道：
> >
> > Congratulations and welcome, Greg.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: Lucene 9.2 release

[Ignacio Vera]

+1 

Thanks Alan!

> On 3. May 2022, at 13:01, Alan Woodward  wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> It’s been six weeks or so since we released 9.1, and we have a bunch of nice 
> new features and enhancements piling up in the 9.x branch.  I’d like to 
> volunteer to be a release manager for a 9.2 release.  I propose to cut a 
> branch this time next week, 10th May.
> 
> - Alan
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.1.0 RC2

[Ignacio Vera]

+1

SUCCESS! [1:08:44.248804]

On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 11:08 PM Uwe Schindler  wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> the test also failed several times in usual Jenkins jobs (see builds@lao
> list). Looks like a problem with the test or some wrong assumption or some
> missing synchronized block (the Policeman Jenkins machine has many cores,
> so issues with not synchronized cache lines can happen easily).
>
>
>
> Uwe
>
>
>
> -
>
> Uwe Schindler
>
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>
> https://www.thetaphi.de
>
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
>
> *From:* Julie Tibshirani 
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 17, 2022 8:04 PM
> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.1.0 RC2
>
>
>
> I investigated the TestMatchAllDocsQuery failure and filed an issue here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10472. To me it doesn't seem
> like a major problem and could potentially be a test issue. We also haven't
> made changes to this early termination logic in 9.1 (to the best of my
> knowledge), so it's unlikely to be a regression.
>
> Julie
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 11:51 AM Anshum Gupta 
> wrote:
>
> Hi Julie,
>
>
>
> Thanks for volunteering as the RM.
>
>
>
> After 4 attempts, I finally got the smoke-tester (jdk11) to pass on the
> 5th attempt.
>
>
>
> Tested out using some other basic indexing/search sample app code that I
> was playing around with.
>
>
>
> Here's my +1 to release Lucene 9.1.0 RC2.
>
>
>
> SUCCESS! [1:05:31.299375]
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:27 PM Julie Tibshirani 
> wrote:
>
> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.1.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.1.0-RC2-rev-5b522487ba8e0f1002b50a136817ca037aec9686
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.1.0-RC2-rev-5b522487ba8e0f1002b50a136817ca037aec9686
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2022-03-19 21:00
> UTC.
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here is my +1.
>
>
>
> Julie
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Anshum Gupta
>
>

Re: Lucene 9.1 release soon?

[Ignacio Vera]

+1

On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 9:05 AM Adrien Grand  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 8:43 AM Michael Wechner
>  wrote:
> >
> > I think this would be great :-) thank you very much for your efforts!
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > Am 24.02.22 um 00:28 schrieb Julie Tibshirani:
> > > Hello everyone,
> > >
> > > Would there be support for releasing Lucene 9.1 soon? It has been ~2.5
> > > months since 9.0 was released and we already have a long list of new
> > > features, optimizations, and bug fixes
> > > (https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/branch_9x/lucene/CHANGES.txt).
> > >
> > > If so, I am happy to take a shot at being release manager. I did not
> > > see any issues marked "blocker", but please let me know if there are
> any.
> > >
> > > Julie
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
>
> --
> Adrien
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: Welcome Guo Feng as Lucene committer

[Ignacio Vera]

Congratulations and welcome!

On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 11:50 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Welcome and congratulations, Feng!
>
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 3:40 PM Koji Sekiguchi <
> koji.sekigu...@rondhuit.com> wrote:
>
>> Welcome, Feng!
>>
>> Koji
>>
>>
>> On 2022/01/25 18:09, Adrien Grand wrote:
>> > I'm pleased to announce that Guo Feng has accepted the PMC's
>> > invitation to become a committer.
>> >
>> > Feng, the tradition is that new committers introduce themselves with a
>> > brief bio.
>> >
>> > Congratulations and welcome!
>> >
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC4

[Ignacio Vera]

+1

SUCCESS! [0:18:22.596596]

On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 12:58 AM Anshum Gupta  wrote:

> +1
>
> Smoke tester is happy. Tried sample indexing/searching, looks good!
>
> SUCCESS! [0:20:22.007002]
>
> Thanks for your effort and patience, Adrien!
>
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 8:56 AM Adrien Grand  wrote:
>
>> Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 9.0.0
>>
>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC4-rev-0b18b3b965cedaf5eb129aa41243a44c83ca826d
>>
>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>
>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC4-rev-0b18b3b965cedaf5eb129aa41243a44c83ca826d
>>
>> The vote will be open until 2021-12-06 08:00 UTC.
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Here is my +1
>>
>> --
>> Adrien
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>

Re: Welcome Julie Tibshirani to the Lucene PMC

[Ignacio Vera]

Congratulations Julie!

On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 10:03 AM Alan Woodward  wrote:

> Congratulations and welcome!
>
> - Alan
>
> > On 30 Nov 2021, at 21:49, Adrien Grand  wrote:
> >
> > I'm pleased to announce that Julie Tibshirani has accepted an invitation
> to join the Lucene PMC!
> >
> > Congratulations Julie, and welcome aboard!
> >
> > --
> > Adrien
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC3

[Ignacio Vera]

+1

SUCCESS! [0:17:28.435474]

On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 1:27 AM Jan Høydahl  wrote:

> +1 SUCCESS! [0:23:41.775448]
>
> Only ran smoketester this time.
>
> Jan
>
> > 26. nov. 2021 kl. 15:31 skrev Adrien Grand :
> >
> > Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene 9.0.0.
> >
> > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC3-rev-1ddce848cf3d5067efcafc6569d5f8203e56af0b
> >
> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >
> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC3-rev-1ddce848cf3d5067efcafc6569d5f8203e56af0b
> >
> > The vote will be open until 2021-11-30 9:00 UTC.
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Here is my +1.
> >
> > --
> > Adrien
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2

[Ignacio Vera]

+1 SUCCESS! [0:19:28.854798]

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 1:20 PM Robert Muir  wrote:

> Thanks Adrien for addressing one half of the back compat problem.
>
> Unfortunately, the "branch_8x" branch is still live and running hot,
> same as before.
> So I have to again give my -1 VOTE, due to the fact that backwards
> compatibility can't be guaranteed.
> Given that it is being expanded to TWO major releases, this is a major
> commitment that we have to take seriously.
> At a ~ 2.5 year average major release rate, that's up to *7.5 years*
> to fully remove a mistake, for example.
>
> So I really do think we need things in order here, despite some
> backwards neanderthal thinking that wants to always stay on the same
> release and java 1.4 and so on.
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 3:40 AM Adrien Grand  wrote:
> >
> > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.0.0
> >
> > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
> >
> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >
> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75
> >
> > The vote will be open until 2021-11-26 09:00 UTC.
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Here is my +1
> >
> > --
> > Adrien
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1

[Ignacio Vera]

Your issue has not been ignored but the problem is that the version of the
blocker has not been added so it doesn't appear in a search for blockers in
Lucene 9 :(

Do we need to discuss this again? I thought we discussed and agreed on
increasing our backwards compatibility. My personal opinion is that it is a
natural step for mature software that it is increasingly used in production
environments.

Regarding your concerns in the subject, there is a healthy discussion in
the issue and there are sound proposals to ease the pain and they can be
implemented any time, do you think it is still a blocker?



On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 12:59 PM Robert Muir  wrote:

> Along the same lines of back compat woes, I'd like to see my blocker
> issue about back compat testing addressed in the release candidate,
> rather than simply ignored.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10168
>
> With the 9.0 release, we are attempting to *double* our backwards
> compatibility guarantees (2 major versions), yet here we are
> discussing insane release strategies that can't be guaranteed/tested
> to work (8.12-after-9.0-etc), here we are with back compat tests
> taking a minute and half on branch_9_0! Imagine how long they will
> take for branch_9_9!
>
> When it comes to more back compat, people are quick to demand more of
> it every time. But when it comes to addressing the necessary issues to
> make it work...crickets.
>
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 5:11 AM Robert Muir  wrote:
> >
> > -1 to release lucene 9.0, as long as branch_8x remains.
> >
> > I know you made a separate thread for this, but it is a real problem.
> >
> > The problem is that we can't support backwards compatibility like
> > this: releasing 9.0 then 8.12's and stuff. It isn't how the back
> > compat testing works, it is completely cowboy and unsupported.
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 9:19 AM Adrien Grand  wrote:
> > >
> > > I think we should remove it but I remember it was controversial in the
> past. I'll start a separate thread.
> > >
> > > Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 14:38, Uwe Schindler  a écrit
> :
> > >>
> > >> Yes. But we won't have a 8.12 release so I assume the branch_8x is
> dead. Maybe we should dass a note to it's readme or delete it?
> > >>
> > >> Uwe
> > >>
> > >> Am 20. November 2021 13:15:23 UTC schrieb Adrien Grand <
> jpou...@gmail.com>:
> > >>>
> > >>> We need to keep the 8.11 jobs, but I think they can be disabled. We
> typically only enable them when we start discussing doing a new patch
> release?
> > >>>
> > >>> Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 12:51, Uwe Schindler  a
> écrit :
> > 
> >  Hi,
> > 
> >  I setup my usual release tester job on Policeman Jenkins and it
> succeeded:
> >  SUCCESS! [0:19:00.801641]
> > 
> >  See here for log:
> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/4/console
> > 
> >  So it looks like technically the release is fine. I will wait a bit
> with my +1, because I wanted to manually check the artifacts and javadocs
> first.
> > 
> >  I also enabled the 9.0 and 9.x builds on Policeman Jenkins (sorry
> for the delay). At the same time I disabled 8.x builds. If Solr people
> still need them we can enable them. But I think the only ones we need now
> are 8.11.x ones, right?
> > 
> >  Uwe
> > 
> >  -
> >  Uwe Schindler
> >  Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> >  https://www.thetaphi.de
> >  eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> > 
> >  > -Original Message-
> >  > From: Adrien Grand 
> >  > Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2021 9:25 AM
> >  > To: Lucene Dev 
> >  > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1
> >  >
> >  > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.0.0.
> >  >
> >  > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> >  >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev-
> >  > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075
> >  >
> >  > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >  >
> >  > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> >  >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev-
> >  > 903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075
> >  >
> >  > The vote will be open until 2021-11-24 09:00 UTC.
> >  >
> >  > [ ] +1  approve
> >  > [ ] +0  no opinion
> >  > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >  >
> >  > Here is my +1
> >  >
> >  > --
> >  > Adrien
> >  >
> >  >
> -
> >  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> >  > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> > 
> > 
> > 
> -
> >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> >  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> > 
> > >> --
> > >> Uwe Schindler
> > >> Achterdiek 

Re: What should we do of branch_8x?

[Ignacio Vera]

I agree with Robert here, this makes little sense as there is no tooling in
this repository to release solr without lucene. If it ever happens it will
probably be done outside.

The idea of "leaving a door open" has no justification because it is more
"drawing a door in a wall" and might give false expectations.

+1 to remove the branch.

On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 12:52 PM Robert Muir  wrote:

> I gave my technical justification: our backwards compatibility testing
> doesnt work this way. 9.0 can't have guaranteed back compat with
> versions coming in the future. This is lunacy.
>
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 6:30 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>  wrote:
> >
> > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#Veto
> >
> > "To prevent vetoes from being used capriciously, the voter must provide
> with the veto a *technical justification* showing why the change is bad
> (opens a security exposure, negatively affects performance, etc. ). A veto
> without a justification is invalid and has no weight."
> >
> > On Sun, 21 Nov, 2021, 3:30 pm Robert Muir,  wrote:
> >>
> >> I think we should remove this branch.
> >>
> >> personally, i'll probably -1 any commit to it. I'll see if i can
> >> automate such an email response with a gmail rule.
> >>
> >> we already released lucene 9.0, we can't change backwards
> >> compatibility for some 8.12, same old story, lets move on people.
> >>
> >> On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 9:29 AM Adrien Grand  wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Uwe brought up the question on a the vote thread: we are not going to
> do a 8.12 release, so what should we do of branch_8x?
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.0 RC1

[Ignacio Vera]

+1

SUCCESS! [1:03:16.453882]

On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 5:31 AM Gus Heck  wrote:

> +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:16.982080]
>
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 9:06 PM Mayya Sharipova
>  wrote:
>
>> +1 SUCCESS! [1:09:47.023515]
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 6:42 PM Timothy Potter 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> totally unofficial, but I posted a Docker image for testing 8.11.0 RC1
>>> on K8s here: thelabdude/apache-solr-dev:8.11.0-rc1
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 1:50 PM Adrien Grand  wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.11.0
>>> >
>>> > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>> >
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.11.0-RC1-reve912fdd5b632267a9088507a2a6bcbc75108f381
>>> >
>>> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>> >
>>> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>> >
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.11.0-RC1-reve912fdd5b632267a9088507a2a6bcbc75108f381
>>> >
>>> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2021-11-12
>>> 21:00 UTC.
>>> >
>>> > [ ] +1  approve
>>> > [ ] +0  no opinion
>>> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>> >
>>> > Here is my +1
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Adrien
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.10.1 RC1

[Ignacio Vera]

+1

SUCCESS! [1:01:50.808390]

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 1:40 PM Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:

> +1
>
>
> SUCCESS! [0:44:35.590557]
>
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 8:00 PM Mayya Sharipova  wrote:
>
>> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.10.1
>>
>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.10.1-RC1-rev2f24e6a49d48a032df1f12e146612f59141727a9
>>
>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>
>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.10.1-RC1-rev2f24e6a49d48a032df1f12e146612f59141727a9
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2021-10-15 23:00
>> UTC.
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Here is my +1 : SUCCESS! [1:07:19.906103]
>> 
>>
>

Re: Soften Jira's note when opening new issues?

[Ignacio Vera]

+1

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:47 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Mon, 20 Sep, 2021, 12:33 pm Adrien Grand,  wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Jira gives the following note when opening an issue:
>>
>> ```
>> This project has a user mailing list and an IRC channel for support.
>> Please ensure that you have discussed your problem using one of those
>> resources BEFORE creating this ticket.
>> ```
>>
>> This can be quite intimidating for someone who has never worked with us
>> before, and we don't apply this logic for ourselves, for instance I feel
>> free to open JIRAs without discussing them first on IRC or dev@l.a.o.
>> Given that we are not seeing much irrelevant traffic on JIRA, I'd like to
>> soften the message to something like below:
>>
>> ```
>> If you are looking for support, or if you are not sure whether the
>> behavior that you are observing is expected or not, please discuss your
>> problem on the user mailing-list instead before creating a ticket.
>> ```
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> --
>> Adrien
>>
>

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Check-main - Build # 2387 - Unstable!

[Ignacio Vera]

fixed here:  https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/123
sorry for the noise


On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 10:12 AM Apache Jenkins Server <
jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote:

> Build: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Lucene/job/Lucene-Check-main/2387/
>
> 2 tests failed.
> FAILED:
> org.apache.lucene.replicator.nrt.TestNRTReplication.testCrashReplica
>
> Error Message:
> java.lang.Exception: Test abandoned because suite timeout was reached.
>
> Stack Trace:
> java.lang.Exception: Test abandoned because suite timeout was reached.
> at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([920CE9E660A95152]:0)
>
>
> FAILED:  org.apache.lucene.replicator.nrt.TestNRTReplication.classMethod
>
> Error Message:
> java.lang.Exception: Suite timeout exceeded (>= 720 msec).
>
> Stack Trace:
> java.lang.Exception: Suite timeout exceeded (>= 720 msec).
> at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([920CE9E660A95152]:0)
>
>
>
>
> Build Log:
> [...truncated 2001 lines...]
> ERROR: The following test(s) have failed:
>   - org.apache.lucene.replicator.nrt.TestNRTReplication.testCrashReplica
> (:lucene:replicator)
> Test output:
> /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene/Lucene-Check-main/lucene/replicator/build/test-results/test/outputs/OUTPUT-org.apache.lucene.replicator.nrt.TestNRTReplication.txt
> Reproduce with: gradlew :lucene:replicator:test --tests
> "org.apache.lucene.replicator.nrt.TestNRTReplication.testCrashReplica"
> -Ptests.jvms=4 -Ptests.haltonfailure=false
> -Ptests.jvmargs=-XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1 -Ptests.seed=920CE9E660A95152
> -Ptests.multiplier=2 -Ptests.badapples=false -Ptests.file.encoding=US-ASCII
>
>   - org.apache.lucene.replicator.nrt.TestNRTReplication.classMethod
> (:lucene:replicator)
> Test output:
> /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene/Lucene-Check-main/lucene/replicator/build/test-results/test/outputs/OUTPUT-org.apache.lucene.replicator.nrt.TestNRTReplication.txt
> Reproduce with: gradlew :lucene:replicator:test --tests
> "org.apache.lucene.replicator.nrt.TestNRTReplication.classMethod"
> -Ptests.jvms=4 -Ptests.haltonfailure=false
> -Ptests.jvmargs=-XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1 -Ptests.seed=920CE9E660A95152
> -Ptests.multiplier=2 -Ptests.badapples=false -Ptests.file.encoding=US-ASCII
>
>
> Deprecated Gradle features were used in this build, making it incompatible
> with Gradle 7.0.
> Use '--warning-mode all' to show the individual deprecation warnings.
> See
> https://docs.gradle.org/6.8.3/userguide/command_line_interface.html#sec:command_line_warnings
>
> BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 2h 17m 24s
> 717 actionable tasks: 717 executed
> Build step 'Invoke Gradle script' changed build result to SUCCESS
> Archiving artifacts
> java.lang.InterruptedException: no matches found within 1
> at hudson.FilePath$ValidateAntFileMask.hasMatch(FilePath.java:3066)
> at hudson.FilePath$ValidateAntFileMask.invoke(FilePath.java:2945)
> at hudson.FilePath$ValidateAntFileMask.invoke(FilePath.java:2926)
> at hudson.FilePath$FileCallableWrapper.call(FilePath.java:3313)
> Also:   hudson.remoting.Channel$CallSiteStackTrace: Remote call to lucene2
> at
> hudson.remoting.Channel.attachCallSiteStackTrace(Channel.java:1800)
> at
> hudson.remoting.UserRequest$ExceptionResponse.retrieve(UserRequest.java:357)
> at hudson.remoting.Channel.call(Channel.java:1001)
> at hudson.FilePath.act(FilePath.java:1157)
> at hudson.FilePath.act(FilePath.java:1146)
> at hudson.FilePath.validateAntFileMask(FilePath.java:2924)
> at
> hudson.tasks.ArtifactArchiver.perform(ArtifactArchiver.java:270)
> at
> hudson.tasks.BuildStepCompatibilityLayer.perform(BuildStepCompatibilityLayer.java:80)
> at
> hudson.tasks.BuildStepMonitor$1.perform(BuildStepMonitor.java:20)
> at
> hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.perform(AbstractBuild.java:804)
> at
> hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.performAllBuildSteps(AbstractBuild.java:753)
> at hudson.model.Build$BuildExecution.post2(Build.java:177)
> at
> hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.post(AbstractBuild.java:698)
> at hudson.model.Run.execute(Run.java:1932)
> at hudson.model.FreeStyleBuild.run(FreeStyleBuild.java:43)
> at
> hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:97)
> at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:429)
> Caused: hudson.FilePath$TunneledInterruptedException
> at hudson.FilePath$FileCallableWrapper.call(FilePath.java:3315)
> at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:211)
> at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:54)
> at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:375)
> at
> 

Re: Welcome Zach Chen as Lucene committer

[Ignacio Vera]

Congratulations and welcome!

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 4:36 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe 
wrote:

> Welcome Zach!
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 3:38 PM Greg Miller  wrote:
>
>> Congrats Zach!
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 3:09 PM Robert Muir  wrote:
>> >
>> > Congratulations!
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:14 AM Adrien Grand 
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I'm pleased to announce that Zach Chen has accepted the PMC's
>> invitation to become a committer.
>> >>
>> >> Zach, the tradition is that new committers introduce themselves with a
>> brief bio.
>> >>
>> >> Congratulations and welcome!
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Adrien
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2 RC1

[Ignacio Vera]

+1 (binding)

SUCCESS! [0:56:27.324736]

On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 12:01 PM Bruno Roustant 
wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Ran the smoke tester successfully.
>
> Bruno
>
> Le jeu. 8 avr. 2021 à 04:38, Anshum Gupta  a
> écrit :
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Ran a sample indexing/search app and browsed through the admin UI.
>>
>> Smoketester is happy!
>>
>> SUCCESS! [1:05:05.761354]
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 3:45 PM Mike Drob  wrote:
>>
>>> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.2
>>>
>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.2-RC1-reva92a05e195b775b30ca410bc0a26e8e79e7b3bfb
>>>
>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>
>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.2-RC1-reva92a05e195b775b30ca410bc0a26e8e79e7b3bfb
>>>
>>> The vote will be open until 2021-04-12 00:00 UTC. I will tally votes on
>>> Monday morning.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>> Here is my +1
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>

Re: Welcome Peter Gromov as Lucene committer

[Ignacio Vera]

Welcome Peter!

On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:10 PM Peter Gromov
 wrote:

> Thanks, that helped!
>
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 11:23 AM Dawid Weiss  wrote:
>
>> See here -
>> https://git.apache.org/setup/
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 10:52 AM Peter Gromov
>>  wrote:
>> >
>> > I have 2FA, but nobody added me to the ASF organization. How does one
>> do that?
>> >
>> > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 10:09 AM Atri Sharma  wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Did you set your 2FA up and get added to the Apache Software
>> >> Foundation Github org?
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 12:42 PM Peter Gromov
>> >>  wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks for the honor!
>> >> >
>> >> > (BTW I'm still not recognized by Github as having write access, and
>> can't merge my pull requests :))
>> >> >
>> >> > > Peter, the tradition is that new committers introduce themselves
>> with a brief bio.
>> >> >
>> >> > Okay, time for some bragging :) I've been working at JetBrains for
>> some 17 years, most of them on IntelliJ platform, mainly supporting various
>> languages and their infrastructure, analyzing snapshots and improving
>> performance. Aiming to catch more bugs before they hit production, I've
>> introduced property-based testing to IntelliJ by creating a small library
>> called jetCheck. Recently I've switched to the Grazie project and now I do
>> some rule-based computational linguistics there and enhance the IDE support
>> for English. As Grazie needs LanguageTool and Hunspell, I've also spent
>> some time rewriting the latter in Java (here in Lucene), and optimizing
>> them both. In my free time, I like mountain hiking (Munich/Germany is a
>> great location for that!), and some amateur piano/harmonica playing/singing.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Regards,
>> >>
>> >> Atri
>> >> Apache Concerted
>> >>
>> >> -
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> >>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

[Ignacio Vera]

Hi Mike,

LUCENE-9870 has been backported, Thanks!

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:32 PM Cassandra Targett 
wrote:

> Oh, I see what you meant! I actually just redid the changes from scratch
> instead of trying to backport the 9.0 changes as a patch, so no worries on
> that front. Thanks for thinking of me there though!
>
> I just committed some changes for morelikethis.adoc that I decided I’d
> like to backport into branch_8_8 since we’re re-publishing…it’s docs-only,
> though.
> On Mar 29, 2021, 2:25 PM -0500, Mike Drob , wrote:
>
> Thanks, Cassandra. When I skimmed the initial changeset, I saw that there
> were changes to build.gradle - I assumed that there would have to be some
> changes to build.xml in the 8x branch, but I didn't investigate further on
> how they would differ. Was just trying to be helpful and give you a heads
> up about it, but looks like I caused more confusion than help!
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 1:31 PM Cassandra Targett 
> wrote:
>
>> I pushed up the URL changes I mentioned.
>>
>> Not sure what you mean, Mike, by “gradle->ant translation”? The build
>> process is different in branch_8x but it’s documented in the
>> how-to-contribute page in the ref guide that talks about contributing and
>> building, etc.
>> On Mar 29, 2021, 12:55 PM -0500, Mike Drob , wrote:
>>
>>
>> Cassandra - yes, I plan to republish the ref guide, your expertise is
>> absolutely appreciated. It looks like there will also be some gradle->ant
>> translation. Was this mostly find-and-replace or was there more order to it?
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:32 PM Alan Woodward > <https://mailto:romseyg...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> I’d like to back port LUCENE-9744 (which fixes an NPE in intervals
>> queries) and LUCENE-9762 (which fixes a bug in QueryValuesSource).
>>
>> Thanks, Alan
>>
>> On 29 Mar 2021, at 09:47, Ignacio Vera > <https://mailto:iver...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries that
>> causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix
>> only touches one class tho so very low risk.
>>
>> lucene
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob > <https://mailto:md...@mdrob.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Ishan,
>>
>> Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra week to
>> accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, others) coming up.
>>
>> I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.
>>
>> Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked with
>> fixVersion in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com <https://mailto:ichattopadhy...@gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 in, but
>> will likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation right now due
>> to the festival of Holi)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ishan
>>
>> On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob, > <https://mailto:md...@mdrob.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
>>
>> I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If you
>> have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please do so using
>> your best judgement.
>>
>> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>>
>> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
>>   why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
>> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
>>   in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as
>> Blocker
>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
>>   to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>>   the current release branch.
>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" will
>> delay
>>   a release candidate build.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

[Ignacio Vera]

I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries that
causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix
only touches one class tho so very low risk.
lucene

On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob  wrote:

> Ishan,
>
> Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra week to
> accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, others) coming up.
>
> I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.
>
> Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked with
> fixVersion in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.
>
> Mike
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 in, but
>> will likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation right now due
>> to the festival of Holi)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ishan
>>
>> On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob,  wrote:
>>
>>> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
>>>
>>> I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If you
>>> have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please do so using
>>> your best judgement.
>>>
>>> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>>>
>>> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
>>>   why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
>>> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
>>>   in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as
>>> Blocker
>>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
>>>   to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>>>   the current release branch.
>>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" will
>>> delay
>>>   a release candidate build.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mike
>>>
>>

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Check-main - Build # 1835 - Unstable!

[Ignacio Vera]

I open https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9859

On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 11:04 AM Dawid Weiss  wrote:

>
> This reproduces for me. I can't file a jira issue for some reason - weird.
>
> gradlew :lucene:core:test --tests
> "org.apache.lucene.search.TestXYPointQueries.testSamePointManyTimes"
> -Ptests.jvms=4 -Ptests.haltonfailure=false
> -Ptests.jvmargs=-XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1 -Ptests.seed=3862947398D9B990
> -Ptests.multiplier=2 -Ptests.badapples=false
> -Ptests.file.encoding=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 7:23 AM Apache Jenkins Server <
> jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Build:
>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Lucene/job/Lucene-Check-main/1835/
>>
>> 2 tests failed.
>> FAILED:
>> org.apache.lucene.search.TestXYDocValuesQueries.testSamePointManyTimes
>>
>> Error Message:
>> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: radius must be bigger than 0, got 0.0
>>
>> Stack Trace:
>> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: radius must be bigger than 0, got 0.0
>> at
>> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([3862947398D9B990:84672DC16C1CE008]:0)
>> at org.apache.lucene.geo.XYCircle.(XYCircle.java:44)
>> at
>> org.apache.lucene.document.XYDocValuesField.newSlowDistanceQuery(XYDocValuesField.java:183)
>> at
>> org.apache.lucene.search.TestXYDocValuesQueries.newDistanceQuery(TestXYDocValuesQueries.java:39)
>> at
>> org.apache.lucene.geo.BaseXYPointTestCase.verifyRandomDistances(BaseXYPointTestCase.java:922)
>> at
>> org.apache.lucene.geo.BaseXYPointTestCase.verify(BaseXYPointTestCase.java:786)
>> at
>> org.apache.lucene.geo.BaseXYPointTestCase.testSamePointManyTimes(BaseXYPointTestCase.java:438)
>> at
>> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>> Method)
>> at
>> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>> at
>> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
>> at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1754)
>> at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:942)
>> at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$9.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:978)
>> at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$10.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:992)
>> at
>> org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:44)
>> at
>> org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
>> at
>> org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:45)
>> at
>> org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:60)
>> at
>> org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:44)
>> at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
>> at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>> at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:370)
>> at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:819)
>> at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:470)
>> at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:951)
>> at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:836)
>> at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:887)
>> at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:898)
>> at
>> org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:43)
>> at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>> at
>> org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
>> at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
>> at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:40)
>> at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>> at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
>> at
>> org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:51)
>> at
>> 

Re: Congratulations to the new Lucene PMC Chair, Michael Sokolov!

[Ignacio Vera]

Congratulations and many many thanks!

On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 8:46 AM Alessandro Benedetti 
wrote:

> Congrats Michael!
> --
> Alessandro Benedetti
> Apache Lucene/Solr Committer
> Director, R Software Engineer, Search Consultant
> www.sease.io
>
>
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 05:35, Melcom87s 
> wrote:
>
>> Congrats!
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> ᐅ Targeted Web Traffic AFFORDABLE web traffic package
>> is the best ideal for small businesses Website Traffic Packages :
>> Turn Traffic Increase Into Revenue
>> --
>> Sent from:
>> https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Lucene-Java-Developer-f564358.html
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2

[Ignacio Vera]

+1 (binding)

SUCCESS! [0:53:01.546134]

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 1:51 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe 
wrote:

> Thanks Noble! And thanks for fixing that concurrency issue, I'd hit it but
> didn't have time to investigate it.
>
> +1
> SUCCESS! [0:58:32.036482]
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:19 AM Timothy Potter 
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Noble!
>>
>> +1 SUCCESS! [1:24:28.212370] (my internet is super slow today)
>>
>> Re-ran all the Solr operator tests and verified the Cloud graph UI
>> renders correctly now.
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 3:22 AM Noble Paul  wrote:
>>
>>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0
>>>
>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/
>>>
>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
>>>
>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>> Here is my +1
>>> --
>>> -
>>> Noble Paul
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC1

[Ignacio Vera]

+1 (binding)

SUCCESS! [1:05:30.358141]

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 8:25 PM Timothy Potter  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> SUCCESS! [1:07:15.796578]
>
>
> Also built a *local* Docker image from the RC and tested various features
> with the Solr operator on K8s, such as the updates to the Prom exporter &
> Grafana dashboard for query performance.
>
>
> Looks good!
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:06 PM Houston Putman 
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> SUCCESS! [1:01:28.552891]
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 1:53 PM Cassandra Targett 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I’ve put up the DRAFT version of the Ref Guide for 8.8:
>>> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_8/.
>>>
>>> I also created the Jenkins job for building the 8.8 guide which pushes
>>> to the Nightlies server in case we have edits between now and release (
>>> https://nightlies.apache.org/Lucene/Solr-reference-guide-8.8/).
>>>
>>> Note branch_8_8 does not (yet) include the new Math Expressions guide
>>> being worked on in SOLR-13105. Still hoping that will make it, but thought
>>> I’d get this out sooner rather than later just in case.
>>> On Jan 19, 2021, 10:51 AM -0600, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com>, wrote:
>>>
>>> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0
>>>
>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC1-rev737cb9c49b08f6e3964c1e8a80132da3c764e027
>>>
>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>
>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC1-rev737cb9c49b08f6e3964c1e8a80132da3c764e027
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2021-01-22 17:00
>>> UTC.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>> Here is my +1
>>> 
>>>
>>>

Re: Code reformatting

[Ignacio Vera]

Hi Dawid,

It is fine, if there are conflicts and will juggle them :)

 thanks for this effort, it is very cool!



On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 5:04 PM Michael Sokolov  wrote:

> I see it there - yes, it makes some occasional widows, and sometimes
> fails to join up consecutive single-line comments (I think you
> mentioned this elsewhere) but I can live with it :)
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 10:07 AM Dawid Weiss 
> wrote:
> >
> > > Looks as if javadoc is likely to be the main challenge?
> >
> > Not really - it's all handled fairly well (automatically). I merged your
> > changes to master branch and reformatted it locally, I'll merge back to
> master
> > soon.
> >
> > Dawid
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.7.0 RC1

[Ignacio Vera]

+1 SUCCESS! [1:42:16.864208]

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:13 PM Adrien Grand  wrote:

> +1 SUCCESS! [2:11:05.149743]
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 5:54 AM Atri Sharma  wrote:
>
>> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.7.0
>>
>>
>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.7.0-RC1-rev2dc63e901c60cda27ef3b744bc554f1481b3b067
>>
>>
>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>
>>
>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.7.0-RC1-rev2dc63e901c60cda27ef3b744bc554f1481b3b067
>>
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2020-11-01 20:00
>> UTC.
>>
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>>
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>>
>> Here is my +1
>>
>> 
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Atri
>> Apache Concerted
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> --
> Adrien
>

Re: [VOTE] Lucene logo contest, third time's a charm

[Ignacio Vera]

A1, A2 (binding)

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 8:00 AM Shawn Heisey  wrote:

> On 9/1/2020 2:21 PM, Ryan Ernst wrote:
> > In February a contest was started to design a new logo for Lucene
> > [jira-issue]. The initial attempt [first-vote] to call a vote resulted
> > in some confusion on the rules, as well the request for one additional
> > submission. The second attempt [second-vote] yesterday had incorrect
> > links for one of the submissions. I would like to call a new vote, now
> > with more explicit instructions on how to vote, and corrected links.
>
> A2.  Binding vote.
>
> I saw two small differences between A1 and A2.  One difference was
> color, but I do not consider that to be a relevant difference --
> different colors can be chosen each time that the logo is deployed.  The
> other difference was that A2 has an inverse version depicted at top
> center.  That difference, NOT the color, is the reason for my preference
> of A2 over A1.  It could be argued that the presence of the inverse
> image is also not a real difference.
>
> The B and C series have VERY tangible differences between the variants.
>
> How will the different variants be counted in the final tally?  I am not
> subscribed to java-user and thus I can only see votes on the dev list.
> Looking at the new threads on the dev list only, the outcome could
> change if votes for A1 and A2 are counted separately instead of together.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Lucene logo contest, here we go again

[Ignacio Vera]

here is my vote:

A1, A2 (binding)

On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 1:49 PM Aurélien MAZOYER 
wrote:

> Hi community,
>
> I would vote for A1.
>
> Aurélien
>
>
>
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 13:26, Andrzej Białecki  wrote:
>
> > A1, D (binding)
> >
> > > On 1 Sep 2020, at 02:26, Ryan Ernst  wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
> > >
> > > In February a contest was started to design a new logo for Lucene
> > > [jira-issue]. The initial attempt [first-vote] to call a vote resulted
> in
> > > some confusion on the rules, as well the request for one additional
> > > submission. I would like to call a new vote, now with more explicit
> > > instructions on how to vote.
> > >
> > > *Please read the following rules carefully* before submitting your
> vote.
> > >
> > > *Who can vote?*
> > >
> > > Anyone is welcome to cast a vote in support of their favorite
> > > submission(s). Note that only PMC member's votes are binding. If you
> are
> > a
> > > PMC member, please indicate with your vote that the vote is binding, to
> > > ease collection of votes. In tallying the votes, I will attempt to
> verify
> > > only those marked as binding.
> > >
> > >
> > > *How do I vote?*
> > > Votes can be cast simply by replying to this email. It is a
> ranked-choice
> > > vote [rank-choice-voting]. Multiple selections may be made, where the
> > order
> > > of preference must be specified. If an entry gets more than half the
> > votes,
> > > it is the winner. Otherwise, the entry with the lowest number of votes
> is
> > > removed, and the votes are retallied, taking into account the next
> > > preferred entry for those whose first entry was removed. This process
> > > repeats until there is a winner.
> > >
> > > The entries are broken up by variants, since some entries have multiple
> > > color or style variations. The entry identifiers are first a capital
> > > letter, followed by a variation id (described with each entry below),
> if
> > > applicable. As an example, if you prefer variant 1 of entry A, followed
> > by
> > > variant 2 of entry A, variant 3 of entry C, entry D, and lastly variant
> > 4e
> > > of entry B, the following should be in your reply:
> > >
> > > (binding)
> > > vote: A1, A2, C3, D, B4e
> > >
> > > *Entries*
> > >
> > > The entries are as follows:
> > >
> > > A*.* Submitted by Dustin Haver. This entry has two variants, A1 and A2.
> > >
> > > [A1]
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12999548/Screen%20Shot%202020-04-10%20at%208.29.32%20AM.png
> > > [A2]
> > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12997172/LuceneLogo.png
> > >
> > > B. Submitted by Stamatis Zampetakis. This has several variants. Within
> > the
> > > linked entry there are 7 patterns and 7 color palettes. Any vote for B
> > > should contain the pattern number followed by the lowercase letter of
> the
> > > color palette. For example, B3e or B1a.
> > >
> > > [B]
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12997768/zabetak-1-7.pdf
> > >
> > > C. Submitted by Baris Kazar. This entry has 8 variants.
> > >
> > > [C1]
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13006392/lucene_logo1_full.pdf
> > > [C2]
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13006392/lucene_logo2_full.pdf
> > > [C3]
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13006392/lucene_logo3_full.pdf
> > > [C4]
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13006392/lucene_logo4_full.pdf
> > > [C5]
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13006392/lucene_logo5_full.pdf
> > > [C6]
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13006392/lucene_logo6_full.pdf
> > > [C7]
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13006392/lucene_logo7_full.pdf
> > > [C8]
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13006392/lucene_logo8_full.pdf
> > >
> > > D. The current Lucene logo.
> > >
> > > [D]
> > https://lucene.apache.org/theme/images/lucene/lucene_logo_green_300.png
> > >
> > > Please vote for one of the above choices. This vote will close one week
> > > from today, Mon, Sept 7, 2020 at 11:59PM.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > [jira-issue] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9221
> > > [first-vote]
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-dev/202006.mbox/%3cCA+DiXd74Mz4H6o9SmUNLUuHQc6Q1-9mzUR7xfxR03ntGwo=d...@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > > [rank-choice-voting]
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
> >
>

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 8.6.2 released

[Ignacio Vera]

01 September 2020, Apache Solr™ 8.6.2 available

The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 8.6.2

Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting, faceted search and analytics, rich document
parsing, geospatial search, extensive REST APIs as well as parallel SQL.
Solr is enterprise grade, secure and highly scalable, providing fault
tolerant distributed search and indexing, and powers the search and
navigation features of many of the world's largest internet sites.

This release contains two bug fixes. The release is available for immediate
download at:

The release is available for immediate download at:

https://lucene.apache.org/solr/downloads.html

Solr 8.6.2 Bug Fixes:

SOLR-14751: Zookeeper Admin screen not working for old ZK versions.

Solr 8.6.2 also includes 1 bugfix in the corresponding Apache Lucene
release:



Please report any feedback to the mailing lists (
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/community.html#mailing-lists-irc)

Note: The Apache Software Foundation uses an extensive mirroring network
for distributing releases. It is possible that the mirror you are using may
not have replicated the release yet. If that is the case, please try
another mirror. This also goes for Maven access.

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucene 8.6.2 released

[Ignacio Vera]

01 September 2020, Apache Lucene™ 8.6.2 available

The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 8.6.2.

Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured text search engine
library written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly
any application that requires full-text search, especially cross-platform.

This release contains one bug fix. The release is available for immediate
download at:

https://lucene.apache.org/core/downloads.html

Lucene 8.6.2 Bug Fixes:

LUCENE-9478: IndexWriter leaked about 500 byte of heap space for each
full-flush, getReader or commit. This was a regression in 6.8.0

Further details of changes are available in the change log available at:
https://lucene.apache.org/core/8_6_2/changes/Changes.html


Please report any feedback to the mailing lists (
https://lucene.apache.org/core/discussion.html)

Note: The Apache Software Foundation uses an extensive mirroring network
for distributing releases. It is possible that the mirror you are using may
not have replicated the release yet. If that is the case, please try
another mirror. This also applies to Maven access.

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.6.2 RC1

[Ignacio Vera]

It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:


+1  12  (10 binding)

 0  0

-1  0


This vote has PASSED

[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.6.2 RC1

[Ignacio Vera]

Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.6.2


The artifacts can be downloaded from:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.2-RC1-rev016993b65e393b58246d54e8ddda9f56a453eb0e


You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:


python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.2-RC1-rev016993b65e393b58246d54e8ddda9f56a453eb0e


The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2020-08-29 15:00 UTC.


[ ] +1  approve

[ ] +0  no opinion

[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)


Here is my +1

SUCCESS! [1:14:00.656250]

Re: Lucene/Solr 8.6.2 bugfix release

[Ignacio Vera]

Thanks Jan, appreciated.

Here are the drafts for the release notes of the release. Let me know if
there is something not right:

Lucene:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=158873763=fa67fd7c-6e49-490c-b05c-0cf9e374198e=shareui=1598436180735

Solr:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=158873764=3ada1d19-8d66-439b-a64c-0b3464bb3e75=shareui=1598436278731


On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:37 AM Jan Høydahl  wrote:

> No need for a respin for this small UI thing. But if there is an RC2,
> let’s include it.
>
> Jan
>
> 26. aug. 2020 kl. 11:13 skrev Ignacio Vera :
>
> Hi Jan,
>
> I spoke with Simon offline and we agreed I will be the release manager as
> he was running in to issues. I have already started building the RC1, do
> you think this bugfix should be considered for a respin?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ignacio
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:11 AM Jan Høydahl 
> wrote:
>
>> I also have a related trivial fix ready for "SOLR-14752 Zookeeper status
>> fails on zk 3.6.1 with prometheus enabled"
>> Will push to master and branch_8x, let me know if it can be merged to
>> branch_8_6
>>
>> Jan
>>
>> 25. aug. 2020 kl. 23:01 skrev Tomás Fernández Löbbe <
>> tomasflo...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hi, I'm about to backport SOLR-14751
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14751>. It's a trivial fix
>> for the ZooKeeper UI
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:03 AM Michael McCandless <
>> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1, thanks Simon.
>>>
>>> Mike McCandless
>>>
>>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 4:14 AM Ignacio Vera  wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 thanks Simon
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:12 AM Uwe Schindler  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I re-enabled Jenkins jobs for 8.6.
>>>>>
>>>>> Uwe
>>>>>
>>>>> -
>>>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>>>>> https://www.thetaphi.de
>>>>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>>>>>
>>>>> > -Original Message-
>>>>> > From: Simon Willnauer 
>>>>> > Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 10:07 AM
>>>>> > To: Ishan Chattopadhyaya 
>>>>> > Cc: Lucene Dev 
>>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 8.6.2 bugfix release
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I'd actually like to build the RC earlier than the end of the week.
>>>>> > Unless somebody objects I'd like to build one tonight or tomorrow.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > simon
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 7:52 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>>>>> >  wrote:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Thanks Simon and Ignacio!
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > On Tue, 25 Aug, 2020, 11:21 am Simon Willnauer,
>>>>> >  wrote:
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> +1 thank you! I was about to write the same email. Lets sync on
>>>>> the RM
>>>>> > >> I can certainly help... I need to go and find my code signing key
>>>>> > >> first :)
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> simon
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 7:49 AM Ignacio Vera 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > Hi,
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > I propose a 8.6.2 bugfix release and I volunteer as RM. The
>>>>> motivation for
>>>>> > this release is LUCENE-9478 where Simon addressed a serious memory
>>>>> leak in
>>>>> > DWPTDeleteQueue.
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > If there are no objections I am planning to build the first RC
>>>>> by the end of
>>>>> > this week.
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > Ignacio
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> -
>>>>> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > -
>>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>

Re: Lucene/Solr 8.6.2 bugfix release

[Ignacio Vera]

Hi Jan,

I spoke with Simon offline and we agreed I will be the release manager as
he was running in to issues. I have already started building the RC1, do
you think this bugfix should be considered for a respin?

Best regards,

Ignacio

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:11 AM Jan Høydahl  wrote:

> I also have a related trivial fix ready for "SOLR-14752 Zookeeper status
> fails on zk 3.6.1 with prometheus enabled"
> Will push to master and branch_8x, let me know if it can be merged to
> branch_8_6
>
> Jan
>
> 25. aug. 2020 kl. 23:01 skrev Tomás Fernández Löbbe  >:
>
> Hi, I'm about to backport SOLR-14751
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14751>. It's a trivial fix
> for the ZooKeeper UI
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:03 AM Michael McCandless <
> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
>> +1, thanks Simon.
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 4:14 AM Ignacio Vera  wrote:
>>
>>> +1 thanks Simon
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:12 AM Uwe Schindler  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I re-enabled Jenkins jobs for 8.6.
>>>>
>>>> Uwe
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>>>> https://www.thetaphi.de
>>>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>>>>
>>>> > -Original Message-
>>>> > From: Simon Willnauer 
>>>> > Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 10:07 AM
>>>> > To: Ishan Chattopadhyaya 
>>>> > Cc: Lucene Dev 
>>>> > Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 8.6.2 bugfix release
>>>> >
>>>> > I'd actually like to build the RC earlier than the end of the week.
>>>> > Unless somebody objects I'd like to build one tonight or tomorrow.
>>>> >
>>>> > simon
>>>> >
>>>> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 7:52 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>>>> >  wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Thanks Simon and Ignacio!
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Tue, 25 Aug, 2020, 11:21 am Simon Willnauer,
>>>> >  wrote:
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> +1 thank you! I was about to write the same email. Lets sync on
>>>> the RM
>>>> > >> I can certainly help... I need to go and find my code signing key
>>>> > >> first :)
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> simon
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 7:49 AM Ignacio Vera 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> > Hi,
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> > I propose a 8.6.2 bugfix release and I volunteer as RM. The
>>>> motivation for
>>>> > this release is LUCENE-9478 where Simon addressed a serious memory
>>>> leak in
>>>> > DWPTDeleteQueue.
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> > If there are no objections I am planning to build the first RC
>>>> by the end of
>>>> > this week.
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >> > Ignacio
>>>> > >> >
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> -
>>>> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > >>
>>>> >
>>>> > -
>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>

Re: Lucene/Solr 8.6.2 bugfix release

[Ignacio Vera]

+1 thanks Simon

On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:12 AM Uwe Schindler  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I re-enabled Jenkins jobs for 8.6.
>
> Uwe
>
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> https://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Simon Willnauer 
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 10:07 AM
> > To: Ishan Chattopadhyaya 
> > Cc: Lucene Dev 
> > Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 8.6.2 bugfix release
> >
> > I'd actually like to build the RC earlier than the end of the week.
> > Unless somebody objects I'd like to build one tonight or tomorrow.
> >
> > simon
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 7:52 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> >  wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks Simon and Ignacio!
> > >
> > > On Tue, 25 Aug, 2020, 11:21 am Simon Willnauer,
> >  wrote:
> > >>
> > >> +1 thank you! I was about to write the same email. Lets sync on the RM
> > >> I can certainly help... I need to go and find my code signing key
> > >> first :)
> > >>
> > >> simon
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 7:49 AM Ignacio Vera 
> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > I propose a 8.6.2 bugfix release and I volunteer as RM. The
> motivation for
> > this release is LUCENE-9478 where Simon addressed a serious memory leak
> in
> > DWPTDeleteQueue.
> > >> >
> > >> > If there are no objections I am planning to build the first RC by
> the end of
> > this week.
> > >> >
> > >> > Ignacio
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> -
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> > >>
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Lucene/Solr 8.6.2 bugfix release

[Ignacio Vera]

Hi,

I propose a 8.6.2 bugfix release and I volunteer as RM. The motivation for
this release is LUCENE-9478 where Simon addressed a serious memory leak in
DWPTDeleteQueue.

If there are no objections I am planning to build the first RC by the end
of this week.

Ignacio

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.6.0 RC1

[Ignacio Vera]

+1

SUCCESS! [0:59:43.446356]

On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 4:19 PM Cassandra Targett 
wrote:

> I've pushed up the draft Solr Ref Guide for 8.6:
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_6/.
>
> This release will be the public debut of the redesign I finished a couple
> months ago; if you have time, please explore around to find any issues I
> may have missed.
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 7:38 AM Noble Paul  wrote:
>
>> SUCCESS! [1:07:35.754307]
>>
>> with Java 8
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 9:20 PM Noble Paul  wrote:
>> >
>> > it worked Uwe.
>> > But there was a test failure
>> >   [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: D6C8B0CC504808B4]:
>> >[junit4]   -
>> > org.apache.solr.cloud.api.collections.TestHdfsCloudBackupRestore
>> > (suite)
>> > I believe it's just an isolated case of failure
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 7:49 PM Uwe Schindler  wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Policeman Jenkins Smoke tester was happy with your release (I tested
>> already yesterday in the evening after your svn commit):
>> > >
>> > > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/33/console
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > SUCCESS! [1:23:18.912909]
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > (Java 8 and Java 9)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I will do some further checks by hand later today – as this is your
>> first release. Will give my +1 later.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Uwe
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > -
>> > >
>> > > Uwe Schindler
>> > >
>> > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>> > >
>> > > https://www.thetaphi.de
>> > >
>> > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > From: Bruno Roustant 
>> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 10:56 AM
>> > > To: Solr/Lucene Dev 
>> > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.6.0 RC1
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.6.0
>> > >
>> > > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>> > >
>> > >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.0-RC1-reva9c5fb0da2dfc8c7375622c80dbf1a0cc26f44dc
>> > >
>> > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>> > >
>> > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>> > >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.0-RC1-reva9c5fb0da2dfc8c7375622c80dbf1a0cc26f44dc
>> > >
>> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2020-07-11
>> 09:00 UTC.
>> > >
>> > > [ ] +1  approve
>> > > [ ] +0  no opinion
>> > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>> > >
>> > > Here is my +1
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > -
>> > Noble Paul
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -
>> Noble Paul
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>

Re: Welcome Tomoko Uchida to the PMC

[Ignacio Vera]

Congratulations!

On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 3:52 AM Koji Sekiguchi 
wrote:

> Welcome and Congrats, Uchida-san!
>
> Koji
>
>
> On 2020/07/04 15:26, Adrien Grand wrote:
> > I am pleased to announce that Tomoko Uchida has accepted the PMC's
> invitation to join.
> >
> > Welcome Tomoko!
> >
> > --
> > Adrien
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: Welcome Michael Sokolov to the PMC

[Ignacio Vera]

Congratulations!

On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 4:20 PM Steve Rowe  wrote:

> Congrats and welcome, Michael!
>
> --
> Steve
>
> > On Jul 3, 2020, at 7:57 AM, Adrien Grand  wrote:
> >
> > I am pleased to announce that Michael Sokolov has accepted the PMC's
> invitation to join.
> >
> > Welcome Michael!
> >
> > --
> > Adrien
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: 8.6 release

[Ignacio Vera]

+1 thanks!

On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:43 PM Atri Sharma  wrote:

> +1, thanks Bruno!
>
> I would like to volunteer to be the RM for the next release. I will
> shadow Bruno for this one and learn to prepare for the next release if
> that is fine.
>
> Atri
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 7:05 PM Adrien Grand  wrote:
> >
> > +1 Thanks Bruno!
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:33 PM David Smiley  wrote:
> >>
> >> +1 Thanks for volunteering Bruno!
> >>
> >> ~ David Smiley
> >> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 9:31 AM Bruno Roustant <
> bruno.roust...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> It’s been a while since we released Lucene/Solr 8.5.
> >>> I’d like to volunteer to be a release manager for an 8.6 release. If
> there's agreement, then I plan to cut the release branch two weeks today,
> on June 30th, and then to build the first RC two days later.
> >>>
> >>> This will be my first time as release manager so I'll probably need
> some guidance. Currently I have two resource links on this subject:
> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/ReleaseTodo
> >>>
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/master/dev-tools/scripts#releasewizardpy
> >>> If you have more, please share with me.
> >>>
> >>> Bruno
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Adrien
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Atri
> Apache Concerted
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: Welcome Mayya Sharipova as Lucene/Solr committer

[Ignacio Vera]

Congratulations Mayya!

On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 7:04 PM Anshum Gupta  wrote:

> Congratulations and welcome, Mayya!
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 9:58 AM jim ferenczi  wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please join me in welcoming Mayya Sharipova as the latest Lucene/Solr
>> committer.
>> Mayya, it's tradition for you to introduce yourself with a brief bio.
>>
>> Congratulations and Welcome!
>>
>> Jim
>>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.5.2 RC1

[Ignacio Vera]

+1


SUCCESS! [1:28:18.127654]

On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 1:30 PM Atri Sharma  wrote:

> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [1:27:85.49203]
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 3:03 PM Tommaso Teofili
>  wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > SUCCESS! [1:30:49.112899]
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tommaso
> >
> > On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 14:47, Michael McCandless <
> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> SUCCESS! [0:44:04.877619]
> >>
> >> Mike McCandless
> >>
> >> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 5:41 AM Andras Salamon <
> andras.sala...@melda.info> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> SUCCESS! [1:50:12.408588]
> >>>
> >>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>
> >>> Andras
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 2:06 AM Jan Høydahl 
> wrote:
> 
>  +1
> 
>  SUCCESS! [1:03:16.225214]
>  I did no manual tests, just ran smoketester on macOS
> 
>  Jan
> 
>  > 20. mai 2020 kl. 19:58 skrev Mike Drob :
>  >
>  > Devs,
>  >
>  > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.5.2
>  >
>  > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>  >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.5.2-RC1-rev384dadd9141cec3f848d8c416315dc2384749814
>  >
>  > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>  >
>  > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>  >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.5.2-RC1-rev384dadd9141cec3f848d8c416315dc2384749814
>  >
>  > The vote will be open until 2020-05-26 18:00 UTC (extended deadline
> due to multiple holidays in the next 72 hours)
>  >
>  > [ ] +1  approve
>  > [ ] +0  no opinion
>  > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>  >
>  > Here is my +1 (non-binding)
>  >
>  > Mike
>  >
>  >
> -
>  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>  > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>  >
> 
> 
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> 
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Atri
> Apache Concerted
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Solr to become a top-level Apache project (TLP)

[Ignacio Vera]

+1 (binding)

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 3:38 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe 
wrote:

> -1 (binding)
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.3 RC1

[Ignacio Vera]

No issues here

+1 SUCCESS! [1:20:57.847225]

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 3:33 PM Jan Høydahl  wrote:

> SUCCESS! [1:05:02.194590]
> No issues
>
> +1 (did not additional manual checking than running the smoketester)
>
> Jan
>
> > 21. apr. 2020 kl. 12:27 skrev Andrzej Białecki :
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I’m getting the following error, looks like the checksum doesn’t match
> the file:
> >
> > Test Solr...
> >  test basics...
> >  check changes HTML...
> >  download solr-7.7.3-src.tgz...
> >56.9 MB in 586.29 sec (0.1 MB/sec)
> >verify sha512 digest
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> >  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1518, in 
> >main()
> >  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1448, in main
> >smokeTest(c.java, c.url, c.revision, c.version, c.tmp_dir,
> c.is_signed, c.local_keys, ' '.join(c.test_args))
> >  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1504, in smokeTest
> >checkSigs('solr', solrPath, version, tmpDir, isSigned, keysFile)
> >  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 366, in checkSigs
> >verifyDigests(artifact, urlString, tmpDir)
> >  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 556, in verifyDigests
> >raise RuntimeError('SHA512 digest mismatch for %s: expected %s but
> got %s' % (artifact, sha512Expected, sha512Actual))
> > RuntimeError: SHA512 digest mismatch for solr-7.7.3-src.tgz: expected
> 549ab2c35ecfba4610921f0951b3b78595da2bcb6e36da2f2a06828a64a01e656c8d424b4ba8d559b638ab62d871827f004f5f02b8e1eed3b9a0e0cbfd31e8ac
> but got
> 57a34207b6c742eae42cf5a0a15eb773d545902314c593c6f10794e6854e2c9ea6b252e9761da9ed5e13915882d6eddba87971495ff88c2cb643f523b6aaff77
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 21 Apr 2020, at 11:36, Noble Paul  wrote:
> >>
> >> sorry, the direct command is
> >>
> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-7.7.3-RC1-rev1a0d2a901dfec93676b0fe8be425101ceb754b85/
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 6:15 PM Noble Paul 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Please vote for release candidate ? for Lucene/Solr 7.7.3
> >>>
> >>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> >>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-7.7.3-RC1-rev1a0d2a901dfec93676b0fe8be425101ceb754b85
> >>>
> >>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >>>
> >>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> >>>
> /tmp/releases/7.7.3/lucene-solr-7.7.3-RC1-rev1a0d2a901dfec93676b0fe8be425101ceb754b85
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Here's my +1
> >>>
> >>> SUCCESS! [1:48:02.520060]
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> -
> >>> Noble Paul
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> -
> >> Noble Paul
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >>
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 8.5.1 released

[Ignacio Vera]

## 16 April 2020, Apache Solr™ 8.5.1 available


The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 8.5.1.


Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting, faceted search, dynamic clustering, database
integration, rich document handling, and geospatial search. Solr is highly
scalable, providing fault tolerant distributed search and indexing, and
powers the search and navigation features of many of the world's largest
internet sites.


Solr 8.5.1 is available for immediate download at:


  


### This release contains no change over 8.5.0 for Solr.


Solr 8.5.1 also includes and bugfixes in the corresponding Apache Lucene
release:


  


Note: The Apache Software Foundation uses an extensive mirroring network for

distributing releases. It is possible that the mirror you are using may not
have

replicated the release yet. If that is the case, please try another mirror.

This also applies to Maven access.

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucene 8.5.1 released

[Ignacio Vera]

## 16 April 2020, Apache Lucene™ 8.5.1 available


The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 8.5.1.


Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured text search engine
library written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly
any application that requires full-text search, especially cross-platform.


This release contains one bug fix. The release is available for immediate
download at:


  


### Lucene 8.5.1 Bug Fixes:

LUCENE-9300: Index corruption with doc values updates and addIndexes.

Please read CHANGES.txt for a full list of changes:


  


Note: The Apache Software Foundation uses an extensive mirroring network for

distributing releases. It is possible that the mirror you are using may not
have

replicated the release yet. If that is the case, please try another mirror.

This also applies to Maven access.

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.5.1 RC1

[Ignacio Vera]

It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:


+1  8  (8 binding)

 0  0

-1  0


This vote has PASSED

Re: Lucene/Solr 8.5.1 bugfix release

[Ignacio Vera]

I updated the Solr's release announcement so there is no changes. I think
the Lucene's bug fix is not relevant for Solr.

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:23 AM Jan Høydahl  wrote:

> If RC1 is released with a non-working SOLR-14359, then please change
> Solr’s release announcement. Not sure whether the Lucene-bugfix is valid
> for Solr users, in that case it can be highlighted instead?
>
> Jan
>
> 7. apr. 2020 kl. 10:13 skrev Ignacio Vera :
>
> Here are the drafts for the release notes, let me know if there is
> something you wish to change:
>
> Lucene:
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=148645634=e835ddb5-3bb9-4b33-b6ad-1770e0a95327=shareui=1586247034772
>
> Solr:
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=148645636=c4a8eb5f-08d0-40db-a877-b94adb383061=shareui=1586247001694
>
> As I reminder I am planning to build the first RC tomorrow, Wednesday
> April 8th.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:37 AM Ignacio Vera  wrote:
>
>>  Thanks Jan,  I see SOLR-14359
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14359> has already been back
>> ported to branch 8.5, I am ok with  SOLR-14317
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14317> backporting as well.
>> I am planning to build the first RC this coming Wednesday. Let me know if
>> that works for you.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:25 AM Jan Høydahl 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Also this coould be a backport candidate: SOLR-14317
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14317> HttpClusterStateProvider
>>> throws exception when only one node down
>>>
>>> Jan
>>>
>>> 3. apr. 2020 kl. 22:29 skrev Jan Høydahl :
>>>
>>> I plan to merge this to branch_8_5
>>>
>>>*SOLR-14359 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14359> Admin
>>> UI has "Select an option" for collections and cores drop-downs*
>>>
>>> Jan
>>>
>>> 3. apr. 2020 kl. 14:15 skrev jim ferenczi :
>>>
>>> +1, thanks Ignacio.
>>> I merged the fix for LUCENE-9300
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9300> and backported to
>>> the 8.5 branch.
>>>
>>> Le jeu. 2 avr. 2020 à 21:48, Adrien Grand  a écrit :
>>>
>>>> My general take on this is that it's ok to upgrade a dependency in a
>>>> patch release if the dependency upgrade itself is a new patch release of
>>>> the same minor version. The changelog of Tika 1.24 seems to include not
>>>> only bug fixes but also some enhancements[1], so I'd rather do a 8.6
>>>> release in the near future than backport this dependency upgrade to 8.5.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://tika.apache.org/1.24/index.html
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 9:33 PM Cassandra Targett 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Should we consider backporting SOLR-14367 (the most recent Tika
>>>>> upgrade)? It addresses a CVE in Tika, and while I think we usually avoid
>>>>> changing 3rd party component versions in patch releases, but maybe we
>>>>> should in this case? The upgrade also looks like it was pretty
>>>>> straightforward (drop-in replacement).
>>>>>
>>>>> Cassandra
>>>>> On Apr 2, 2020, 12:47 PM -0500, Ignacio Vera ,
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I propose a quick 8.5.1 bugfix release and I volunteer as RM. The main
>>>>> motivation for this release is LUCENE-9300 where Jim addressed a serious
>>>>> bug that can lead to data corruption when merging indices via 
>>>>> IW#addIndices.
>>>>>
>>>>> If there are no objections I am planning to create a RC early next
>>>>> week.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Ignacio
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Adrien
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>

[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.5.1 RC1

[Ignacio Vera]

Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.5.1


The artifacts can be downloaded from:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.5.1-RC1-revedb9fc409398f2c3446883f9f80595c884d245d0


You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:


python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.5.1-RC1-revedb9fc409398f2c3446883f9f80595c884d245d0


The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2020-04-15 11:00 UTC.


[ ] +1  approve

[ ] +0  no opinion

[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)


Here is my +1


SUCCESS! [1:02:16.691004]

Re: Lucene/Solr 8.5.1 bugfix release

[Ignacio Vera]

Here are the drafts for the release notes, let me know if there is
something you wish to change:

Lucene:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=148645634=e835ddb5-3bb9-4b33-b6ad-1770e0a95327=shareui=1586247034772

Solr:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=148645636=c4a8eb5f-08d0-40db-a877-b94adb383061=shareui=1586247001694

As I reminder I am planning to build the first RC tomorrow, Wednesday April
8th.



On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:37 AM Ignacio Vera  wrote:

>  Thanks Jan,  I see SOLR-14359
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14359> has already been back
> ported to branch 8.5, I am ok with  SOLR-14317
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14317> backporting as well. I
> am planning to build the first RC this coming Wednesday. Let me know if
> that works for you.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:25 AM Jan Høydahl  wrote:
>
>> Also this coould be a backport candidate: SOLR-14317
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14317> HttpClusterStateProvider
>> throws exception when only one node down
>>
>> Jan
>>
>> 3. apr. 2020 kl. 22:29 skrev Jan Høydahl :
>>
>> I plan to merge this to branch_8_5
>>
>>*SOLR-14359 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14359> Admin
>> UI has "Select an option" for collections and cores drop-downs*
>>
>> Jan
>>
>> 3. apr. 2020 kl. 14:15 skrev jim ferenczi :
>>
>> +1, thanks Ignacio.
>> I merged the fix for LUCENE-9300
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9300> and backported to
>> the 8.5 branch.
>>
>> Le jeu. 2 avr. 2020 à 21:48, Adrien Grand  a écrit :
>>
>>> My general take on this is that it's ok to upgrade a dependency in a
>>> patch release if the dependency upgrade itself is a new patch release of
>>> the same minor version. The changelog of Tika 1.24 seems to include not
>>> only bug fixes but also some enhancements[1], so I'd rather do a 8.6
>>> release in the near future than backport this dependency upgrade to 8.5.
>>>
>>> [1] https://tika.apache.org/1.24/index.html
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 9:33 PM Cassandra Targett 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Should we consider backporting SOLR-14367 (the most recent Tika
>>>> upgrade)? It addresses a CVE in Tika, and while I think we usually avoid
>>>> changing 3rd party component versions in patch releases, but maybe we
>>>> should in this case? The upgrade also looks like it was pretty
>>>> straightforward (drop-in replacement).
>>>>
>>>> Cassandra
>>>> On Apr 2, 2020, 12:47 PM -0500, Ignacio Vera ,
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I propose a quick 8.5.1 bugfix release and I volunteer as RM. The main
>>>> motivation for this release is LUCENE-9300 where Jim addressed a serious
>>>> bug that can lead to data corruption when merging indices via 
>>>> IW#addIndices.
>>>>
>>>> If there are no objections I am planning to create a RC early next week.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Ignacio
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Adrien
>>>
>>
>>
>>

Re: Welcome Eric Pugh as a Lucene/Solr committer

[Ignacio Vera]

Welcome Eric!

On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 3:52 PM Steve Rowe  wrote:

> Congrats and welcome Eric!
>
> --
> Steve
>
> > On Apr 6, 2020, at 8:21 AM, Jan Høydahl  wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Please join me in welcoming Eric Pugh as the latest Lucene/Solr
> committer!
> >
> > Eric has been part of the Solr community for over a decade, as a code
> contributor, book author, company founder, blogger and mailing list
> contributor! We look forward to his future contributions!
> >
> > Congratulations and welcome! It is a tradition to introduce yourself
> with a brief bio, Eric.
> >
> > Jan Høydahl
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: Lucene/Solr 8.5.1 bugfix release

[Ignacio Vera]

 Thanks Jan,  I see SOLR-14359
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14359> has already been back
ported to branch 8.5, I am ok with  SOLR-14317
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14317> backporting as well. I
am planning to build the first RC this coming Wednesday. Let me know if
that works for you.



On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:25 AM Jan Høydahl  wrote:

> Also this coould be a backport candidate: SOLR-14317
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14317> HttpClusterStateProvider
> throws exception when only one node down
>
> Jan
>
> 3. apr. 2020 kl. 22:29 skrev Jan Høydahl :
>
> I plan to merge this to branch_8_5
>
>*SOLR-14359 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14359> Admin
> UI has "Select an option" for collections and cores drop-downs*
>
> Jan
>
> 3. apr. 2020 kl. 14:15 skrev jim ferenczi :
>
> +1, thanks Ignacio.
> I merged the fix for LUCENE-9300
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9300> and backported to the
> 8.5 branch.
>
> Le jeu. 2 avr. 2020 à 21:48, Adrien Grand  a écrit :
>
>> My general take on this is that it's ok to upgrade a dependency in a
>> patch release if the dependency upgrade itself is a new patch release of
>> the same minor version. The changelog of Tika 1.24 seems to include not
>> only bug fixes but also some enhancements[1], so I'd rather do a 8.6
>> release in the near future than backport this dependency upgrade to 8.5.
>>
>> [1] https://tika.apache.org/1.24/index.html
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 9:33 PM Cassandra Targett 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Should we consider backporting SOLR-14367 (the most recent Tika
>>> upgrade)? It addresses a CVE in Tika, and while I think we usually avoid
>>> changing 3rd party component versions in patch releases, but maybe we
>>> should in this case? The upgrade also looks like it was pretty
>>> straightforward (drop-in replacement).
>>>
>>> Cassandra
>>> On Apr 2, 2020, 12:47 PM -0500, Ignacio Vera , wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I propose a quick 8.5.1 bugfix release and I volunteer as RM. The main
>>> motivation for this release is LUCENE-9300 where Jim addressed a serious
>>> bug that can lead to data corruption when merging indices via IW#addIndices.
>>>
>>> If there are no objections I am planning to create a RC early next week.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Ignacio
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Adrien
>>
>
>
>

Lucene/Solr 8.5.1 bugfix release

[Ignacio Vera]

Hi,

I propose a quick 8.5.1 bugfix release and I volunteer as RM. The main
motivation for this release is LUCENE-9300 where Jim addressed a serious
bug that can lead to data corruption when merging indices via IW#addIndices.

If there are no objections I am planning to create a RC early next week.

Best regards,

Ignacio

Re: Welcome Alessandro Benedetti as a Lucene/Solr committer

[Ignacio Vera]

Welcome Alessandro!

On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 3:21 PM Namgyu Kim  wrote:

> Congrats and welcome! Alessandro :D
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 11:10 PM Michael Sokolov 
> wrote:
>
>> Welcome Alessandro!
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 3:25 PM Alessandro Benedetti <
>> a.benede...@sease.io> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks everyone for the warm welcome!
>>> I already know most of you but for all the others here's my brief bio :)
>>>
>>> I am Italian (possibly the only other italian in addition to Tommaso)
>>> and I have been living in the UK for the last 7 years.
>>> I am currently based in London.
>>> I started working with Apache Solr back in 2010 (and a few months later
>>> with Apache Lucene), my first project was a search API that translated the
>>> Verity query language to Lucene syntax, at the time I was a junior software
>>> engineer with a background in Information Retrieval research at Roma3
>>> university.
>>> Since then I have explored a lot of different use cases for Apache
>>> Lucene/Solr and I spent more and more time studying and working with the
>>> internals, across various companies and positions.
>>> My favourite projects in my career have been the design and
>>> implementation of a Semantic Search engine called Sensify (when I was
>>> working in a small and cohesive R team in Zaizi, with spanish friends and
>>> colleagues from Seville), the Apache Solr Learning To Rank plugin from
>>> Bloomberg (and integrations/applications) and the Rated Ranking Evaluator
>>> project (an Open Source library for Search Quality Evaluation we
>>> contributed back to the community).
>>> In 2016 I founded my own company, Sease where we try to build a bridge
>>> between Academia and the industry through Open Source software in the
>>> domain of Information Retrieval.
>>>
>>> As David mentioned my main areas of contribution in Apache Lucene/Solr
>>> have been the More Like This, the Learning To Rank plugin, Synonyms
>>> expansion and the Suggester component.
>>> I have a lot of ideas in my to do list, so stay tuned, we'll have a lot
>>> to discuss and innovate !
>>>
>>> It is a pleasure to join this group and I am sure we'll do great things
>>> together :)
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alessandro Benedetti
>>> Search Consultant, R Software Engineer, Director
>>> www.sease.io
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 13:00, David Smiley 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Hi all,

 Please join me in welcoming Alessandro Benedetti as the latest
 Lucene/Solr committer!

 Alessandro has been contributing to Lucene and Solr in areas such as
 More Like This, Synonym boosting, and Suggesters, and other areas for
 years.  Furthermore he's been a help to many users on the solr-user mailing
 list and has helped others through his blog posts and presentations about
 search.  We look forward to his future contributions.

 Congratulations and welcome!  It is a tradition to introduce yourself
 with a brief bio, Alessandro.

 ~ David Smiley
 Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
 http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley

>>>

Re: 8.5 release

[Ignacio Vera]

done. Thank you!

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:43 AM Alan Woodward  wrote:

> Go ahead, I’ll start the release build once it’s in.
>
> On 10 Mar 2020, at 07:26, Ignacio Vera  wrote:
>
> Hi Alanm
>
> Is it  possible to backport
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9263 for the 8.5 release, I
> push it tester day and CI is happy.
>
> Thanks,
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 2:35 AM Joel Bernstein  wrote:
>
>>
>> Finished the backport for
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14073.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> Joel Bernstein
>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 8:44 AM Joel Bernstein  wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, I'll do the backport today. Thanks!
>>>
>>> Joel Bernstein
>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 6:21 AM Alan Woodward 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Uwe!
>>>>
>>>> On 7 Mar 2020, at 10:06, Uwe Schindler  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> FYI, I cleaned, renamed, and changed the Jenkins Jobs, so the 8.5
>>>> branch is in the loop on ASF Jenkins and Policeman Jenkins.
>>>>
>>>> Uwe
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>>>> https://www.thetaphi.de
>>>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Alan Woodward 
>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 4, 2020 5:35 PM
>>>> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
>>>> *Subject:* Re: 8.5 release
>>>>
>>>> I’ve created a branch for the 8.5 release (`branch_8_5`) and pushed it
>>>> to the apache repository.  We’re now at feature freeze, so only bug fixes
>>>> should be pushed to the branch.
>>>>
>>>> I can see from
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20in%20(SOLR%2C%20LUCENE)%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%208.5%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20in%20(SOLR,%20LUCENE)%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open,%20Reopened)%20AND%20priority%20=%20Blocker%20AND%20fixVersion%20=%208.5%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC>
>>>>  that
>>>> we have 4 tickets marked as Blockers for this release.  I plan to build a
>>>> first release candidate next Monday, which gives us a few days to resolve
>>>> these.  If that’s not going to be long enough, please let me know.
>>>>
>>>> Uwe, Steve, can one of you start the Jenkins tasks for the new branch?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, Alan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 3 Mar 2020, at 14:50, Alan Woodward  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> PSA: I’ve had to generate a new GPG key for this release, and it takes
>>>> a while for it to get mirrored to the lucene KEYS file.  I’ll hold off
>>>> cutting the branch until everything is ready, so it will probably now be
>>>> tomorrow UK time before I start the release proper.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 25 Feb 2020, at 07:49, Noble Paul  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 9:35 PM Ignacio Vera  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 7:26 PM Jan Høydahl 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> That should give us time to update release docs for the new website too.
>>>>
>>>> Jan Høydahl
>>>>
>>>> 18. feb. 2020 kl. 18:28 skrev Adrien Grand :
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 4:58 PM Alan Woodward 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> It’s been a while since we released lucene-solr 8.4, and we’ve
>>>> accumulated quite a few nice new features since then.  I’d like to
>>>> volunteer to be a release manager for an 8.5 release.  If there's
>>>> agreement, then I plan to cut the release branch two weeks today, on
>>>> Tuesday 3rd March.
>>>>
>>>> - Alan
>>>> -
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>> 
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>> 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Adrien
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> -
>>>> Noble Paul
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>> 
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>> 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
> - To
> unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional
> commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: 8.5 release

[Ignacio Vera]

Hi Alanm

Is it  possible to backport
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9263 for the 8.5 release, I
push it tester day and CI is happy.

Thanks,

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 2:35 AM Joel Bernstein  wrote:

>
> Finished the backport for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14073
> .
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 8:44 AM Joel Bernstein  wrote:
>
>> Ok, I'll do the backport today. Thanks!
>>
>> Joel Bernstein
>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 6:21 AM Alan Woodward 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Uwe!
>>>
>>> On 7 Mar 2020, at 10:06, Uwe Schindler  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> FYI, I cleaned, renamed, and changed the Jenkins Jobs, so the 8.5 branch
>>> is in the loop on ASF Jenkins and Policeman Jenkins.
>>>
>>> Uwe
>>>
>>> -
>>> Uwe Schindler
>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>>> https://www.thetaphi.de
>>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>>>
>>> *From:* Alan Woodward 
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 4, 2020 5:35 PM
>>> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
>>> *Subject:* Re: 8.5 release
>>>
>>> I’ve created a branch for the 8.5 release (`branch_8_5`) and pushed it
>>> to the apache repository.  We’re now at feature freeze, so only bug fixes
>>> should be pushed to the branch.
>>>
>>> I can see from
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20in%20(SOLR%2C%20LUCENE)%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%208.5%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20in%20(SOLR,%20LUCENE)%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open,%20Reopened)%20AND%20priority%20=%20Blocker%20AND%20fixVersion%20=%208.5%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC>
>>>  that
>>> we have 4 tickets marked as Blockers for this release.  I plan to build a
>>> first release candidate next Monday, which gives us a few days to resolve
>>> these.  If that’s not going to be long enough, please let me know.
>>>
>>> Uwe, Steve, can one of you start the Jenkins tasks for the new branch?
>>>
>>> Thanks, Alan
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3 Mar 2020, at 14:50, Alan Woodward  wrote:
>>>
>>> PSA: I’ve had to generate a new GPG key for this release, and it takes a
>>> while for it to get mirrored to the lucene KEYS file.  I’ll hold off
>>> cutting the branch until everything is ready, so it will probably now be
>>> tomorrow UK time before I start the release proper.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 25 Feb 2020, at 07:49, Noble Paul  wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 9:35 PM Ignacio Vera  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 7:26 PM Jan Høydahl 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> That should give us time to update release docs for the new website too.
>>>
>>> Jan Høydahl
>>>
>>> 18. feb. 2020 kl. 18:28 skrev Adrien Grand :
>>>
>>> 
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 4:58 PM Alan Woodward 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> It’s been a while since we released lucene-solr 8.4, and we’ve
>>> accumulated quite a few nice new features since then.  I’d like to
>>> volunteer to be a release manager for an 8.5 release.  If there's
>>> agreement, then I plan to cut the release branch two weeks today, on
>>> Tuesday 3rd March.
>>>
>>> - Alan
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> 
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Adrien
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -
>>> Noble Paul
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> 
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>>