Re: Welcome Atri Sharma to the PMC

Welcome Atri! Tommaso On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 11:47, Namgyu Kim wrote: > Congratulations and welcome, Atri! :D > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 5:11 PM Noble Paul wrote: > >> Welcome Atri! >> >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 5:08 PM Dawid Weiss >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > Congratulations and welcome, Atri.

Re: Welcome Mayya Sharipova as Lucene/Solr committer

congrats and welcome onboard Mayya! Regards, Tommaso On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 19:27, Trey Grainger wrote: > Woohoo - awesome news! Congrats, Mayya! > > Trey Grainger > Founder, Searchkernel > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 12:58 PM jim ferenczi wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.5.2 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:30:49.112899] Regards, Tommaso On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 14:47, Michael McCandless wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:44:04.877619] > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 5:41 AM Andras Salamon > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> SUCCESS!

Re: [VOTE] Solr to become a top-level Apache project (TLP)

+1 (binding) Tommaso On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 09:37, Dawid Weiss wrote: > Dear Lucene and Solr developers! > > According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am > calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache > project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr

Re: Welcome Alessandro Benedetti as a Lucene/Solr committer

welcome on board Alessandro, well deserved! I still remember when we were sitting together in the same room having fun with Lucene/Solr a few years ago, keep up the good job ! Regards, Tommaso On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 14:01, David Smiley wrote: > Hi all, > > Please join me in welcoming

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.4.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [1:28:25.980994] Regards, Tommaso On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 04:34, Nhat Nguyen wrote: > +1 > SUCCESS! [0:57:57.529512] > > On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 6:04 PM Michael Sokolov > wrote: > >> SUCCESS! [1:21:34.167550] >> >> +1 >> >> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 2:56 PM Anshum Gupta >> wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.4.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:33:40.587556] On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 at 11:37, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:50:00.981792] > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 11:53 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.4.0 >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.3.1 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [1:30:05.298235] On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 16:20, MUNENDRA S N wrote: > > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:28:14.138771] > > > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 8:12 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > >> +1 >> >> SUCCESS! [1:52:34.599842] >> >> I still think https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13977 is >>

Re: Welcome Atri Sharma as Lucene/Solr committer

Congrats and welcome Atri! Regards, Tommaso On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 08:55, Atri Sharma wrote: > Thank you so much! > > On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 23:05, Furkan KAMACI > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Congrats Atri! >> >> Kind Regards, >> Furkan KAMACI >> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 5:47 PM Atri Sharma

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-6687) MLT term frequency calculation bug

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili updated LUCENE-6687: Fix Version/s: 8.1 > MLT term frequency calculation

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6687) MLT term frequency calculation bug

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16831521#comment-16831521 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-6687: - bq. Why do we show Fix Version 5.2.2? Was it really

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-6687) MLT term frequency calculation bug

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili updated LUCENE-6687: Fix Version/s: master (9.0) > MLT term frequency calculation

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6687) MLT term frequency calculation bug

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16801565#comment-16801565 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-6687: - thanks [~mbonaci] and [~alessandro.benedetti], I've

[jira] [Assigned] (LUCENE-6687) MLT term frequency calculation bug

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili reassigned LUCENE-6687: --- Assignee: Tommaso Teofili > MLT term frequency calculation

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-8659) Upgrade OpenNLP to 1.9.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili updated LUCENE-8659: Fix Version/s: 8.0 > Upgrade OpenNLP to 1.

Re: Lucene/Solr 8.0

blocker issues that are still open this leaves another week to work on a > patch and we can update the status at the end of the week in order to decide > if we can start the first build candidate > early next week. Would that work for you ? > > Le lun. 28 janv. 2019 à 10:19, Tommaso T

Re: Lucene/Solr 8.0

I'd like to backport https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8659 (upgrade to OpenNLP 1.9.1) to 8x branch, if there's still time. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno lun 28 gen 2019 alle ore 07:59 Adrien Grand ha scritto: > > Hi Noble, > > No it hasn't created yet. > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 3:55

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8659) Upgrade OpenNLP to 1.9.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16753205#comment-16753205 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-8659: - thanks [~steve_rowe], I've adjusted the checksums

[jira] [Reopened] (LUCENE-8659) Upgrade OpenNLP to 1.9.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili reopened LUCENE-8659: - > Upgrade OpenNLP to 1.9.1 > > > Key:

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-8659) Upgrade OpenNLP to 1.9.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili resolved LUCENE-8659. - Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Tommaso Teofili > Upgrade OpenNLP to 1.

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8659) Upgrade OpenNLP to 1.9.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16753010#comment-16753010 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-8659: - created [PR|https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-8659) Upgrade OpenNLP to 1.9.1

Tommaso Teofili created LUCENE-8659: --- Summary: Upgrade OpenNLP to 1.9.1 Key: LUCENE-8659 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8659 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Task

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-5698) Evaluate Lucene classification on publicly available datasets

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili resolved LUCENE-5698. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: trunk > Evaluate Lucene classificat

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5698) Evaluate Lucene classification on publicly available datasets

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16746633#comment-16746633 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-5698: - created PR at https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr

Re: Congratulations to the new Lucene/Solr PMC chair, Cassandra Targett

Congrats Cassandra! Il giorno mer 2 gen 2019 alle ore 12:43 Shalin Shekhar Mangar ha scritto: > > Congratulations Cassandra! > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 1:08 PM Adrien Grand wrote: >> >> Every year, the Lucene PMC rotates the Lucene PMC chair and Apache >> Vice President position. >> >> This

Re: Welcome Gus Heck as Lucene/Solr committer

welcome Gus! Regards, Tommaso Il giorno mar 6 nov 2018 alle ore 01:24 Christian Moen ha scritto: > > Congrats, Gus! > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:11 AM Otis Gospodnetić > wrote: >> >> Another welcome, Gus! >> >> Otis >> -- >> Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection >> Solr &

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12879) Query Parser for MinHash/LSH

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16676322#comment-16676322 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on SOLR-12879: [~andyhind] I think a separate issue is not needed

Re: Welcome Tim Allison as a Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Tim!!! Tommaso Il giorno ven 2 nov 2018 alle ore 22:30 Steve Rowe ha scritto: > > Welcome Tim! > > Steve > > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 12:20 PM Erick Erickson > wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Please join me in welcoming Tim Allison as the latest Lucene/Solr committer! >> >> Congratulations

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12879) Query Parser for MinHash/LSH

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16663405#comment-16663405 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on SOLR-12879: it should be back to green now, thanks [~steve_rowe

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-12879) Query Parser for MinHash/LSH

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16660186#comment-16660186 ] Tommaso Teofili edited comment on SOLR-12879 at 10/23/18 7:12 AM: -- +1

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-12879) Query Parser for MinHash/LSH

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16660186#comment-16660186 ] Tommaso Teofili edited comment on SOLR-12879 at 10/23/18 7:12 AM: -- +1

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12879) Query Parser for MinHash/LSH

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16660186#comment-16660186 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on SOLR-12879: +1 for backporting to 7.x branch. bq. the parser could

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-12879) Query Parser for MinHash/LSH

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili resolved SOLR-12879. Resolution: Fixed thanks [~andyhind] for your patch, it's now committed on master

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-12879) Query Parser for MinHash/LSH

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili reassigned SOLR-12879: -- Assignee: Tommaso Teofili > Query Parser for MinHash/

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12879) Query Parser for MinHash/LSH

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16653938#comment-16653938 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on SOLR-12879: bq. Should the score from the overall query

Re: LSH/MinHash

Hi Andy, It would be very nice if you could do that and I'd be very interested in reviewing and helping out with the patch. I have been using that filter for a while with my own query bits; a full fledged query parser would surely be a very useful contribution. Regards, Tommaso Il giorno lun 15

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.5.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:23:18.214164] Il giorno mer 19 set 2018 alle ore 14:39 Adrien Grand ha scritto: > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:30:09.416660] > > Le mer. 19 sept. 2018 à 12:21, Andrzej Białecki a écrit : >> >> +1 >> >> SUCCESS! [1:42:09.201482] >> >> >> On 19 Sep 2018, at 03:56, Shalin Shekhar Mangar >>

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

+1 Tommaso Il giorno mar 5 giu 2018 alle ore 14:53 Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> ha scritto: > +1 > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 4:24 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> We released 7.3 two months ago on April 4th and

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8331) MergePolicy simulator utility

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16493290#comment-16493290 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-8331: - bq. I think it should support deletes and should

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-8162) Make it possible to throttle (Tiered)MergePolicy when commit rate is high

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16492469#comment-16492469 ] Tommaso Teofili edited comment on LUCENE-8162 at 5/28/18 10:05 AM

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-8162) Make it possible to throttle (Tiered)MergePolicy when commit rate is high

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16492469#comment-16492469 ] Tommaso Teofili edited comment on LUCENE-8162 at 5/28/18 10:04 AM

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8162) Make it possible to throttle (Tiered)MergePolicy when commit rate is high

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16492469#comment-16492469 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-8162: - {quote}but many users index at full speed for a long

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-8162) Make it possible to throttle (Tiered)MergePolicy when commit rate is high

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili updated LUCENE-8162: Attachment: LUCENE-8162.0.patch > Make it possible to throttle (Tiered)MergePolicy w

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.3.1 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [2:41:456007] Il giorno dom 13 mag 2018 alle ore 05:59 Ahmet Arslan ha scritto: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:19:56.690027] > > Ahmet > > > > > On Saturday, May 12, 2018, 12:41:16 AM GMT+3, Michael McCandless < > luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > > > > > > +1 >

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8162) Make it possible to throttle (Tiered)MergePolicy when commit rate is high

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16468743#comment-16468743 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-8162: - [~mikemccand] any suggestions on how to make "rel

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-8162) Make it possible to throttle (Tiered)MergePolicy when commit rate is high

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16355374#comment-16355374 ] Tommaso Teofili edited comment on LUCENE-8162 at 5/9/18 11:49 AM

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-8223) CachingNaiveBayesClassifierTest.testPerformance() fails on slow machines

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili resolved LUCENE-8223. - Resolution: Fixed > CachingNaiveBayesClassifierTest.testPerformance() fails on s

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-8223) CachingNaiveBayesClassifierTest.testPerformance() fails on slow machines

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili updated LUCENE-8223: Fix Version/s: 7.4 trunk

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-8223) CachingNaiveBayesClassifierTest.testPerformance() fails on slow machines

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili updated LUCENE-8223: Component/s: modules/classification > CachingNaiveBayesClassifierTest.testPerforma

[jira] [Assigned] (LUCENE-8223) CachingNaiveBayesClassifierTest.testPerformance() fails on slow machines

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili reassigned LUCENE-8223: --- Assignee: Tommaso Teofili > CachingNaiveBayesClassifierTest.testPerformance() fa

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8223) CachingNaiveBayesClassifierTest.testPerformance() fails on slow machines

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16413630#comment-16413630 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-8223: - agreed [~romseygeek], will remove such time based

NLP - OSS workshop @ ACL 2018

Hi all (sorry for cross posting), this year ACL 2018 [1] will run a workshop on NLP in the open source [2]. CFP is open until March 25th, you can find the list of topics at [3]. Here's the list of invited speakers: - Christopher Manning, Stanford University - Matthew Honnibal and Ines Montani,

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-5351) More Like This Handler uses only first field in mlt.fl when using stream.body

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16382048#comment-16382048 ] Tommaso Teofili edited comment on SOLR-5351 at 3/1/18 2:19 PM: --- +1 thanks

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5351) More Like This Handler uses only first field in mlt.fl when using stream.body

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16382048#comment-16382048 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on SOLR-5351: --- +1 thanks [~dweiss] , the patch looks good to me, thanks

Re: Test failures are out of control......

+1, agree with Adrien, thanks for bringing this up Erick! Il giorno mer 21 feb 2018 alle ore 17:15 Adrien Grand ha scritto: > Thanks for bringing this up Erick. I agree with you we should silence > those frequent failures. Like you said, the side-effects of not silencing >

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8162) Make it possible to throttle (Tiered)MergePolicy when commit rate is high

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16355374#comment-16355374 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-8162: - the class in Oak is a fork of TMP, but the one

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-8162) Make it possible to throttle (Tiered)MergePolicy when commit rate is high

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili updated LUCENE-8162: Description: As discussed in a recent mailing list thread [1] and observed in a project

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-8162) Make it possible to throttle (Tiered)MergePolicy when commit rate is high

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili updated LUCENE-8162: Description: As discussed in a recent mailing list thread [1] and observed in a project

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-8162) Make it possible to throttle (Tiered)MergePolicy when commit rate is high

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili updated LUCENE-8162: Description: As discussed in a [recent mailing list thread|[http://markmail.org/message

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-8162) Make it possible to throttle (Tiered)MergePolicy when commit rate is high

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili updated LUCENE-8162: Description: As discussed in a [recent mailing list thread|[http://markmail.org/message

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-8162) Make it possible to throttle (Tiered)MergePolicy when commit rate is high

Tommaso Teofili created LUCENE-8162: --- Summary: Make it possible to throttle (Tiered)MergePolicy when commit rate is high Key: LUCENE-8162 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8162

Re: Welcome Ahmet Arslan as Lucene/Solr committer

congrats and welcome Ahmet! Regards, Tommaso Il giorno lun 18 dic 2017 alle ore 05:48 Christian Moen ha scritto: > Congratulations! > > > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 7:15 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Please join me in welcoming Ahmet Arslan as the

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-2899) Add OpenNLP Analysis capabilities as a module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16289246#comment-16289246 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-2899: - looks good to me, thanks Steve! > Add Open

Re: Welcome Ishan Chattopadhyaya to the PMC

congrats and welcome Ishan! Tommaso Il giorno mar 12 dic 2017 alle ore 12:13 Shalin Shekhar Mangar < shalinman...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Congratulations and welcome Ishan! > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Adrien Grand wrote: > > I am pleased to announce that Ishan

Re: Welcome Noble Paul to the PMC

congrats and welcome Noble! Tommaso Il giorno lun 20 nov 2017 alle ore 10:19 Alan Woodward ha scritto: > Congratulations Noble! > > Alan Woodward > www.flax.co.uk > > > On 19 Nov 2017, at 20:02, Adrien Grand wrote: > > I am pleased to announce that Noble

Congratulations to the new Lucene/Solr PMC Chair, Adrien Grand

Once a year the Lucene PMC rotates the PMC chair and Apache Vice President position. This year we have nominated and elected Adrien Grand as the chair and today the board just approved it, so now it's official. Congratulations Adrien! Regards, Tommaso

Re: Making "routing" strategies for writing segments explicit ?

ity for this. > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 9:55 AM Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> having been involved in such kind of challenge and having seen a few more >> similar enquiries on the dev list, I was wonderi

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7991) KNearestNeighborDocumentClassifier.knnSearch applies previous boosted field's factor to subsequent unboosted fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16207191#comment-16207191 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-7991: - thanks [~cpoerschke], sure, it looks good to me

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.2 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [3:44:31.153413] Il giorno lun 16 ott 2017 alle ore 17:41 Steve Rowe ha scritto: > +1 > > Docs, changes and javadocs look good. > > Smoke tester says: SUCCESS! [0:27:54.146682] > > -- > Steve > www.lucidworks.com > > > On Oct 15, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Ishan

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.1.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [3:56:51.561738] Il giorno lun 16 ott 2017 alle ore 06:00 Yonik Seeley ha scritto: > +1 > > -Yonik > > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > > +1 > > > > Changes, docs and javadocs look good. > > > > Smoke tester says: SUCCESS!

Making "routing" strategies for writing segments explicit ?

Hi all, having been involved in such kind of challenge and having seen a few more similar enquiries on the dev list, I was wondering if it may be time to think about making it possible to have an explicit (customizable and therefore pluggable) policy which allows people to chime into where

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.1.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [3:35:06.139114] Il giorno gio 12 ott 2017 alle ore 13:20 Shalin Shekhar Mangar < sha...@apache.org> ha scritto: > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 7.1.0 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.0.1 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [2:16:41.101128] Il giorno mar 3 ott 2017 alle ore 10:56 Dawid Weiss ha scritto: > +1. > > SUCCESS! [0:56:08.500826] > > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 7.0.1 > > >

Re: Proposal: create @since Javadoc tags for URPs, Analyzers

I fully agree on adding @since. BTW I still feel that Solr should have stricter javadoc rules in general (kind of the same Lucene has) for developers to read easier through the code. Tommaso Il giorno mar 3 ott 2017 alle ore 18:50 Alexandre Rafalovitch < arafa...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > I

Re: n dimensional points proximity search

FloatPoint KNN impl to the sandbox > module: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7974>. Not a > scoring function though. > > -- > Steve > www.lucidworks.com > > > On Oct 3, 2017, at 4:09 AM, Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> > wrote: >

n dimensional points proximity search

Hi all, is it possible to use lucene-spatial for n dimensional points kind of the same way we use it for 2/3d ? My goal is to use such n dimensional points for proximity search (nearest neighbour) as a scoring function . Regards, Tommaso

Re: Welcome Hrishikesh Gadre as Lucene/Solr committer

Congrats and welcome Hrishikesh ! Tommaso Il giorno sab 30 set 2017 alle ore 16:39 Otis Gospodnetic < otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Welcome, Hrishikesh! > > Otis > -- > http://sematext.com > > > On Sep 29, 2017, at 13:23, Yonik Seeley wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > >

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-7981) ClassificationTestBase should check if result is null

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili resolved LUCENE-7981. - Resolution: Fixed > ClassificationTestBase should check if result is n

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7981) ClassificationTestBase should check if result is null

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili updated LUCENE-7981: Priority: Trivial (was: Major) > ClassificationTestBase should check if result is n

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-7981) ClassificationTestBase should check if result is null

Tommaso Teofili created LUCENE-7981: --- Summary: ClassificationTestBase should check if result is null Key: LUCENE-7981 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7981 Project: Lucene - Core

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene/Solr 7.0.0 RC3

SUCCESS! [4:47:50.042814] +1 for me too, then a quick bugfix release which includes also SOLR-11348 Il giorno lun 11 set 2017 alle ore 19:08 Anshum Gupta ha scritto: > I have the same opinion. I’ll let this vote run :) > > -Anshum > > > > On Sep 11, 2017, at 7:52 AM, Steve

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7950) SimpleNaiveBayesDocumentClassifier throws NPE if no docs have the class field

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili updated LUCENE-7950: Affects Version/s: 6.6 > SimpleNaiveBayesDocumentClassifier throws NPE if no docs h

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-7950) SimpleNaiveBayesDocumentClassifier throws NPE if no docs have the class field

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili resolved LUCENE-7950. - Resolution: Fixed > SimpleNaiveBayesDocumentClassifier throws NPE if no docs h

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-7950) SimpleNaiveBayesDocumentClassifier throws NPE if no docs have the class field

Tommaso Teofili created LUCENE-7950: --- Summary: SimpleNaiveBayesDocumentClassifier throws NPE if no docs have the class field Key: LUCENE-7950 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7950

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene/Solr 7.0.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [4:03:59.484041] Tommaso Il giorno ven 1 set 2017 alle ore 00:55 Andrzej Białecki < andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> ha scritto: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:57:58.000161] > > On 31 Aug 2017, at 14:18, Jan Høydahl wrote: > > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:57:25.968248] > > I

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7915) Avoid looping over merge segments in best merge selection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16109841#comment-16109841 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-7915: - thanks! > Avoid looping over merge segments in b

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-7915) Avoid looping over merge segments in best merge selection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili resolved LUCENE-7915. - Resolution: Fixed > Avoid looping over merge segments in best merge select

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7915) Avoid looping over merge segments in best merge selection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili updated LUCENE-7915: Fix Version/s: 7.1 > Avoid looping over merge segments in best merge select

Re: merge policy vs commit rates

ponent" (Mike's ™ [1]) behaves. My 2 cents, Tommaso [1] : http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2011/02/visualizing-lucenes-segment-merges.html > > Le mar. 1 août 2017 à 10:59, Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> > a écrit : > >> Hi all, >> >> latel

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-7915) Avoid looping over merge segments in best merge selection

Tommaso Teofili created LUCENE-7915: --- Summary: Avoid looping over merge segments in best merge selection Key: LUCENE-7915 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7915 Project: Lucene

merge policy vs commit rates

Hi all, lately I am looking a bit closer at merge policies, of course particularly at the tiered one, and I was wondering if we can mitigate the amount of possibly avoidable merges in high commit rates scenarios, especially when a high percentage of the commits happens on same docs. I've observed

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8492) Add LogisticRegressionQuery and LogitStream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16102919#comment-16102919 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on SOLR-8492: --- sure Joel, I'll have a look and let you know. >

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-7838) Add a knn classifier based on fuzzified term queries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili resolved LUCENE-7838. - Resolution: Fixed I'm marking this as resolved, improvements will come in subsequent

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7838) Add a knn classifier based on fuzzified term queries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili updated LUCENE-7838: Summary: Add a knn classifier based on fuzzified term queries (was: Add a knn classifier

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7838) Add a knn classifier based on fuzzy like this

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16067962#comment-16067962 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-7838: - I've removed the dependency on the sandbox module

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-7274) Add LogisticRegressionDocumentClassifier

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tommaso Teofili resolved LUCENE-7274. - Resolution: Won't Fix > Add LogisticRegressionDocumentClassif

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7838) Add a knn classifier based on fuzzy like this

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16031313#comment-16031313 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-7838: - as per related thread on dev@ I'll drop the dependency

Re: [DISCUSS] Sandbox module dependencies

I agree with Adrien about assumptions on core and other modules ("core may not depend on anything (either libraries or other modules) and modules may not depend on other modules"). Now that we're at it we should probably check modules that contain "exceptions" and check them on a case by case

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC5

+1 SUCCESS! [2:29:35.127006] Tommaso Il giorno mer 31 mag 2017 alle ore 11:48 Adrien Grand ha scritto: > +1 SUCCESS! [2:15:24.428078] > > Le mer. 31 mai 2017 à 09:05, Martijn v Groningen < > martijn.v.gronin...@gmail.com> a écrit : > >> +1 >> >> SUCCESS! [1:22:57.327825] >>

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7838) Add a knn classifier based on fuzzy like this

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16027295#comment-16027295 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-7838: - bq. you added a dependency on the sandbox module from

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >