[RESULT][VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2

Could I backport it to branch_9_0? >>>> >>>> Tomoko >>>> >>>> >>>> 2021年11月25日(木) 3:46 Uwe Schindler : >>>>> >>>>> See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10260 >>>>> >>>>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2

ra/browse/LUCENE-10260 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> - >>>> >>>> Uwe Schindler >>>> >>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >>>> >>>> https://www.thetaphi.de >>>> >>>> eMai

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2

>> 2021年11月25日(木) 3:46 Uwe Schindler : >> >>> See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10260 >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> >>> Uwe Schindler >>> >>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >>> >>> https://www.t

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2

ee: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10260 >> >> >> >> - >> >> Uwe Schindler >> >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >> >> https://www.thetaphi.de >> >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >> >> >> *From:* Uwe Schindler

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2

* Uwe Schindler > *Sent:* Wednesday, November 24, 2021 7:44 PM > *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org > *Subject:* RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2 > > > > I found another bug in Luke: > > > > Implementation version no longer shows. May have to do wi

RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2

ct: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2 I found another bug in Luke: Implementation version no longer shows. May have to do with this class LuceneVersion no longer getting Implementation-Version from the module JAR. This is not serious, but would be good to fix in a respin. Will open

RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2

Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Uwe Schindler > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 7:00 PM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2 > > Hi, > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2

solr-9.0.0, too  > > Uwe > > - > Uwe Schindler > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > https://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > -Original Message- > > From: Adrien Grand > > Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2021 9:40 AM > > To: Lucene Dev &g

RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2

hterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Adrien Grand > Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2021 9:40 AM > To: Lucene Dev > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2 > > Please vote for release candidate

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [0:21:35.63292] On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 2:10 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.0.0 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75 > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2

SUCCESS! [0:17:25.661795] I checked Windows artifacts and scripts. +1. Dawid On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 9:40 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.0.0 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2

Hi Jan, thanks for testing and reporting it. > Minor: Luke started on macOS Monterey complains about Times font not being > available: > Warning: the fonts "Times" and "Times" are not available for the Java logical > font "Serif", which may have unexpected appearance or behavior. Re-enable the

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2

and ... now all the tests are passing; no change to Lucene needed. On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 5:22 PM Michael Sokolov wrote: > > I ran the smoke tester to SUCCESS! - sorry, I lost the timing in my > terminal scrollback, but it is so fast :) Also ran unit tests of our > service after upgrading, and

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2

I ran the smoke tester to SUCCESS! - sorry, I lost the timing in my terminal scrollback, but it is so fast :) Also ran unit tests of our service after upgrading, and although there are some fails, it all looks like we are stumbling over our own feet - not Lucene issues. +1 to release On Tue, Nov

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [0:19:28.854798] On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 1:20 PM Robert Muir wrote: > Thanks Adrien for addressing one half of the back compat problem. > > Unfortunately, the "branch_8x" branch is still live and running hot, > same as before. > So I have to again give my -1 VOTE, due to the fact

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2

Thanks Adrien for addressing one half of the back compat problem. Unfortunately, the "branch_8x" branch is still live and running hot, same as before. So I have to again give my -1 VOTE, due to the fact that backwards compatibility can't be guaranteed. Given that it is being expanded to TWO major

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [0:20:30.247277] Ran smoketester and browsed around the archives. Lincense and Notice on top-level of src dist looks good. Tested launching Luke from bin/luke.sh - OK Minor: Luke started on macOS Monterey complains about Times font not being available: > Warning: the fonts "Times"

[VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2

Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.0.0 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev-95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75 You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: python3 -u