row. Will run them now.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Aug 6, 2016 5:13 PM, "Andrew Palumbo" <ap@outlook.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> We will likely move to Java 8 at some point of course, but I
> > personally
> > >>>> would not be inclined to
>
> Someone will review the PR shortly.
>
>
> And these ran w/o issue for you in cluster mode, correct?
>
>
> Andy
>
>
> From: Raviteja Lokineni <raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 9:01:08 PM
> To:
ou in cluster mode, correct?
>
>
> Andy
>
>
> From: Raviteja Lokineni <raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 9:01:08 PM
> To: mahout
> Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
>
> Submitted another
;>> work is Scala-based, and this (the lucene dep.) is only used in legacy
>>>> components. Admittedly though, one useful legacy component.Were you
>>>> able to get the examples to run in pseudo-cluster mode with lucene 6?
>>>>
>>>>
>>&g
gt; work is Scala-based, and this (the lucene dep.) is only used in legacy
>>>> components. Admittedly though, one useful legacy component.Were you
>>>> able to get the examples to run in pseudo-cluster mode with lucene 6?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
gt;>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap@outlook.com>
>>> Sent: Saturday, August 6, 2016 5:03:45 PM
>>> To: dev@mah
seudo-cluster mode with lucene 6?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, August 6, 2016 5:03:45 PM
>> To: dev
___
> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap@outlook.com>
> Sent: Saturday, August 6, 2016 5:03:45 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
>
> Thank you Raviteja, this is something that we will have to discuss.
>
> ___
to get the
examples to run in pseudo-cluster mode with lucene 6?
Thanks,
Andy
From: Andrew Palumbo <ap@outlook.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 6, 2016 5:03:45 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
Thank you Ra
Thank you Raviteja, this is something that we will have to discuss.
From: Raviteja Lokineni <raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 11:41:09 PM
To: mahout
Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
Guys, found an issue luce
Cluster.html#
> Pseudo-Distributed_Operation
>
>
> Thanks very much,
>
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 2:38 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lu
y much,
Andy
From: Andrew Palumbo <ap@outlook.com>
Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 2:38 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
Ahh- yes I think we started removing MAHOUT_LOCAL capability I see the check
for
.
From: Raviteja Lokineni <raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 2:28:08 PM
To: mahout
Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
Nope in a Linux environment.
On Aug 5, 2016 2:21 PM, "Suneel Marthi" <smar...@apache.org> wrote:
> r
ion (2), cluster-reuters.sh option (1) pr
> > (2)
> > > > and
> > > > > classify-20newsgroups.sh option 1 in (pseudo)cluster mode if
> > possible?
> > > > >
> > > > > This would to ensure that seq2sparse is working correct
oups.sh option 1 in (pseudo)cluster mode if
> possible?
> > > >
> > > > This would to ensure that seq2sparse is working correctly which
> relies
> > > > heavily on lucene.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks again for the great contribution.
> >
to ensure that seq2sparse is working correctly which relies
> > > heavily on lucene.
> > >
> > > Thanks again for the great contribution.
> > >
> > > Andy
> > >
> > >
> > > Original message
> > > From: Rav
ies
> > heavily on lucene.
> >
> > Thanks again for the great contribution.
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >
> > Original message --------
> > From: Raviteja Lokineni <raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com>
> > Date: 08/05/2016 12:42 PM (GMT-05:00)
eavily on lucene.
>
> Thanks again for the great contribution.
>
> Andy
>
>
> Original message
> From: Raviteja Lokineni <raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com>
> Date: 08/05/2016 12:42 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: mahout <dev@mahout.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: M
again for the great contribution.
Andy
Original message
From: Raviteja Lokineni <raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com>
Date: 08/05/2016 12:42 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: mahout <dev@mahout.apache.org>
Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
Just a FYI, all the tests are successfu
16 12:14:24 PM
> To: mahout
> Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
>
> Yay! for the heads up on merging.
>
> FYI, I take back my word on failure on windows though. I had to include the
> hadoop.dll file on PATH. Tests are running (I am running it just to satisfy
> mysel
+1
From: Raviteja Lokineni <raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 12:14:24 PM
To: mahout
Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
Yay! for the heads up on merging.
FYI, I take back my word on failure on windows though. I had to i
3.3.3,
> > >>> java >= 1.7,
> > >>> MAHOUT_HOME=/path/to/install,
> > >>>
> > >>> also MAHOUT_LOCAL=true
> > >>>
> > >>> If ur not running against a hadoop cluster. (Looks like ur not)
> >
;> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Maven >= 3.3.3,
> >>> java >= 1.7,
> >>> MAHOUT_HOME=/path/to/install,
> >>>
> >>> also MAHOUT_LOCAL=true
> >>>
> >>> If ur not running against a hadoop cluste
r not)
>>>
>>> Upgrading this dep is not a trivial task.
>>>
>>>
>>> Original message
>>> From: Raviteja Lokineni <raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com>
>>> Date: 08/04/2016 6:09 PM (GMT-05:00)
>>> To: mahout
st.java:881)
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap@outlook.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Actually, Travis CI is not set up to test all mahout modules. Could you
>> > please test again on your local machine, and report any errors.
>>
pgrading this dep is not a trivial task.
>
>
> Original message
> From: Raviteja Lokineni <raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com>
> Date: 08/04/2016 6:09 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: mahout <dev@mahout.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
&
Date: 08/04/2016 6:09 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: mahout <dev@mahout.apache.org>
Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
Are there any pre-requisites to run tests on local machines?
Most of the MR module tests failed with:
java.lang.NullPointerException: null
at __randomizedtes
; Original message
> From: Raviteja Lokineni <raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com>
> Date: 08/04/2016 4:01 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: mahout <dev@mahout.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
>
> All the tests are successful even with my code
t <dev@mahout.apache.org>
Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
All the tests are successful even with my code change and upgrade to
Lucene. (The test failure that I reported above was on my local machine, I
guess you can ignore that.)
So is this pull request good to merge?
https://githu
All the tests are successful even with my code change and upgrade to
Lucene. (The test failure that I reported above was on my local machine, I
guess you can ignore that.)
So is this pull request good to merge?
https://github.com/apache/mahout/pull/247
Most of the MR tests are failing with:
java.lang.NullPointerException: null
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([C8C254E3D9D80CC9:845EFDB07D41873E]:0)
at java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(ProcessBuilder.java:1012)
at org.apache.hadoop.util.Shell.runCommand(Shell.java:445)
at
31 matches
Mail list logo
