Re: PMML

2015-03-05 Thread Suneel Marthi
t; Sent from my iPhone > >> > >>> On Mar 4, 2015, at 4:17 PM, Andrew Musselman < > > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com > >> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Sure, those would be options. > >>> > >>>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Sa

Re: PMML

2015-03-05 Thread Pat Ferrel
>>> Sure, those would be options. >>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Saikat Kanjilal > > wrote: >>>> >>>> Question, is there a way to introduce PMML with using a more > lightweight >>>> format like yaml or json? >>&

Re: PMML

2015-03-05 Thread Ted Dunning
t; > wrote: > > >> > > >> Question, is there a way to introduce PMML with using a more > lightweight > > >> format like yaml or json? > > >> > > >>> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 13:25:29 -0800 > > >>> Subject: Re: PMML

Re: PMML

2015-03-04 Thread Andrew Musselman
be options. > > > >> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Saikat Kanjilal > wrote: > >> > >> Question, is there a way to introduce PMML with using a more lightweight > >> format like yaml or json? > >> > >>> Date: Wed, 4 M

Re: PMML

2015-03-04 Thread Saikat Kanjilal
son? >> >>> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 13:25:29 -0800 >>> Subject: Re: PMML >>> From: andrew.mussel...@gmail.com >>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org >>> >>> Yes, the limitations are often an issue for people doing things that >> aren't >

Re: PMML

2015-03-04 Thread Andrew Musselman
Sure, those would be options. On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Saikat Kanjilal wrote: > Question, is there a way to introduce PMML with using a more lightweight > format like yaml or json? > > > Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 13:25:29 -0800 > > Subject: Re: PMML > > From:

RE: PMML

2015-03-04 Thread Saikat Kanjilal
Question, is there a way to introduce PMML with using a more lightweight format like yaml or json? > Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 13:25:29 -0800 > Subject: Re: PMML > From: andrew.mussel...@gmail.com > To: dev@mahout.apache.org > > Yes, the limitations are often an issue for people

Re: PMML

2015-03-04 Thread Andrew Musselman
Yes, the limitations are often an issue for people doing things that aren't in the PMML spec yet; there could be room for suggesting new features in the spec by building them though, I suppose. Also agree that XML is a lousy/bloated way of representing stuff like this, but in the end it's just a c

Re: PMML

2015-03-04 Thread Dmitriy Lyubimov
I am willing to +1 any contribution at this point. my previous company used pmml to serialize simple stuff, but i don't have first hand experience. Its flexibility is ultimately pretty limited, isn't it? And xml is ultimately a media which is too ugly and too verbose at the same time to represent

Re: PMML

2015-03-03 Thread Suneel Marthi
It makes sense to support PMML for classification and clustering tasks to be able to share and distribute trained models. Sean, Pat, Dmitriy and Ted please chime in. PMML support in Mahout was talked about for a long time now but never really got any traction to take off. +1 to build this. On Tu