On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Suneel Marthi
wrote:
> It should work fine with Java 1.7. Mahout's presently at Lucene 4.6.x and
> Lucene versions >= 4.7 mandate JDK 1.7.
>
For what it's worth, the current version of Lucene is 4.9.
n official version. Or as I said just make a quick fix on the building
> from source page.
>
>
>
>
> > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 14:21:36 -0700
> > Subject: Re: Requiring Java 1.7 for Mahout
> > From: dlie...@gmail.com
> > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> >
>
econd-order and deeper, not immediate.
> Did
> > you try to compile it yet?
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Andrew Palumbo
> wrote:
> >
> > > also sorry- btw- I assuming 1500 will be merged..
> > >
> > > &
uick fix on the building from source page.
> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 14:21:36 -0700
> Subject: Re: Requiring Java 1.7 for Mahout
> From: dlie...@gmail.com
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>
> I am not sure if it actually would require 1.7 to build either, since my
> understanding depe
t; > From: ap@outlook.com
> > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: Requiring Java 1.7 for Mahout
> > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 16:56:39 -0400
> >
> > oracle?
> >
> > > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 13:54:43 -0700
> > > Subject: Re: Requiri
My own feeling is that 1.6 is finally dying out and officially moving to
1.7 allows some nice capabilities which assist in writing reliable code.
Of the major changes, here are my reactions after about a year of using
1.7 seriously:
IO and New IO - The nio package is significantly better and more
also sorry- btw- I assuming 1500 will be merged..
> From: ap@outlook.com
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Requiring Java 1.7 for Mahout
> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 16:56:39 -0400
>
> oracle?
>
> > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 13:54:43 -0700
> > Subject:
oracle?
> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 13:54:43 -0700
> Subject: Re: Requiring Java 1.7 for Mahout
> From: dlie...@gmail.com
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>
> or testing.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote:
>
> > My current java is
to push or
> require 1.7.
>
> Just checking our bases, so I'll drop it if there's no problem here.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
> > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 13:33:19 -0700
> > Subject: Re: Requiring Java 1.7 for Mahout
> > From: dlie...@gmail.com
> > To
mething about being limited to our current lucene version
>> though by 1.6 so i am wondering if this is may be a good time to push or
>> require 1.7.
>>
>> Just checking our bases, so I'll drop it if there's no problem here.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
0700
> Subject: Re: Requiring Java 1.7 for Mahout
> From: dlie...@gmail.com
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>
> the only problem is that we are not really requiring it. We are not using
> anything of 1.7 functionality. If people compile (as i do) Mahout, they can
> compile any bytecode ver
the only problem is that we are not really requiring it. We are not using
anything of 1.7 functionality. If people compile (as i do) Mahout, they can
compile any bytecode version they want.
There are some 1.7 artifact dependencies in H20 but 1.7 would be required
at run time only and only if the p
As far as I can tell there should be no problems with declaring Java 1.7 as the
official minimum Java version for building and running Mahout. Are there any
objections to this or problems that I am missing?
Andy
13 matches
Mail list logo
