My votes are:
Your company. Your data. Your Office. (A, C, D) - 1
Free Your Files (A) - 2
Upgrade to Open Standards (A, B, C) - 3
Hackers Wanted (C, G) - 4
Open. For Business. (A, C, D) - 5
Today's Office. Tomorrow's Standard. (A, B, D) - 6 (Maybe reworded to
Tomorrow's Standard in Today's
Hi,
even if Steven Sheldon and myself think it to be important having a
single official positioner for corporate and visual identity
reasons (I wanted to put a logo with positioner for download at the
logo gallery) most of you seem not interested in that theme.
(During my writing Konrad did
On 9/26/05, Bernhard Dippold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
even if Steven Sheldon and myself think it to be important having a
single official positioner for corporate and visual identity
reasons (I wanted to put a logo with positioner for download at the
logo gallery) most of you seem not
Hi
Two more articles to point out:
(1) The Minnesota Daily writes about the waste on MSO when OOo could
have been used at university
http://www.mndaily.com/articles/2005/09/23/65277
http://ooonewsletter.blogspot.com/2005/09/university-wastes-millions-on-software.html
(2) Massachusetts Makes
THE largest tender yet issued for open-source software has been
released by the State Information Technology Agency (Sita), formalising
its plans to switch from brand-name packages to the free-to-use
alternatives.
Sita is offering three-year deals to supply software and technical
support so that
On Sep 26, 2005, at 5:15 AM, Deepankar Datta wrote:
Hi
Two more articles to point out:
(1) The Minnesota Daily writes about the waste on MSO when OOo could
have been used at university
http://www.mndaily.com/articles/2005/09/23/65277
Bernhard Dippold wrote:
I wanted the CC to discuss this topic at Koper, therefore close the
voting tonight. By now this seems not to be possible, so tell me what
to do:
- nothing at all (drop the idea of a central positioner)
- wait until tonight for many many postings
- extend the time for
Hi Chad, *
Chad Smith wrote:
On 9/26/05, Bernhard Dippold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
even if Steven Sheldon and myself think it to be important
having a single official positioner for corporate and visual
identity reasons (I wanted to put a logo with positioner for
download at the
I hope I've understood the voting algorithm. I am excercising my right to
only use some of my votes :-)
For what it's worth, I've also included comments on some of those for which
I didn't vote.
Open. For Business. (A, C, D)
10 points - clear winner for me.
Passion Unleashed (A, G)
5 points
Steven Shelton wrote:
Bernhard Dippold wrote:
I wanted the CC to discuss this topic at Koper, therefore close the
voting tonight. By now this seems not to be possible, so tell me what
to do:
- nothing at all (drop the idea of a central positioner)
- wait until tonight for many many
Open. For Business. (A, C, D)
10
Free Your Files (A)
9
Can't really choose from the rest, yes even mine. ;)
--
Adam Moore
Community Volunteer
OOo blog: AdamMooreOOo.blogspot.com http://AdamMooreOOo.blogspot.com
Please reverse my votes - I misunderstood the voting structure.
-Chad
On 9/26/05, Chad Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My votes are:
Your company. Your data. Your Office. (A, C, D) - 1
Free Your Files (A) - 2
Upgrade to Open Standards (A, B, C) - 3
Hackers Wanted (C, G) - 4
Open. For
Forwarded Jeans so it has the subject of the rest of the votes so it will be
easy to find all the votes.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jean Hollis Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sep 26, 2005 2:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Marketing] No interest in official positioner?
To:
Chad Smith wrote:
On 9/26/05, Bernhard Dippold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope voting is less confusing by now.
- 10 points for the best positioner
- 9 points for the second
- 8 for the third
...
- 2 for the ninth best
- 1 for the tenth best
In that case, please reverse my votes. :-)
Chad Smith wrote:
Today's Office. Tomorrow's Standard. (A, B, D) - 6 (Maybe reworded to
Tomorrow's Standard in Today's Office. - lead with the future. So it's
like The future - today. instead of Today is the future.)
I like that, too. :-)
AND PEOPLE, IT'S SHELTON! WITH A FRICKIN' T!!!
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 15:31 +0200, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
[snip]
Do you know the schedule of the CC meeting? I don't know even the
day they meet. And we'll have to include it in the Style Manual
before they decide about it.
[snip]
It's Wednesday afternoon:
16 matches
Mail list logo