Re: [Marketing] Re: Brilliant marketing campaign

2006-06-30 Thread Chad Smith
On 6/30/06, eric b <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Le 30 juin 06 à 22:05, Chad Smith a écrit : > The Community Manager. I'm not sure you are aware : OpenOffice.org project is managed by a Community Council. What means "Community Manager" ? Louis is the Community Manager.- http://www.openoffic

Re: [Marketing] Re: Brilliant marketing campaign

2006-06-30 Thread Adam Moore
On 6/30/06, André Wyrwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I'll explain in more detail: why.openoffice.org/: ./index.html (page with current campain (almost copy of keepthecar.html)) ./keepthecar.html (page with keep the car campain) ./getlegal.html (page with get legal campain) ./..

Re: [Marketing] Re: Brilliant marketing campaign

2006-06-30 Thread Bernhard Dippold
Hi John, John McCreesh wrote: On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 11:32 +0200, Marko Moeller wrote: [snip] Yes, indeed the new Site and the idea behind is really good! Replacing the site content of the old get-legal campaign isn't! [snip] The reason for taking this approach was: The "real" (permanent) w

Re: [Marketing] OOo Mac OS X port - VS - NeoOffice.org

2006-06-30 Thread André Wyrwa
Hi Adam, > Is what he's saying on his own personal website actually up to us? He is in > his right to say whatever he wants. You're speaking my thoughts. > That said, if the layout is in a license that doesn't allow other people to > use it then we should ask that it be removed as the site does

Re: [Marketing] OOo Mac OS X port - VS - NeoOffice.org

2006-06-30 Thread Adam Moore
To reply to the overall thread. Is what he's saying on his own personal website actually up to us? He is in his right to say whatever he wants. That said, if the layout is in a license that doesn't allow other people to use it then we should ask that it be removed as the site does not solely pro

Re: [Marketing] OOo Mac OS X port - VS - NeoOffice.org

2006-06-30 Thread eric b
Hi Bernard, Your propostion is full of sense, a good compromise, and I completely agree. Thank you very much for your constructive and objective opinion :-) Regards, Eric Bachard - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [Marketing] OOo Mac OS X port - VS - NeoOffice.org

2006-06-30 Thread Bernhard Dippold
Hi Chad, Eric, * both of you have different opinions about the OOo Mac port and NeoOffice. That's your personal right. If we would have to decide as marketing project, my (personal!) opinion is: - We want to have our project to be promoted, not NeoOffice.org. - Chad's page is not objectiv

Re: [Marketing] Re: Brilliant marketing campaign

2006-06-30 Thread eric b
Le 30 juin 06 à 22:05, Chad Smith a écrit : The Community Manager. I'm not sure you are aware : OpenOffice.org project is managed by a Community Council. What means "Community Manager" ? Again, this site is not official, is not an OpenOffice.org project neither and I don't understand

Re: [Marketing] Re: Brilliant marketing campaign

2006-06-30 Thread Chad Smith
On 6/30/06, eric b <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Le 30 juin 06 à 21:32, Chad Smith a écrit : > > It's my site to promote OOo, and I have permission to use that look > and > logo. I wonder who authorized you to use Logo and appearance of OpenOffice.org project ? The Community Manager. Again,

Re: [Marketing] Re: Brilliant marketing campaign

2006-06-30 Thread eric b
Le 30 juin 06 à 21:32, Chad Smith a écrit : It's my site to promote OOo, and I have permission to use that look and logo. I wonder who authorized you to use Logo and appearance of OpenOffice.org project ? Again, this site is not official, is not an OpenOffice.org project neither and

Re: [Marketing] Re: Brilliant marketing campaign

2006-06-30 Thread Chad Smith
On 6/30/06, eric b <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Is this site : part of OpenOffice.org project ? Or a fake ? And why are the OpenOffice.org logo and look used ? It's my site to promote OOo, and I have permission to use that look and logo. It is clearly

Re: [Marketing] Re: Brilliant marketing campaign

2006-06-30 Thread André Wyrwa
Hi John, > The "real" (permanent) why.openoffice.org site is work in progress. the > target is to have it in place by OOoCon (2006 :-) latest > > In the mean time, these "tactical" campaigns get us publicity using a > very easy to remember URL, and gets links to the site out there in > cyberspace

Re: [Marketing] Re: Brilliant marketing campaign

2006-06-30 Thread eric b
Hi, Is this site : part of OpenOffice.org project ? Or a fake ? And why are the OpenOffice.org logo and look used ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,

Re: [Marketing] Re: Brilliant marketing campaign

2006-06-30 Thread Chad Smith
On 6/30/06, John McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am quite happy to hear opinions on this - maybe it's too subtle, maybe it's sheer genius, or maybe it's plain stupid. Tell me, and give me a better suggestion - including a proposal for what we should we have why.openoffice.org/index.html un

Re: [Marketing] Re: Brilliant marketing campaign

2006-06-30 Thread John McCreesh
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 11:32 +0200, Marko Moeller wrote: [snip] > Yes, indeed the new Site and the idea behind is really good! > > Replacing the site content of the old get-legal campaign isn't! > [snip] The reason for taking this approach was: The "real" (permanent) why.openoffice.org site is w

Re: [Marketing] another digg for Metro ads?

2006-06-30 Thread John McCreesh
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 20:34 +0200, Finn Gruwier Larsen wrote: > Why don't we make this an international campaign? > > If it can be done in New York, it can be done everywhere! Any volunteers? John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM

Re: [Marketing] Re: Brilliant marketing campaign

2006-06-30 Thread Simon Phipps
On Jun 30, 2006, at 11:52, André Wyrwa wrote: 1. Give the current campains button a neutral filename, like i.e. ooo_current_why_120x60.png. 2. Have each campain in a different subdirectory like it is now the case with get legal. But have it from the very beginning! Well, that's actually a

[Marketing] Re: [users] OpenOffice.org 2.0.3 Is Here. Download It Now.

2006-06-30 Thread Daniel Kasak
Louis Suarez-Potts wrote: > All, > > OpenOffice.org 2.0.3 is now ready for download, The P2P link on the page: http://download.openoffice.org/2.0.3/index.html comes up with an error. -- Daniel Kasak IT Developer NUS Consulting Group Level 5, 77 Pacific Highway North Sydney, NSW, Australia 2060

Re: [Marketing] Re: Brilliant marketing campaign

2006-06-30 Thread André Wyrwa
> 1. Give the current campains button a neutral filename, like i.e. > ooo_current_why_120x60.png. > > 2. Have each campain in a different subdirectory like it is now the case > with get legal. But have it from the very beginning! Well, that's actually a bit silly. However, each campain should be

Re: [Marketing] Re: Brilliant marketing campaign

2006-06-30 Thread André Wyrwa
Hi, > Yes, indeed the new Site and the idea behind is really good! > > Replacing the site content of the old get-legal campaign isn't! > > There is a big confusion under the sysadmins and webmasters linking the > why.openoffice.org site via the get-legal buttons! > > Yes the old content still e

[Marketing] Re: Brilliant marketing campaign

2006-06-30 Thread Marko Moeller
Hi @all, Jacqueline McNally schrieb: > John McCreesh wrote: >> On Tue, June 27, 2006 10:52, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: >> >>> I've just seen the new "Why OpenOffice.org" page, after receiving >>> the announcement about the "Take a Test Drive - Keep the Car!" >>> campaign. [...] > >> Comments welcome

Re: [Marketing] testimonials, case studies

2006-06-30 Thread André Wyrwa
Hi, > http://www.openoffice.org/product/studies.html Hmm...that helps a bit, but leaves some questions. The last two studies on that page are OOo-layoutet documents (and i think they talk about OOo 1.1 :-/ ). Which obviously means we are having the right to use, publish and reformat them. All o