Hi Jonathon,
jonathon wrote:
[...]
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 01:06, Peter Junge wrote:
That's why R&D needs to address the challenges of tomorrow. I really hope
mobile OOo gets underway before it's too late. In fact it almost is.
For mobile platforms, the office suite has to be completely
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Andrew Greig wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This is my first post to this list, and I have read the entire thread on
> this subject.
>
> A brief history: I am a Linux user of 9 years, I have been using OOo on
> the desktop since StarOffice 5.2, I am a community distributor
Hi All,
This is my first post to this list, and I have read the entire thread on
this subject.
A brief history: I am a Linux user of 9 years, I have been using OOo on
the desktop since StarOffice 5.2, I am a community distributor of OOo,
and I have been a Palm user for 8 years. Even before Palm
eric b wrote:
> FYI, OOo4Kdis runs honestly on Celeron 500 + 128 MB or RAM ( using
> Puppy Linux distribution ), or on XO ( Sugar / 900 MHz / 521 MB or
> RAM).
>
> The drawback : no Java, nor Base, but who cares, if we got a reader ?
>
Yep, played with it on a Celeron 400 / 256 Megs here, and act
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 13:08 +0200, eric b wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> Le 19 oct. 09 à 12:34, Ian a écrit :
> >
> > So port OpenOffice.org to say a G-phone - Google probably want
> > people to
> > use their on-line apps but an option for OOo would be good. Ok, it
> > will
> > probably run like a drain
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 11:06 +, jonathon wrote:
> I was not referring to the cost of the office suite. Rather, I was
> referring to the cost of the additional hardware (mouse, keyboard).
> Is it cost-effective to spend US$100 for a bluetooth keyboard and
> mouse for a US$250 smarrtphone/PDA?
Hi Ian,
Le 19 oct. 09 à 12:34, Ian a écrit :
So port OpenOffice.org to say a G-phone - Google probably want
people to
use their on-line apps but an option for OOo would be good. Ok, it
will
probably run like a drain to start with but once the concept is
achieved
no doubt the technology w
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:34, Ian wrote:
>> * Lack of decent office software on a smartphone/PDA;
> So port OpenOffice.org to say a G-phone
a) Inasmuch as a complete rewrite is required, the best approach
would be to scrap the existing code base, and write a new application
from scratch, in t
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 10:12 +, jonathon wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 13:00, Ian wrote:
>
> > What happens when someone markets a phone that you can plug in a USB
> > keyboard and a monitor.
>
> I've seen keyboards and mice that had bluetooth connectivity support.
>
> Assuming the carri
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:12 PM, jonathon wrote:
>
> > I have no idea, why Nokia is investing in "KOffice libs" as backend for a
> viewer application. Okular is already very good in displaying office
> (including ODF)
>
> Going by their website, Okular does not support impress, draw, or calc
> f
Hi Kami,
I'm on my way to a trade show, therefore only a short reply: John
compiled a great list of information at
http://marketing.openoffice.org/press_kit.html - this should be a good
starter.
Hope that helps,
Florian
Hello!
I will have a presentation about OpenOffice.org. I will show
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 13:00, Ian wrote:
> What happens when someone markets a phone that you can plug in a USB keyboard
> and a monitor.
I've seen keyboards and mice that had bluetooth connectivity support.
Assuming the carriers haven't blocked that functionality (Bluetooth
connections to n
Hello!
I will have a presentation about OpenOffice.org. I will show the
upcoming news of OpenOffice.org 3.2 also I would like to introduce the
OpenOffice.org in general. DO you have actual numbers about
contributors, developers, registered users, donwloads, etc.? Also I want
to speak about the pre
13 matches
Mail list logo
