Hi,
> * positioner text (your next productivity/office upgrade, etc)
(could someone create a list of all suggestions?)
> * navigation tabs: which ones from the current website should stay,
> and should any new ones be added?
I think this discussion belongs at the website list.
> * sub-text for t
I'm going to 'bump' this, since there's been no discussion on it for
almost a week, and it's already mid-January.
So please, we need to decide:
* positioner text (your next productivity/office upgrade, etc)
* navigation tabs: which ones from the current website should stay,
and should any new ones
Victor, Everyone,
Slowly catching up on list messages 8^)
--- viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> About 'your next office upgrade', it eliminates individual home user. It is
> directed
> towards business, and yes some people do have offices at home but most dont,
> especially
> students. I be
Hi Georg,
> Would it be possible, to not only detect the operating system but as
> well the language of the user? I have quite a lot of friends who
> came back to me telling me that they don't like OOo because it is in
> English. I have to tell them, that they need to go to
> de.openoffice.org for
oximate in march.
viktor
-Original Message-
From: "Paul F. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@marketing.openoffice.org
Sent: 1/8/2008 15:09
Subject: Re: [Marketing] Website Redesign Content
On Tuesday, Jan 08, John McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> vi
On Tuesday, Jan 08, John McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
viktor wrote:
About 'your next office upgrade', it eliminates individual home user. It
is directed towards business, and yes some people do have offices at
home but most dont, especially students. I believe we need to replace
'of
:murb: [maarten brouwers] wrote:
[snip]
* Reduce the content of the footer (can anyone inform us about what legal
stuff is required?)
I had great fun with this when we did the why.openoffice.org pages, with
lots of important people telling me why I couldn't hide different parts
of the site t
viktor wrote:
About 'your next office upgrade', it eliminates individual home user. It is directed towards business, and yes some people do have offices at home but most dont, especially students. I believe we need to replace 'office' with more broader term maybe: productivity, suite, workflow,
Hi,
Would it be possible, to not only detect the operating system but as
well the language of the user? I have quite a lot of friends who
came back to me telling me that they don't like OOo because it is in
English. I have to tell them, that they need to go to
de.openoffice.org for the German
On Tuesday, Jan 08, :murb: [maarten brouwers] wrote:
I must admit that I'm partial to the explanatory subtitles as well,
however
they have to be informative but short. More of a subheader than an
explanation. Think of it like a "Positioner" for the page that it's
aimed
at. It has to "sell" th
Hi,
Ivan wrote in reply to Graham:
>> The thing that concerns me is that thee seems to be more and more
>> "Stuff"
>> getting onto the page.
>
> That's why this message was posted here - to determine just how much
> stuff is needed. I think the navbar would be useful for more frequent
> visitors.
Hi Graham (please scroll down for reply to Viktor's email),
> The thing that concerns me is that thee seems to be more and more "Stuff"
> getting onto the page.
That's why this message was posted here - to determine just how much
stuff is needed. I think the navbar would be useful for more freque
rkflow,
etc.
Hey, im a photographer. Anyone has any ideas for good promo images i can shoot
for OOo?
viktor
-Original Message-
From: "Paul F. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@marketing.openoffice.org
Sent: 1/7/2008 15:50
Subject: Re: [Marketing] Website Redesign Conte
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 09:50:56 Paul F. Olson wrote:
> I come down somewhere in between the draft page and Graham's more bare
> bones approach.
>
> I agree that cleaner is better, and I agree that the goal is to move
> people along as quickly as possible. Toward that end, I'd eliminate any
> na
I come down somewhere in between the draft page and Graham's more bare
bones approach.
I agree that cleaner is better, and I agree that the goal is to move
people along as quickly as possible. Toward that end, I'd eliminate any
nav bar or other distracting, focus-pulling options that only s
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 07:59:34 Ivan M wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The look of the new OpenOffice.org homepage is currently being worked
> on (a good indication of where it's headed can be seen at
> www.patentpending.co.nz/openoffice). This is based on the action
> statements approach that was di
Hi everyone,
The look of the new OpenOffice.org homepage is currently being worked
on (a good indication of where it's headed can be seen at
www.patentpending.co.nz/openoffice). This is based on the action
statements approach that was discussed on this list in December, and
the main goal of this n
17 matches
Mail list logo
