You seem to be on the right track. We'd certainly welcome contributions
along these lines, and there are a few people working on this elsewhere
already as you've highlighted.
Have you seen
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Support+for+other+languages?
- Brett
Richard van der Hoff wrote
Torsten Curdt wrote:
First thought: Why "modules"? Everyone talks about
"multi-projects" and "artifacts"
I try to avoid calling it multiproject for this reason.
When I tried to build the (main) project I got told off that packaging
was meant to be "pom" not "jar" ...ok - but why?
Currentl
This vote is cancelled for lack of participation. I will try again
another time.
-Lukas
Lukas Theussl wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to release the following plugins for inclusion in
maven-1.1-beta-3:
[] maven-antlr-plugin-1.2.2
[] maven-cruisecontrol-plugin-1.8
I am not using either of them so I'd
Brian E. Fox wrote:
Question 1: (I think I tried this a long time ago and it didn't work) If
I include a war as a dependency, will maven transitively get those
dependencies, or is it ignored since it's a war?
ignored. There's an open jira for skinny wars that don't bundle their
deps and inst
Hey Kenney,
Did you make any progress on this.
A couple of things about reports definitely need to be sorted out in 2.1
- this is one of them.
- Brett
Kenney Westerhof wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to implement a multi-page report.
The problem is that currently the ReportDocumentRenderer from
mav
Heh, this was 13/4 not 14/5 as I thought. Are these still needing to be
looked at?
Brett Porter wrote:
I'm not going to have time this week (and I'm utterly sick of working on
plugins right now :)
Anyone else available?
jerome lacoste wrote:
On 4/12/06, jerome lacoste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
I'm not going to have time this week (and I'm utterly sick of working on
plugins right now :)
Anyone else available?
jerome lacoste wrote:
On 4/12/06, jerome lacoste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Fellow Riders of the Lost good code,
Message to the commiters of the plexus-archiver and maven-
This sounds like a really crappy way to have to run your tests. Can't
MockStrutsTestCase look at an alternate location for the XML file?
Perhaps some functionality to add to Cactus since it does WAR
modification for this purpose? :)
- Brett
Felipe Leme wrote:
Hi all,
Is it posible to remov
Mike Perham wrote:
The only thing keeping the site plugin from compiling out of the box on
my machine is a reliance on an unpublished plexus-velocity version. If
this component is stable, can it be released for ease of development?
This was sorted out a few days ago, for the record.
As a si
done.
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hello
I've been doing some work on the Maven Confluence wiki lately. There is
one thing that I am not allowed to do though and that is remove pages.
There are currently 4 orphaned pages [1] that are the results of people
trying to learn the wiki.
It would be ni
On Sun, 14 May 2006, Jason van Zyl wrote:
[snip]
> I think this would make it easier for each person to grok if we had a
> common pattern. And common patterns is what we're about.
True, although you have to read the entire issue to completely understand
it, so for me personally it doesn't matt
On Sun, 14 May 2006, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> On 12 May 06, at 11:02 AM 12 May 06, Kenney Westerhof wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > (none of this is committed)
> >
> > Jerome and I have added support for an 'implementation' parameter
> > to the @parameter tag, so that you can use interfaces as field-
It shouldn't be required (as you can use ref + name, in theory).
If the name isn't working, please file a bug.
- Brett
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hello
I'm trying to upgrade the Maven 2 site build for the Jakarta Commons
Sandbox [1] to use the release 2.0-beta-5 version of the
maven-site-plugin
Maven 2.0 had a fairly decent regression:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-38
which appears to have been caused by:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-7 (though the fix should support both)
I'm surprised nobody noticed this during the testing period. Is nobody
using EJBs any more? :)
An
Hi,
I was just looking at the wiki for the 2.1 design stuff and was
wondering if we could use a common format for each issue? I was
thinking that we may borrow from a Pattern Language and for each
issue have a Context, Problem, Solution, and maybe Implementation
Details. So for something
On 14 May 06, at 11:55 AM 14 May 06, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
I propose we focus on developing Maven 2.1 with both a mix of new
features and bug fixes.
If we identify the need for a 2.0.5, we should manually merge
changes there based on revisions from trunk, bearing in mind our
new dev p
Hi,
I propose we focus on developing Maven 2.1 with both a mix of new
features and bug fixes.
If we identify the need for a 2.0.5, we should manually merge changes
there based on revisions from trunk, bearing in mind our new dev process.
Thoughts?
- Brett
-
Anyone know what changed here? I can't see anything.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
http://maven.zones.apache.org/~maven/logs/branches/maven-2.0.x/m2-build-log-20060514.181504.txt
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
F
On 12 May 06, at 11:02 AM 12 May 06, Kenney Westerhof wrote:
Hi,
(none of this is committed)
Jerome and I have added support for an 'implementation' parameter
to the @parameter tag, so that you can use interfaces as field-types.
So this will essentially work in the same way that component
Hello
I'm trying to upgrade the Maven 2 site build for the Jakarta Commons
Sandbox [1] to use the release 2.0-beta-5 version of the
maven-site-plugin. This has been using 2.0-SNAPSHOT before and uses the
special property ${modulesItems} in the site.xml file. That property
doesn't seem to exis
20 matches
Mail list logo
