Re: Fw: [plexus-dev] Plexus Website

2006-06-14 Thread jerome lacoste
On 6/15/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's a good idea too :) I was actually thinking of taking the ideas from John's thread on the Maven documentation and applying the same principles, but it'd be good to hear what Maven plugin people think of the plexus docs. Perhaps best to g

Re: Fw: [plexus-dev] Plexus Website

2006-06-14 Thread Brett Porter
That's a good idea too :) I was actually thinking of taking the ideas from John's thread on the Maven documentation and applying the same principles, but it'd be good to hear what Maven plugin people think of the plexus docs. Perhaps best to get through the current round of polishing them up

Fw: [plexus-dev] Plexus Website

2006-06-14 Thread Rinku
Greetings everyone, We are keen to gather inputs for Plexus documentation/website from users on this list. Please see the attached emails below for a heads up. Ideas and suggestions are welcome; contributions are even better :-) Look forward to hear... cheers, Rahul - Original Message

Re: Instantiating a class in a modello DataModel

2006-06-14 Thread Brett Porter
use new MyClass() Prasad Kashyap wrote: Hi, How I can instantiate a class while declaring it as a field member in a modello DataModel ? field/association/type is another class that needs to be instantiated.. myObj 1.0.0 MyClass MyClass myObj = new MyClass(); <<<--

Re: [Proposal] Documenting Maven

2006-06-14 Thread Jeremy Whitlock
Rahul, I agree that the accompanying projects/sub-projects should be documented but that also seems like common sense. I also agree heavily with Jimisola. When I first tried Maven, I canned it within a mont or so due to lack of documentation. That is getting better with "Better Builds With Ma

Instantiating a class in a modello DataModel

2006-06-14 Thread Prasad Kashyap
Hi, How I can instantiate a class while declaring it as a field member in a modello DataModel ? field/association/type is another class that needs to be instantiated.. myObj 1.0.0 MyClass MyClass myObj = new MyClass(); <<<-- is what I need MyClass myObj; (= null)

[jira] Subscription: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Uploads

2006-06-14 Thread jira
Issue Subscription Filter: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Uploads (18 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MAVENUPLOAD-944Version 1.1 of UISPec4J http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-944 MAVENUPLOAD-933Please add Java Web Parts to iBiblio Maven repository

[jira] Subscription: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Evangelism

2006-06-14 Thread jira
Issue Subscription Filter: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Evangelism (36 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MEV-413 Jaxen has unnecessary and unexpected dependencies (which cause problems with JDK 1.5) http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-413 MEV-360 nan

Re: The "How To Help" page needs help...

2006-06-14 Thread Brett Porter
Probably dev list for discussion. Dennis Lundberg wrote: Brett Porter wrote: Hi Dennis, Looking back, I saw this mail from you and a number of patches in JIRA. Are you able to look at applying these yourself now? Thanks! - Brett Sure, that would be something suitable to start out with. I

MNG-2369: Generic 3rd Pary DotNet Libraries not appropriately handled

2006-06-14 Thread james . le . carpenter
I am actively using the maven csharp plugins in the maven plugin sandbox. Of the bugs I have reported (MNG-2367, MNG-2369, MNG-2370, MNG-2371) by far the most painful for me is "MNG-2369: Generic 3rd Pary DotNet Libraries not appropriately handled" found in JIRA at: http://jira.codehaus.org/bro

Re: [Proposal] Documenting Maven

2006-06-14 Thread Rinku
+1 for documentation reorganization on the Maven website. Also, quickly wanted to add that documenting Maven would, IMHO, encompass a number of other projects/sub-projects (For instance ones appearing in the top navigation on the Maven homepage). I think we need to include them in the scope a

Re: [Proposal] Documenting Maven

2006-06-14 Thread Jimisola Laursen
+1 Not sure where the responsibility between Maven and it's core plugins is, but the uncomplete and sometimes even lack of documentation has been one of the main obsticles during our migration from Ant to Maven. The book "Better Builds with Maven" was a warm welcome. -- View this message in cont

Re: [Proposal] Documenting Maven

2006-06-14 Thread Dan Diephouse
A big +1! - Dan John Casey wrote: Hi everyone, I know we've talked about this quite a bit already. Actually, I'm having trouble finding the past threads on this topic in my email...can someone who knows please link them in? Basically, I've talked to Brett, Jason, and a few other Maven develo

Re: [Proposal] Documenting Maven

2006-06-14 Thread Jeremy Whitlock
John, I'll put a +1 on that one. I am fairly new to Maven development and non-standard Maven use and I feel that the documentation is lacking. Even when there is documentation it isn't complete. Take care, Jeremy On 6/14/06, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi everyone, I know we've

[Proposal] Documenting Maven

2006-06-14 Thread John Casey
Hi everyone, I know we've talked about this quite a bit already. Actually, I'm having trouble finding the past threads on this topic in my email...can someone who knows please link them in? Basically, I've talked to Brett, Jason, and a few other Maven developers, and I think it's time we started

Re: The "How To Help" page needs help...

2006-06-14 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Brett Porter wrote: Hi Dennis, Looking back, I saw this mail from you and a number of patches in JIRA. Are you able to look at applying these yourself now? Thanks! - Brett Sure, that would be something suitable to start out with. I'll have a go at them. What's the appropriate place to dis

Re: ibiblio not updated

2006-06-14 Thread Carlos Sanchez
Later versions have moved to http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/lucene/lucene-core/ On 6/14/06, Howard Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Greetings, The version of lucene at ibiblio is still 1.4.3 even though it was pushed to the apache site, it didnt get replicated. Will ibiblio be upda

Re: [vote] [m1] release dist-plugin-1.7

2006-06-14 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
that's good thanks. arnaud On 6/14/06, Lukas Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I added a note to the entry about the artifact-plugin requirement (which is the one incompatible with m1.0). Is that ok? -Lukas Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > +1 > > In the changes report, can you add a delete entry f

Re: [vote] [m1] release dist-plugin-1.7

2006-06-14 Thread Lukas Theussl
I added a note to the entry about the artifact-plugin requirement (which is the one incompatible with m1.0). Is that ok? -Lukas Arnaud HERITIER wrote: +1 In the changes report, can you add a delete entry for the maven 1.0.2compatibility. It's not shown in the changes, thus it will not appear

Re: [vote] [m1] release dist-plugin-1.7

2006-06-14 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
+1 In the changes report, can you add a delete entry for the maven 1.0.2compatibility. It's not shown in the changes, thus it will not appear in the rss fead [1] when you'll update the main site after the release. Thx. Arnaud [1] http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/plugins/bundled/multichanges-rep

Re: suggestions for handling native libraries

2006-06-14 Thread dan tran
Hi Richard, The native-maven-plugin JNI example shows that you can have your native project depends on a java jar project that has java jni interfaces. This way you can use native plugin to generate jni native include files before building the native artifacts. This is the same behavior in mave

Re: [vote] [m1] release dist-plugin-1.7

2006-06-14 Thread Stephane Nicoll
+1 Stéphane On 6/14/06, Lukas Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I just finished some stuff in the dist plugin and I'd like to release it for inclusion in maven-1.1-beta-3. For changes please check the jira and changes reports on the stage site given below. +1, 72h... Cheers, Lukas htt

Re: suggestions for handling native libraries

2006-06-14 Thread Richard van der Hoff
A while ago, I posted here asking for help with using Maven to handle projects which make use of JNI code. I was met by a stony wall of silence at that time... Anyway, a month later, and after quite a lot of thinking, hacking and tweaking, I've come up with a solution I'm reasonably happy with

ibiblio not updated

2006-06-14 Thread Howard Moore
Greetings, The version of lucene at ibiblio is still 1.4.3 even though it was pushed to the apache site, it didnt get replicated. Will ibiblio be updated regularly? thanks Howard Moore

Re: [result] Re: [vote] Release Release plugin 2.0-beta-5

2006-06-14 Thread Brett Porter
per an earlier message in the thread, I messed up the subject line. The release (2.0-beta-4) happened. - Brett jerome lacoste wrote: On 5/14/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Binding +1: Brett, Vincent M, Stephane, Emmanuel, John Committer +1: Mike P, Brian, Fabrizio Committer +0: V

Re: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-14 Thread jerome lacoste
On 6/14/06, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: jerome lacoste wrote: > I am not so sure this test is a valid test case. Continuations are > supposedly allowed. Read my comment in your issue in Jira. I believe, you are misreading the specification. A continuation is defined as otherchar*

Re: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-14 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
jerome lacoste wrote: > I am not so sure this test is a valid test case. Continuations are > supposedly allowed. Read my comment in your issue in Jira. I believe, you are misreading the specification. A continuation is defined as otherchar* newline. But otherchar is defined as anything but NUL, C

Re: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-14 Thread jerome lacoste
On 6/14/06, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Kenney Westerhof wrote: > Wasn't the line ending stuff fixed in plexus-archiver a long time ago? Running the attached test case (which might well be added to the plexus-archiver, whenever it should be fixed) demonstrates: No. Where is the

Re: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-14 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLX > component plexus-archiver Thanks, issue created. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: releasing project that depends on webdav wagon SNAPSHOT

2006-06-14 Thread Mark Hobson
I had the same issue performing internal releases since we moved to the webdav wagon, see: http://www.mail-archive.com/users@maven.apache.org/msg42873.html http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-111 +1 for a webdav wagon release, it's working fine here for us. Cheers, Mark On 14/06/06, Emma

Re: releasing project that depends on webdav wagon SNAPSHOT

2006-06-14 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
I think too it would be a good thing to do. jerome lacoste a écrit : Hi, trying to release a mojo plugin, I am stuck because the Mojo root pom depends on the 1.0-beta-1-SNAPSHOT wagon provider. Apparently Jason said there was problem deploying, but I've deployed sites and poms without issue th

Re: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-14 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLX component plexus-archiver Jochen Wiedmann a écrit : Kenney Westerhof wrote: Wasn't the line ending stuff fixed in plexus-archiver a long time ago? Running the attached test case (which might well be added to the plexus-archiver, whenever it should be fixed

releasing project that depends on webdav wagon SNAPSHOT

2006-06-14 Thread jerome lacoste
Hi, trying to release a mojo plugin, I am stuck because the Mojo root pom depends on the 1.0-beta-1-SNAPSHOT wagon provider. Apparently Jason said there was problem deploying, but I've deployed sites and poms without issue this morning. Anyone has some more information about this ? If everythin

Re: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-14 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Kenney Westerhof wrote: > Wasn't the line ending stuff fixed in plexus-archiver a long time ago? Running the attached test case (which might well be added to the plexus-archiver, whenever it should be fixed) demonstrates: No. Where is the plexus archivers issue tracker so that I can file an issu

Re: [result] Re: [vote] Release Release plugin 2.0-beta-5

2006-06-14 Thread jerome lacoste
On 5/14/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Binding +1: Brett, Vincent M, Stephane, Emmanuel, John Committer +1: Mike P, Brian, Fabrizio Committer +0: Vincent S User +1: Olivier User +0: Bob So now this happened just before the Big Crash. The release doesn't seem to have happened: h