+1
-Deng
Brett Porter wrote:
per the thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] - should Archiva have it's own
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list?
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1
Cheers,
Brett
Could the plugin dependencies not be specified in the pluginManagement
section in the same pom that has the dependencyManagement, thus when
the plugin is referenced, it will get the dependencies specified in
the parent pom
On Dec 5, 2007 5:16 PM, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone
Mauro Talevi wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to release Maven Surefire 2.3.1
Yihaa!
That would solve a lot of my problems
(http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-326 ,
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-297 and
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-388 are all biting us in
several projec
Unfortunately unless the release plugin was setup to load this as a
component, the only choice is to extend the source. Depending on a
plugin causes lots of bad things to happen so you can't really extend
it.
-Original Message-
From: Bashar Jawad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
Hi,
I want to make some modifications to the way release-plugin works. For
example I want to make some modifications to the way snapshots are
handled in the check-dependency-snapshots phase. I know I can just grab
the source code of maven-release and modify
CheckDependencySnapshotsPhase and instal
+1
Was wondering what this was about, as I have a .procmailrc filter
already to do this for me.
Sure. formalize it!
- Joakim
Brett Porter wrote:
per the thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] - should Archiva have it's own
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list?
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1
Cheers,
Brett
+1
--
Olivier
2007/12/5, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> I'd like to release version 1.0-beta-2 of the
> maven-remote-resources-plugin. The only change between this and
> 1.0-beta-1 is to fix the fact that 1.0-beta-1 would not work with JDK
> 1.4 due to it overriding a method that was fin
+1
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 10:55:14
To:Maven Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] maven-remote-resources-plugin 1.0-beta-2
I'd like to release version 1.0-beta-2 of the
maven-remote-resources-plugin. The only change betwee
Hi,
When I compare the Maven dependency mechanisms with our home-brewn
solution in our company then among others one major thing is
different: Maven does not know the concept of an artifact life cycle.
(At least I do not know about such a mechanism and I do not refer to
the build life cycle). Such
+1
On Dec 5, 2007 1:57 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> per the thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] - should Continuum have it's own [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
> list?
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
John Casey wrote:
Did we ever remove the dependency on plexus-archiver, so we are just creating
the manifest-only jar directly? I know you and I talked about it, Dan...I was
just wondering.
Nope. SUREFIRE-347 is "regression: plexus is not properly isolated" which
is what I'd wish we'd fix b
Actually - there are two in use: the one for jetty:run (if you run
from the source code) that I think Deng was referring to, and the one
for the bundled application which is jetty5 (which I don't think is
affected by any of the issues, but am not sure).
- Brett
On 06/12/2007, at 1:01 AM, A
This exists in continuum 1.1 (we have just to upgrade).
--
Olivier
2007/12/5, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I had a look at the Continuum mails that go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> Continuum actually caught this on its November 30 run [1].
>
> Would it be possible to get Continuum to sen
I had a look at the Continuum mails that go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
Continuum actually caught this on its November 30 run [1].
Would it be possible to get Continuum to send an email directly to the
committer, that caused a build to fail? Such emails have a higher chance
of getting noticed.
-0. I can try to fix the three open 2.3.1 bugs sometime this weekend; if
you can afford to wait that long, I think that'd be preferable.
-Dan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMA
Hi everyone,
I wanted to invite you to weigh in on a new issue in JIRA that has
some implications on how Maven functions. The issue is here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3311
I'd like to get this sorted out one way or another, documented, and
put in place before the next 2.0.x relea
Did we ever remove the dependency on plexus-archiver, so we are just
creating the manifest-only jar directly? I know you and I talked
about it, Dan...I was just wondering.
-john
On Dec 4, 2007, at 10:13 PM, Dan Fabulich wrote:
There are still three bugs targeted for 2.3.1. These bugs are
I'd like to release version 1.0-beta-2 of the
maven-remote-resources-plugin. The only change between this and
1.0-beta-1 is to fix the fact that 1.0-beta-1 would not work with JDK
1.4 due to it overriding a method that was final in 1.4, but not in 1.5.
Staging area:
http://people.apache.org
OK. I'll do a 1.0-beta-2 now.
Dan
On Tuesday 04 December 2007, olivier lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> I confirm binaries doesn't work.
>
> MRRESOURCES-29
>
> --
> Olivier
>
> 2007/12/4, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Monday 03 December 2007, olivier lamy wrote:
> > > I have compilation failure w
Deng,
Do you need the issues filed in JIRA, right?
Thanks and regards,
Alex
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Jetty-version-on-Archiva-1.0--tf4946013.html#a14171959
Sent from the archiva-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
surefire-providers has corrupt dependency:
${project.groupId}
surefire-api
2.3.1-SNAPSHOT
should be 2.3.1 instead of 2.3.1-SNAPSHOT
2007/12/5, Mauro Talevi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to release Maven Surefire 2.3.1
>
> Issues solved:
> ht
+1
Arnaud
On Dec 5, 2007 11:57 AM, Mauro Talevi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to release Maven Surefire 2.3.1
>
> Issues solved:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541&styleName=Html&version=13251
>
> Staging repo:
> http://people.apache.org/~mau
Hi all,
I'd like to release Maven Surefire 2.3.1
Issues solved:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541&styleName=Html&version=13251
Staging repo:
http://people.apache.org/~mauro/staging-repo/
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/surefire/tags/surefire-2.3.1/
Vote
+1
Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Hi,
Following Maven release, I'd like to release Maven Ant Tasks 2.0.8.
We solved 17 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11533&styleName=Html&version=13618
The tasks can be downloaded from:
http://people.apache.org/~hboutemy/staging-repo/
Brett Porter wrote:
I was hesitant because at least one of them seemed to be a regression
over 2.3.
Anyway, my preference is to fix them first - but if someone is prepared
to do a release - go for it. There's lots of good stuff in there already.
I agree they should be fixed, but since no on
I was hesitant because at least one of them seemed to be a regression
over 2.3.
Anyway, my preference is to fix them first - but if someone is
prepared to do a release - go for it. There's lots of good stuff in
there already.
- Brett
On 05/12/2007, at 2:13 PM, Dan Fabulich wrote:
Ther
26 matches
Mail list logo
