// Release existing
-release( archivaConfiguration );
+// FIXME spring equivalent ? release( archivaConfiguration );
I don't know if spring takes care of managing them itself - but we
need to look into this since we used to have leaks from the webapp
when it never
Hi,
What about the sandbox content ? [1]
Not sure it's well maintained code ;-).
--
Olivier
[1] : https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/sandbox/trunk/continuum/
2008/2/28, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This has been done (and switch works just fine). No other changes
should be needed on
Hi,
As continuum has moved in the apache svn.
The project is no longer available here http://fisheye6.cenqua.com.
I have created an issue [1] to ask the hosting.
Is there any objections before notifying/asking infra ?
Thanks,
--
Olivier
[1] https://support.atlassian.com/browse/FSH-580
done :)
On 01/03/2008, at 9:27 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
What about the sandbox content ? [1]
Not sure it's well maintained code ;-).
--
Olivier
[1] : https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/sandbox/trunk/continuum/
2008/2/28, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This has been done (and switch
Go for it - I had no idea it was in place already :)
On 01/03/2008, at 12:11 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
As continuum has moved in the apache svn.
The project is no longer available here http://fisheye6.cenqua.com.
I have created an issue [1] to ask the hosting.
Is there any objections before
+1
-Deng
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 3:21 AM, John Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier.
He's been instrumental in the recent push to release the assembly
plugin, and I see his work (debugging some issues, patches for other
issues) all over JIRA.
John/Mark,
You have anything that you want to put in maven-artifact as I'm going
to start making alphas. I'll take a look at the one issue scheduled
for m-a, let you guys add anything you were working on and then
squeeze it out to prepare for a 2.1-alpha-1.
Thanks,
Jason
Nope, go for it!
Mark
On 29/02/2008, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John/Mark,
You have anything that you want to put in maven-artifact as I'm going
to start making alphas. I'll take a look at the one issue scheduled
for m-a, let you guys add anything you were working on and then
I've setup a WebWorkPlexusInSpringObjectFactory to replace the spring
ObjectFactory used by webwork and fix this lookup issue.
The application works for basic requirements (configure admin, display repo
configuration, download a jar from proxies).
Still some exceptions to fix for missing plexus
Hi guys,
sorry to bother you again, but I resolved it:
in one of the parent poms the assemble phase wasn't attached with the single
goal. I changed it and now the build doesn't get forked.
Once again to all that helped.
Petar Tahchiev wrote:
Well, everything seems fine, the single goal is
the reason in plexus was because each action was allocated on every
request and not released - I just want to check whether that was the
case again here. I think Olivier investigated it originally - is he
listening here? :)
- Brett
On 29/02/2008, at 7:43 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
I assume this is the current trunk and not the CAP branch?
On 29/02/2008, at 5:34 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
John/Mark,
You have anything that you want to put in maven-artifact as I'm
going to start making alphas. I'll take a look at the one issue
scheduled for m-a, let you guys add
Definitely revert the aggregator tag. It is an uggly pb for many of us.
Vincent
PS: read also the recent Dan's thread
http://www.nabble.com/%40aggregator-mojo-annotation-td15302246s177.html
2008/2/28, Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I say pull the aggregation out (MJAVADOC-104) and find
Can anyone help answer whether I've missed some subtlety as to why a
fix like this wouldn't work (I appreciate the inner workings of maven
can be a bit complicated...) ?
On Sun, Feb 3, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Nigel Magnay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is that putting it in pluginManagement
Plain PUT does not work if the directory doesn't exist yet. (That's part
of the HTTP spec).
You need something to create the directory (or Collection in WebDAV
Terms), this is the MKCOL method.
While it is true that FTP is also a provider, it should be painfully
obvious that all existing
Correct.
On 29-Feb-08, at 3:28 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
I assume this is the current trunk and not the CAP branch?
On 29/02/2008, at 5:34 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
John/Mark,
You have anything that you want to put in maven-artifact as I'm
going to start making alphas. I'll take a look at
On 28-Feb-08, at 4:04 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
I'm fine removing whatever you want from core once you can show me
the same use case working without it.
Not a problem, I'll roll it back and use the dynamic collections. I
don't want the core getting bloated out when it's not required.
On 28-Feb-08, at 9:58 PM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 28-Feb-08, at 1:35 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 29/02/2008, at 5:51 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I'm going to roll back all the WagonDAV changes as
1) As we discussed about extensions on the list that for
deployment
+1
John Casey wrote:
I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier.
He's been instrumental in the recent push to release the assembly
plugin, and I see his work (debugging some issues, patches for other
issues) all over JIRA. Not to mention he's pretty active on IRC, and
he's
This vote passed with the following votes:
+1 Dennis Lundberg, Jason van Zyl, Olivier Lamy, Vincent Siveton
No other votes.
I will start the release process.
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi
To get the latest version of maven-source-plugin into our toolchain, I'd
like to release maven parent pom
+1 to putting in on the url, that's a muuuch better solution and works
for all wagons, not just webdav.
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 2:25 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Wagon changes and WebDAV
On 28-Feb-08,
The other problem with dropping it into the distribution is that when
we find out there is a bug in it you can't simply specify a new
version of the provider, you would have to go replace the provider and
all its deps, or make your own shaded JAR which would be a pain in the
ass.
On
Hi,
I would like to advertize the usage of java.util.LinkedHashMap and
java.util.LinkedHashSet. Unlike their close relatives HashMap and HashSet,
the former two collection classes offer a deterministic iteration order of
their elements by keeping the insertion order.
In general, clients will be
Here's the direction I would like to go in:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/URL-based+dynamic+loading+of+providers+for+artifact+retrieval+and+deployment
Full support for all types of transport for retrieval and deployment
in a standard way that doesn't bloat out the core.
On
+1
Works for my assemblies.
On 21-Feb-08, at 11:01 AM, John Casey wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to propose that we release both the assembly plugin and one
of its shared-component dependencies: maven-repository-builder. See
below for more information on what's included in these releases. I
binding +1: John Casey, Brett Porter, Jason van Zyl
non-binding +1: Sejal Patel, Fabrice Bellingard
No other votes.
I've released the binaries to the synchronization point on
people.apache.org, and will do likewise with the assembly plugin site
momentarily.
Thanks, everyone!
-john
---
On 01/03/2008, at 9:02 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Here's the direction I would like to go in:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/URL-based+dynamic+loading+of+providers+for+artifact+retrieval+and+deployment
Full support for all types of transport for retrieval and deployment
in a standard
Can we unsubcribe it ???
Arnaud
-- Forwarded message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 1 Mar 2008 00:06:57 -
Subject: Re: [ANN] Maven Assembly Plugin 2.2-beta-2 Released -- Ref
#[1MFnp02kuP0MEmu]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Thank you for contacting NetZero.
This is an
Unsubscribed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 01/03/2008, at 11:10 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
Can we unsubcribe it ???
Arnaud
-- Forwarded message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 1 Mar 2008 00:06:57 -
Subject: Re: [ANN] Maven Assembly Plugin 2.2-beta-2 Released -- Ref
On 29-Feb-08, at 3:40 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 01/03/2008, at 9:02 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Here's the direction I would like to go in:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/URL-based+dynamic+loading+of+providers+for+artifact+retrieval+and+deployment
Full support for all types of
On 01/03/2008, at 11:30 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Yes, I'm generally in favour of the proposal - it is how we've
always wanted it to work.
I'm just chucking out ideas.
Yep, I just meant in reference to not needing to distribute stuff in
the core.
- I don't see any point of
+1
Vincent
2008/2/28, John Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'd like to propose giving commit access to Paul Gier.
He's been instrumental in the recent push to release the assembly
plugin, and I see his work (debugging some issues, patches for other
issues) all over JIRA. Not to mention he's
32 matches
Mail list logo
