Shane,
I'm trying out the MathML support and flipping the document to
Confluence. Edit the Tex as you like and I'll merge in the
differences. I'm editing the document as I refactor the project
builder and build up the spec tests here but don't worry about the
Confluence for now as I'm
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 17-Dec-08, at 9:57 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
Hi,
In this thread you are talking about several teams. I'm considering
there
is only one maven team. If this not the case is there someone who can
explain to me which teams we have and who is working in which ?
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Oleg Gusakov wrote:
Unit tests were using those jars to compile test code.
Just a technical question: Is it actually required/desirable to really
compile code during the tests?
Over in the Maven core ITs, running the Compiler (or Surefire) Plugin
was the
Oleg Gusakov wrote:
Test performance: 100s of millis added by the compiler do not add too
much of a delay; the compilation unit is a 2-liner.
Yep, it's surely of minor concern for the Mercury tests themselves. But
just imagine a penalty of about 1 sec and scale this by 250 and you get
an
I don't see this as required for 2.0.x
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:br...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 7:10 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: MNG-3645
Do we need to bump this out to 2.0.11? It seems to still be reopened
for 2.0.10 waiting on a
Interesting, what about RC4?
-Original Message-
From: Henrique Prange [mailto:hpra...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 12:54 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Cc: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: [2.0.10 RC6] please test
Hi Brian,
RC6 - ERROR!
RC5 - ERROR!
RC3 - OK!
Sorry for not
Hi Brian,
RC4 also works correctly.
Cheers,
Henrique
Brian E. Fox wrote:
Interesting, what about RC4?
-Original Message-
From: Henrique Prange [mailto:hpra...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 12:54 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Cc: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: [2.0.10
Hi,
In this thread you are talking about several teams. I'm considering there
is only one maven team. If this not the case is there someone who can
explain to me which teams we have and who is working in which ?
cheers
Arnaud.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Oleg Gusakov
Oleg Gusakov wrote:
Unit tests were using those jars to compile test code.
Just a technical question: Is it actually required/desirable to really
compile code during the tests?
Over in the Maven core ITs, running the Compiler (or Surefire) Plugin
was the classical approach to test
Hi Brian,
I found a problem while executing 'mvn clean install' in one of my
projects. (See the error below)
I verified and the build works with 2.0.9 and 2.1.0-M1 without problems.
Cheers,
Henrique
[ERROR] FATAL
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:25 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.comwrote:
Mine below.
OK. As I read 2.2 it basically only says the first definition wins. 2.1
talks about a collection of models, but it doesn't say anything about
dependency resolution, either directly or in its references
Hi Jason,
I know that we have several sub-projects and in parallel we have more
people working on it (or more precisely I think we have not really more
people but those one are working more because it's part of there job). What
I asked was who was in those teams/subprojects to better understand
There is only one team, the Maven team.
However I think it's fair to ask that people be careful when changing
things that are being actively developed by another person, at least
over-communicate to avoid collisions. AFAIK, the issue was resolved
already by both sides.
-Original
Henrique, could you also try with RC5 to see if it is a new issue in
this RC? I'm betting it is related to the Modello change introduced in
RC6.
RC5 is at:
http://people.apache.org/~brianf/RC-5/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.0.
10-RC5/
-Original Message-
From: Henrique Prange
Hello,
Before I head of starting a custom plugin, I would like to know if anyone is
aware of a plugin like the mojo-executor plugin, but with a bit more features.
http://code.google.com/p/mojo-executor/
http://code.google.com/p/mojo-executor/
My intent is to automate making releases using
On 17-Dec-08, at 9:57 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
Hi,
In this thread you are talking about several teams. I'm considering
there
is only one maven team. If this not the case is there someone who can
explain to me which teams we have and who is working in which ?
Obviously there are
Hi Brian,
RC6 - ERROR!
RC5 - ERROR!
RC3 - OK!
Sorry for not detecting the problem in the RC5. I didn't find time to
test this release candidate. :(
Cheers,
Henrique
Brian E. Fox wrote:
Henrique, could you also try with RC5 to see if it is a new issue in
this RC? I'm betting it is related
I think Oleg answered the Mercury question: currently himself, Hervé
and Ben.
On 17-Dec-08, at 2:55 PM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
Hi Jason,
I know that we have several sub-projects and in parallel we have more
people working on it (or more precisely I think we have not really
more
people but
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:51 AM, Jason van Zyl jvan...@sonatype.com wrote:
Howdy,
This is primarily directed at Benjamin (who has done a great job getting the
ITs in shape), John (who has spent a great deal of time getting our grid up
and running), and Tom (who has made some very cool
Le mercredi 17 décembre 2008, Brian E. Fox a écrit :
Herve,
I was just in the process of staging 2.0.10 when I noticed that you
bumped the Modello version from alpha-13 to alpha-22. I didn't see this
raised as an issue in any of the RCs
I raised the issue:
Hi - we have a classical jee setup with jar/war/ear and a ws-client
dep: ear - war - jar
the ws-client is part of the same multimodule as the others - same parent
and all.
The ws-client has:
build
plugins
plugin
artifactIdmaven-dependency-plugin/artifactId
uh, this problem is really strange:
1. Modello 1.0-alpha-22 was introduced in RC6: RC5 was still using
1.0-alpha-13
2. looking at RC6 model generated sources, Extension.java line 147 is:
result = 37 * result + getVersion() != null ? getVersion().hashCode() : 0;
I don't see how a NPE can get
Benjamin has already solved it, check out his recent commit and JIRA.
Cheers,
Brett
On 18/12/2008, at 9:36 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
uh, this problem is really strange:
1. Modello 1.0-alpha-22 was introduced in RC6: RC5 was still using
1.0-alpha-13
2. looking at RC6 model generated sources,
On 17-Dec-08, at 5:00 PM, Tom Huybrechts wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:51 AM, Jason van Zyl
jvan...@sonatype.com wrote:
Howdy,
This is primarily directed at Benjamin (who has done a great job
getting the
ITs in shape), John (who has spent a great deal of time getting our
grid up
and
Patch proposed : http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SWIZZLE-37
Reports fixed :
https://ci.sonatype.org/view/Reports/
http://www.sonatype.org/~j2ee-hudson/reports/
We'll have to see how to move them on the grid.
Arnaud
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Arnaud HERITIER aherit...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
John, can you sync those up and get it publishing from the grid master?
-Original Message-
From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:aherit...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 6:02 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Reports are down
Patch proposed :
Le mercredi 17 décembre 2008, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit :
Oleg Gusakov wrote:
Unit tests were using those jars to compile test code.
Just a technical question: Is it actually required/desirable to really
compile code during the tests?
Over in the Maven core ITs, running the Compiler (or
Be careful that actually the path were the report is generated is harcoded
in shell scripts.
We can change it to pass the path as parameter.
cheers
Arnaud
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Brian E. Fox bri...@reply.infinity.nuwrote:
John, can you sync those up and get it publishing from the
It fails when doing release:prepare for real - because the SomeModuleWAR is
not available in local repo because the default prepare goals are:
clean verify :
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-release-plugin/prepare-mojo.html#preparationGoals
now - why does this fail? does the dependency
Herve,
Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Le mercredi 17 décembre 2008, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit :
Oleg Gusakov wrote:
Unit tests were using those jars to compile test code.
Just a technical question: Is it actually required/desirable to really
compile code during the tests?
Over in the
Hi everyone,
It's been quite awhile since we released a new version of the Assembly
Plugin, and there have been some important fixes. Along with the plugin
itself, its dependencies contain some improvements, and all of it is
ready to be released for use (at least, that's my opinion).
Since
This fixes the NPE reported in the last RC:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3921 (Thanks Benjamin and Henrique)
Here's the list of issues fixed in 2.0.10:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=14112styleName
=HtmlprojectId=10500Create=Create
And I've staged RC-6 here:
(once again with the right url)
This fixes the NPE reported in the last RC:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3921 (Thanks Benjamin and Henrique)
Here's the list of issues fixed in 2.0.10:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=14112styleName
Comments below:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
I fixed some typos - is it ok to regenerate the PDF? (mine comes out
slightly different on the Mac but it's all there AFAICT).
Just to add to what Brian and Ralph have already said:
3.1 - I think we have
On 18/12/2008, at 1:51 PM, Shane Isbell wrote:
Comments below:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org
wrote:
I fixed some typos - is it ok to regenerate the PDF? (mine comes out
slightly different on the Mac but it's all there AFAICT).
Just to add to what Brian
Hi,
I give up on Confluence, the math markup just isn't there. So I say we
stick to Tex for now. There's a nice editor/viewer invoker for Eclipse
here:
http://texlipse.sourceforge.net/
Installed easily and allows you to nicely navigate the document.
Thanks,
Jason
-alpha-1-20081217-all.jar
* put it into ~/.ant/lib
* if you want to try PGP signature functionality - grab Bouncy Castle
bcpg-jdk15-140.jar and bcprov-jdk15-140.jar that could be found in
central, and put them into ~/.ant/lib -
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/bouncycastle/
* check the UT build
On Dec 17, 2008, at 9:27 AM, Shane Isbell wrote:
I guess I really have no clue what functionality a mixin is
supposed to
provide or how it would be retrieved without a version or groupid.
Is it
being suggested they would be stored in the repo without that? I'd
need a
lot of
On 18-Dec-08, at 12:47 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Dec 17, 2008, at 9:27 AM, Shane Isbell wrote:
I guess I really have no clue what functionality a mixin is
supposed to
provide or how it would be retrieved without a version or groupid.
Is it
being suggested they would be stored in the
OK - I'm looking forward to seeing this. I understand the programmatic
aspect in the use case you describe with the IDE, but not with
something like the release capability. IIUC this would allow our
organization to create a standard way of doing something and then
somehow make it available
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.comwrote:
On Dec 17, 2008, at 9:27 AM, Shane Isbell wrote:
I guess I really have no clue what functionality a mixin is supposed to
provide or how it would be retrieved without a version or groupid. Is it
being suggested
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.comwrote:
OK - I'm looking forward to seeing this. I understand the programmatic
aspect in the use case you describe with the IDE, but not with something
like the release capability. IIUC this would allow our organization to
On Dec 17, 2008, at 10:57 PM, Shane Isbell wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
wrote:
On Dec 17, 2008, at 9:27 AM, Shane Isbell wrote:
I guess I really have no clue what functionality a mixin is
supposed to
provide or how it would be
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.comwrote:
On Dec 17, 2008, at 10:57 PM, Shane Isbell wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
wrote:
On Dec 17, 2008, at 9:27 AM, Shane Isbell wrote:
I guess I really have no
On Dec 17, 2008, at 11:15 PM, Shane Isbell wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
wrote:
OK - I'm looking forward to seeing this. I understand the
programmatic
aspect in the use case you describe with the IDE, but not with
something
like the
On Dec 17, 2008, at 11:31 PM, Shane Isbell wrote:
And I've said multiple times that that isn't an adequate definition.
Jason's post provided a better clue but still doesn't define it.
Your
definition is about like me telling you that I am heading a JCP
committee to
define a new Java
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.comwrote:
On Dec 17, 2008, at 11:31 PM, Shane Isbell wrote:
And I've said multiple times that that isn't an adequate definition.
Jason's post provided a better clue but still doesn't define it. Your
definition is about
47 matches
Mail list logo
