Re: Progress on support for large projects

2009-05-16 Thread Brian Fox
Also be aware that 2.1/2.2 already do some pom transformations, so this would have to extend instead of replicate what's already there. On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > On May 16, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Joerg Hohwiller wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1

Re: Adding a packaging type to the Dependency plugin

2009-05-16 Thread Brian Fox
You could probably also add it to a jar and add that as a dependency in the plugin block of your pom. The archiver looks up the unarchiver impl and it needs to be known to plexus. On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Tim O'Brien wrote: > Is there a more straightforward way to add support for a custo

Re: maven 2.1 incompatibility list

2009-05-16 Thread Brian Fox
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Joerg Hohwiller wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi there, > > > >> E.g. with maven 2.0.x you could have a module included in your > >> toplevel pom that you also add as dependency to some plugin such > >> as checkstyle or findbugs. In m

Adding a packaging type to the Dependency plugin

2009-05-16 Thread Tim O'Brien
Is there a more straightforward way to add support for a custom packaging type to the dependency plugin aside from just customizing the components.xml, forking the plugin, and publishing your own custom build?I'm assuming the answer is no because I see that there is an UnArchiver with a "swc" r

Re: Extending the Pom

2009-05-16 Thread Joerg Hohwiller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Shane, > >> Something that I think would be useful is a language/platform element. Then >> it's purely additions to the POM. If you could identify the >> language/platform and it's version would that be enough for you? > > > For this element, I t

Re: Progress on support for large projects

2009-05-16 Thread Ralph Goers
On May 16, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Joerg Hohwiller wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ralph, Okay. So thats what I guessed when I said that the MavenProject/ Model is just a stupid POJO and various plugins manipulate it with side effects. Sounds a little hacky to me but th

Re: maven 2.1 incompatibility list

2009-05-16 Thread Joerg Hohwiller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, >> E.g. with maven 2.0.x you could have a module included in your >> toplevel pom that you also add as dependency to some plugin such >> as checkstyle or findbugs. In maven 2.1 you have to remove the >> module declaration or you will get a

Re: Progress on support for large projects

2009-05-16 Thread Joerg Hohwiller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ralph, >> >> Okay. So thats what I guessed when I said that the MavenProject/Model is >> just a stupid POJO and various plugins manipulate it with side effects. >> Sounds a little hacky to me but thats the way it is. So my serialization >> idea is

Re: Progress on support for large projects

2009-05-16 Thread Joerg Hohwiller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Brian, >> >> Do you need simple IT-projects that I shall attach to MNG-4161 and related? >> > > Sample ITs for sure, and some level of detail in a proposal like these: > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/User+Proposals > here is my propo

AW: [VOTE] Java 5 and Maven Plugins

2009-05-16 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 it's a simple trade off. Do we like to punish >=jdk1.5 users or <=jdk1.4 users. For a production build or in a CI system, plugin versions should be set in the pom anyway. Otherwise a build is not 100% reproduceable. LieGrue, strub - Ursprüngliche Mail > Von: Brett Porter > An:

Re: svn commit: r775177 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-site-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/site/AbstractSiteMojo.java

2009-05-16 Thread Jason van Zyl
Looks like it's all in the project-info plugin where the project builder is used. On 15-May-09, at 5:12 PM, Vincent Siveton wrote: Hi Jason, Thanks for your log. Yes I think your changes are corrects. Could you please merge them to the branch too [1]? Cheers, Vincent [1] https://svn.apa

Re: svn commit: r775177 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-site-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/site/AbstractSiteMojo.java

2009-05-16 Thread Jason van Zyl
From what Lukas pointed out it's further down in the Doxia tools that uses the project builder. I'll go digging but I'm certain you don't need the signature you're using. On 15-May-09, at 5:12 PM, Vincent Siveton wrote: Hi Jason, Thanks for your log. Yes I think your changes are corrects.