Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 0.9

The problem is that ignoring the tests will still fail as long as you run the release on windows. I'll try to fix the testcases tonight. Kristian 2015-09-16 9:37 GMT+02:00 Tibor Digana : > I see ASF builds pass on Linux, but I am using Win with Java 5. > That's the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 0.9

We can release Version 0.10 but the PMC has to then prepare a new milestone in Jira and migrate these three issues we solved in 0.9. @Kristian Shall we skip the tests on Windows? This would be the 4th issues to fix. On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Tibor Digana wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 0.9

I see ASF builds pass on Linux, but I am using Win with Java 5. That's the reason why symbolic links were skipped because they are Java 7 specific. I am running Java 5 build with [1], and then with Java 7 [2]. I am not authenticated peer with deployment to Maven Central while using Java 5. So yes

Re: Project Jigsaw: Early-Access Builds available on jdk9.java.net/jigsaw

Hi Robert, Apply this patch which contains a fix for deep classpath scanning under Jigsaw (this mode isn’t used by Maven at runtime, just this test) https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/66 or alternatively change DefaultMavenExecutionRequestPopulatorTest to use the component index rather than

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 0.9

Hi Tibor, based on the following i have to give -1... I have downloaded the source zip and tested with Maven 3.0.5, 3.1.1, 3.2.5, 3.3.3 (via mvn clean verify) on my Mac and got the following in all cases... Running org.apache.maven.shared.utils.cli.shell.BourneShellTest [/bin/sh, -c, chmod

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 0.9

Tibor; Which operating system did you use when running the release ? I'm probably a bit slow since I'm the last person in the universe to realize this: Symlinks cannot really be checked into git/svn if we are to support releases from windows. (If the release is run on macos/linux it will be ok)

Re: Project Jigsaw: Early-Access Builds available on jdk9.java.net/jigsaw

It was a jigsaw bug, should be fixed with http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/rev/948a1770620e Op Mon, 14 Sep 2015 07:23:17 +0200 schreef Olivier Lamy : I didn't have a deep look but I guess yes. On 11 September 2015 at 04:43, Robert Scholte

Re: Project Jigsaw: Early-Access Builds available on jdk9.java.net/jigsaw

I'm just going to continue with the next failure: --- Test set: org.apache.maven.execution.DefaultMavenExecutionRequestPopulatorTest ---

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 0.9

Hi Tibor, On 9/16/15 9:40 AM, Tibor Digana wrote: We can release Version 0.10 but the PMC has to then prepare a new milestone in Jira and migrate these three issues we solved in 0.9. Why using 0.10 ? The release can be dropped from Nexus, cause it's a staged release ...and make Take 2 of the

Re: Project Jigsaw: Early-Access Builds available on jdk9.java.net/jigsaw

PS. you should also update animal-sniffer-maven-plugin to 1.14 to pick up the fix for MANIMALSNIFFER-49 On Wednesday, 16 September 2015 at 10:20, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > Hi Robert, > > Apply this patch which contains a fix for deep classpath scanning under > Jigsaw (this mode isn’t used by

Re: JavaxToolsCompiler

On 14/09/2015 20:21, Stuart McCulloch wrote: Yes, the issue is that ToolProvider.getSystemJavaCompiler() is returning null when using the Jigsaw EA with Maven. AFAICT this is because it’s now using the service loader mechanism which is influenced by the Thread’s context ClassLoader The

build park slows down

Hello guys, Let's discuss build park issues. The build [1] permanently fails on performance tests because the JVM is blocked by something. After a segmentation fault, happened 3 days ago, on JVM Java 7 the machine Windows1 is already very slow [2]. It looks like something eats the CPU. Our

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shared Utils version 0.9

Ok, I fixed the problem in r1703454 Basically I created a method that creates all the symlinks required for the test on the fly, since running on the release on windows would simply not work (it would not create a zip with the proper symlinks since windows subversion does not check out symlinks).

Re: Category Maven in ASF JIRA

Am 2015-09-07 um 10:45 schrieb Michael Osipov: Hi folks, during issue cleanup I have noticed that our category Maven contains two other projects [1] which we do not maintain. Namely, Archiva and Continuum. I would open an INFRA issue to remove them. Any opinions? [1]

[GitHub] maven-plugins pull request: [MDEP-490] Add option to ignore exclus...

Github user jhaber closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/54 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

Re: Another JIRA cleanup

Am 2015-09-07 um 10:40 schrieb Michael Osipov: Am 2015-08-30 um 21:31 schrieb Michael Osipov: Hi folks, some of you might remember that I have closed a bunch of issues some time ago. I'd like to reperform that task because we have more than 3100 open issues at the moment [1]. Many issues