ok, you convinced me: done
styled content should be small, then the overhead to create some Strings
should be really small...
Regards,
Hervé
Le dimanche 17 juillet 2016 21:11:09 Robert Scholte a écrit :
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2016 20:49:52 +0200, Christian Schulte
>
> wrote:
> >
Hi Robert,
I see, I will try to debug why the test is failing for spaces and special
characters. How about naming the folder "space & special char" instead? It
would make it clearer that this is the purpose of the test.
Regards,
Guillaume
2016-07-17 22:39 GMT+02:00 Robert Scholte
Hi,
or those folders should be generated with a setup script during the
invoker run...
Kind regards
Karl Heinz
On 7/17/16 10:39 PM, Robert Scholte wrote:
Hi Guillaume,
there's a reason why this directory was called like this (spaces +
special character).
It is failing on my Windows machine
Hi Guillaume,
there's a reason why this directory was called like this (spaces + special
character).
It is failing on my Windows machine too, but haven't investigated why it
is failing, I think the Plexus Commandline doesn't like it...
This should be reverted and fixed or excluded for
On Sun, 17 Jul 2016 20:49:52 +0200, Christian Schulte
wrote:
Am 07/17/16 um 12:04 schrieb Robert Scholte:
On Sun, 17 Jul 2016 09:49:39 +0200, Hervé BOUTEMY
wrote:
I worked on documentation to finish from my pov my work on this API:
Am 07/17/16 um 12:04 schrieb Robert Scholte:
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2016 09:49:39 +0200, Hervé BOUTEMY
> wrote:
>
>> I worked on documentation to finish from my pov my work on this API:
>> http://maven.apache.org/shared-archives/maven-shared-utils-LATEST/
>>
>> I'd like to
On Sun, 17 Jul 2016 19:12:35 +0200, Hervé BOUTEMY
wrote:
just keeping the option with Object will meaen that you must create a
String
to append it to the buffer: that's less memory-efficient
What do you mean: you must create a String? Because in the end
just keeping the option with Object will meaen that you must create a String
to append it to the buffer: that's less memory-efficient
if we stay with only one concept, let's remove the methods with Object that
were suppose just to ease simple use cases
Do you really want that?
Regards,
Hervé
fixed
thanks for the feedback
Regards,
Hervé
Le dimanche 17 juillet 2016 11:19:44 Michael Osipov a écrit :
> Am 2016-07-17 um 09:49 schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY:
> > I worked on documentation to finish from my pov my work on this API:
> >
Github user mryan43 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/10
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/10
@mryan43 Please close the PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
On Sat, 16 Jul 2016 20:15:16 +0200, Christian Schulte
wrote:
Am 16.07.2016 um 15:40 schrieb Robert Scholte:
I understand that every element has an original scope, but I wonder if
it
is useful in the tree. I'd say based on the scope(s) you get a certain
tree, where scopes
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/10
Agreed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user mryan43 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/10
I just want to make it coherent with other source files in this project so
that contributors can configure their IDE to order the imports properly and
avoid unrelated changes due to
On Sun, 17 Jul 2016 09:49:39 +0200, Hervé BOUTEMY
wrote:
I worked on documentation to finish from my pov my work on this API:
http://maven.apache.org/shared-archives/maven-shared-utils-LATEST/
I'd like to release maven-shared-utils 3.1.0 to start releasing plugins
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/10
Where is the need for this fix? `O` comes after `J`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Hi,
so after I found the issue related to reactor order (MNG-6057) (Thanks
Robert for the tip which brought me to right direction) now I'm diving
more into the problem related to the resolution of the artifacts which I
have described related to maven-assembly-plugin after more testing I
have
Github user AlesRybak closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype/pull/11
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Am 2016-07-17 um 09:49 schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY:
I worked on documentation to finish from my pov my work on this API:
http://maven.apache.org/shared-archives/maven-shared-utils-LATEST/
I'd like to release maven-shared-utils 3.1.0 to start releasing plugins with
styled messages, and of course work
Hi Hervé,
I was to fast pushing on the send button ;-(.
On 7/17/16 9:49 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
I worked on documentation to finish from my pov my work on this API:
http://maven.apache.org/shared-archives/maven-shared-utils-LATEST/
I'd like to release maven-shared-utils 3.1.0 to start
Hi Hervé,
On 7/17/16 9:49 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
I worked on documentation to finish from my pov my work on this API:
http://maven.apache.org/shared-archives/maven-shared-utils-LATEST/
I'd like to release maven-shared-utils 3.1.0 to start releasing plugins with
styled messages, and of course
I worked on documentation to finish from my pov my work on this API:
http://maven.apache.org/shared-archives/maven-shared-utils-LATEST/
I'd like to release maven-shared-utils 3.1.0 to start releasing plugins with
styled messages, and of course work on releasing Maven 3.4.0-SNAPSHOT
any
22 matches
Mail list logo