Steve Loughran wrote:
Vincent Massol wrote:
what we actually do at work is just run cruise control on a single box
and collect the results. Its that result collection which becomes
critical and hard on a big distributed system.
Just some other things to note FYI.
Continuum recently gained
I think its a great feature to have in Maven. I'd suppose a change like this
would be targeted for 2.1, right?
Cheers,
Rahul
- Original Message -
From: "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Developers List"
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005
Vincent Massol wrote:
I am working with a PhD student at CERN on distributed testing, and
there is a project gridunit that does some good stuff already, running
junit tests across a farm of nodes, collecting and presenting the
results.
Wow, that sounds really cool! Especially as there's a
> -Original Message-
> From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: vendredi 6 janvier 2006 15:59
> To: 'Maven Developers List'
> Subject: RE: [discussion] Integration testing location
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> > -Original Message-
Hi Steve,
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mercredi 4 janvier 2006 14:37
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: [discussion] Integration testing location
[snip]
> > For example cargo could define a cargo:test goal
Vincent Massol wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jesse McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: mercredi 28 décembre 2005 20:44
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [discussion] Integration testing location
I worry a bit about mixing unit and integration tests generally...
maybe we
On Dec 28, 2005, at 10:00 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
-1 to generic pre/post phases. For one, there's no difference between
pre-process-classes and post-compile.
Maybe that indicates that the process-classes is really a decoration
for the compile phase. We have several pl
Brett Porter wrote:
If we just do pre/post, won't the next point be that pre-pre-compile is
needed?
I imagine that 90% of what people do will be covered by the standard
lifecycle, 5% of people might make custom lifecycle and 5% might need to
do some really weird stuff with a big pile of rop
Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Brett Porter wrote:
>
>> -1 to generic pre/post phases. For one, there's no difference between
>> pre-process-classes and post-compile.
>
> Maybe that indicates that the process-classes is really a decoration
> for the compile phase. We have several places in the lifecycle w
Brett Porter wrote:
-1 to generic pre/post phases. For one, there's no difference between
pre-process-classes and post-compile.
Maybe that indicates that the process-classes is really a decoration for
the compile phase. We have several places in the lifecycle where the
same argument applies
Jesse McConnell wrote:
I worry a bit about mixing unit and integration tests generally...
maybe we have the recommended case for them go into
src/integration-test/java or something along those lines...
+1
When I said parallel to unit testing that's what I meant so that
everything was distinc
Sorry to top reply, am trying to capture a response to several emails in
the thread:
+1 to src/it/java, and a reproduction of all test phases for integration
testing
We may want to have a functional test set as well that is separate to
integration testing (I know there a bunch of different names,
On 12/28/05, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Sure but there's a very common use case for integration testing: the need
> to
> have environment setup before the test and to clean it after the tests. Of
> course you could write all sort of plugin to that the plugin support doing
> t
> -Original Message-
> From: Jesse McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mercredi 28 décembre 2005 20:44
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: [discussion] Integration testing location
>
> I worry a bit about mixing unit and integration tests generally.
-Original Message-
> > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: mercredi 28 décembre 2005 19:51
> > To: Maven Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [discussion] Integration testing location
> >
> > Vincent Massol wrote:
> > > Hi there
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mercredi 28 décembre 2005 19:51
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: [discussion] Integration testing location
>
> Vincent Massol wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I&
Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi there,
I'd like to continue the discussion about integration testing (see
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Testing+Strategies). Here are some
topics on which I'd like to get your opinion:
1) Need for a pre/post phase to integration-test. See
http://jira.codehaus.o
17 matches
Mail list logo
