> -Original Message-
> From: Michal Maczka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 June 2003 22:01
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: Recent changes in war plugin
[snip]
> > I think we're talking about the same thing. You can have a jelly
taglib
&g
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Michal Maczka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 18 June 2003 21:13
> > To: Maven Developers List
> > Subject: RE: Recent changes in war plugin
> >
> >
> > > This already exists in Ant: it'
hanks
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: Michal Maczka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 June 2003 21:40
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: Recent changes in war plugin
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[E
> -Original Message-
> From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:46 PM
> To: 'Maven Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Recent changes in war plugin
>
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mic
> -Original Message-
> From: Michal Maczka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 June 2003 21:13
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: Recent changes in war plugin
>
>
> > This already exists in Ant: it's called
> > (http://ant.apache.org/ma
> This already exists in Ant: it's called
> (http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/manifest.html). And you can use
> it from java too... :-) It weights 37K and contains lots of useful code.
> Why start reimplementing it again?
>
It's about different thing. There is no central place in maven whi
> -Original Message-
> From: Michal Maczka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 June 2003 12:44
> To: 'Maven Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Recent changes in war plugin
>
>
> > > >
> > >
> > > What's so magical in an
Michal Maczka wrote:
...
Last time I am asking:
Does anybody has something against building war ___always__ in two distinct
steps?
a) copying to build area (somewhere in target/ )
b) making a jar archive
Yes, this is the best way to do it. If your servlet engine can use
exploded webapps it
> > >
> >
> > What's so magical in ant war task?
>
> It's written, fully supports the war model and has gone through lots of
> testing.
>
OK I agree. But if we all have all files in given folder and we just want
to archive it why we should care? It's just fairly simple thing.
Do we need realy w
--- Michal Maczka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's so magical in ant war task?
Nothing. I would say, that I never used it before
maven - jar was just fine for me.
> And personally I think that as much as possible of
> the code should be done
> in pure java - not in jelly with help of ant.
> -Original Message-
> From: Michal Maczka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 June 2003 11:20
> To: 'Maven Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Recent changes in war plugin
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Vincent Massol [mail
> -Original Message-
> From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:33 AM
> To: 'Maven Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Recent changes in war plugin
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Michal
> -Original Message-
> From: Michal Maczka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 June 2003 10:01
> To: 'Maven Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Recent changes in war plugin
>
> Yes.
> I am still working on deployer.
> That's the art which I
Michal Maczka wrote:
> Does anybody has something against building war ___always__ in two distinct
> steps?
>
> a) copying to build area (somewhere in target/ )
> b) making a jar archive
Go for it - it seems to simplify things, and people might want to run
their application off that "explode
.
Michal
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 1:32 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: Recent changes in war plugin
>
> By this do you mean the war plugin??
> --
> dIon Gillard, M
.
>
> mm
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Konstantin Priblouda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 11:58 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Recent changes in war plugin
> >
> > Hi Michal,
> >
> >
It was mistake!
will fix that
Michal
> -Original Message-
> From: Kurt Schrader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 6:36 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: Recent changes in war plugin
>
>
> I thought that we voted on this and
I thought that we voted on this and decided that a war qould remained
unversioned for easy deployment, but there would be a property to switch
it to a versioned war.
I am still -1 on making a versioned war the default behavior.
-Kurt
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Konstantin Priblouda wrote:
> I'm not sur
--- Michal Maczka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for pointing that!
> I also realized that I did this change (bit
> unintentionally)
I was sure you did it :) cvs log does not lie :)
> Any other problems with the plugin?
not at the moment
> BTW:
>
> This plugin has not yet reached "releas
Konstantin Priblouda wrote:
> I'm not sure that war artifact always needs version
> name on it. Well, from one point of view it would be
> nice to have versioned one if we are assembling ear.
>
> But from other point of view if we just assemble web
> app
> versioned war is not cool...
IMO a war s
out..
mm
> -Original Message-
> From: Konstantin Priblouda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 11:58 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Recent changes in war plugin
>
> Hi Michal,
>
> Last changes in war plugin seem suboptimal for
> me.
>
&g
Hi Michal,
Last changes in war plugin seem suboptimal for
me.
I'm not sure that war artifact always needs version
name on it. Well, from one point of view it would be
nice to have versioned one if we are assembling ear.
But from other point of view if we just assemble web
app
versioned war is
22 matches
Mail list logo
