Re: Review Request 30952: Adding scheduler validations to master

) { case 1: { ... break; } case 1: { ... break; } } ``` - Joris Van Remoortere On Feb. 13, 2015, 6:54 p.m., Isabel Jimenez wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e

Re: Review Request 30808: Fix high CPU bug. MESOS-2325.

/30808/#comment11 Re-organize this to keep next() simple. Introduce a schedule() to uses next and manipulates the global. Return an OptionTime rather than duration so there is no information loss. - Joris Van Remoortere On Feb. 10, 2015, 2:22 a.m., Joris Van Remoortere wrote

Re: Review Request 29406: Introduce libevent ssl socket.

://reviews.apache.org/r/29406/diff/ Testing --- make check (uses non-ssl socket) benchmarks using ssl sockets master, slave, framework, webui launch with ssl sockets Thanks, Joris Van Remoortere

Re: Review Request 32152: Fix memory corruption in AbstractState JNI bindings. MESOS-2161.

1accc8a498a68b7cfd9e39dc1f3ce01c8bfd219f src/java/src/org/apache/mesos/state/AbstractState.java c66bf0519e7fc671d1e167ccd1e778dc65d3d8e6 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32152/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Joris Van Remoortere

Re: Review Request 32151: Add MESOS_{MAJOR|MINOR|PATCH}_VERSION to libmesos.

668647fdfc0e203fcde59263256659ba14e29960 src/java/jni/org_apache_mesos_MesosNativeLibrary.cpp PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32151/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Joris Van Remoortere

Re: Review Request 29541: Added network::resolve and network::hostname.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29541/#review77068 --- @benh: is this still relevant? - Joris Van Remoortere On Jan. 31

Re: Review Request 28254: http: Allow sending Request objects

? - Joris Van Remoortere On Nov. 20, 2014, 12:54 a.m., Cody Maloney wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28254

Re: Review Request 28485: Provide a default bind() in Socket: any port localhost.

--- make check Thanks, Joris Van Remoortere

Re: Review Request 28485: Provide a default bind() in Socket: any port localhost.

2c4258775bd90f91f1922a3cf2bb4ddf5c334881 3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp e7b029ba97e640c2102548c190ba62b30602f43d Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28485/diff/ Testing --- make check Thanks, Joris Van Remoortere

Re: Review Request 28485: Provide a default bind() in Socket: any port localhost.

, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28485/#review77122 --- On March 20, 2015, 6:24 p.m., Joris Van Remoortere wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit

Re: Review Request 28485: Provide a default bind() in Socket: any port localhost.

://reviews.apache.org/r/28485/diff/ Testing --- make check Thanks, Joris Van Remoortere

Re: Review Request 29406: Introduce libevent ssl socket.

/29406/#comment123548 Use the verify flag correctly. Currently it is being ignored and we always verify the cert if provided. - Joris Van Remoortere On Feb. 20, 2015, 7:24 a.m., Joris Van Remoortere wrote

Re: Review Request 29406: Introduce libevent ssl socket.

://reviews.apache.org/r/29406/diff/ Testing --- make check (uses non-ssl socket) benchmarks using ssl sockets master, slave, framework, webui launch with ssl sockets Thanks, Joris Van Remoortere

Re: Review Request 31930: Introduced an http::Pipe abstraction to simplify streaming HTTP Responses.

/#comment123832 Can we add a test that covers the copying behavior of Reader / Writer? (regarding the high-level usage pattern mentioned above). For example we should not be able to read from a copied reader if one of the instances has closed. - Joris Van Remoortere On March 11, 2015

Review Request 32630: Add style change proposal for constant reference to temporaries.

PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32630/diff/ Testing --- The 'output' in the proposal shows the problem. Thanks, Joris Van Remoortere

[Style Proposal] Disallow Capture by Constant Reference to temporary

I would like to propose we disallow capturing temporaries using a constant reference: const T val = f(); *The reasons, and examples for this are outlined in the proposal here:* [Review Board]: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32630/ [original markdown version]:

Re: Review Request 32558: Improve compile time of mesos by splitting flags

that a seperate proposal / patch. - Joris Van Remoortere On March 27, 2015, 1:21 a.m., Cody Maloney wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32558

Re: Review Request 32151: Add MESOS_{MAJOR|MINOR|PATCH}_VERSION to libmesos.

/version_tests.cpp PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32151/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Joris Van Remoortere

Re: Review Request 32152: Fix memory corruption in AbstractState JNI bindings. MESOS-2161.

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32152/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Joris Van Remoortere

Re: Review Request 32152: Fix memory corruption in AbstractState JNI bindings. MESOS-2161.

/org_apache_mesos_state_AbstractState.cpp 1accc8a498a68b7cfd9e39dc1f3ce01c8bfd219f src/java/src/org/apache/mesos/state/AbstractState.java c66bf0519e7fc671d1e167ccd1e778dc65d3d8e6 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32152/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Joris Van Remoortere

Re: Review Request 32151: Add MESOS_{MAJOR|MINOR|PATCH}_VERSION to libmesos.

/jni/org_apache_mesos_MesosNativeLibrary.cpp PRE-CREATION src/tests/common/version_tests.cpp PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32151/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Joris Van Remoortere

Re: Review Request 32550: Add major, minor, and patch accessors to stout's Version.

() and minor() (http://man.he.net/man3/gnu_dev_major) Diffs - 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/version.hpp 090fcf09dd96538a8748cf4443d150911e2c0d27 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32550/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Joris Van Remoortere

Re: Review Request 32152: Fix memory corruption in AbstractState JNI bindings. MESOS-2161.

1accc8a498a68b7cfd9e39dc1f3ce01c8bfd219f src/java/src/org/apache/mesos/state/AbstractState.java c66bf0519e7fc671d1e167ccd1e778dc65d3d8e6 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32152/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Joris Van Remoortere

Re: Review Request 32583: Marked RunTaskMessage::framework_id as optional.

/#comment127658 Add deprecated tag to indicate that no one should use this going forward. It doesn't affect the C++ code and only adds @deprecated for Java. optional FrameworkID framework_id = 1 [deprecated = true]; - Joris Van Remoortere On April 1, 2015, 7:34 p.m., Kapil Arya wrote

Review Request 33159: Pump updateFramework through Allocator from Master.

/mesos.hpp 42e42ac425a448fcc5e93db1cef1112cbf5e67c4 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33159/diff/ Testing --- make check Thanks, Joris Van Remoortere

Re: Review Request 32961: WIP: Allow framework re-registeration to update master http fields.

/ Testing --- make check. re-registered no_executor_framework with different 'name', 'hostname', 'failover_timeout', and 'webui_url' Thanks, Joris Van Remoortere

Re: Review Request 27113: Libprocess benchmark cleanup

/benchmarks.cpp a927e4ecd8c8955cd9f85e716173a73a9a21c6cd Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27113/diff/ Testing --- make check Thanks, Joris Van Remoortere

Re: Review Request 33376: MESOS-2633 Moved struct Framework methods to their own implementation class.

any code changes into a seperate review (with a JIRA)? Here and elsewhere. See my high-level comment at the top of the review. src/master/master.hpp https://reviews.apache.org/r/33376/#comment131064 We use a period at the end of comments. - Joris Van Remoortere On April 20, 2015, 10:38

Re: Changing Mesos Minimum Compiler Version

on April 9, 2015. Current status (as of April 21, 2015): +1 (Binding) -- Vinod Kone Timothy Chen Yan Xu Brenden Matthews +1 (Non-binding) -- Cody Maloney Joris Van Remoortere Jeff Schroeder Jörg Schad Elizabeth Lingg

Re: Review Request 33376: MESOS-2633 Moved struct Framework methods to their own implementation class.

On April 21, 2015, 3:27 a.m., Joris Van Remoortere wrote: Hey Marco, great first patch! Some high level comments: - Can you check your editor settings to make sure you don't modify lines you don't intend? - Just do a quick look over the 'diff' section before publishing a review so

Re: Review Request 32961: Allow framework re-registeration to update master http fields.

44b0a0147f5354824d86332a67b30018634c9a36 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32961/diff/ Testing --- make check. re-registered no_executor_framework with different 'name', 'hostname', 'failover_timeout', and 'webui_url' Thanks, Joris Van Remoortere

Re: Oversubscription design doc

We have a dedicated IRC channel for this: mesos-oversubscription. Feel free to drop in and chat. On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Niklas Nielsen nik...@mesosphere.io wrote: Hi everyone, In context of some of the recent discussions on 'Resource overcommittal', we are very interested and

Re: Review Request 27113: Libprocess benchmark cleanup

/27113/diff/ Testing --- make check Thanks, Joris Van Remoortere

Re: Review Request 27113: Libprocess benchmark cleanup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27113/#review80101 --- On April 17, 2015, 5:28 p.m., Joris Van Remoortere wrote

Re: Review Request 29406: Introduce libevent ssl socket.

67b6b3b9c13d95fa1a24b48a12c5c831c7f249bf 3rdparty/libprocess/src/socket.cpp 4b0f6bec8051f938812dbc90a7312e4082ea203f Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29406/diff/ Testing --- make check (uses non-ssl socket) benchmarks using ssl sockets master, slave, framework, webui launch with ssl sockets Thanks, Joris Van

Re: Suggestion: Mesos 0.22.1 point release

I think the plan is to cut a new RC by sometime tomorrow. The spreadsheet is up-to-date, just need to cherry-pick and modify the change-log. Joris On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Benjamin Mahler benjamin.mah...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Nik, any progress on this? Is the spreadsheet up-to-date?

Re: Review Request 27113: Libprocess benchmark cleanup

/src/tests/benchmarks.cpp a927e4ecd8c8955cd9f85e716173a73a9a21c6cd Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27113/diff/ Testing --- make check Thanks, Joris Van Remoortere

Re: Review Request 32859: Add Camel-case libprocess variable and method names sample.

for you :-) - Joris Van Remoortere On April 6, 2015, 9:19 p.m., haosdent huang wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32859

Re: Review Request 32911: Fixed sandbox ownership bug for executors without URIs.

://reviews.apache.org/r/32911/#comment128199 Can we remove the capture by reference here? I know it's not in the style guide yet, but it will likely be accepted. - Joris Van Remoortere On April 7, 2015, 12:40 a.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote

Re: Review Request 27113: Libprocess benchmark cleanup

/tests/benchmarks.cpp a927e4ecd8c8955cd9f85e716173a73a9a21c6cd Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27113/diff/ Testing --- make check Thanks, Joris Van Remoortere

Re: Changing Mesos Minimum Compiler Version

+1 On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Cody Maloney c...@mesosphere.io wrote: As discussed in the last community meeting, we'd like to bump the minimum required compiler version from GCC 4.4 to GCC 4.8. The overall goals are to make Mesos development safer, faster, and reduce the maintenance

Re: Introduction - Aditi

Hi Aditi, Please feel free to add me as a reviewer for these patches. I contributed part of Phase 1, and ended up looking ahead as to what would be required for the further phases. I'd be happy to review your patches! Joris On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Aditi Dixit aditi96di...@gmail.com

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: mesos-reviewbot #6201

JPeach: That's correct. You had it right in the top level project, but the comparison was wrong in the libprocess check. Probably just a copy paste error, all fixed now! :-) Thanks for helping us move to more general macros! Joris On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 10:51 PM, James Peach jor...@gmail.com

Re: constexpr and non-POD static variables

We had an internal discussion about this. White-listing constexpr is fine by us. I think technically the google style guide allows c++11 features that are not explicitly disallowed, but it doesn't hurt to add it to the style guide :-) Joris On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Paul Brett

Re: constexpr and non-POD static variables

: On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Joris Van Remoortere jo...@mesosphere.io wrote: We had an internal discussion about this. White-listing constexpr is fine by us. I think technically the google style guide allows c++11 features that are not explicitly disallowed, but it doesn't hurt to add

Re: Apache Mesos Community Sync

Reminder: The Mesos Community Developer Sync will be happening today at 3pm Pacific. To participate remotely, join the Google hangout: https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/twitter.com/mesos-sync On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 7:22 AM, Adam Bordelon a...@mesosphere.io wrote: Reminder: We're hosting a

Re: Mesos Style Guideline Adjustments

I will volunteer to update all the comments to wrap at 80 if we agree to keep the code base consistent. Naturally that is also my vote ;-) Joris On Aug 8, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Michael Park mcyp...@gmail.com wrote: An update on this topic since we covered it at the community developer sync.

Re: Review board: diff update

This is the worflow I usually share with people: Updating a review after comments: `git checkout master` `git fetch apache` `git rebase apache/master` 'git checkout your-branch-name` `git rebase master` resolve any rebase issues `git rebase -i HEAD^` (number of `^` based on how far back you

Re: minor doc fixes - do I need to have a JIRA ticket and a shepherd and a compass and a map of the pacific NW?

. I'm sorry the current impression of the contribution process is laborious. Mpark and I gave a talk about this at MesosCon EU. Hopefully the material will be available soon! Thanks for contributing! Joris — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Erik Weathers <ewe

Re: Proposal: move towards #pragma and away from #include guards

+1 with all-at-once — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Kapil Arya <ka...@mesosphere.io> wrote: > +1. > > I think we should do it all at once as Artem mentioned. This doesn't really > affect the history (git-blame, etc.) because we are not touc

Re: Mesos Style Guideline Adjustments

ting tools. If there is more than some simple math involved, this may not be a viable solution. Joris — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Benjamin Mahler <benjamin.mah...@gmail.com> wrote: > I raise this because there is a ton of value in keeping our cod

Re: More Project Structure in JIRA

+1 sounds great! I like the idea of making epics more manageable and the ability to file JIRAs based on a design doc while still separating the Epic for the MVP from the further phases. > On Oct 15, 2015, at 10:11 AM, Bernd Mathiske wrote: > > Proposal: in extension of

Re: RFC: license headers interfere with doxygen documentation (MESOS-3581)

+1 for (a). — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Benjamin Mahler <benjamin.mah...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for (a), in this case the wide sweep only touches the license comments, > so it won't be disruptive to history. > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.25.0 (rc3)

+1 (binding) On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Niklas Nielsen wrote: > Hi all, > > Following up with an RC with the build fix suggested by Kapil: > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos 0.25.0. > > > > 0.25.0 includes the following: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.25.0 (rc2)

+1 (binding) On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Niklas Nielsen wrote: > Hi all, > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos 0.25.0. > > > > 0.25.0 includes the following: > > >

Re: Do we still need to add InverseOffer support to Scheduler API?

Hi Qian, There is no current plan to add this to the old API. Those tickets were created pre-V1 API. Currently the goal is to encourage developers to use the V1 API to have access to new features such as maintenance primitives. Joris On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Qian AZ Zhang

Re: Mesos 0.25.0

Following in the footsteps of the dashboard for the 0.23.0 release, here is the Mesos 0.25.0 Release Dashboard This dashboard was very successful at reducing the time required to triage the first release candidate. Let's

Re: Do we still need to add InverseOffer support to Scheduler API?

but the offer related operations such > as offer and InverserOffers are initiatedby mesos master, the master need > notify the framework for those offers via the callbacks. Comments? > > Thanks, > > Guangya > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Joris Van Remoortere &l

Re: [5/5] mesos git commit: Integer Precision for JSON <-> Protobuf conversions.

aster > > Commit: 2c277f1c0e0dc0a6618ba930bb5f8d9dd753d4be > > Parents: df9eacb > > Author: Joseph Wu <jos...@mesosphere.io> > > Authored: Wed Sep 16 13:44:47 2015 -0400 > > Committer: Joris Van Remoortere <joris.van.remoort...@gmail.com> >

Re: [5/5] mesos git commit: Integer Precision for JSON <-> Protobuf conversions.

t;> >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Jie Yu <j...@twitter.com> wrote: >> >>> Joris, I am using CentOS6 with devtoolset-2 >>> >>> gcc version 4.8.2 20140120 (Red Hat 4.8.2-15) (GCC) >>> >>> I did a clean build (rebootstrap, reconfigure). >

Re: Apache Mesos Community Sync

t 3 PM PST. >>> >>> Please add items to agenda >>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/153CUCj5LOJCFAVpdDZC7COJDwKh9RDjxaTA0S7lzwDA/edit#heading=h.u1x3j7f3uixf> >>> . >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at

Re: Mesos 0.25.0

to 0.25.0! > > Thanks, > > Joris, MPark, and Niklas > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015, 9:23 AM Joris Van Remoortere <jo...@mesosphere.io> > wrote: > > > Following in the footsteps of the dashboard for the 0.23.0 release, > > here is the Mesos 0.25.0 Release Dashboard &

Re: Volunteer for next release

+1 I can help triage with you :-) On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Till Toenshoff wrote: > Hi folks, > > Bernd and I would like to volunteer for managing the next release 0.26. > > The scope and ETA of 0.26 will be discussed today at the Mesos community > sync - hence more

Re: Mesos 0.25.0

Hi Nik, I'd like to co-manage with you as I am invested in Maintenance Primitives :-) Joris On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Michael Park mcyp...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Niklas, As we discussed offline, I'm happy to co-manage or shadow this release. I would also like to add the beta

Fwd: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.26.0 (rc5)

+1 (binding) From: Till Toenshoff Date: Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:55 PM Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.26.0 (rc5) To: u...@mesos.apache.org, dev Hi friends, we did unfortunately, once again run into an issue that needed immediate attention (see

Re: Change minimum supported version for GCC to 4.8.1

+1 (binding) I would like to propose that we bump our minimum supported version for gcc > from 4.8.0 to 4.8.1. The main motivation behind this is that there are at > least 2 outstanding reviews on RB that want to use ref-qualifiers < >

Re: shepherd for MESOS-3909

I will. I think Joseph can (and already has) help review this. — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:02 AM, James Peach <jor...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Can anyone shepherd https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3909? > > Mesos modul

Re: Rack awareness support for Mesos

+dev. @Fan, I responded on the JIRA with some next steps. Thanks for bringing this up! — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:58 PM, james <gar...@verizon.net> wrote: > On 06/07/2016 09:57 AM, Du, Fan wrote: > >> >> >> On 2016/6/6 21

Re: Apply for assignment of jira MESOS-5425

Hello! Thanks for sharing your feedback regarding the range performance. Indeed as you partition things like agent ports heavily this can be detrimental. We have looked at this in the past, and the right thing to do is indeed to use the interval set in Stout. That being said, the reason we

Re: Rack awareness support for Mesos

values are allowed to change vs. not. — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Aaron Carey <aca...@ilm.com> wrote: > #3 would be very helpful for us. Also related: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3059 > > -- > > Aaron Carey >

Re: Multiple framework DRF tuning

Your e-mail seems truncated or mangled in some way (at least for me). Could you please resend it? — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:00 PM, meghdoot bhattacharya < meghdoo...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > > > I wanted to follow up on 2 issues that w

Re: Persistent volume ownership issue

he App tried to create /Database-backups/ ? Only the framework as its original user would be able to do that? — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Jie Yu <yujie@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > Currently, the ownership of the persistent volumes a

Re: Multiple framework DRF tuning

from doing this. — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 8:33 PM, meghdoot bhattacharya < meghdoo...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > Resending with fixed links. > > I wanted to follow up on 2 issues that we discussed few years back on the > below blog described in

Re: [GPU] [Allocation] "Scarce" Resource Allocation

@Fan, In the community meeting a question was raised around which frameworks might be ready to use this. Can you provide some more context for immediate use cases on the framework side? — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:51 AM, Du, Fan <fan...@intel.com>

Re: Failed to shutdown socket with fd xxx

temd lack of support to the new support. — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 2:35 PM, haosdent <haosd...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, @Qiang. > > @Joseph have a nice explain about at Shutdown failed on fd > > http://search-hadoop.com/m/0Vlr6pe7qb2MJX8B1=Re+Beni

Re: Slack as the canonical chat channel

+1 Slack — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Vinod Kone <vinodk...@apache.org> wrote: > Looks like people have jumped the gun here before I sent the email :) > > Here is the context. During the community sync we discussed about using > *

Re: Mesos CLI

n experts have time. This is a trade-off we should consider. The best option may still be for it to be in Python, this is why I'm asking if there are particular things that our helper libraries don't provide which you are leveraging in python. — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Thu, Jun 23, 2

Re: Mesos CLI

+1 for maintaining in repo. +1 for C++. Are the tools in libprocess not sufficient to make this easy to write? What is missing that would make it easier to write in C++? — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Zhou Z Xing <xingz...@cn.ibm.com> wrote:

Re: Failed to shutdown socket with fd xxx

ut the isolation (you likely do in production), then the only remedy is to restart them. — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 4:45 AM, Qiang Chen <qzsc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks @Haosdent for the link to explain the shutdown errors. so I can > ignore this... > >

Re: [GPU] [Allocation] "Scarce" Resource Allocation

With this 4th sorter approach, how does quota work for scarce resources? — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Guangya Liu <gyliu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ben, > > The pre-condition for four stage allocation is that we need to put > d

Re: [Protobuf] Why do we mark field as 'required'

I think it would be great to comment in place e.g. `/* required */ optional `. It's difficult enough as is to extract the semantics out of the current Protos. The required helped document which fields were actually required. — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 2:40 AM

Re: Mesos 0.27.0

+1 On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Timothy Chen wrote: > Hi all, > > As we continue with the monthly release cadence, we should be cutting > a new release a month from the last one (12/16/15), which the next > version will be 0.27.0. > > MPark, Kapil and I are volunteering

Re: Links in documentation

external documentation. — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 4:44 AM, Jörg Schad <jo...@mesosphere.io> wrote: > Hi, > just a short note about links in our documentation. > In the current documentation we use three different ways to link between > differen

Re: "sleep" in a libprocess Process

Hi Hans, If you delay, and then the lambda that you schedule is a `defer` on to the same process, then this accomplishes what you want. The one caveat is that other functions may be invoked on your actor process in the mean time. — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:14

Re: Failed to shutdown socket with fd xxx

, then you can devise a plan for your upgrade. Joris — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Qiang Chen <qzsc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I met an issue when upgrading mesos-slave to 0.28.2. > > At the process of recovering mesos-slave / fram

Re: Need shepherd for MESOS-4353 [Limit the number of processes created by libprocess]

such as not having silent failure. — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 9:02 PM, Maged Michael <maged.mich...@gmail.com> wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4353 > > Thanks. >

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.27.0 (rc2)

If we did feature based releases, we could hold the release for the documentation. Since we do time based releases, it so happened that the release went through before we could get the docs done. I'll be working on the docs shortly :-) — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Thu, Feb 4, 2016

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.27.0 (rc2)

+1 (binding) Tested on Ubuntu 15.04: - Built with clang-3.6 and gcc-4.8. - Launched 1K agents. - Launched 100K tasks (slowly) on 100 agents. - Validated virtual memory set did not grow. - Validate UI was responsive. - Validate task recovery with 0.26 Master -> 0.27

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.27.0 (rc1)

-1 (binding) There is a bug with mutable resource math that surfaced in the allocator changes, but is also happening elsehwere. Mpark is currently working on a patch to disallow this behavior in general, and fix the current issues. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4030 On Wed, Jan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.27.0 (rc1)

Correction to my previous e-mail. The mutable resource bug is here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4534 On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Joris Van Remoortere < joris.van.remoort...@gmail.com> wrote: > -1 (binding) > There is a bug with mutable resource math t

Re: Anonymous modules running context - Another attempt

Hi Marco, It seems Kapil took a look at your reviews, and likely has context to understand whether this change makes sense. I would suggest that you clean up the style errors in the reviews, as there are still quite a few. Thanks! — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9

JIRA Shepherds

Hello Mesos developers, You may have noticed some churn in Jira recently around the shepherd assignment. Specifically, we have unassigned the shepherds for a bunch of projects. We did this in order to get a better sense of which projects are being actively shepherded versus having gone stale, and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.27.1 (rc1)

+1 (binding) - systemd integration testing - upgrade path testing - launching and killing 10K tasks On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Jörg Schad wrote: > + 1 (non-binding) > > Mac OS: non-root: DockerFetcherPluginTest.INTERNET_CURL_FetchManifest >

Re: 答复: Question about "Framework directly access Meso agent"

evenly among agents. — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Suteng <sut...@huawei.com> wrote: > Alex, > We don't have test the performance of mesos. But we have develop a > framework in house, which is like a simplified mesos, use to schedule a >

Re: Enable compiler optimization by default?

+1 (binding) with the condition that we fix the flag mixing problem between CXXFLAGS and --enable-optimize --enable-debug, even if it is to disallow it for now. I want to avoid surprising behavior with implicit flags such as optimize: passing irrelevant CXXFLAGS magically turns it into a debug

Re: Precision of scalar resources

+1 Thanks for taking this on Neil! — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Neil Conway <neil.con...@gmail.com> wrote: > tl;dr: > > If you use resource values with more than three decimal digits of > precision (e.g., you are launching a task tha

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.27.2 (rc1)

@Michael Browning: > > MasterTest.MaxCompletedTasksPerFrameworkFlag [flaky, tracked in > MESOS-4518] This is supposed to be fixed in this release. It is concerning that this came up. Can you verify this and provide logs to Kevin Klues? — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Tue, Ma

Re: Negative durations

solute value, then it would be a bug. To represent infinity we currently wrap the Duration with an Option. The None state represents infinity. You can find this in the protobufs. — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Alexander Rojas <alexan...@mesosphere.io> w

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.27.2 (rc1)

The SHAs rarely exist on HEAD because we tend to cherry-pick bug fixes into release candidates. I'm all for using branches in the repository to put together the release candidates, as well as have committers consider their bug fixes for some N number of backport (future LTS) releases. As Kevin

Re: RFC: RevocableInfo Changes

never want that concept in Mesos. — *Joris Van Remoortere* Mesosphere On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Klaus Ma <klaus1982...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here's some input :). > > If throttling is tolerable but preemption is not, how would that be > expressed? (Is that supported

<    1   2   3   4   5   >