Re: grizzly versus mina

2007-05-25 Thread Julien Vermillard
Le jeudi 24 mai 2007 à 11:45 -0400, Adam Fisk a écrit : > The slides were just posted from this Java One session claiming Grizzly > blows MINA away performance-wise, and I'm just curious as to people's views > on it. They present some interesting ideas about optimizing selector > threading and Byt

Re: Encryption method

2007-05-25 Thread Trustin Lee
Hi Mat, On 5/25/07, mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can I ask which encryption method do you guys use when exchange message? Blowfish is probably one of the most popular and reliable encryption algorithms. BTW, Korean financial corporates use SEED, the Korean standard encryption algorithm, cre

[AsyncWeb] How to shutdown gracefully?

2007-05-25 Thread wolverine my
Hi! I started the AsyncWeb like below: public static void main(String[] args) { AsyncWebStandalone.main(new String[0]); } May I know how to shutdown the AsyncWeb gracefully? At the moment I do a CTRL+C which I think it is not a nice way...

Re: grizzly versus mina

2007-05-25 Thread Holger Hoffstaette
On Fri, 25 May 2007 08:45:34 +0900, Trustin Lee wrote: > The HEAD revision of AsyncWeb highly depends on MINA and had significant > performance improvement. It seems like they used older release (or didn't > use a lightweight asyncweb example). Moreover, I don't think MINA doesn't > have any not

Re: grizzly versus mina

2007-05-25 Thread Trustin Lee
Hi Holger, On 5/25/07, Holger Hoffstaette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 25 May 2007 08:45:34 +0900, Trustin Lee wrote: > The HEAD revision of AsyncWeb highly depends on MINA and had significant > performance improvement. It seems like they used older release (or didn't > use a lightweight

Re: grizzly versus mina

2007-05-25 Thread Ashish Sharma
its strange to see how x vs y wars can generate so many responses. if they are good we can adapt, if we are good we have nothing to worry. On 5/25/07, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Holger, On 5/25/07, Holger Hoffstaette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 25 May 2007 08:45:34 +090

Re: grizzly versus mina

2007-05-25 Thread John Preston
As they say, don't shoot the messenger, deal wih the message. John On 5/25/07, Ashish Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: its strange to see how x vs y wars can generate so many responses. if they are good we can adapt, if we are good we have nothing to worry. On 5/25/07, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PR

Re: Encryption method

2007-05-25 Thread Vinod Panicker
On 5/25/07, mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can I ask which encryption method do you guys use when exchange message? AES is currently an accepted standard for Symmetric key encryption. Supports different key sizes, so you can go for high-strength/low-strength encryption. HTH, Vinod.

Re: grizzly versus mina

2007-05-25 Thread Ersin Er
Hi, MINA started a new trend in NIO based frameworks. It's elegant and I am sure it can be further optimized for performance. What I care now is how easily I can integrate it into my application and MINA with new enhancements seems to be quite cool in this job. And it's Apache! On 5/24/07, Adam

Re: grizzly versus mina

2007-05-25 Thread James Im
Ashish Sharma wrote: its strange to see how x vs y wars can generate so many responses. if they are good we can adapt, if we are good we have nothing to worry. competition is good _ Vælg selv hvordan du vil kommunikere - skrift,

Re: grizzly versus mina

2007-05-25 Thread Adam Fisk
I just wanted to reiterate that I didn't mean to be discouraging to the MINA devs at all. If I hadn't come across the Grizzly tidbit, I was planning on posting a "thank you" for writing such a kick-ass framework that's saving me a ton of time, money, and stress. Asyncweb rocks too, by the way.

mina-sm: other options?

2007-05-25 Thread Yigal Rachman
Hi, Folks: Yesterday my first MINA-based code went into production. As expected, it is working wonderfully well - really cool! Thank you all for making MINA such a joy to use. As noted by others in this group, MINA is very well suited for use with state machines because all the operations

Address already in use?

2007-05-25 Thread Aneel Nazareth
I've been having a problem that I thought I knew how to resolve: If I stop my Mina (1.1.0) server when it has clients connected, and then try to immediately restart it, I get a BindException complaining that the address is already in use. When this happens, netstat shows some connections in TIM

Re: Address already in use?

2007-05-25 Thread Maarten Bosteels
Hi Aneel, try adding these two lines: SocketSessionConfig config = (SocketSessionConfig) acceptor.getSessionConfig (); config.setReuseAddress(true); This will set reuseAddress true for all accepted sockets. Maarten On 5/25/07, Aneel Nazareth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've been having a pro

Re: Address already in use?

2007-05-25 Thread Aneel Nazareth
Maarten Bosteels wrote: Hi Aneel, try adding these two lines: SocketSessionConfig config = (SocketSessionConfig) acceptor.getSessionConfig (); config.setReuseAddress(true); This will set reuseAddress true for all accepted sockets. Aha! SocketAcceptor.getSessionConfig() doesn't seem to exis

2.0 roadmap ?

2007-05-25 Thread Trevor Croft
Greetings. I've been using mina 1.1 for a couple months now and have really enjoyed it. I'm about ready to rip out some home brew networking stuff and replace it with mina. Out of curiosity, are there any time frames for the 2.0 branch release ? Are there any documents that indicate the bi

Re: Migration of AsyncWeb to Apache

2007-05-25 Thread Hez
The "grizzly versus mina" posts mentioned about AsyncWeb several times and it seems that AsyncWeb is getting a lot of attention now. Unfortunately AsyncWeb project seem to be very quiet and not active now ... I wish to see this happen very soon! Alex Karasulu-2 wrote: > > No plan at this poin

Re: Migration of AsyncWeb to Apache

2007-05-25 Thread Alex Karasulu
Can get some volunteers to work through the ip-clearance and migration process. We got the approval from Incubator to make it a subproject of the MINA TLP. Alex On 5/25/07, Hez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The "grizzly versus mina" posts mentioned about AsyncWeb several times and it seems that

Re: Migration of AsyncWeb to Apache

2007-05-25 Thread peter royal
On May 25, 2007, at 5:34 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: Can get some volunteers to work through the ip-clearance and migration process. We got the approval from Incubator to make it a subproject of the MINA TLP. What else is needed? Make a checklist in SVN or on the wiki of remaining steps? -pet

Re: Migration of AsyncWeb to Apache

2007-05-25 Thread Alex Karasulu
We just need to go through the steps defined in the ip-clearance forms over at the incubator which are pretty simple. Then we just import the code into our repo. Here's the ip-clearance doco: http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html The process is pretty simple and r