We just need to go through the steps defined in the ip-clearance forms over
at the incubator which are pretty simple. Then we just import the code into
our repo. Here's the ip-clearance doco:
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html
The process is pretty simple and r
On May 25, 2007, at 5:34 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
Can get some volunteers to work through the ip-clearance and migration
process. We got the approval
from Incubator to make it a subproject of the MINA TLP.
What else is needed? Make a checklist in SVN or on the wiki of
remaining steps?
-pet
Can get some volunteers to work through the ip-clearance and migration
process. We got the approval
from Incubator to make it a subproject of the MINA TLP.
Alex
On 5/25/07, Hez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The "grizzly versus mina" posts mentioned about AsyncWeb several times and
it
seems that
The "grizzly versus mina" posts mentioned about AsyncWeb several times and it
seems that AsyncWeb is getting a lot of attention now. Unfortunately
AsyncWeb project seem to be very quiet and not active now ...
I wish to see this happen very soon!
Alex Karasulu-2 wrote:
>
> No plan at this poin
Greetings. I've been using mina 1.1 for a couple months now and have
really enjoyed it.
I'm about ready to rip out some home brew networking stuff and replace
it with mina.
Out of curiosity, are there any time frames for the 2.0 branch release
? Are there any documents that indicate the bi
Maarten Bosteels wrote:
Hi Aneel,
try adding these two lines:
SocketSessionConfig config = (SocketSessionConfig)
acceptor.getSessionConfig
();
config.setReuseAddress(true);
This will set reuseAddress true for all accepted sockets.
Aha! SocketAcceptor.getSessionConfig() doesn't seem to exis
Hi Aneel,
try adding these two lines:
SocketSessionConfig config = (SocketSessionConfig) acceptor.getSessionConfig
();
config.setReuseAddress(true);
This will set reuseAddress true for all accepted sockets.
Maarten
On 5/25/07, Aneel Nazareth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been having a pro
I've been having a problem that I thought I knew how to resolve: If I
stop my Mina (1.1.0) server when it has clients connected, and then try
to immediately restart it, I get a BindException complaining that the
address is already in use. When this happens, netstat shows some
connections in TIM
Hi, Folks:
Yesterday my first MINA-based code went into production. As expected,
it is working wonderfully well - really cool! Thank you all for making
MINA such a joy to use.
As noted by others in this group, MINA is very well suited for use with
state machines because all the operations
I just wanted to reiterate that I didn't mean to be discouraging to the MINA
devs at all. If I hadn't come across the Grizzly tidbit, I was planning on
posting a "thank you" for writing such a kick-ass framework that's saving me
a ton of time, money, and stress.
Asyncweb rocks too, by the way.
Ashish Sharma wrote:
its strange to see how x vs y wars can generate so many responses.
if they are good we can adapt, if we are good we have nothing to worry.
competition is good
_
Vælg selv hvordan du vil kommunikere - skrift,
Hi,
MINA started a new trend in NIO based frameworks. It's elegant and I
am sure it can be further optimized for performance. What I care now
is how easily I can integrate it into my application and MINA with new
enhancements seems to be quite cool in this job.
And it's Apache!
On 5/24/07, Adam
On 5/25/07, mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can I ask which encryption method do you guys use when exchange message?
AES is currently an accepted standard for Symmetric key encryption.
Supports different key sizes, so you can go for
high-strength/low-strength encryption.
HTH,
Vinod.
As they say, don't shoot the messenger, deal wih the message.
John
On 5/25/07, Ashish Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
its strange to see how x vs y wars can generate so many responses.
if they are good we can adapt, if we are good we have nothing to worry.
On 5/25/07, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PR
its strange to see how x vs y wars can generate so many responses.
if they are good we can adapt, if we are good we have nothing to worry.
On 5/25/07, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Holger,
On 5/25/07, Holger Hoffstaette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2007 08:45:34 +090
Hi Holger,
On 5/25/07, Holger Hoffstaette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 25 May 2007 08:45:34 +0900, Trustin Lee wrote:
> The HEAD revision of AsyncWeb highly depends on MINA and had significant
> performance improvement. It seems like they used older release (or didn't
> use a lightweight
On Fri, 25 May 2007 08:45:34 +0900, Trustin Lee wrote:
> The HEAD revision of AsyncWeb highly depends on MINA and had significant
> performance improvement. It seems like they used older release (or didn't
> use a lightweight asyncweb example). Moreover, I don't think MINA doesn't
> have any not
Hi Mat,
On 5/25/07, mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can I ask which encryption method do you guys use when exchange message?
Blowfish is probably one of the most popular and reliable encryption
algorithms. BTW, Korean financial corporates use SEED, the Korean
standard encryption algorithm, cre
Hi!
I started the AsyncWeb like below:
public static void main(String[] args) {
AsyncWebStandalone.main(new String[0]);
}
May I know how to shutdown the AsyncWeb gracefully?
At the moment I do a CTRL+C which I think it is not a nice way...
Le jeudi 24 mai 2007 à 11:45 -0400, Adam Fisk a écrit :
> The slides were just posted from this Java One session claiming Grizzly
> blows MINA away performance-wise, and I'm just curious as to people's views
> on it. They present some interesting ideas about optimizing selector
> threading and Byt
20 matches
Mail list logo
