tomaswolf closed issue #620: No more authentication methods available with
Apache Mina SSHD
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/620
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
sshd/2.14.0/
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1102
> Git tag:
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/commits/sshd-2.14.0
>
> Please review and vote !
> --
>
> Guillaume Nodet
>
--
Guillaume Nodet
didate release for an SSHD 2.14.0 release.
> >
> > Official staging repo:
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/2.14.0/
> > Maven staging repo:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1102
> > Git tag:
> >h
ache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1102
> Git tag:
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/commits/sshd-2.14.0
>
> Please review and vote !
> --
>
> Guillaume Nodet
>
--
Guillaume Nodet
> >
> > Official staging repo:
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/2.14.0/
> > Maven staging repo:
> >https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1102
> > Git tag:
> >https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/commits/sshd-
ikely since the test failed for you in all three runs.
>
> With which parameters did it fail? (It's a parameterized test; one
> parameter setting will cause several key exchanges during the 10MB
> transfer.) Maybe the problem is not with the file transfer but with
> the KEX during
nd I cannot reproduce on
> either Mac OS or Windows 10 (JDK 17.0.7). A race condition seems
> unlikely since the test failed for you in all three runs.
>
> With which parameters did it fail? (It's a parameterized test; one
> parameter setting will cause several key exchanges du
aging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1102
Git tag:
https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/commits/sshd-2.14.0
Please review and vote !
--
*Emmanuel Lécharny* P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61
elecha...@
t tag:
https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/commits/sshd-2.14.0
Please review and vote !
My +1 from my other message stands, but I notice that
https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/blob/master/CHANGES.md
is not updated.
The "planned for next version" section should have become a new
docs
tps://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1102
> Git tag:
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/commits/sshd-2.14.0
>
> Please review and vote !
> --
>
> Guillaume Nodet
>
> --
t tag:
https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/commits/sshd-2.14.0
Please review and vote !
+ 1
* Src tar builds (mvn clean package) fine and without problems on Mac OS
* Src tar and zip both build fine and without problems on Windows 10
* Class version 52 is fine (Java 8)
* MANIFEST.MF of sshd
On 27.09.24 15:23 , Gary Gregory wrote:
Woa, the build went through and succeeded even with the above error. How
does that make sense? I'm a bit baffled.
Check the log. Our test setup re-tries failed tests multiple times;
perhaps it succeeded in one of the retries. Though I don't see why
that p
64", family: "mac"
>
> Gary
>
Woa, the build went through and succeeded even with the above error. How
does that make sense? I'm a bit baffled.
Gary
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 5:07 AM Guil
Gary
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 5:07 AM Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I've staged a candidate release for an SSHD 2.14.0 release.
>
> Official staging repo:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/2.14.0/
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.ap
fail? (It's a parameterized test; one
parameter setting will cause several key exchanges during the 10MB
transfer.) Maybe the problem is not with the file transfer but with
the KEX during the transfer. (Also unlikely, but not impossible.)
Is there anything in the test logs? The test transfers a
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1102
> Git tag:
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/commits/sshd-2.14.0
>
> Please review and vote !
> --
>
> Guillaume Nodet
>
> -
> I've staged a candidate release for an SSHD 2.14.0 release.
>
> Official staging repo:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/2.14.0/
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1102
> Git tag:
> https:
Hey,
I've staged a candidate release for an SSHD 2.14.0 release.
Official staging repo:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/2.14.0/
Maven staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1102
Git tag:
https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/co
761x25519-sha512 (https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/525)
>
> Official staging repo:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/2.13.2/
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1099
> Git tag:
> https://github.com/apa
On 28/07/2024 13:18, Thomas Wolf wrote:
On 25.07.24 20:08 , Gary Gregory wrote:
Is there something special I have to do on macOS?
I'm getting a lot of:
IllegalState Previous attempts to find a Docker environment failed.
Will not retry. Please see logs and check configuration
I have Docker D
+1
Le mar. 23 juil. 2024 à 18:24, Guillaume Nodet a écrit :
>
> Hey,
>
> I've staged a candidate release for an SSHD 2.13.2 release.
> This release contains a single bug fix:
> * Fix sntrup761x25519-sha512 (https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/525)
>
> Off
Fs.
I was testing the .tar.gz, and that one works (LF line endings).
Commit https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/commit/5a6cf2f47 should fix
this for the next release.
Cheers,
Thomas
P.S.: I don't quite understand why the ZIP worked on Windows; containers
should have the same pro
I switched to Windows and it works, so +1
Apache Maven 3.9.8 (36645f6c9b5079805ea5009217e36f2cffd34256)
Maven home: C:\java\apache-maven-3.9.8
Java version: 17.0.11, vendor: Eclipse Adoptium, runtime: C:\Program
Files\Eclipse Adoptium\jdk-17.0.11.9-hotspot
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding
FTR I'm using Docker Desktop 4.3.0 (157355)
On 27/07/2024 00:48, Gary Gregory wrote:
Hm, odd this is on an Intel mac mini. I'll try again in the AM...
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 6:32 PM Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Weird.
I ran the build on mac OS, worked like a charm.
But I was on my old Intel b
Hm, odd this is on an Intel mac mini. I'll try again in the AM...
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 6:32 PM Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> Weird.
>
> I ran the build on mac OS, worked like a charm.
>
> But I was on my old Intel based mac, not on my new M3 Mac OS.
>
> Could it be something like that,
>
> On 2
Weird.
I ran the build on mac OS, worked like a charm.
But I was on my old Intel based mac, not on my new M3 Mac OS.
Could it be something like that,
On 26/07/2024 15:33, Gary Gregory wrote:
I have Docker Desktop up and running and "docker ps" returns nothing
running before or after I try to
I have Docker Desktop up and running and "docker ps" returns nothing
running before or after I try to build.
What am I missing?
Gary
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 5:35 PM Thomas Wolf wrote:
>
> On 25.07.24 20:08 , Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Is there something special I have to do on macOS?
>
> Not real
Hi Team,
We are trying to update Apache Mina sshd : sftp defined in our application from
0.11.0 to 2.9.3 version.
The code snippet defined in build.gradle file is as :
compile("org.apache.sshd:sshd-sftp:2.9.3")
During our analysis we found that some of the classes and interface a
On 25.07.24 20:08 , Gary Gregory wrote:
Is there something special I have to do on macOS?
Not really.
I'm getting a lot of:
IllegalState Previous attempts to find a Docker environment failed.
Will not retry. Please see logs and check configuration
I have Docker Desktop 4.33.0 (160616).
The
gt; >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1101 :
> >> * sshd.osgi MANIFEST.MF looks good now
> >> * JGit tests pass
> >> * Class version 52 (i.e., Java 8)
> >> Thanks, Guillaume!
> >> Cheers,
> >> Thomas
>
now
>> * JGit tests pass
>> * Class version 52 (i.e., Java 8)
>> Thanks, Guillaume!
>> Cheers,
>> Thomas
>>>
>>> Le mar. 23 juil. 2024 à 19:15, Thomas Wolf a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> On 23.07.24 18:24 , Guillaume Nodet wrote
release for an SSHD 2.13.2 release.
This release contains a single bug fix:
* Fix sntrup761x25519-sha512
(https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/525)
Official staging repo:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/2.13.2/
Maven staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/
ins a single bug fix:
* Fix sntrup761x25519-sha512 (https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/525)
Official staging repo:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/2.13.2/
Maven staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1099
Git tag:
https
;
> On 23.07.24 18:24 , Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > I've staged a candidate release for an SSHD 2.13.2 release.
> > This release contains a single bug fix:
> > * Fix sntrup761x25519-sha512
> > (https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/525)
On 23.07.24 18:24 , Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Hey,
I've staged a candidate release for an SSHD 2.13.2 release.
This release contains a single bug fix:
* Fix sntrup761x25519-sha512 (https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/525)
Official staging repo:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dis
Hey,
I've staged a candidate release for an SSHD 2.13.2 release.
This release contains a single bug fix:
* Fix sntrup761x25519-sha512 (https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/525)
Official staging repo:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/2.13.2/
Maven staging repo:
Thanks you for the detailed explanation Thomas :)
Gary
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024, 12:34 PM Thomas Wolf wrote:
> On 20.07.24 14:52 , Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Could this be achieved via a mock, if only to validate that a regression
> > won't happen?
>
> Assuming we'd want to test that on an XDH instant
On 20.07.24 14:52 , Gary Gregory wrote:
Could this be achieved via a mock, if only to validate that a regression
won't happen?
Assuming we'd want to test that on an XDH instantiated
with raw=true calculateK() returns the full 32 bytes
of the secret resulting from a curve25519 key agreement
even
Could this be achieved via a mock, if only to validate that a regression
won't happen?
Gary
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024, 7:09 AM Thomas Wolf wrote:
> On 20.07.24 01:46 , Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I don't see a matching unit test in [2] so we are asking for a future
> > regression IMO...
>
> This _is_
On 20.07.24 01:46 , Gary Gregory wrote:
> I don't see a matching unit test in [2] so we are asking for a future
> regression IMO...
This _is_ tested. Our tests connect to old OpenSSH, not using
this key exchange method, and to new OpenSSH method, where it
is used.
The problem is that to test thi
I don't see a matching unit test in [2] so we are asking for a future
regression IMO...
Gary
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024, 5:34 PM Thomas Wolf wrote:
> Could we do a bugfix release 2.13.2 for Apache MINA sshd,
> please?
>
> I know it's only one change, but I think it's wor
Could we do a bugfix release 2.13.2 for Apache MINA sshd,
please?
I know it's only one change, but I think it's worth it.
In 2.13.0 we had introduced an implementation for the
sntrup761x25519-s...@openssh.com key exchange method,
which is supposed to be quantum-safe.
Unfortu
.
Release notes at:
https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/releases/tag/sshd-2.13.1
https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/releases/tag/sshd-2.13.0
The release is available for download at
https://mina.apache.org/sshd-project/download_2.13.1.html
Here's a brief list of changes since 2.12.1 re
ist/dev/mina/sshd/2.13.1/
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1095
> Git tag:
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/commits/sshd-2.13.1
>
> Please review and vote !
>
> --
>
> Guillaume Nodet
>
>
--
Guillaume Nodet
che.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1095
> Git tag:
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/commits/sshd-2.13.1
>
> Please review and vote !
>
> --
>
> Guillaume Nodet
>
>
--
Guillaume Nodet
gt; *Given this release does not contain any code change, the vote period
>>> will be reduced to 24 hours.*
>>>
>>> Official staging repo:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/2.13.1/
>>> M
this release does not contain any code change, the vote period
will be reduced to 24 hours.*
Official staging repo:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/2.13.1/
Maven staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1095
Git tag:
https://github.
*
>
> Official staging repo:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/2.13.1/
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1095
> Git tag:
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/
vote period
will be reduced to 24 hours.*
Official staging repo:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/2.13.1/
Maven staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1095
Git tag:
https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/commits/sshd-2.13.1
Please review and
coderZoe commented on issue #518:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/518#issuecomment-2172226499
well，I have discovered another issue: there is a memory leak when
reconnecting the client. Here is an example:
I register a listener for each session to monitor if the
coderZoe opened a new issue, #518:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/518
### Version
sshd-core 2.12.0
### Bug description
Hello,
I am using sshd-core to interact with some hardware devices. My code is
structured as follows:
```java
public
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 8, 2024, 2:56 PM Thomas Wolf > <mailto:tw...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >
> > On 2024-06-08 20:48 , Thomas Wolf wrote:
> > > I suggest we start with a release for Apache MINA 2.
est we start with a release for Apache MINA 2.13.0.
Apache MINA SSHD, of course.
Cheers,
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
<mailto:dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org>
Sounds 👍 good to me.
Gary
On Sat, Jun 8, 2024, 2:56 PM Thomas Wolf wrote:
> On 2024-06-08 20:48 , Thomas Wolf wrote:
> > I suggest we start with a release for Apache MINA 2.13.0.
>
> Apache MINA SSHD, of course.
>
>
On 2024-06-08 20:48 , Thomas Wolf wrote:
I suggest we start with a release for Apache MINA 2.13.0.
Apache MINA SSHD, of course.
Cheers,
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional
he full list of noteworthy changes is, as always, at [1].
Cheers,
Thomas
[1] https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/blob/master/CHANGES.md
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands
I am using Apache MINA SSHD. I found that I am unable to implement the
following function. This may be caused by the high degree of encapsulation.
My needs are as follows. When I already have a Socket, I want to perform ssh
handshake, authentication, and communication based on this Socket
> >
> > > This new minor release provides a bunch of bug enhancements and bug
> > > fixes, see the details at:
> > > https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/releases/tag/sshd-2.12.0
> > >
> > > The release is available for download at
> > > https://m
a bunch of bug enhancements and bug
> > fixes, see the details at:
> > https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/releases/tag/sshd-2.12.0
> >
> > The release is available for download at
> > https://mina.apache.org/sshd-project/download_2.12.0.html
>
>
>
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:21 AM Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> The Apache Mina PMC is proud to announce the release of Mina SSHD 2.12.0.
>
> This new minor release provides a bunch of bug enhancements and bug
> fixes, see the details at:
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/re
The Apache Mina PMC is proud to announce the release of Mina SSHD 2.12.0.
This new minor release provides a bunch of bug enhancements and bug
fixes, see the details at:
https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/releases/tag/sshd-2.12.0
The release is available for download at
https
I'll start the release process tomorrow.
Guillaume
Le mar. 9 janv. 2024 à 20:43, Thomas Wolf a écrit :
> Could we have a new Apache MINA SSHD 2.12.0 release, please?
>
> There've been a few minor improvements, but the main reason
> for a new release is that we've
Could we have a new Apache MINA SSHD 2.12.0 release, please?
There've been a few minor improvements, but the main reason
for a new release is that we've implemented the "strict key
exchange" mitigation against the Terrapin attack
(CVE-2023-48795, which is a CVE against the
Hello Team: A gentle reminder
From: Satish Tedla
Date: Monday, 4 December 2023 at 4:33 PM
To: dev@mina.apache.org
Cc: Anandhi S
Subject: apache/mina-sshd: Request to prioritise: JIRA: 432 - Huge File
transfer (>5GB) to AIX host through SSH key credentials is always getting hung
Hello Apa
Hello Apache Mina SSHD Team:
Need your help in troubleshooting/resolving a Customer issue: “For (huge) file
transfers, we consistently observe hangs with SSH Key credentials + AIX. At
times, File transfer hangs after transferring 300MB and at times at 2GB, 4.9GB
too.”
* JIRA: https
Great !!
FTR, I announced the releases on Mastodon:
https://fosstodon.org/@apachemina
On 20/10/2023 11:48, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
This new minor release provides a bunch of bug enhancements and bug
fixes, see the details at:
https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/releases/tag/sshd-2.11.0
The Apache Mina PMC is proud to announce the release of Mina SSHD 2.11.0.
This new minor release provides a bunch of bug enhancements and bug fixes,
see the details at:
https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/releases/tag/sshd-2.11.0
The release is available for download at
https
The Apache Mina PMC is proud to announce the release of Mina SSHD 2.9.3.
This is a bug fix release, see the details at:
https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/releases/tag/sshd-2.9.3
The release is available for download at
https://mina.apache.org/sshd-project/download_2.9.3.html
Changelog
.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/2.11.0/
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1089
> Git tag:
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/commits/sshd-2.11.0
> Changelog:
>
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/blob/sshd-2.11.0/docs
pachemina-1089
> Git tag:
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/commits/sshd-2.11.0
> Changelog:
>
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/blob/sshd-2.11.0/docs/changes/2.11.0.md
>
> Please review and vote !
>
>
> --
>
> Guillaume Nodet
>
>
--
Guillaume Nodet
sshd/2.9.3/
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1088
> Git tag:
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/commits/sshd-2.9.3
> Changelog:
>
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/blob/sshd-2.9.3/docs/cha
pachemina-1088
> Git tag:
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/commits/sshd-2.9.3
> Changelog:
>
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/blob/sshd-2.9.3/docs/changes/2.9.3.md
>
> Please review and vote !
>
> --
>
> Guillaume Nodet
>
>
--
Guillaume Nodet
to the usage of TestContainer. I don't really like it, the
build should be self-supported.
The use of TestContainers isn't new.
Add to that it took 25mins to ran the tests. TC is clearly slowing down
the whole tests (it takes around 10 s to start a new container):
[INFO] Apache Mina
f TestContainers isn't new.
> >
> > > Add to that it took 25mins to ran the tests. TC is clearly slowing down
> > > the whole tests (it takes around 10 s to start a new container):
> > >
> > > [INFO] Apache Mina SSHD :: Common support utilits . SUCCE
ld be self-supported.
>
> The use of TestContainers isn't new.
>
> > Add to that it took 25mins to ran the tests. TC is clearly slowing down
> > the whole tests (it takes around 10 s to start a new container):
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Mina SSHD :: Common suppor
ins to ran the tests. TC is clearly slowing down
the whole tests (it takes around 10 s to start a new container):
[INFO] Apache Mina SSHD :: Common support utilits . SUCCESS [01:30 min]
...
[INFO] Apache Mina SSHD :: Core ... SUCCESS [08:37 min]
[INFO] Apache Mina SS
lease for 2.9.3 at:
Official staging repo:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/2.9.3/
Maven staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1088
Git tag:
https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/commits/sshd-2.9.3
Changelog:
https://
; >> (or
> > >> > source compatibility) since there is no use of japicmp (or revapi or
> > >> ...)
> > >> >
> > >> > - mvn apache-rat:check OK
> > >> >
> > >> > - mvn clean install OK
> > >> >
> > &g
at it took 25mins to ran the tests. TC is clearly slowing down
the whole tests (it takes around 10 s to start a new container):
[INFO] Apache Mina SSHD :: Common support utilits . SUCCESS [01:30 min]
...
[INFO] Apache Mina SSHD :: Core ... SUCCESS [08:37 min]
[INFO] Apache Mina
vn clean install OK
> >> >
> >> > - Using:
> >> > Apache Maven 3.9.5 (57804ffe001d7215b5e7bcb531cf83df38f93546)
> >> > Maven home: C:\java\apache-maven-3.9.5
> >> > Java version: 17.0.8, vendor: Eclipse Adoptium, runtime: C:\P
pot
>> > Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
>> > OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>> >
>> > Gary
>> >
>> >
>> &g
on: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
> >
> > Gary
> >
> >
> > On 2023/10/12 14:33:37 Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> > > I've staged a candidate release for 2.11.0 at:
> > > Official staging repo:
> > > ht
uot;windows"
>
> Gary
>
>
> On 2023/10/12 14:33:37 Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> > I've staged a candidate release for 2.11.0 at:
> > Official staging repo:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/2.11.0/
> > Maven staging repo:
> >
3/10/12 14:33:37 Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I've staged a candidate release for 2.11.0 at:
> Official staging repo:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/2.11.0/
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1089
> Gi
, platform encoding: Cp1252
> OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>
> Gary
>
> On 2023/10/12 14:33:21 Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> > I've staged a candidate release for 2.9.3 at:
> > Official staging rep
ist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/2.9.3/
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1088
> Git tag:
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/commits/sshd-2.9.3
> Changelog:
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/blob/sshd-2.9.3/docs/chan
On 12.10.23 16:33 , Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've staged a candidate release for 2.9.3 at:
+1
* Src tar unpacks and builds fine; all tests pass locally (OS X)
* Signatures verify
* Class version 52 (Java 8)
Cheers,
Thomas
On 12.10.23 16:33 , Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've staged a candidate release for 2.11.0 at:
+1
* Src tar unpacks and builds fine; all tests pass locally (OS X)
* Signatures verify
* Maven JARs work with Java 8
* Github CI builds are green
* JGit SSH tests all pass
Thanks Guillaume!
Cheers,
I've staged a candidate release for 2.11.0 at:
Official staging repo:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/2.11.0/
Maven staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1089
Git tag:
https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/commits/sshd-2.11.0
Chan
I've staged a candidate release for 2.9.3 at:
Official staging repo:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/2.9.3/
Maven staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1088
Git tag:
https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/commits/sshd-2.9.3
Chan
Sounds good, I'll do that asap.
I'll also release a 2.9.3 bugfix release with the CVE fix for users that
can't easily upgrade to the newer 2.10 or 2.11.
Guillaume
Le lun. 9 oct. 2023 à 23:27, Thomas Wolf a écrit :
> I think it would be about time for a new Apache MINA SSH
I think it would be about time for a new Apache MINA SSHD 2.11.0
release.
The last 2.10.0 release was in May 2023; since then we have a couple
of bug fixes and improvements ([1], [2]). Two regressions from 2.10.0
were fixed (GH-407 and SSHD-1332), from the rest the fixes for GH-410
and GH-414
tomaswolf closed issue #357: Non Root User Apache Mina SSHD
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/357
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe
tomaswolf closed issue #380: Apache MINA SSHD : Client Session Pooling
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/380
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
GeezFORCE commented on issue #380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/380#issuecomment-1564402253
Thank You Tomas for the comprehensive answer.
I can confirm that my custom pool implementation was not successful due to
the bug you mentioned. I was using the
tomaswolf commented on issue #380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/380#issuecomment-1563197659
Several thoughts on that:
- You always have to deal with sessions getting closed, whether or not there
is a pool. You cannot control when a server disconnects you. You can
07070529 commented on issue #360:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/360#issuecomment-1556775343
We understand.
Thanks for your reply.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
tomaswolf commented on issue #360:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/360#issuecomment-1552027083
Unfortunately MINA 2.0.x and 2.2.x are not source compatible. Switching
might also require testing effort. (Perhaps we'd be lucky, and everything just
still works. But mayb
shd/2.10.0/
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1081
> Git tag:
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/tree/sshd-2.10.0
> Change log:
>
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/blob/sshd-2.10.0/docs/chan
pachemina-1081
> Git tag:
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/tree/sshd-2.10.0
> Change log:
>
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/blob/sshd-2.10.0/docs/changes/2.10.0.md
>
> Please review and vote !
>
> --
>
> Guillaume Nodet
>
>
1 - 100 of 409 matches
Mail list logo
