can find all the
> place where it exists and handle each of them individually.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: jeffma...@gmail.com [mailto:jeffma...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
> MAURY
> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 15:32
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: MINA build with Ja
On Behalf Of Jeff MAURY
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 15:32
To: dev
Subject: Re: MINA build with Java 8
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Lyor Goldstein
wrote:
> I think there is @SuppressWarning("javadoc") available...
>
We don't want that as it will not fix the real pr
com] On Behalf Of Jeff
> MAURY
> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 15:17
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: MINA build with Java 8
>
> Given the Java5 minimum requirement for MINA, can't we have an annotation.
>
> Jeff
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny
&
Le 17/12/15 14:17, Jeff MAURY a écrit :
> Given the Java5 minimum requirement for MINA, can't we have an annotation.
Probably... I have no idea how xbean works...
I think there is @SuppressWarning("javadoc") available...
-Original Message-
From: jeffma...@gmail.com [mailto:jeffma...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jeff MAURY
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 15:17
To: dev
Subject: Re: MINA build with Java 8
Given the Java5 minimum requiremen
Given the Java5 minimum requirement for MINA, can't we have an annotation.
Jeff
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
> Le 17/12/15 13:49, Jeff MAURY a écrit :
> > Agree that we should adopt Java8 standards related to JavaDoc.
> > I think we should have a CI job that does th
Le 17/12/15 13:49, Jeff MAURY a écrit :
> Agree that we should adopt Java8 standards related to JavaDoc.
> I think we should have a CI job that does the check from now, even if it
> fails until we finished what you propose.
Actually, the pb is just when we run mvn site (which makes sense,
because
Agree that we should adopt Java8 standards related to JavaDoc.
I think we should have a CI job that does the check from now, even if it
fails until we finished what you propose.
Jeff
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Java 8 is pretty picky when it comes to
