Re: [RESULT][LAZY VOTE] Next MXNet release

Reporting back on this thread, I received feedbacks with some valid concerns: - There are different parties that are already working toward the previously communicated timeline. - It creates a hassle for people. Although I'd love to see the release happening soon, let's keep the existing

Re: [Mentor needed] Create ticket to add webhook for the new label bot

Thanks Sebastian for creating the ticket. The webhook has successfully been created. During our production tests, we have encountered some issues which will delay the release by a bit. From that point, we don't need further support from Infra and we're able to make the changes on our side. Best

Requesting access for SLACK

Hi! I would like to request access to the Slack channel for MXNet. Thanks and regards, Gaurav Gireesh

Re: Requesting Access for SLACK

Welcome Gavin, added you to slack. Steffen On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 6:52 AM Gavin M. Bell wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to please have access to slack for MXNet. > > -- > Sincerely, > Gavin M. Bell > > "Never mistake a clear view for a short distance." > -Paul Saffo >

Re: Requesting slack access

Hi Kamaci - welcome to Apache MXNet project. Please let us know what you working on and reach out if you need help. Steffen On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 12:01 AM Furkan KAMACI wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to access to Slack. > > Kind Regards, > Furkan KAMACI >

Re: [RESULT][LAZY VOTE] Next MXNet release

+1 to trying to get a 1.4.0 Nov release. I think the MKLDNN work alone is a headline feature that users would love to get their hands on. On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 11:32 PM Sheng Zha wrote: > I'd like to propose that we expedite the 1.4.0 release slightly as there > doesn't seem to be a rule that

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

Yes, you are right about the versions wording, thanks for clarification. A performance improvement can be considered a bugfix as well. I see no big risks in including PR's by Haibin and Lin into the patch release. @Haibin, if you can reopen the PR's they should be good to go for the relase,

[Mentor needed] Create ticket to add webhook for the new label bot

Hello, the new label bot [1] is in the final stage of deployment. We would now need the assistance from Apache Infra to install a GitHub webhook. Mentors, would you mind helping us to create a JIRA ticket with Infra? The content would be as follows: Hello Apache Infra, Apache MXNet (incubating)

Re: CLion dev setup tutorial

Great detailed guide, thanks Jose! I'm sure it will be of great use for many developers. -Marco Am Mi., 7. Nov. 2018, 15:18 hat Jose Luis Contreras Santos < joseluis.contreras.san...@gmail.com> geschrieben: > Hi all, > > I recently published a guide on how to setup CLion for MXNet development

Unit test breakdown by time

Hi I made a quick breakdown of time spent on unit tests (in seconds) per test and per test class. I run CPU tests on an m1 instance. As you can see the slowest test classes are: test_operator, 630.92699 test_gluon, 261.106017 test_profiler, 159.427002

CLion dev setup tutorial

Hi all, I recently published a guide on how to setup CLion for MXNet development on Mac. It's published on Confluence here , so if you are interested have a look at it and let me know if there's anything

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

@Sheng: Sorry, nevermind. It was already suggested by Lin. The following backport PR's have been created: allow foreach on input with 0 length (v1.3.x) https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13151 [MXNET-1179] Enforce deterministic algorithms in convolution layers (v1.3.x)

Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1 patch release

Hi Sheng, thanks for you suggestions. Personally, I would not rush with new major release as this breaks the pace and creates unnecessary pressure in my opinion. If the changes suggested by Haibin are really important then I think we can consider them for the minor release, even if they are not

Re: [DISCUSS] Speedup non-code PR in CI

Hi Lin, thanks for your suggestion. I think it makes total sense. The triggering logic of the verification build is in the Jenkinsfile [1]. We would be happy if you could drive this and introduce a PR that implements this check. Best Anton [1]

Requesting slack access

Hi, I would like to access to Slack. Kind Regards, Furkan KAMACI