Hi,
There have been a couple of offline inquiries from contributors about
becoming a committer. From those inquiries, it seems that there’s confusion
in our community about how to become a committer, so I’d like to take this
opportunity to clarify.
The guideline about becoming a committer can be
I guess you should add instructions about speaking on various event like
conf., meetups - to present the whole project team.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 11:15 PM, Sheng Zha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There have been a couple of offline inquiries from contributors about
> becoming a committer
On 6/9/2018 12:45 AM, Sheng Zha wrote:
> There have been a couple of offline inquiries from contributors about
> becoming a committer. From those inquiries, it seems that there’s confusion
> in our community about how to become a committer, so I’d like to take this
> opportunit
been a couple of offline inquiries from contributors about
> > becoming a committer. From those inquiries, it seems that there’s
> confusion
> > in our community about how to become a committer, so I’d like to take
> this
> > opportunity to clarify.
> >
> > The guide
ibute so we can attract more users.
>
>Pedro.
>
>On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:31 AM Yasser Zamani
>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 6/9/2018 12:45 AM, Sheng Zha wrote:
>> > There have been a couple of offline inquiries from contributors
>about
>> > be
As an aside: if you want to learn more on the background of Apache, or free and
open source in general join us at Http://fossbackstage.de in Berlin in walking
distance from U2 stop Eberswalder Str.
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:54 PM, Pedro Larroy wrote:
> * I personally don't like the idea that comittership status is decided in a
> closed mail list. This is not the transparency level that I would expect in
> an open source project. I'm happy to receive feedback from others that
> might be opp
process, this is
about whether the individual has shown the commitment to be extended the
trust to manage commits.
So; -1 to quality being more important than quantity. It's not.
Hen
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Sheng Zha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There have been a couple of of
tended the
> trust to manage commits.
>
> So; -1 to quality being more important than quantity. It's not.
>
> Hen
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Sheng Zha wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > There have been a couple of offline inquiries from contri
rged; I don't care if it's stunning code or an inspired
> > design. It was merged. This isn't a technical promotion process, this is
> > about whether the individual has shown the commitment to be extended the
> > trust to manage commits.
> >
> > S
> > never merged (or the merger had to write a ton of
> fixes/tests/additions)
> > > then yes, that's a pretty bad sign.
> > >
> > > If the code was merged; I don't care if it's stunning code or an
> inspired
> > > design. It was mer
to be extended the
> trust to manage commits.
>
> So; -1 to quality being more important than quantity. It's not.
>
> Hen
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Sheng Zha wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > There have been a couple of offline
ndividual has shown the commitment to be extended the
> > trust to manage commits.
> >
> > So; -1 to quality being more important than quantity. It's not.
> >
> > Hen
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Sheng Zha wrote:
> >
&g
I would propose the two following action points:
* Resetting the list of committers to people that have contributed in the
previous terms in the latest 6 months
* Suspend veto rights temporarily and use simple majority for decisions
that need a vote so we realign the project with the communit
Hi Sebastian.
Thank you for your comment. That's why I said "I would propose", because I
don't know if it's possible as my experience with Apache is limited to the
MXNet project.
How do you interpret this part?: "Since the appointed Project Management
Committees have the power to create their own
Whoa, who said that? I can’t find it on this thread.
On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 8:37 AM Sebastian wrote:
> > I would propose the two following action points:
> >
> > * Resetting the list of committers to people that have contributed in
> the
> > previous terms in the latest 6 months
> > * Suspe
On 16.06.2018 10:57, Pedro Larroy wrote:
Hi Sebastian.
Thank you for your comment. That's why I said "I would propose", because I
don't know if it's possible as my experience with Apache is limited to the
MXNet project.
How do you interpret this part?: "Since the appointed Project Management
Co
Oh Pedro... lol funny stuff.
On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 10:20 AM Sebastian wrote:
> On 16.06.2018 10:57, Pedro Larroy wrote:
> > Hi Sebastian.
> >
> > Thank you for your comment. That's why I said "I would propose", because
> I
> > don't know if it's possible as my experience with Apache is limited
* Resetting the list of committers to people that have contributed in
the previous
terms in the latest 6 months
I bought this before and got shot down by the mentors, as according to
Apache it is impossible to bar merit based on time of contributions.
On the other hand, I like some of the point
19 matches
Mail list logo
