> We mentioned applying for TLP in the proposal. So, if that's
> what we still want, then yes.
>
> Unless, of course, there is another TLP that you would like
> to join instead.
>
> Personally, I think the scope is broad enough to justify its
> own project.
Yes, think so too. So with a TL
Hi All,
I'd like to propose that we use the same process that Tomcat uses;
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/decisions.html
As you can read in the copied thread below this is one of the last
remaining items before we become a top level project (cool!) so we need
to nail this down RSN.
I believe all
+1
regards,
Martin
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:21:22 -0700, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to propose that we use the same process that Tomcat uses;
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/site/decisions.html
>
> As you can read in the copied thread below this is one of the la
+1
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:44:07 +0100, Martin Marinschek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:21:22 -0700, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'd like to propose that we use the same process that Tomcat uses;
> >
> > http:/
+1
What about this decision itself, do we need a meta decision process? ;-)
Oh, I love recursive self-references :-)
Manfred
Heath Borders schrieb:
+1
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:44:07 +0100, Martin Marinschek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
regards,
Martin
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:21:22 -0700, Bill Dudney <[
+1 for a meta decision ;)
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:25:17 +0100, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> What about this decision itself, do we need a meta decision process? ;-)
> Oh, I love recursive self-references :-)
>
> Manfred
>
> Heath Borders schrieb:
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Fri,
org.apache.myfaces.mailinglist.EmailStackOverflowError
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:32:18 +0100, Martin Marinschek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 for a meta decision ;)
>
>
> On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:25:17 +0100, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > What about this decision itself,
+1 on both
On Friday 07 January 2005 04:21, Bill Dudney wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to propose that we use the same process that Tomcat uses;
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/site/decisions.html
>
> As you can read in the copied thread below this is one of the last
> remaining items before we becom
What is the current CVSROOT? :pserver:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]:2401/home/cvspublic/incubator-myfaces isn't working.
On Friday 07 January 2005 08:32, Joshua White wrote:
> What is the current CVSROOT?
> :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2401/home/cvspublic/incubator-myfaces isn't
> working.
Try :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvs/incubator-myfaces
--
Grant S. Smith
Marathon Computer Systems
503-582-8445
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:25:17 +0100, Manfred Geiler wrote:
> +1
>
> What about this decision itself, do we need a meta decision
> process? ;-) Oh, I love recursive self-references :-)
>
> Manfred
Just as an aside, the preference is for Apache projects to discuss their way
into a decision, rather t
> Just as an aside, the preference is for Apache projects to discuss their way
> into a decision, rather than appeal to the process.
>
> Ideally, people should chat about things on the list, until someone does
> something about it. If no one comments on the commit, then the decision is
> made.
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Ted Husted wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 21:12:55 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
sounds good. Since we notice a *growing* community I think time is
right to leave incubator. Btw. will MyFaces be a TLP?
We mentioned applying for TLP in the proposal. So, if that's what we still
Checkout the comment on the CVS page of the www.myfaces.org site.
Sorry for it's terseness... it's copied below for convenience.
Langley
--
The nutshell is...
CVSROOT=:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspublic
export CVSROOT
cvs login
the passwd is anoncvs
cvs
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 21:55 -0400, Sylvain Vieujot wrote:
> Hello Alex,
>
> I think I fixed just the bug for selectOneRadio.
I checked on my simple example and it seems still broken :(
> But we still have an issues for UISelectItems.
> If someone could look at line 140 of the HtmlCheckBoxRendere
+1
Anton
On Fri, January 7, 2005 6:32 am, Martin Marinschek said:
> +1 for a meta decision ;)
>
>
> On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:25:17 +0100, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> What about this decision itself, do we need a meta decision process? ;-)
>> Oh, I love recursive self-ref
16 matches
Mail list logo