The thing is that it was an error in the spec for jsf 1.1, followed by
the ri and myfaces. This has been fixed in the spec for jsf 1.2 (after
we found the mistake in 1.1).
Regards,
Bruno
On 2/22/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm puzzled here - is the TCK *really* asserting that thi
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-155?page=comments#action_12367480
]
Werner Punz commented on TOMAHAWK-155:
--
The Extensionsfilter is just a web frontend trigger for loading resources.
The extensionsfilter is way too problematic for the e
BTW, this is MYFACES-778 [1]
Bruno
[1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-778
On 2/23/06, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The thing is that it was an error in the spec for jsf 1.1, followed by
> the ri and myfaces. This has been fixed in the spec for jsf 1.2 (after
> we found
Mike Kienenberger schrieb:
> Sorry, I guess my statement could be interpreted multiple ways.
>
> Currently you have to use a dojo tag, an input, and a piece of inline
> javascript to make it work. What I meant was that I'd prefer a
> component tag so you'd only have to use the component tag (wh
Now that we're using maven2 to build MyFaces, perhaps it's time to take
advantage of some of the more interesting plugins, and specifically the
PMD plugin:
http://pmd.sourceforge.net/
The PMD plugin for maven2 offers 2 report types, a Cut&Paste Detector
and a problem detector, with configurabl
Hi!
Sorry for all my "urgent" mails, but I address them so only if I really
think it IS urgent. ;-)
> Yes, that is true.
>
This turned out to be a serious problem here.
Not only the java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException problem, but also
that it might deliver the content of another reques
I recollected all the issues, ideas, and feedback and tried to
summarize them (from my personal POV):
==
Here is a "management summary" of what we could/should end with:
* A "myfaces-shared" project, housing all MyFaces-specific classes
shared between impl
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-155?page=all ]
sean schofield closed TOMAHAWK-155:
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
> Move ExtensionsFilter to commons so it can be reused outside Tomahawk
> ---
+1
regards,
Martin
On 2/23/06, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Sorry for all my "urgent" mails, but I address them so only if I really
> think it IS urgent. ;-)
>
> > Yes, that is true.
> >
> This turned out to be a serious problem here.
>
> Not only the java.lang.StringInd
Hello,
is it intended that the acceptCharset attribute of is written
in mixed case in MyFaces 1.1.1 and lower case in the Sun RI 1.1.01?
Thanks in advance,
Arvid
> * myfaces-shared will have sub-modules that represent the custom
> dependency libs with private namespace for each MyFaces subproject
> that needs shared classes (only impl and tomahawk so far). All (=both)
> artifacts will automatically be created from the same source that sits
> in the Maven p
Interesting idea. I think for the next few days we will have our
hands full with the commons refactor but I'm open to trying it out.
Not sure if the license matters since we are not actually distributing
the plugin. Maven is the one downloading it.
Sean
On 2/23/06, Jurgen Lust <[EMAIL PROTECTE
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-83?page=all ]
Darlan Oliveira updated TOMAHAWK-83:
> Changes in navigationMenuItem jsf component to make it work with
> HtmlCommandJSCookMenu (action) or any simple URL
> --
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-82?page=all ]
Mathias Stein updated TOMAHAWK-82:
--
> t:commandNavigation2 rendering ignores static text of its value attribute,
> iff layout="list"
> ---
On 2/23/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * myfaces-shared will have sub-modules that represent the custom
> > dependency libs with private namespace for each MyFaces subproject
> > that needs shared classes (only impl and tomahawk so far). All (=both)
> > artifacts will automatica
> I don't understand this; don't the component APIs matter? Do
> you truly believe that MyFaces should feel free to make any change
> at any time?
The component API's matter but I don't hold the components to the same
standard as I would a language or framework. I think its unrealistic
for a us
On 2/23/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't understand this; don't the component APIs matter? Do
> > you truly believe that MyFaces should feel free to make any change
> > at any time?
>
> The component API's matter but I don't hold the components to the same
> standard as I
On 2/23/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't understand this; don't the component APIs matter? Do> you truly believe that MyFaces should feel free to make any change> at any time?The component API's matter but I don't hold the components to the same
standard as I would a langua
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-155?page=all ]
Mike Kienenberger reopened TOMAHAWK-155:
I don't think you should have closed this issue, especially on such short
notice.
Currently the extension filter *IS* the defacto way to do
On 2/22/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In response to #1 I would say we do not need to be in the business of
> ensuring developers can rely on our public API's. From my perspective
> we are in the business of providing a JSF implementation and a series
> of components and addons f
To this point. I would really like to see some of the faces rendering
implementation technologies getting together and making child standard APIS.
Let me explain: If you look at the RI, they have a set of utils for
handling the creation of Javascript, hidden fields, etc. MyFaces has it's
own. I
Hi Arvid,
There is a bug for this and a rather large set of other differences w/ the RI.
I think "HTML" and "TLD" are somewhere in the name of the issue.
Dennis Byrne
>-Original Message-
>From: Arvid Hülsebus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 09:06 AM
>To: 'M
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-2?page=comments#action_12367535 ]
Mike Kienenberger commented on TOMAHAWK-2:
--
The concensus at the time was to remove it.
No one has been sufficiently motivated to do that yet.
Adding IndentingReponse
Hi!
This is what I get if I try to build myfaces with tests enabled:
[ stacktrace ] ---
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: HTML_BASIC
at
org.apache.shale.test.mock.MockRenderKitFactory.addRenderKit(MockRenderKitFactory.java:69)
Try deleting struts/shale/shale-test.jar in your local repo and running the
tests again.
Dennis Byrne
>-Original Message-
>From: Mario Ivankovits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 12:15 PM
>To: 'MyFaces Development'
>Subject: tomahawk test failed in StylesheetR
HTTP Accept header not properly processed
-
Key: MYFACES-1152
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1152
Project: MyFaces Core
Type: Bug
Components: General
Versions: 1.1.1
Reporter: Chris Paulson-El
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1152?page=all ]
Chris Paulson-Ellis updated MYFACES-1152:
-
> HTTP Accept header not properly processed
> -
>
> Key: MYFACES-1152
> URL: http://is
Hi Dennis!
> Try deleting struts/shale/shale-test.jar in your local repo and running the
> tests again.
>
I already used mvn -U to update the repository, but it looks like you
have to delete it.
Now it works.
Thanks!
Ciao,
Mario
Hi!
> new tomahawk branch
>
> Added:
> myfaces/tomahawk/branches/1_1_2/
> - copied from r380160, myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/
>
I am already working on a fix for the treading problem with AddResource.
Even in myfaces-commons this will influence tomahawk too (testCase and
extensionFilter)
Wi
That's ok we can work your fix in later. Right now I am refactoring
the commons stuff so we need a branch to do that. We can merge this
branch down and then create a new one again (so we will capture your
fix at that point.)
Just make your fix on the trunk.
Sean
On 2/23/06, Mario Ivankovits <[
+1 for creating a jira component to JSF component mapping.
Don't really care if we use * or sbx or sandbox or just leave them all the same.
The sandbox/tomahawk division is just an indication of
stability/support. I don't see it as an important distinction in the
context of reporting JIRA issues.
On 2/21/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I made another improvement to our JIRA setup. I added a "Patch
> Available" state. There is now an operation called "Provide Patch"
> that users can click once they have attached a patch. It will then
> place the issue in the "Patch Availab
> The sandbox/tomahawk division is just an indication of
> stability/support. I don't see it as an important distinction in the
> context of reporting JIRA issues.
Exactly.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-837?page=comments#action_12367558
]
sean schofield commented on MYFACES-837:
These files are also in shared which seem confusing to me.
> WelcomeFileFilter wants to go to the internet to load web.xml D
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-108?page=all ]
Mario Ivankovits resolved TOMAHAWK-108:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Made AddResource request scope so it is request safe now.
Its still not "thread safe" but this is not required as the req
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-108?page=all ]
Mario Ivankovits closed TOMAHAWK-108:
-
> ExtensionsFilter is not THREAD SAFE
> ---
>
> Key: TOMAHAWK-108
> URL: http://issues.apache.org
Yes that makes more sense. I created the svn branch for tomahawk. I
started the refactoring but I didn't make much progress so feel free
to start fresh. There are 3 classes in the core branch that are now
in shared and the core since they were moved to shared after the core
branch (see MYFACES-1
Everyone has the same problem. It must be a bug in maven.
Sean
On 2/23/06, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Dennis!
> > Try deleting struts/shale/shale-test.jar in your local repo and running the
> > tests again.
> >
> I already used mvn -U to update the repository, but it looks
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-837?page=comments#action_12367562
]
sean schofield commented on MYFACES-837:
OK now I know what happened. They are still in core on the branch because the
branch is old.
> WelcomeFileFilter wants to
Hi,
On 19:53 Sean Schofield wrote:
> The refactoring will be a pain because both JBuilder and Idea want to
> rename the package in all of the modules and not just commons.
after running 'mvn idea:idea' there should be a commons only project
file 'myfaces-commons.ipr' in the commons dir.
IMO this
Well I'm new to idea so I did not have time to experiment. It still
seems like that would be a problem because we want the tomahawk and
core classes to be refactoring to use the new package. We just don't
want their classes in the same dirs to move.
Sean
On 2/23/06, Volker Weber <[EMAIL PROTECT
I think BSD makes no problem
On 2/23/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interesting idea. I think for the next few days we will have our
> hands full with the commons refactor but I'm open to trying it out.
> Not sure if the license matters since we are not actually distributing
>
On 2/23/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 2/23/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I don't understand this; don't the component APIs matter? Do
> > > you truly believe that MyFaces should feel free to make any change
> > > at any time?
> >
> > The component
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-50?page=all ]
Mike Kienenberger updated TOMAHAWK-50:
--
> equals validator shows text (nit nice by validating passwords...)
> -
>
> Ke
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-801?page=all ]
Mike Kienenberger updated MYFACES-801:
--
> RegExprValidatorTag patch: message attribute
>
>
> Key: MYFACES-801
> URL: http://issu
+1 to Adam and Craig's excellent points.Kind Regards,John Fallows.On 2/23/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:On 2/23/06, Craig McClanahan <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>>> On 2/23/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > > I don't understand this; don't the component APIs matter? Do
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-150?page=all ]
Jurgen Lust updated TOMAHAWK-150:
-
> custom ScheduleEntryRenderer is applied to all schedule components in the
> same application
> --
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-104?page=all ]
updated TOMAHAWK-104:
--
> dataScroller "divide by zero" error should be changed to a "missing row
> attribute" error
> --
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1148?page=comments#action_12367592
]
Adam Brod commented on MYFACES-1148:
Well, I'm still working with Bea to see if they can provide a great solution.
However, I have found one cause in the MyFaces Star
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-146?page=all ]
Jurgen Lust resolved TOMAHAWK-146:
--
Resolution: Fixed
This problem occurred in the old example jsps, it no longer applies for the new
examples
> Schedule renders duplicate ids in rend
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-148?page=all ]
Jurgen Lust resolved TOMAHAWK-148:
--
Resolution: Duplicate
Assign To: Jurgen Lust
this is a duplicate of TOMAHAWK-146
> Schedule component in Sandbox fails to run on WebSphere Appl
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-146?page=all ]
sean schofield closed TOMAHAWK-146:
---
> Schedule renders duplicate ids in render tree
> -
>
> Key: TOMAHAWK-146
> URL: http://i
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-148?page=all ]
sean schofield closed TOMAHAWK-148:
---
> Schedule component in Sandbox fails to run on WebSphere Application Server
> 5.1.1.8
> -
53 matches
Mail list logo
