Hi,
I was wondering if someone could shed some light on the status of
myfaces and the plans for it in the near future:
* In terms of a date or features/bugs, when will 1.0.8 be released?
* Is there a target date/release for passing the TCK?
* How close is the 1.0.7 release to passing the TCK? (ie.
Hi,
I've been playing around with some custom components and I ran into a
problem with myFaces 1.0.8 (vs. the Sun reference implementation). I
wanted to bring it up to the list before I created a new issue.
In the reference implementation, UIInput has a protected method
'validateValue'. By defaul
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 10:49 AM
> To: MyFaces Development
> Subject: [VOTE] Simplified Examples (was Simplified Examples)
>
> OK I am changing the subject to a simple vote. +1 if you favor
> *replacing* m
+0
I suggest that the MyFaces custom components be moved to a subproject. A
debate such as "Tree vs. Tree2" shouldn't hold up a release of the JSF
implementation and API.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 5:56 AM
> To: My
there will be no scheduling impact on the next release
> now that this has been resolved.
>
> sean
>
>
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 12:56:09 -0500, Abrams, Howard A
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +0
> >
> > I suggest that the MyFaces custom components be
build and release the
> JSF implementation separate from the custom components. So it is
> already possible to use the JSF Implementation without the components.
> Is this what you are after or are you looking for something more?
>
> sean
>
>
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 1
Isn't having a separate 'shared' jar project an issue? Either it is tied
to the impl or to the components. We can't tie the 'shared' jar's
release to both; it would put the impl our-of-sync with the components
or visa-versa. Releasing the shared jar with the impl makes sense to me.
+1 for the orig
-1
Perhaps I'm crazy or winzip did something weird, but it appears
myfaces-1.0.9-src.tar.gz contains myfaces-1.0.9.tgz and myfaces-1.0.9-src.tgz.
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 5:17 AM
> To: myfaces-dev@incuba
Sorry I'm coming into this late, so forgive me if this was covered and I
missed it:
What is the status on getting access to the TCK?
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 5:56 AM
> To: MyFaces Development
> Subject: Re: Who be
If any of the committers have a second, I'd appreciate if they could
look at the issue below. The current myfaces behavior differs from the
RI in this case.
> -Original Message-
> From: Howard Abrams (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 3:01 PM
> To: myfaces-d
+1 for adding client-side state encryption
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 8:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dev@myfaces.apache.org
> Subject: Re: JSF 1.2 and TCK
>
> What about the 1.2 changes that do not conflict with
Read Craig’s reply again. It’s
not that colons are not allowed in *HTML, it’s that they are use by the
naming container to separate the container’s id from the component’s
id. The HTML generated by JSF Renderers will have colons in it.
From: Matt Blum
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AFAIK, JSF 1.2 won't be really 'final' until Java EE 5 is final.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jacob Hookom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 7:24 AM
> To: MyFaces Development
> Subject: Re: MyFaces w/ Facelets
>
> Ed Burns (JSF co-spec lead) usually tags his emails
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 10:34 AM
> To: MyFaces Development
> Subject: Re: uidata, svn reorg and tomahawk
>
> I confess to forgetting the abbreviation taxonomy, but does "impl"
> below refer to the JSF conta
+1, excellent idea. Then maybe my spec-related bugs will get noticed
among all the 'tree2' bugs :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 2:27 PM
> To: MyFaces Development
> Subject: [proposal] Add some meaningful 'component' ent
>From the 1.1 spec:
"The class and method Javadoc documentation for the classes and
interfaces in
javax.faces (and its subpackages) are incorporated by reference as
requirements
of this Specification."
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, J
Perhaps one of the committers could fix MYFACES-359 for me before 1.0.10
closes? It's a very simple fix (patch included), and is a spec-related
issue.
Thanks in advance,
h.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 7:21 AM
> To:
Thanks Manfred!
> -Original Message-
> From: Manfred Geiler (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 1:44 AM
> To: dev@myfaces.apache.org
> Subject: [jira] Resolved: (MYFACES-359) JspViewHandlerImpl.createView
doesn't play nice with
> decorators
>
> [ http://i
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 10:24 AM
> To: MyFaces Development
> Subject: Release decisions
>
> I just fixed an important stumbling block in the build script so now
> it should be possible to build a releas
Hi everyone,
Stan can probably answer this, but I thought I'd send the question to
the entire list:
Forgive me, I'm not (yet) a portlet person, but should the MyFaces
implementation of portlet support create unique components IDs across
different portlets? How else is one supposed to use two inde
JSF 1.2 spec requires JDK 5.
From: Keith Lynch
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005
9:29 AM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: JDK 1.5, JSP 2.0 XML
This is certainly a large
issue. Some products still have to support Java 1.3.
At ILOG I had maj
+1 to the reorganization.
I too feel this is the only way to release the 'Core' separate from any
components, and that separate releases are vital to all of the MyFaces
projects.
> -Original Message-
> From: Manfred Geiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 3:43 A
ve
commons...
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 2/17/06, Abrams, Howard A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1 to the reorganization.
> >
> > I too feel this is the only way to release the 'Core' separate from
any
> > components, and that sep
I’ll be there!
From: Jonas Jacobi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006
9:55 AM
To: MyFaces Development; MyFaces
Discussion
Subject: The annual MyFaces
JavaOne party/dinner
Hi All,
Its getting close to JavaOne and it is time to add the MyFaces JavaOn
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 4:51 PM
> To: MyFaces Development
> Subject: Re: idea regarding components
>
> On 4/18/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually unfortunately martin pointed me towards a
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 5:13 PM
> To: MyFaces Development
> Subject: Re: idea regarding components
>
> On 4/18/06, Abrams, Howard A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Reading t
In addition, I am very proud to announce that CA will be co-sponsoring
the event this year. I'll let Jonas fill everyone in on the details once
he returns.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Matthias Wessendorf
> Sent: Wednesday, April 26,
Hi,
Is there any reason why the UIComponentTag appends “jsp”
to all the component ids in 1.1.3/1.1.4? Any chance this can be removed for
1.1.4 so that it returns the same ids as UIViewRoot.createUniqueId() and the
RI?
Thanks,
h
ion 359449"
> > >
> > > see
> > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=359449
> > <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=359449>
> > >
> > > I can't tell you m
Hi all,
Is there a release plan for 1.1.2? It seems there are a
significant number of issues on the trunk; some of which may not be marked as
such in JIRA.
Also, now that we’ve gotten passed the TCK, moved to
SVN, and broken out the various sub projects, I’d like to revisit the
subj
CTED]> wrote:
> > > Not sure about the release plan, but +1 for a quicker release
cycle.
> > > Let's not get caught up in the same slow cycle that has affected
> > > Struts for so long.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > James Mitchell
>
now member of "myfaces-developers" group on Jira. Can you
> please check if this gives you enough rights?
> Thanks,
> Manfred
>
> 2005/11/21, Abrams, Howard A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > If you're certain that issues on the custom/extended components have
From: Manfred Geiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 2:26 AM
> To: MyFaces Development
> Subject: Re: Plan for 1.1.2?
>
> Howard,
> You are now member of "myfaces-developers" group on Jira. Can you
> please check if this gives you enough ri
gt; the implementation.
> > > >
> > > > In the meantime, without a nightly version label in JIRA and
without a
> > > > 1.1.2 branch, basically every fix that goes into SVN will be
part of
> > > > the 1.1.2 release. On the other hand, we don't w
er or a
> is reported against - version number
>
> indeed, there should be two fields in jira to reflect this, right?
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 11/22/05, Abrams, Howard A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think there are several points of confusio
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 8:14 AM
> To: MyFaces Development
> Subject: Re: Plan for 1.1.2?
>
>
[Snip]
> I'm not wild about multiple nightly versions, etc. Perhaps we could
> use the roadmap as is being sug
> -Original Message-
> From: Manfred Geiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 11:23 AM
> To: MyFaces Development
> Subject: Re: Plan for 1.1.2?
>
> 2005/11/23, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > What if someone reported with "affects [Nightly]". If we
A while back someone asked if ASF was reviewing CDDL to allow including
part of glassfish into a future MyFaces JSF1.2 implementation. Did a
review ever happen?
My understanding is JSF1.2 (and the rest of glassfish) is CDDL licensed,
and that CDDL is _NOT_ compatible with the Apache license. Someo
> on this issue.
> However, (and I'm not a lawyer), the CDDL looks compatible with the
> Apache license to me.
>
> On 12/2/05, Abrams, Howard A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A while back someone asked if ASF was reviewing CDDL to allow
including
> > part
My concern would be that things will get out of hand and we'll do so
much logging that it will affect performance in a noticeable way. We
should find a way to "compile-out" some of the logging for production
use before "logging everthing".
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Schofield [mailt
il.logging, I really don't know why people think
> log4j is so much better, maybe someone can fill me in? (I can see the
> flames rising from that question... ;) ) In any case, I hope we can
> come to some conclusion quickly, I'd like to start making this happen.
>
> Tra
;) ) In any case, I hope we can
> come to some conclusion quickly, I'd like to start making this happen.
>
> Travis
>
> On 12/7/05, Abrams, Howard A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My concern would be that things will get out of hand and we'll do so
&
How about just releasing smaller bug-fix releases, more often? I tried
to start the conversation about then 1.1.2 would be released and the
'roadmap', but the conversation has stalled.
Should we call a vote to begin the release process for 1.1.2?
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Kitchi
+1 for:
nightly + votes = M1
nightly + votes = M2
.
.
M[n] + votes + branch = RC1
RC1 + bug fixes = RC2
RC2 + bug fixes = RC3
.
.
RC[n] + votes -> 1.[n]
[SNIP]
> A milestone release could even be just a nightly build renamed (or
maybe
> not even renamed). They wo
Hi Everyone,
Forgive me in advance if the following questions sound
insensitive to the hard work that’s been going into getting maven going. I
haven’t been following that thread so I don’t know the current
state of things.
I want to use some of the functionality and fixes that have
Thanks, I'll look at the wiki and give maven a try tonight.
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Kitching [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 5:12 PM
> To: MyFaces Development
> Subject: Re: Nightlys and 1.1.2
>
> Abrams, Howard A wrote
AFAIK, findComponent on a Table items works in the RI. (I found a note
to myself from last august to figure out why MyFaces does not :) ).
Because the table is a naming container, I believe you can override its
findComponent method to do the right thing. I imagine this is what the
RI's HtmlDataTab
Hi All,
Can any of the committers out there take a look at two issues I reported
a while back?
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1026
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1027
Thanks in advance,
h.
I'd appreciate it if MYFACES-1026 & MYFACES-1027 could be addressed
before the branch.
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 2:01 AM
> To: MyFaces Development
> Subject: MyFaces 1.1.2 RC-1
>
> Hi all,
>
> Manfred and me
I'd appreciate it if one of the committers could look at MYFACES-1027
(It is currently assigned to Bruno). I submitted a patch a few weeks
back and I would be very grateful if someone could verify that it is
correct and check it in before 1.1.2 is released.
> -Original Message-
> From: Se
+1 to JIRA split
+1 to using 1.1.2-SNAPSHOT, etc. as version numbers.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 4:52 PM
> To: MyFaces Development
> Subject: [proposal] Split Up JIRA Projects
>
> I propose we split up some of th
51 matches
Mail list logo
