Hi
Just for your information, I committed the proposal on MYFACES-2863.
Suggestions are welcome.
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
2010/8/4 ssilv...@redhat.com
Hi guys,
Would you like to see MyFaces Core ship with JBoss AS6? If so, read on.
If you've been around MyFaces awhile, you probably
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Bernd Bohmann
bernd.bohm...@atanion.com wrote:
Hello,
why we need the @author tag?
I don't like code owner ship.
well, some do. I am fine without. In fact a lot of Apache project do so, since
there is no code-ownership. SVN has still all the information
Hey,
I'm not a big fan of code ownership either, but the proposal was just to
remove the redundant stuff. If there is a consensus about removing the
@author tag too, that's fine with me. Removing all this stuff at once is
easier than having multiple runs where we remove one thing at a time.
I would also get rid of the author tags too. I guess that in many cases
they are not correct anyway as files are constantly changed.
Michael
Am 11.08.2010 08:22, schrieb Matthias Wessendorf:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Bernd Bohmann
bernd.bohm...@atanion.com wrote:
Hello,
why we need
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Jan-Kees van Andel
jankeesvanan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
I'm not a big fan of code ownership either, but the proposal was just to
remove the redundant stuff. If there is a consensus about removing the
@author tag too, that's fine with me. Removing all this
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Michael Kurz michi.k...@gmx.at wrote:
I would also get rid of the author tags too. I guess that in many cases they
are not correct anyway as files are constantly changed.
exactly, and still svn (blame) knows everything... Original committer
and who introduced
I'd like to keep the @author tags. Isn't the spirit of the meritocracy involved
with making authors visible? Shouldn't personal merit for a project be made
visible in the code? I think it's great to see Manfred Geiler as the orginal
author of most MyFaces parts. Many people download the source
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Ganesh gan...@j4fry.org wrote:
I'd like to keep the @author tags. Isn't the spirit of the meritocracy
involved with making authors visible?
Actually not...
There are a ton of discussions on this in the archives.
Fact: there is no code ownership...
Shouldn't
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Ganesh gan...@j4fry.org wrote:
I'd like to keep the @author tags. Isn't the spirit of the meritocracy
involved with making authors visible?
Actually not...
There are a ton of
Hi guys,
+1 on removing all this stuff.
Frankly I always added or changed the headers to include author and version
information, but only because I read it in the MyFaces developer notes [1]
and the referenced Struts svn guide [2] in the wiki.
@Jan-Kees: I don't really understand what you mean
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
+1 on removing all this stuff.
Frankly I always added or changed the headers to include author and version
information, but only because I read it in the MyFaces developer notes [1]
and the referenced
there are other social issues dealing with collaborative
development, but the Board is concerned about the legal ramifications
around the use of author tags
OK, I see the point.
+1 of removing this, the info is in svn anyway, why duplicate it?
Werner
Am 09.08.10 21:43, schrieb Jan-Kees van Andel:
Hi,
What do you guys think about pruning the SVN keywords in the source files?
Matthias pointed out a nice example of an issue you run into with this
stuff.
1 Not
Hi,
The issue has been filed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2871
About the guidelines Michael referred to:
- I suggest to completely get rid of all SVN related stuff.
- I think it's ok to keep the @author tags.
- Also the @since tags seem useful to me.
In other words, drop all
Hi
Could you provide an explicit example about how the header of java files
should be?
best regards,
Leonardo
Hi,
Sure. For example, take a look at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/trunk/api/src/main/java/javax/faces/FacesException.java
If we remove the SVN stuff, we'll end up with this JavaDoc comment:
/**
* see Javadoc of a href=
Hello,
why we need the @author tag?
I don't like code owner ship.
Does your request mean we don't allow the svn:keywords=Date Author Id
Revision HeadURL
in the Subversion config file?
Regards
Bernd
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Jan-Kees van Andel
jankeesvanan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Hi Stan
I have attached a proposal for this issue on:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2860
It includes the patch to be applied on myfaces, the project created to do
the integration, and the jsf deployer used in JBoss AS6 to give a try.
It could be good to know what do yo think
+ * @author Leonardo Uribe (latest modification by $Author: jankeesvanandel $)
+ * @version $Revision: 799929 $ $Date: 2009-08-01 16:29:33 -0500
(sáb, 01 ago 2009) $
did you copy that into your IDE template for new files? :-)
-M
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
Yeah, I know. I'm so quick. I can edit files back in time. ;-)
/JK
2010/8/9 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
+ * @author Leonardo Uribe (latest modification by $Author: jankeesvanandel
$)
+ * @version $Revision: 799929 $ $Date: 2009-08-01 16:29:33 -0500
(sáb, 01 ago 2009) $
did
Hi,
What do you guys think about pruning the SVN keywords in the source files?
Matthias pointed out a nice example of an issue you run into with this
stuff.
1 Not everybody has (the same) svn:keywords on every file.
2 When 1, it will get out of sync.
3 Unreadable version numbers are pretty
+1
these are the reasons why you won't find such information in the extensions
projects.
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2010/8/9 Jan-Kees van Andel
+1 because it's most times broken anyway ;)
LieGrue,
strub
From: Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
Sent: Mon, August 9, 2010 11:22:34 PM
Subject: Re: Proposal to stop using SVN Keywords - (was: MyFaces shipping
with
JBoss AS6?)
+1
: Gerhardgerhard.petra...@gmail.com
To: MyFaces Developmentdev@myfaces.apache.org
Sent: Mon, August 9, 2010 11:22:34 PM
Subject: Re: Proposal to stop using SVN Keywords - (was: MyFaces shipping
with
JBoss AS6?)
+1
these are the reasons why you won't find such information in the extensions
Hello Stan,
welcome back. We do understand that you can not make any promise on that topic.
The fact that some folks at JBoss are thinking about shipping MyFaces
(as an alternative option)
is a good news for this entire community here. Especially it is a
great motivation for the
folks that did
Hi,
Great news! It would be very nice if JBoss ships with MyFaces 2. This also
opens up possibilities to do some enhancements to increase developer
productivity in JBoss, like better resource reloading and so on. Or doing
some things more efficient by plugging into the JBoss infrastructure. Just
At Apache we can not have code that contains (L)GPL code; or depends on it.
We had discussion(s) about this in the past. The below link contains references
to other (Apache) documents:
http://markmail.org/message/qtc4g6vsracgzbok
-Matthias
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Jan-Kees van Andel
Hi guys,
sure we would want to have this!
@Leonardo: can you take care of this high priority (next to your
optimization and performance improvement work)?
best regards,
Martin
On 8/4/10, ssilv...@redhat.com ssilv...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi guys,
Would you like to see MyFaces Core ship with
That's OK. I guess I can do the SPI implementations on my end but it
might not make it into JBoss AS6 GA. Let's concentrate on the MyFaces
SPI's for now. How does MyFaces handle the SPI's like Mojarra has?
I'm sure it's OK to look at Mojarra code since it's GPL2, right? If
not, you can
Well, looking at the RI is for sure not OK.
I didn't see a problem with the previous provided links (the JBoss
code), however
I have not opened any of the provided links yet.
-Matthias
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 1:54 PM, ssilv...@redhat.com wrote:
That's OK. I guess I can do the SPI
Somehow I think there was already work/discussion about it, based on a
Tomcat interface.
It for sure does bring back some fragile memory. Let me think...
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
Well, looking at the RI is for sure not OK.
I didn't see a
Can you look at javadoc comments?
Quoting Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org:
Well, looking at the RI is for sure not OK.
I didn't see a problem with the previous provided links (the JBoss
code), however
I have not opened any of the provided links yet.
-Matthias
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at
Hi
2010/8/4 ssilv...@redhat.com
Hi guys,
Would you like to see MyFaces Core ship with JBoss AS6? If so, read on.
This is top priority for me.
If you've been around MyFaces awhile, you probably remember that JBoass AS
used to ship with MyFaces instead of Mojarra. It was regrettable,
Quoting David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com:
I haven't and wont look at the mojarra code but I think you are looking for
org.apache.myfaces.config.annotation.LifecycleProvider
Looks like that takes care of spec section 5.4 (injection,
@PreDestroy, @PostConstruct).
How do you deal with
MyFaces has an AnnotationConfigurator [1] which scans the classpath using a
simple bytecode scanning mechanism [2] (comparable with the one in
Javassist). It's pretty fast, but it's true that classes might be scanned
twice.
Regards,
Jan-Kees
[1]
Hi guys,
Would you like to see MyFaces Core ship with JBoss AS6? If so, read on.
If you've been around MyFaces awhile, you probably remember that
JBoass AS used to ship with MyFaces instead of Mojarra. It was
regrettable, but at the time Mojarra was far ahead spec-wise and the
powers
Hi Stan,
welcome back, good to hear from you again, this is excellent news.
Werner
Am 04.08.10 20:42, schrieb ssilv...@redhat.com:
Hi guys,
Would you like to see MyFaces Core ship with JBoss AS6? If so, read on.
If you've been around MyFaces awhile, you probably remember that JBoass
AS used
37 matches
Mail list logo
