[jira] Resolved: (TOBAGO-57) Add globalOnly attribute to messages tag

2006-08-20 Thread Volker Weber (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-57?page=all ] Volker Weber resolved TOBAGO-57. Resolution: Fixed Add globalOnly attribute to messages tag Key: TOBAGO-57 URL:

Re: open discussion about the dojo related roadmap

2006-08-20 Thread Ernst Fastl
Hi there! just some thoughts ... I also think that it is right about time to include dojo into tomahawk. Since a lot of sandbox components are already using dojo an probably a lot more will come this should be the right way to go. Sooner or later those components will move from the sandbox to

Re: Getting rid of the wish issue type

2006-08-20 Thread Sean Schofield
+1 for removing wish. Its all a wish - even the bugs. I think the current voting system is a better way for finding what the popular requests are. IMO those take second priority over Patch Available. sean On 8/18/06, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: for a wish ? Yes, I do it if

Re: MyFaces zone account?

2006-08-20 Thread Sean Schofield
Do you have an account yet? If not, I can create one for you. Sean On 8/16/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: see offline email On 8/16/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can I get an account on the MyFaces zone? Recent discussion about the Core 1.1.4 release indicated

Re: MyFaces zone account?

2006-08-20 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 8/20/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have an account yet? If not, I can create one for you. Apparently we're sharing one, so I have that. If you have time to set up 'wsmoak' as well, that would be great. I could use a tour of the zone. What is all the stuff in the

Re: Proposal: Mark fixed issues as resolved instead of closed -- close all resolved issues on release

2006-08-20 Thread Sean Schofield
+1 We basically decided on this a long time ago but not everyone is following it. Newer versions of JIRA (in use with Shale but not MyFaces) also allows you to disable email on bulk changes. At some point I will change the JIRA workflow so that you can not directly close a feature (it must be

[jira] Created: (MYFACES-1390) Change JIRA workflow so issues must be resolved before they are closed

2006-08-20 Thread sean schofield (JIRA)
Change JIRA workflow so issues must be resolved before they are closed -- Key: MYFACES-1390 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1390 Project: MyFaces Core

Re: Proposal: Mark fixed issues as resolved instead of closed -- close all resolved issues on release

2006-08-20 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 8/20/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We basically decided on this a long time ago but not everyone is following it. Newer versions of JIRA (in use with Shale but not MyFaces) also allows you to disable email on bulk changes. At some point I will change the JIRA workflow so that

BUILD ERROR for current

2006-08-20 Thread Dennis Byrne
Anyone else getting this on a clean co ? Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/doxia/doxia-core/1.0-alpha-4/doxia-co re-1.0-alpha-4.pom 4K downloaded [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO]

[jira] Resolved: (TOBAGO-111) Add blank and demo example to assembly

2006-08-20 Thread Bernd Bohmann (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-111?page=all ] Bernd Bohmann resolved TOBAGO-111. -- Resolution: Fixed Add blank and demo example to assembly -- Key: TOBAGO-111 URL:

Re: Proposal: Mark fixed issues as resolved instead of closed -- close all resolved issues on release

2006-08-20 Thread Sean Schofield
Can you do it so this is only required for Fixed issues? Invalid/Won't Fix issues should be closed directly. Why should these be closed directly? Maybe we would revisit one of these before the release is done. Also, I believe having them resolved (instead of closed) allows the user to appeal

[jira] Resolved: (TOBAGO-113) TabChangeEvent should provide the same methods like the TabChangeEvent in tomahawk

2006-08-20 Thread Bernd Bohmann (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-113?page=all ] Bernd Bohmann resolved TOBAGO-113. -- Resolution: Fixed TabChangeEvent should provide the same methods like the TabChangeEvent in tomahawk

Re: Getting rid of the wish issue type

2006-08-20 Thread Sean Schofield
Is there any way to search for Patch Available issues? I haven't been able to figure this out yet myself. Just create a custom search under Find Issues Be sure to change the project to MyFaces and click the refresh link that they show you. Otherwise you are stuck with options available for all

[jira] Resolved: (TOBAGO-114) The datepicker of tx:date should surrounded by a form to prevent validation errors from other fields

2006-08-20 Thread Bernd Bohmann (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-114?page=all ] Bernd Bohmann resolved TOBAGO-114. -- Resolution: Fixed The datepicker of tx:date should surrounded by a form to prevent validation errors from other fields

[jira] Resolved: (TOBAGO-109) UICommand facet support for change and click events in selectOneRadio, selectBooleanCheckbox, selectManyCheckbox and selectOneChoice

2006-08-20 Thread Bernd Bohmann (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-109?page=all ] Bernd Bohmann resolved TOBAGO-109. -- Resolution: Fixed UICommand facet support for change and click events in selectOneRadio, selectBooleanCheckbox, selectManyCheckbox and selectOneChoice

Re: Proposal: Mark fixed issues as resolved instead of closed -- close all resolved issues on release

2006-08-20 Thread Mike Kienenberger
I see the primary use of resolved versus closed as keeping/generating a log of what's changed during a release. Things that don't impact a release (non-fixes) don't need to have a resolved state. I have never had a need to revisit an invalid issue. Won't fix hasn't come up yet. Users can

Re: Getting rid of the wish issue type

2006-08-20 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Aha! I was sure that the last time I looked, Patch Available wasn't an option under status. Thanks for pointing this out. On 8/20/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any way to search for Patch Available issues? I haven't been able to figure this out yet myself. Just

Re: Re: Getting rid of the wish issue type

2006-08-20 Thread Adam Winer
Even easier than that - there''s a link right off the main Browse Project page... Look under Project Summary at http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES -- Adam On 8/20/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any way to search for Patch Available issues? I haven't been able

[jira] Created: (TOMAHAWK-612) Shale test framework 1.0.3 includes MyFaces 1.1.1

2006-08-20 Thread Paul Spencer (JIRA)
Shale test framework 1.0.3 includes MyFaces 1.1.1 - Key: TOMAHAWK-612 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-612 Project: MyFaces Tomahawk Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions:

[jira] Updated: (TOMAHAWK-612) Shale test framework 1.0.3 includes MyFaces 1.1.1

2006-08-20 Thread Paul Spencer (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-612?page=all ] Paul Spencer updated TOMAHAWK-612: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Shale test framework 1.0.3 includes MyFaces 1.1.1 -

Re: Re: Getting rid of the wish issue type

2006-08-20 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Has this stuff been here all along and I somehow missed it when looking for it, or was it added recently (in the last couple of months)? I feel like a fool for not seeing it up to this point. On 8/20/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Even easier than that - there''s a link right off the

How to configure the default renderers and component within a Shale-Test based unit test

2006-08-20 Thread Paul Spencer
I am writing a unit test based on the Shale Test Framework for a Tomahawk component. My current problem is the I need to add the default MyFaces and Tomahawk components and renderers to the FacesContext. To date I have been using facesContext.getApplication().addComponent(...) and

Re: How to configure the default renderers and component within a Shale-Test based unit test

2006-08-20 Thread Dennis Byrne
I would be suprised if you found a quick and easy way to do this. MyFaces core uses digester to unmarshal the config files. It then calls the API you mention. I would start digging around in org.apache.myfaces.config . Dennis Byrne -Original Message- From: Paul Spencer [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: How to configure the default renderers and component within a Shale-Test based unit test

2006-08-20 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 8/20/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would be suprised if you found a quick and easy way to do this. MyFaces core uses digester to unmarshal the config files.It then calls the API you mention. I would start digging around in org.apache.myfaces.config . One aggressive approach you