Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

2008-04-04 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! sev-en is a new jsf-extension. Looks Cool, I love it to see that a long standing idea now seems to be realized. You posted on the dev list .. cool .. you probably know we are developers too ... so .. where do we find the code? Or is it just a too-late April joke ;-) I think that would make

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1693) Make JSP 2.1 optional

2008-04-04 Thread Bernhard Huemer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585411#action_12585411 ] Bernhard Huemer commented on MYFACES-1693: -- Note that you can't use JSP 2.0 (or

[jira] Commented: (TRINIDAD-992) Validator as child of tr:inputText causes label jumping when client side validation enabled

2008-04-04 Thread Carsten Pieper (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585418#action_12585418 ] Carsten Pieper commented on TRINIDAD-992: - As a side note: This issue is related

RE: MyfacesBuilderPlugin

2008-04-04 Thread simon
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 20:29 -0400, Kito D. Mann wrote: Thanks for the explanation, Leonardo. I’m guessing that the Trinidad plugin isn’t generic enough to be used outside of Trinidad? No, the Trinidad plugin could be used elsewhere. In fact it has been used to build the myfaces-core 1.2.0 and

[jira] Created: (MYFACES-1850) component attributes problem with server side state saving with serialize in state = false

2008-04-04 Thread Mario Ivankovits (JIRA)
component attributes problem with server side state saving with serialize in state = false Key: MYFACES-1850 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1850

[jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-1199) Seems like email validation is not working

2008-04-04 Thread Ingo Nolden (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585455#action_12585455 ] Ingo Nolden commented on TOMAHAWK-1199: --- I just ran into the same problem with

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

2008-04-04 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! sev-en is a new jsf-extension. Looks Cool, I love it to see that a long standing idea now seems to be realized. You posted on the dev list .. cool .. you probably know we are developers too ... so .. where

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

2008-04-04 Thread Martin Haimberger
Hi Gerhard, sounds fancy and simple! Nice work! I think i will take a closer look. How stable is it in the mean time? Regards, Martin On 4/3/08, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sev-en is a new jsf-extension. sev-en allows jsf validation with annotations! some central features:

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

2008-04-04 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hello mario, at the moment it's not available at a public repository. my current plan is to publish it within the next view weeks. i agree with you - sev-en would be a great myfaces module! regards, gerhard 2008/4/4, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi! sev-en is a new jsf-extension.

[jira] Commented: (TOBAGO-627) JNDI-Problem on Websphere Application Server

2008-04-04 Thread Dennis Hauser (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585470#action_12585470 ] Dennis Hauser commented on TOBAGO-627: -- Hi Bernd, we have applied your Tobago -

Re: [Tobago] Merging maven-apt-plugin with Codehaus'

2008-04-04 Thread Mark Hobson
Hi Bernd, On 03/04/2008, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/tobago/trunk/sandbox/pom.xml http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/tobago/trunk/extension/facelets/pom.xml

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

2008-04-04 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi, On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:11 PM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sev-en is a new jsf-extension. sev-en allows jsf validation with annotations! some central features: - cross-component validation (including cross-entity validation) - support for jpa based validation - zero

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

2008-04-04 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hello, @matthias: in my opinion the best solution would be an independent sub-project - e.g. myfaces sev-en @martin: it started just as private feasibility study. the demo works great. however, it needs e.g. junit test-cases, much more annotations and such things. (please note - the sev-en core

[jira] Resolved: (TOBAGO-627) JNDI-Problem on Websphere Application Server

2008-04-04 Thread Bernd Bohmann (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bernd Bohmann resolved TOBAGO-627. -- Resolution: Fixed JNDI-Problem on Websphere Application Server

Re: [Tobago] Merging maven-apt-plugin with Codehaus'

2008-04-04 Thread Bernd Bohmann
Hello Mark, during the ApacheCon Europe next week I can spend some time to test the plugin with the tobago build. Regards Bernd

[jira] Resolved: (TOBAGO-325) Popups background not disabled

2008-04-04 Thread Bernd Bohmann (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bernd Bohmann resolved TOBAGO-325. -- Resolution: Fixed This issue needs futher investigation, but i will change the status to

Re: [Tobago] Merging maven-apt-plugin with Codehaus'

2008-04-04 Thread Mark Hobson
Great, I'll looking forward to hearing back from you then. Cheers, Mark On 04/04/2008, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Mark, during the ApacheCon Europe next week I can spend some time to test the plugin with the tobago build. Regards Bernd

Re: shale-test location (was RE: JSF 2.0 component set)

2008-04-04 Thread Paul Spencer
Gary, I also use shale-test. One of the feature in the unreleased 1.1.0 allows you the test against any JSF 1.1/1.2 implementation without having to replace the faces.xml configuration inside the test. Thus keeping the test framework independent from an implantation. Which is a good thing

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

2008-04-04 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hello mario, today i uploaded an intermediate result of the demo. all information are available at the sev-en section of my blog [1]. regards, gerhard [1] http://os890.blogspot.com/search/label/sev-en 2008/4/4, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi! sev-en is a new jsf-extension.

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

2008-04-04 Thread Leonardo Uribe
Hi I have run the example on my tomcat installation. This works only with trinidad, or I can plug any jsf lib to use with (tomahawk or tobago) regards Leonardo Uribe

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

2008-04-04 Thread Leonardo Uribe
Another question If I have a validator, does exists annotations to use it like: @Validator(org.apache.myfaces.custom.emailvalidator.EmailValidator) private string email; Or the annotations should have defined inside sev-en regards Leonardo Uribe On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 10:26 AM,

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

2008-04-04 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hello leonardo, you don't need trinidad - i used it just for the demo! you will find the requirements at my blog [1] ;) regards, gerhard [1] http://os890.blogspot.com/2008/04/sev-en-framework-requirements.html 2008/4/4, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi I have run the example on my

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

2008-04-04 Thread Leonardo Uribe
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello leonardo, you don't need trinidad - i used it just for the demo! you will find the requirements at my blog [1] ;) And jdk 1.5 is required (myfaces 1.1 is for 1.4) regards, gerhard [1]

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

2008-04-04 Thread Andrew Robinson
Since this is currently supported in Seam and Orchestra is a Seam spin-off/clone, perhaps this should be incorporated into Orchestra instead of yet another project. On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:11 PM, Gerhard

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

2008-04-04 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hello leonardo, once again (as mentioned within my blog): the core of sev-en is independent of specific annotations. - if you would like to have the mentioned annotation - implement and provide it. ;) you will find a short description at my blog [1] as you see within the demo: validators within

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

2008-04-04 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hello leonardo, that's right - because of the fact you are using annotations ;) regards, gerhard 2008/4/4, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello leonardo, you don't need trinidad - i used it just for the

Re: shale-test location (was RE: JSF 2.0 component set)

2008-04-04 Thread Scott O'Bryan
Yeah, the conversation has already gone on longer then I intended. I was merely expressing sentiments that the moving of shale-test is not something I would oppose. It is frustrating though to have to port the bridges ExternalContext logic to another platform. The logic in JSF is largely

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

2008-04-04 Thread Leonardo Uribe
I have tried the demo on my workstation, and in my opinion is a very cool idea and this should be on myfaces :) The idea of include with myfaces-commons sounds better that put this on orchestra (someone could want to use this only). Maybe myfaces-commons-sev-en. regards Leonardo Uribe On Fri,

tobago island logo :)

2008-04-04 Thread Adonis Raduca
Hi Udo, I designed a Tobago island logo for you. What do you think, it is OK now ? Have a nice evening ! Adonis On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Udo Schnurpfeil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hallo Adonis, thank you for your good work. But for the Tobago project it would be nice to have a

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

2008-04-04 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hello andrew, sev-en is completely independent of orchestra or the idea behind it. regards, gerhard 2008/4/4, Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Since this is currently supported in Seam and Orchestra is a Seam spin-off/clone, perhaps this should be incorporated into Orchestra instead of

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

2008-04-04 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
And jdk 1.5 is required (myfaces 1.1 is for 1.4) @nnotation bring that requirement to the table. which is cool. That the CORE impl of JSF 1.1 needs Java1.4 doesn't mean, that every 1.1 complaint lib is also having that (poor) requirement ;-) -M regards, gerhard [1]

Re: tobago island logo :)

2008-04-04 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
I like it! On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Adonis Raduca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Udo, I designed a Tobago island logo for you. What do you think, it is OK now ? Have a nice evening ! Adonis On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Udo Schnurpfeil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hallo Adonis,

Re: MyfacesBuilderPlugin

2008-04-04 Thread Leonardo Uribe
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The drawback is that creates a log file on the project folder (I'm not found how to output the log on the screen yet!). Have you looked at

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

2008-04-04 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hello leonardo, concerning myfaces-commons-sev-en: i don't agree. it's similar if you suggest to merge myfaces-orchestra with myfaces-commons. - in my opinion that's not a good idea. sev-en should stay independent! + commons-sev-en sounds strage. :) (the pronunciation isn't [sev] ... [en] - it's

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

2008-04-04 Thread Leonardo Uribe
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello leonardo, concerning myfaces-commons-sev-en: i don't agree. it's similar if you suggest to merge myfaces-orchestra with myfaces-commons. - in my opinion that's not a good idea. sev-en should stay independent!

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

2008-04-04 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hello leonardo, that's ok! :) it's great to have these discussions. regards, gerhard 2008/4/4, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello leonardo, concerning myfaces-commons-sev-en: i don't agree. it's

[jira] Created: (ORCHESTRA-20) single conversation

2008-04-04 Thread Mario Ivankovits (JIRA)
single conversation --- Key: ORCHESTRA-20 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORCHESTRA-20 Project: MyFaces Orchestra Issue Type: Improvement Components: Conversation Reporter: Mario Ivankovits

[jira] Commented: (ORCHESTRA-19) refactor conversationContext to allow nested conversationContext

2008-04-04 Thread Mario Ivankovits (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORCHESTRA-19?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585648#action_12585648 ] Mario Ivankovits commented on ORCHESTRA-19: --- The conversationContext URL

[jira] Commented: (ORCHESTRA-19) refactor conversationContext to allow nested conversationContext

2008-04-04 Thread Mario Ivankovits (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORCHESTRA-19?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585651#action_12585651 ] Mario Ivankovits commented on ORCHESTRA-19: --- The conversationContext api needs

RE: shale-test location (was RE: JSF 2.0 component set)

2008-04-04 Thread Kito D. Mann
-Original Message- From: Scott O'Bryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 6:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 'MyFaces Development'; 'Gary VanMatre' Subject: Re: shale-test location (was RE: JSF 2.0 component set) I don't really see why the physical location

RE: shale-test location (was RE: JSF 2.0 component set)

2008-04-04 Thread Kito D. Mann
-Original Message- From: Scott O'Bryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 12:12 PM To: MyFaces Development Subject: Re: shale-test location (was RE: JSF 2.0 component set) Yeah, the conversation has already gone on longer then I intended. I was merely

RE: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

2008-04-04 Thread Kito D. Mann
Gerhard, Actually, it's different. Commons is a collection of useful utilities and features. Think of it in terms of the Apache Commons. Orchestra is about conversations and persistence contexts. ~~~ Kito D. Mann - Author,

RE: MyfacesBuilderPlugin

2008-04-04 Thread Kito D. Mann
Simon, Thanks for the recap. Guess I missed that discussion :-). Whenever you guys get this one out of the door, make sure you devote an obvious Wiki location for it. That way, it'll be easier for people to document it. That’s a major issue with the Trinidad plugins :-).

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

2008-04-04 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hello kito, you can put every extension into a commons module. orchestra is about conversations and persistence and sev-en is about validation (simple and cross-component validation) at the moment i'm not aware of the difference. it might be ok to put specific sev-en annotation modules into the

RE: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

2008-04-04 Thread Kito D. Mann
From: Gerhard Petracek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 2:47 PM To: MyFaces Development; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations hello kito, you can put every extension into a commons module. I see what you're saying. I suppose the

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

2008-04-04 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hello, maybe there is a misunderstanding in view of the used annotations, jsr 303 and so on. as mentioned before: the sev-en core is independent of specific annotations! e.g. you can implement your own annotations [1] regards, gerhard [1]

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

2008-04-04 Thread Cagatay Civici
Hi, I think Orchestra is kinda out of it's original scope, Mario and Simon couldn't resist and add many cool useful features like viewController, dynaForm and more that are not related to conversations and persistence. Orchestra is becoming our alternative to seam, sev-en is a goodie right? So

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1850) component attributes problem with server side state saving with serialize in state = false

2008-04-04 Thread Martin Marinschek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585735#action_12585735 ] Martin Marinschek commented on MYFACES-1850: This is very dangerous; it's

Re: [jira] Updated: (TRINIDAD-873) JavaScriptError in Core.js _formatErrorString

2008-04-04 Thread Yee-wah Lee
Hi all, I would like to modify the code slightly from this patch. Basically, move the check for typeof down, so that it only affects the code which does String.replace(). For details, see TRINIDAD-1036. I didn't see a test scenario for TRINIDAD-873, so if anyone familiar with the above can

[jira] Commented: (TRINIDAD-1036) Client Color Converter's getFormatHint() returns empty string for the hints.

2008-04-04 Thread Yee-Wah Lee (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12585801#action_12585801 ] Yee-Wah Lee commented on TRINIDAD-1036: --- Attachment works for both trunk and jsf

[Trinidad] Debug JS version breaks trunk

2008-04-04 Thread Andrew Robinson
A renderer using LibraryScriptlet is getting the URL: /trinidad-demo/adf/jsLibs/DebugApacheChart1_2_8.js instead of: /trinidad-demo/adf/jsLibsDebug/ApacheChart1_2_8.js The former is what is added to the page. The latter is what is being generated by the build. As a result, any component using

[jira] Resolved: (TRINIDAD-999) tr:panelLabelAndMessage ... facet=help generates two help strings

2008-04-04 Thread Cagatay Civici (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Cagatay Civici resolved TRINIDAD-999. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.2.8-core 1.0.8-core

Re: [Trinidad] Debug JS version breaks trunk

2008-04-04 Thread Andrew Robinson
Okay, I am doing something wrong, it is not broken. If I am having a custom script that I do not want in Common for a core component, how can I do it? I am adding JS code for my panelBorderLayout enhancement that is only needed for IE6. So I want to send it down from the renderer after checking

[jira] Updated: (TOMAHAWK-1229) PDF Exporter Component

2008-04-04 Thread Hazem Saleh (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hazem Saleh updated TOMAHAWK-1229: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) PDF Exporter Component --

The pdfExport component released ;)

2008-04-04 Thread Hazem Saleh
Hi guys, Iam pleased to tell you that the (PDFExport) component is finished. It works like the (excelExport) component. for example) s:pdfExport for=your table id h:commandButton action= value=Export as PDF/ /s:pdfExport Here is the patch url :

[jira] Resolved: (TRINIDAD-1032) New component: tr:panelStretchLayout

2008-04-04 Thread Andrew Robinson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Robinson resolved TRINIDAD-1032. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.2.8-core 1.0.8-core