On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 19:56 -0700, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Jan-Kees van Andel
jankeesvanan...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think Scannotation itself is an issue, but it has a required
dependency on Javassist, which has an LGPL license. Isn't that a
problem?
Hi!
-Original Message-
From: Jan-Kees van Andel [mailto:jankeesvanan...@gmail.com]
Mario, I've been looking at the Shale code that handles the annotation
scanning, but I saw it uses Reflection and standard Java ClassLoaders
for scanning the classpath for JSF artifacts. What's your
Fwik Javassist uses a Mozilla Public License 1.1 not a pure LGPL (though I've
not checked explicitly for the javassist version we use).
MPL 1.1 is explicitly listed as appropriate license at least.
Maybe we can kick scannotation, and do the scanning ourself (in a later phase).
But Javassist is
Hi!
not sure on the PERF, but if it is really (proven) the case, I am with
you.
Well... startup time isn't really a big problem, right? :-)
Is that ironic?
In projects with 3000 classes and 60 jar files you are up to 30 seconds, or
even more, scanning time.
Under load, with shale, I saw
Yep, I should have checked the original statement. The javassist website
here:
http://www.jboss.org/javassist/
states clearly that:
quote
License: You can choose either MPL or LGPL.
/quote
Surprising for a jboss project, but the website clearly says so.
The MPL is no problem. So using
I've checked mojarra 2.0 some time ago to see how do they implemented this,
well they're using reflection/class way.
Spring's scanning mechanism also gives out of memory if you dont specify a
sub package name to scan.
So, my thought is to implement this in myfaces, it's not a complicated task
as
My 2 cents: Don't load classes to use java.lang.reflect on it:
- What if a class does something bad (or just about anything) in a static
initializer?
For example try to run the code below. It will EXIT THE VM
- Can you be sure that those classes are unloaded again?
- Performance: It is
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Mario Ivankovits ma...@ops.co.at wrote:
Hi!
not sure on the PERF, but if it is really (proven) the case, I am with
you.
Well... startup time isn't really a big problem, right? :-)
Is that ironic?
;-) I really hate to wait on the boot-up.
:-)
In projects
