On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 19:56 -0700, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Jan-Kees van Andel > <jankeesvanan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't think Scannotation itself is an issue, but it has a required > > dependency on Javassist, which has an LGPL license. Isn't that a > > problem? > > hrm, I think not really, b/c it's not a direct dependency.
I'm pretty sure that scannotation's dependency on an LGLP project is a showstopper. There is some brief info here: http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html I'm not sure this approach is a good one anyway. Javasisst's jar is 560kb. That's a fairly heavy dependency for such a simple task as scanning for annotations. Regards, Simon
