ProjectStage extension
--
Key: MYFACES-2235
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2235
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: JSR-314
Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Simon Lessard
simon.lessar...@gmail.com wrote:
Well I guess you're right, there's no way that the property will be set
during the tests.
created ticket
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2235
will commit change soon
-M
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12709754#action_12709754
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-2218:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leonardo Uribe updated MYFACES-2165:
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
concurrent issue in initializing myfaces 1.1.6
+1
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.orgwrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Simon Lessard
simon.lessar...@gmail.com wrote:
Well I guess you're right, there's no way that the property will be set
during the tests.
created ticket
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
Werner,
according to here:
http://www.apache.org/dev/git.html
we need to provide the following information, for the INFRA jira ticket:
* Name of the codebase, for example Apache Tika
* Name of the requested Git mirror, for example tika.git
* Subversion
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
core
Ok, I filed this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053
maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a branch ...
(since we already work on 2.0.x)
+1
1.1.x branch
1.2 trunk
2.0 branch
instead of
1.1 trunk
1.2 trunk_1.2
2.0
Hi,
...
Ok, I filed this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053
maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a branch ...
(since we already work on 2.0.x)
what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes trunk
And the following efforts are on a branch:
-2.0.x
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
core
Ok, I filed this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053
maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a branch ...
(since we already work on 2.0.x)
+1
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
Hi,
...
Ok, I filed this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053
maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a branch ...
(since we already work on 2.0.x)
what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes trunk
And the following efforts
Ok I added a dynamically loading loadScript function to our javascript
_Utils class/function.
The code basically resolves the script src handling
aspect by loading the script
via synchronous xhr and doing a global eval on the script!
This way we dont have dom manipulations just to do the script
Hello everyone I wanted to start a legal discussion here regarding the
status of Mojarra and our codebase.
As far as I understood it is following.
The mojarra license prevents us from using their code, while they can
use ours, this is fine with me the Apache license is more liberal.
The
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone I wanted to start a legal discussion here regarding the
status of Mojarra and our codebase.
As far as I understood it is following.
The mojarra license prevents us from using their code, while they can
I have to explain, I noticed that we probably need a special response
writer impl which tries to determine script blocks the way
Trinidad does it to send the scripts as separate entities in the ppr
response. I wanted to check if Mojarra already had something along those
lines implemented and if
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone I wanted to start a legal discussion here regarding the
status of Mojarra and our codebase.
As far as I understood it is following.
The mojarra license prevents us from using
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I have to explain, I noticed that we probably need a special response writer
impl which tries to determine script blocks the way
Trinidad does it to send the scripts as separate entities in the ppr
response. I wanted to
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello everyone I wanted to start a legal discussion here regarding the
status of Mojarra and our codebase.
As
Ok before anyone is starting to write one.
I have a script splitting response writer in state
which triggers also on src attributes and
the connected javascripts load the scripts via xhr and do a global eval.
I have not comitted it yet, because I want to compare my code
with Trinidad just to
Hey Mike,
please make sure you are running the build;
I am seeing checkstyle problems for this new file; No license added to
the beginning
of the file...
#fixed in revision 775217
-Matthias
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:10 PM, mconc...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mconcini
Date: Wed May 13
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matthias Weßendorf resolved MYFACES-2235.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-alpha
ProjectStage extension
some more infos:
http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
core
Ok, I filed this:
Add Window abstraction to Trinidad
--
Key: TRINIDAD-1474
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1474
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Archetype
Affects
Here is the proposed api:
package org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.context;
/**
* Represents a Window in the current user's Session. Windows are
created and vended
* by the Session's WindowManager and the Window for the current request is
* available from codeWindowManager.getCurrentWindow/code
Hi Blake,
I'm + 1 with the idea and the general API, but I have some concerns:
1. I don't really like the API to expose a read only map through
WindowManager.getWindows, I would prefer
WindowManager.getWindowIds(ExternalContext) and
WindowManager.getWindow(ExternalContext, String);
Hi,
At least for the AJAX part I can tell that many details are treated as
implementation details, so the spec purposely leaves them open. On some
details in the jsdocs Roger has even relaxed the wording of the spec to
leave the details to the impl. If we muddle through the specs and do it
From a logical standpoint you cannot avoid to send the entire abslute
(html) id
because otherwise on the server side you cannot
identify the component properly.
If you take the relative id, a proper identification within the
component tree is impossible.
So the id sent down has to be the
Hi Werner,
of course you have to send the absolute id.
But in the json attributes execute and render we should use the JSF id's
(so not the html id of the element).
Alex
2009/5/15 Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com
From a logical standpoint you cannot avoid to send the entire abslute
(html)
I would say -1. Seems pointless to use another version control client
that is not 100% compatible with SVN when the SVN command-line and UI
clients works fine. What next, a mercurial read-only repository too?
We have chosen to use subversion with MyFaces at Apache, I don't see
any reason to
I don't know much about git, but I know that other committers on
Apache Cayenne use git to commit to the Cayenne svn, so it's certainly
possible to do what Andrew suggests. From my limited git
understanding, that's the typical practice of using git -- as a
front-end to svn or cvs.
On Fri, May
Hey andrew,
Thanks for your mail. There is a discussion on the members list. Let
me point them to our thread.
Thanks again!
Sent from my iPod.
On 15.05.2009, at 22:08, Andrew Robinson
andrew.rw.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
I would say -1. Seems pointless to use another version control
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leonardo Uribe updated MYFACES-1982:
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Too many open files on Weblogic 9.2
Sent from my iPod.
On 15.05.2009, at 21:35, Simon Lessard simon.lessar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Blake,
I'm + 1 with the idea and the general
+1 good idea!
API, but I have some concerns:
I don't really like the API to expose a read only map through
WindowManager.getWindows, I would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12709957#action_12709957
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-1982:
-
Committed solution (1.2.7-SNAPSHOT).
Anderw, I asked to move the thread to committ...@.
Thx
Matthias
Sent from my iPod.
On 15.05.2009, at 22:21, Matthias Wessendorf mwessend...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey andrew,
Thanks for your mail. There is a discussion on the members list. Let
me point them to our thread.
Thanks again!
Hi,
The confusion was based on the mixup between javascript parameters and
tag attributes. It's easy: The tag takes component ids and the
javascript function takes clientids.
Here's what the spec says on this:
table 10-3, f:ajax's render attribute:
If a literal is specified, it must be a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12709973#action_12709973
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-2165:
-
committed solution on both branches
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leonardo Uribe updated MYFACES-2155:
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.7-SNAPSHOT
1.1.7-SNAPSHOT
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12709990#action_12709990
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-1891:
-
The problem described before is a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leonardo Uribe resolved MYFACES-1891.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.1.6)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leonardo Uribe resolved MYFACES-2177.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.7-SNAPSHOT
Assignee: Leonardo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leonardo Uribe resolved MYFACES-1808.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
Assignee: Leonardo Uribe
This is a duplicate of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leonardo Uribe resolved MYFACES-2008.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.1.7-SNAPSHOT
Assignee: Leonardo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leonardo Uribe resolved MYFACES-2167.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.1.7-SNAPSHOT
Assignee: Leonardo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leonardo Uribe resolved MYFACES-2160.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.1.7-SNAPSHOT
Assignee: Leonardo
Simon Lessard said the following On 5/15/2009 12:35 PM PT:
Hi Blake,
I'm + 1 with the idea and the general API, but I have some concerns:
1. I don't really like the API to expose a read only map through
WindowManager.getWindows, I would prefer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12710072#action_12710072
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-2160:
-
Thanks a lot to Roger Wegmann for the
Ah lovely saturday morning and a general technology discussion.
Ok here is the deal, it is a very common practice to use git for local
versioning and svn or cvs for hosting the code (I do that very often).
There are downsides to this practice. First of all git-svn does not have
external
47 matches
Mail list logo
