PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
I was running the tasks needed to release the Trinidad Maven Plugins
version 2.0.8 which is needed as a prerequisite to a Trinidad release. I
have compiled the Release Notes[1] for the 2.0.8 release.
I have generated the tag [2] and have deployed
have no idea whether this exception in new in 2.0.8. Is this something that
we should look at before rolling out the plugins release?
Andy
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
I was running the tasks needed to release the Trinidad Maven Plugins version
2.0.8
?
Andy
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
I was running the tasks needed to release the Trinidad Maven Plugins version
2.0.8 which is needed as a prerequisite to a Trinidad release. I have compiled
the Release Notes[1] for the 2.0.8 release.
I have
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
I was running the tasks needed to release the Trinidad Maven Plugins
version 2.0.8 which is needed as a prerequisite to a Trinidad release. I
have compiled the Release Notes[1] for the 2.0.8 release.
I have generated
in new in 2.0.8. Is this something
that we should look at before rolling out the plugins release?
Andy
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
I was running the tasks needed to release the Trinidad Maven Plugins
version 2.0.8 which is needed
the Trinidad Maven Plugins version
2.0.8 which is needed as a prerequisite to a Trinidad release. I have compiled
the Release Notes[1] for the 2.0.8 release.
I have generated the tag [2] and have deployed the built artifacts to nexus
[3]. Lastly I have included a source archive [4]. I've done
This vote is now closed and has passed. We have 4 binding +1 votes:
Blake Sullivan
Andy Schwartz
Max Starets
Scott O'Bryan
Thanks to everyone who voted, I'll prepare the artifacts and the announcement.
--
Scott O'Bryan
that
we should look at before rolling out the plugins release?
Andy
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
I was running the tasks needed to release the Trinidad Maven Plugins version
2.0.8 which is needed as a prerequisite to a Trinidad release. I have
I was running the tasks needed to release the Trinidad Maven Plugins version
2.0.8 which is needed as a prerequisite to a Trinidad release. I have compiled
the Release Notes[1] for the 2.0.8 release.
I have generated the tag [2] and have deployed the built artifacts to nexus
[3]. Lastly I
The Apache MyFaces team is please to announce the release of Apache
MyFaces Trinidad Maven Plugins v. 2.0.7.
Apache MyFaces Trinidad Maven Plugins provide the ability to package
translations, automatically create JSF component and renderkit artifacts
from meta-data, and provide JDeveloper
Thank you all for voting!
4 +1 votes:
- Scott O'Bryan
- Matt Cooper
- Dave Robinson
- Nathan Hokanson
no 0 or -1 votes.
Sincerely,
Scott
On 12/19/2011 03:54 PM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad Maven Plugins v.
2.0.7 released
.
Sincerely,
Scott
On 12/19/2011 03:54 PM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad Maven Plugins v. 2.0.7
released and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not.
There were some minor fixes and the plugins including
,
Scott
On 12/19/2011 03:54 PM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad Maven Plugins
v. 2.0.7 released and now I need a vote as to whether everything
looks good or not. There were some minor fixes and the plugins
including
, December 22, 2011 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: Result (was: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad Maven Plugins v. 2.0.7)
hi scott,
thx for releasing it. however, 3 binding votes are required (right now we have
2).
regards,
gerhard
2011/12/22 Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com
Thank you all for voting!
4 +1
From: Gerhard Petracekgpetra...@apache.org
To: MyFaces Developmentdev@myfaces.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: Result (was: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad Maven Plugins v. 2.0.7)
hi scott,
thx for releasing it. however, 3 binding votes
To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
Cc: Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: Result (was: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad Maven Plugins v. 2.0.7)
G erhard, since when have we started requiring binding votes? Was this
new
+1
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Dave Robinson drmaill...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello Everyone,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad Maven Plugins v. 2.0.7
released and now I need a vote
+1
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Dave Robinson drmaill...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello Everyone,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad Maven Plugins v. 2.0.7
released and now I need a vote
+1
On 12/19/2011 03:54 PM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad Maven Plugins v.
2.0.7 released and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks
good or not. There were some minor fixes and the plugins including
adding support marking
Hello Everyone,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad Maven Plugins v.
2.0.7 released and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good
or not. There were some minor fixes and the plugins including adding
support marking deprecated tag in tag documentation
+1
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad Maven Plugins v. 2.0.7
released and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not.
There were some minor fixes and the plugins
Here are the results of MyFaces plugins [1].. It's been a very busy few
weeks - sorry for the delay.
+1: Matt Cooper, Scott O'Bryan, Max Starets
Thanks for voting,
Scott O'Bryan
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-dev/201108.mbox/%3c4e39a765.4070...@gmail.com%3E
+1
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On 08/03/2011 03:43 PM, Max Starets wrote:
+1
On 8/3/2011 3:54 PM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad Maven Plugins v.
2.0.6released and now I need
+1
On 08/03/2011 03:43 PM, Max Starets wrote:
+1
On 8/3/2011 3:54 PM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad Maven Plugins v.
2.0.6released and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks
good or not. There were some minor fixes
Hello Everyone,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad Maven Plugins v.
2.0.6released and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good
or not. There were some minor fixes and the plugins including adding
support for more JSF 2.0 stuff as well as support for later
+1
On 8/3/2011 3:54 PM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad Maven Plugins v.
2.0.6released and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks
good or not. There were some minor fixes and the plugins including
adding support for more JSF
Forgot to vote.. :) +1
On 03/24/2011 10:32 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad Maven Plugins v.
2.0.5 released and not I need a vote as to whether everything looks
good or not. There were some minor fixes and the plugins now mark
Hi,
Thanks to all the people who voted.
We have 5 +1 votes:
Max Starets
Andy Schwartz
Leonardo Uribe
Blake Sullivan
Scott O'Bryan
No +0 or -1 votes. I will now proceed with the release.
Scott
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
I have created these issues:
http://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-952
Thank you Leonardo!
Although we are in between JSRs now, I sent mail to the old
jsr-314-open list to see whether we can address this
Thanks, Leonardo!
You rock!
Max
On 3/24/2011 6:06 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
Hi
I have created these issues:
http://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-952
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3082
I agree with the proposed behavior, and I don't think do it could
Hello Everyone,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad Maven Plugins v.
2.0.5 released and not I need a vote as to whether everything looks good
or not. There were some minor fixes and the plugins now mark the
trinidad package as being metadata complete in order to help avoid
+1
On 3/24/2011 12:32 PM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad Maven Plugins v.
2.0.5 released and not I need a vote as to whether everything looks
good or not. There were some minor fixes and the plugins now mark the
trinidad package
+1. Thanks for putting this together Scott!
Andy
Hi
As a side note:
SO There were some minor fixes and the plugins now mark the trinidad package
SO as being metadata complete in order to help avoid having to
scan the jar for
SO class annotations at runtime.
Reading JSF 2.0 spec, metadata-complete is only used on
WEB-INF/faces-config.xml.
Hey Leonrado,
The change is to allow the plugin to generate metadata-complete=true for
trinidad-impl's faces-config.xml.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2068
Max
On 3/24/2011 3:50 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
Hi
As a side note:
SO There were some minor fixes and the
+1
-- Blake Sullivan
On 3/24/11 9:32 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad Maven Plugins v.
2.0.5 released and not I need a vote as to whether everything looks
good or not. There were some minor fixes and the plugins now mark
Hi
2011/3/24 Max Starets max.star...@oracle.com:
Hey Leonrado,
The change is to allow the plugin to generate metadata-complete=true for
trinidad-impl's faces-config.xml.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2068
The problem here is this config will be ignored by myfaces core,
Well there ya go. Thanks for commenting Leonardo. I did not know
that.. :D
Is this going to be a showstopper for the release or (since it's
ignored) are people okay with having it in our FacesConfig for now? I
personally think it can't hurt but the spec does seem pretty clear on
the
Leonardo,
I have tested metadata-complete with Mojarra, and it is not ignored. I
can point you to the Mojarra code that does the check.
From what I understand, this feature was included a while ago (during
the initial 2.0 release) after Andy Schwartz lobbied for it. It looks
like the spec was
Leonardo,
The check in Mojarra is done in
com.sun.faces.config.ConfigManager.getAnnotationScanURLs().
Andy can probably dig out EG e-mails where this was agreed.
Thanks,
Max
On 3/24/2011 5:35 PM, Max Starets wrote:
Leonardo,
I have tested metadata-complete with Mojarra, and it is not
I, for one, am all for having it in. It's not like it will break anything
and if it gives a performance boost, all the better.
Max, we may want to generate a bug against the spec to see if they can fix
that. Is that possible?
On Mar 24, 2011, at 3:49 PM, Max Starets max.star...@oracle.com
Gang -
Looking back at the EG emails, I realize now that I dropped the ball
on making sure that my proposed changes actually made it into the
spec.
Here was my original email (Metadata complete jar files) from
Septeber 3, 2009:
Gang -
Section 11.5.1 of the spec defines the following
Hi
I have created these issues:
http://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-952
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3082
I agree with the proposed behavior, and I don't think do it could
cause any problems. So from my side there is no objections about the
artifacts
Hey Andy,
I'm wondering if there should be a TCK check for this as well since the
behavior has come into question.
Scott
On 03/24/2011 03:57 PM, Andy Schwartz wrote:
Gang -
Looking back at the EG emails, I realize now that I dropped the ball
on making sure that my proposed changes actually
Is that a +1? :D
On Mar 24, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I have created these issues:
http://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-952
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3082
I agree with the proposed behavior, and I don't think do
+1
2011/3/24 Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com:
Is that a +1? :D
On Mar 24, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I have created these issues:
http://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-952
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3082
I agree
+1
Jeanne Waldman wrote:
+1
Matthias Wessendorf wrote, On 4/2/2010 1:58 AM PT:
Hi,
currently the work for JSF2 (and Trinidad2) is on a branch, since
Trinidad2 (JSF2-based) is now trunk,
I feel that we should make the 2.0-specific maven work trunk and the
current trunk will be a branch.
Any
Hi,
currently the work for JSF2 (and Trinidad2) is on a branch, since
Trinidad2 (JSF2-based) is now trunk,
I feel that we should make the 2.0-specific maven work trunk and the
current trunk will be a branch.
Any concerns?
-Matthias
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
+1
Matthias Wessendorf wrote, On 4/2/2010 1:58 AM PT:
Hi,
currently the work for JSF2 (and Trinidad2) is on a branch, since
Trinidad2 (JSF2-based) is now trunk,
I feel that we should make the 2.0-specific maven work trunk and the
current trunk will be a branch.
Any concerns?
-Matthias
ok...
looks like myfaces-build-tools won the race.
structure will be
/myfaces-build-tools
-/maven2-plugins
-/all the current (trin) plugins
-tbc
-M
On Dec 15, 2007 11:12 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
there is this maven plugins folder for the Trinidad Plugins
Did a relocate of the plugins to:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/myfaces-build-tools/trunk/maven2-plugins/
the current trinidad-pluings are still in their trinidad-maven trunk;
I renamed the plugins to be compliant to the naming-schema
maven-blah-plugin means that blah is a plugin
Thanks for the build-tools stuff Matthias. That's a very nice tidyup. Having
myfaces-core depend on stuff called trinidad was rather confusing...
Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Did a relocate of the plugins to:
no other comments ?
that would mean to me, everbody is fine w/ the change.
-M
On Dec 16, 2007 3:29 PM, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, myfaces-build-tools is a much better name
--Manfred
On 12/16/07, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 About the naming, though, this
yes, myfaces-build-tools is a much better name
--Manfred
On 12/16/07, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 About the naming, though, this seems to be more myfaces-build-tools
than myfaces-dev-tools, because as far as I understand, this artifacts
are used during the build, not for just
Hi,
there is this maven plugins folder for the Trinidad Plugins (see [1]).
The Trinidad inside the name may confuse people. The plugins
are generally usable outside of Trinidad as well.
The maven-faces-plugin for instance, is used in other projects, such
as MyFaces Core, or MyFaces Commons.
The
Bernd's wagon could be also hosted there as well.
-M
On Dec 15, 2007 11:12 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
there is this maven plugins folder for the Trinidad Plugins (see [1]).
The Trinidad inside the name may confuse people. The plugins
are generally usable outside of
+1 About the naming, though, this seems to be more myfaces-build-tools
than myfaces-dev-tools, because as far as I understand, this artifacts
are used during the build, not for just development...
Thanks for the good work!
Bruno
On 15/12/2007, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
57 matches
Mail list logo
