On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 19:39 -0500, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
2008/4/25 Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Forgot to ask, this uses annotations for JSF = 1.2 right?
Yes.
Well, actually it is user's choice, as both are supported. But I would
imagine that people would choose real
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 2:03 PM, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 19:39 -0500, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
2008/4/25 Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Forgot to ask, this uses annotations for JSF = 1.2 right?
Yes.
Well, actually it is user's choice, as both are
Hi
Thanks to all people who voted.
We got 7 +1
Grant Smith
Bruno Aranda
Sochor Zdeněk
Werner Punz
Gerald Müllan
Simon Kitching
Leonardo Uribe
and one +0
Mario Ivankovits
So MyfacesBuilderPlugin will be moved to trunk:
Forgot to ask, this uses annotations for JSF = 1.2 right?
Also one more question, would Jsf* be better than JSF* for the names
(ie JsfProperty vs JSFProperty)? Using all uppercase for an acronym in
a java name is not conventional. Uppercase is usually reserved for
starting a new, unabbreviated
2008/4/25 Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Forgot to ask, this uses annotations for JSF = 1.2 right?
Also one more question, would Jsf* be better than JSF* for the names
(ie JsfProperty vs JSFProperty)? Using all uppercase for an acronym in
a java name is not conventional. Uppercase is
Leonardo Uribe schrieb:
MyfacesBuilderPlugin is now available for use on myfaces 1.1, so we
can officially vote about what plugin use on myfaces 1.1, 1.2 and
tomahawk for code generation
+1 for myfaces-core 1.1.x and tomahawk now!
(+1 for myfaces-core 1.2.x eventually, but there's no hurry..)
Hi,
great work!
So please vote if you want to see this feature included on myfaces 1.x and
tomahawk
+1
cheers,
Gerald
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Leonardo Uribe schrieb:
+0
... just due to the fact that I don't have time to review these bits,
but I trust you guys that *everything* ;-) works as expected.
+1 for the architecture and the general approach!
Great work!
Hi
MyfacesBuilderPlugin is now available for use on myfaces 1.1, so we
+1 definitely for jsf 1.1 we need something
working and well documented.
Leonardo Uribe schrieb:
+1
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
MyfacesBuilderPlugin is now available for use on myfaces 1.1, so we
can
Werner Punz schrieb:
+1 definitely for jsf 1.1 we need something
working and well documented.
Just to be clear: the options for the next core-1.1and tomahawk releases
are:
(a) the new myfaces-builder-plugin
(b) the myfaces-faces-plugin (formerly called trinidad-faces-plugin) as
currently used
Hi,
+1 for (a)
and for component class generation:
Annotated class is a private class that is used as template (never
instantiated, just the code is copied inside the generated class)
(to not lose typeof checking in deeper trees - using abstract class in
the middle would lose it for
+1a!
Bruno
On 23/04/2008, Sochor Zdeněk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
+1 for (a)
and for component class generation:
Annotated class is a private class that is used as template (never
instantiated, just the code is copied inside the generated class)
(to not lose typeof checking in
+1 for (a)
2008/4/23 Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1a!
Bruno
On 23/04/2008, Sochor Zdeněk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
+1 for (a)
and for component class generation:
Annotated class is a private class that is used as template (never
instantiated, just the code is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Werner Punz schrieb:
+1 definitely for jsf 1.1 we need something
working and well documented.
Just to be clear: the options for the next core-1.1and tomahawk releases
are:
(a) the new myfaces-builder-plugin
I am voting for a in this case
the old trinidad plugin is
Before I vote, I am curious to know if there has been an audit of the
functionality compared to the maven-faces-plugin tool.
I am wondering about that I can think of right now:
1. component, facet and property meta data extensions that live in
faces-config.xml
2. importing of code from shared
There are my personal opinions and solutions about each point :
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Andrew Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before I vote, I am curious to know if there has been an audit of the
functionality compared to the maven-faces-plugin tool.
I am wondering about that I
Hi
MyfacesBuilderPlugin is now available for use on myfaces 1.1, so we can
officially vote about what plugin use on myfaces 1.1, 1.2 and tomahawk for
code generation
Please note that this work is based on the discussion about code generation
long time ago.
A vote is necessary since this is a
+1
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
MyfacesBuilderPlugin is now available for use on myfaces 1.1, so we can
officially vote about what plugin use on myfaces 1.1, 1.2 and tomahawk for
code generation
Please note that this work is based on the
18 matches
Mail list logo
