-Original Message-
From: Paul Spencer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 9:59 AM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
Matthias,
I made this same request, in addition to moving parts or all of Shale
into MyFaces, to Wendy
to show to users
that
no
one is really working on an project.
Mario
-Original Message-
From: Grant Smith
Date: Monday, Okt 22, 2007 6:02 pm
Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
To: Reply- MyFaces Development To: MyFaces
Development
It was discussed, that Shale should have a final release;
I am +1 on that.
snip/
What do you have in mind, other than cutting the release? I may be
able to help with the release (depends when etc.). v1.0.5 or v1.1.0 or
both?
it was now a while, since the last release; and a release
community, but in the end I think it would be fair to show to users that no
one is really working on an project.
Mario
-Original Message-
From: Grant Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, Okt 22, 2007 6:02 pm
Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
To: Reply-MyFaces Development dev
: Merging Shale into MyFaces
To: Reply-MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.orgTo: MyFaces
Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
Conceptually, I am in favor of a merge. I wouldn't wait for JSF 2.0 to do
it, though. +1.
On 10/22/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:At least
Matthias,
I made this same request, in addition to moving parts or all of Shale
into MyFaces, to Wendy Smoak at ApacheCon in Atlanta. She said that she
would look into it.
Paul Spencer
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
It was discussed, that Shale should have a final release;
I am +1 on that.
That's cool;
I think, I now remember (perhaps I forgot b/c of the cycling bar), you told me
about it;
We should have a release in shale, before we move/refactor/overhaul things;
Let's discuss this release thing on shale-dev ml;
-M
On Dec 6, 2007 3:58 PM, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although I usually prefer dynamic mocks and easymock, I'm interested in the
test framework but only in this test module not other modules of shale.
On Dec 6, 2007 4:58 PM, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthias,
I made this same request, in addition to moving parts or all of Shale
Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Dec 6, 2007 4:50 PM, Kito D. Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Annotations and Remoting could be part of Tomahawk or common, and the
ViewController could be part of Orchestra.
I summarized today the same bits, makes sense to me.
I'd
I'd rather see a viewcontroller go into one of the common projects (if one is
appropriate) and then have Orchestra depend on that.
that would be a good idea;
I started thinking about REST, to have the viewController call some callbacks.
I was inspired about a talk at ApacheCon US on the S2
-Original Message-
Their is a feature in the SNAPSHOT version of test-framework that reads
the implementation's configuration, i.e. faces.xml, when setting up the
environment. This feature is valuable when testing against different
implementations, i.e. RI 1.1. In tomahawk 1.1.x, I
From: Jesse Alexander (KSFH 323) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Their is a feature in the SNAPSHOT version of test-framework that reads
the implementation's configuration, i.e. faces.xml, when setting up the
environment. This feature is valuable when testing against
-
From: Grant Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, Okt 22, 2007 6:02 pm
Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
To: Reply-MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.orgTo: MyFaces
Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
Conceptually, I am in favor of a merge. I wouldn't wait for JSF 2.0
think it would be fair to show to users that
no
one is really working on an project.
Mario
-Original Message-
From: Grant Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, Okt 22, 2007 6:02 pm
Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
To: Reply-MyFaces Development
-Original Message-
From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 3:16 AM
To: MyFaces Development; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
For me, a merger makes sense.
Seems almost unanimous :-).
The question is who will do
on an project.
Mario
-Original Message-
From: Grant Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, Okt 22, 2007 6:02 pm
Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
To: Reply-MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.orgTo:
MyFaces
Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
- ViewController/Dialog: I hope Orchestra can take in what makes sense
here (the notion of subflows which
I like Orchesta a lot, but I don't think the view controller/dialog features
should be tied to Spring
I see two configuration options - Spring and annotations. The managed
that no
one is really working on an project.
Mario
-Original Message-
From: Grant Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, Okt 22, 2007 6:02 pm
Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
To: Reply-MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.orgTo: MyFaces
Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
, October 24, 2007 9:16 AM
To: MyFaces Development; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
For me, a merger makes sense.
The question is who will do the work, though.
Some reflections on the modules:
- ViewController/Dialog: I hope Orchestra can take in what makes sense
here
Betreff: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
* Remoting
Unsure, as most of this can be done with PPR too.
+1 This is pretty useful and easy to use, and will affect JSF 2.0.
A secondary benefit is near-zero config for resource access,
particularly for resources provided in a jar file
On 10/21/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
big-snip/
* Dialog Manager
* Dialog Manager (Basic Implementation)
* Dialog Manager (SCXML Implementation)
The Dialog Manager might be a next step for MyFaces Orchestra. Anyway,
I
hope that one of the original
On 10/21/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Tiles Integration
See Clay.
+0 I'll abstain here and since I don't know much about the Tiles side of
things. Let's just say that I think Tiles integration should just work
in
MyFaces and Shale.
Likely relevant for
- JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info
-Original Message-
From: Bernhard Slominski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 8:41 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; MyFaces Development
Subject: AW: Merging Shale into MyFaces
Hi all,
I guess it makes sense, to make the merger
PROTECTED]'; MyFaces Development
Subject: AW: Merging Shale into MyFaces
Hi all,
I guess it makes sense, to make the merger a post JSF 2 project.
So all features, which are included in JSF 2 (e.g Remoting) should not
move,
but just stay in Shale.
Also let's see where templating
, news, and info
-Original Message-
From: Bernhard Slominski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 8:41 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; MyFaces Development
Subject: AW: Merging Shale into MyFaces
Hi all,
I guess it makes sense, to make the merger
-Original Message-
From: Bernhard Slominski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 12:33 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: AW: Merging Shale into MyFaces
The spec develops over the time so even it's not finsihed we roughly
know
what will be in it, it's
it would be fair to show to users that no one
is really working on an project.
Mario
-Original Message-
From: Grant Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, Okt 22, 2007 6:02 pm
Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
To: Reply-MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.orgTo: MyFaces
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Hi!
I sent out an e-mail to the Shale mailing list a week or so ago about
the
possibility of merging Shale with MyFaces. Development of Shale has
become
somewhat stale, and I'd rather see MyFaces pickup the pieces than
have the
code base atrophy The overwhelming
,
I sent out an e-mail to the Shale mailing list a week or so ago about the
possibility of merging Shale with MyFaces. Development of Shale has become
somewhat stale, and I'd rather see MyFaces pickup the pieces than have the
code base atrophy The overwhelming consensus for the Shale list
Hi!
I sent out an e-mail to the Shale mailing list a week or so ago about
the
possibility of merging Shale with MyFaces. Development of Shale has
become
somewhat stale, and I'd rather see MyFaces pickup the pieces than
have the
code base atrophy The overwhelming consensus for the Shale
Hello everyone,
I sent out an e-mail to the Shale mailing list a week or so ago about the
possibility of merging Shale with MyFaces. Development of Shale has become
somewhat stale, and I'd rather see MyFaces pickup the pieces than have the
code base atrophy The overwhelming consensus
about the
possibility of merging Shale with MyFaces. Development of Shale has become
somewhat stale, and I'd rather see MyFaces pickup the pieces than have the
code base atrophy The overwhelming consensus for the Shale list is yes
(and Craig is no exception). What does the MyFaces PMC think
32 matches
Mail list logo
