Betreff: Re: Shale Annotations
The problem with using Orchestra is that it requires Spring, which is an
extra framework that some organizations don't necessarily need. Although
JSF managed beans aren't that great, sometimes they're a better choice than
integrating Spring into the project
Hello everyone,
I know that MyFaces is in the process of swallowing Shale Test. What do you
guys think about swallowing Shale Annotations, too? I know it's a dead-end
add-on considering JSF 2, but I run into enough clients that aren't going to
be using JSF 2 for a lng time, and could use
and so on...
Cheers,
Bruno
2009/7/7 Kito Mann kito.m...@virtua.com:
Hello everyone,
I know that MyFaces is in the process of swallowing Shale Test. What do you
guys think about swallowing Shale Annotations, too? I know it's a dead-end
add-on considering JSF 2, but I run into enough clients
beans and so on...
Cheers,
Bruno
2009/7/7 Kito Mann kito.m...@virtua.com:
Hello everyone,
I know that MyFaces is in the process of swallowing Shale Test. What do
you
guys think about swallowing Shale Annotations, too? I know it's a
dead-end
add-on considering JSF 2, but I run
think? Is it worth it?
Ciao,
Mario
Von: Kito Mann [mailto:kito.m...@virtua.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 07. Juli 2009 23:45
An: MyFaces Development
Betreff: Re: Shale Annotations
The problem with using Orchestra is that it requires Spring, which is an extra
framework that some organizations don't
