Re: Build failing locally

2019-12-01 Thread Peter Hull
On Sun, 1 Dec 2019 at 22:15, Steven Ingram wrote: > I tried to build the project today, but I kept hitting errors which led me > to make a new clone of an up-to-date master branch of my fork. I keep > running into compilation errors. See attached truncated output. If i need > to attach the re

Build failing locally

2019-12-01 Thread Steven Ingram
I tried to build the project today, but I kept hitting errors which led me to make a new clone of an up-to-date master branch of my fork. I keep running into compilation errors. See attached truncated output. If i need to attach the rest I can at request. Thanks! Steven -prepare-mandatory-fi

Re: Architecture document

2019-12-01 Thread Steven Ingram
I think I may have been thinking of the wiki NetBeansDeveloperFAQ http://wiki.netbeans.org/NetBeansDeveloperFAQ Regards, Steven On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 3:08 PM Steven Ingram wrote: > I'm looking for a document I actually found last week, that goes into the > platform architecture. It covered to

Re: Travis is failing on building hibernateweb

2019-12-01 Thread Matthias Bläsing
Hi, hibernateweb can't be build because it depends on hibernate, which was removed in the far past. What we could do: We could restore the code of the hibernate module into the "contrib" directory. We don't build the contrib modules, but if others want to do it, I'm fine with it. I'm willing to do

Re: Accepting contributions not covered by an ICLA

2019-12-01 Thread Matthias Bläsing
Hi, I have in the past merged from non ICLA signees. Am Sonntag, den 01.12.2019, 20:54 +0100 schrieb Jan Lahoda: > > I have a question related to: > https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1559 > > I think the patch is good to be integrated, but I believe the author > does not have an ICLA fil

Architecture document

2019-12-01 Thread Steven Ingram
I'm looking for a document I actually found last week, that goes into the platform architecture. It covered topics like LookUps and such. When I found it I was pretty stoked because i had been looking for such a document for some time. Does anyone know where that document is? I can not find it

Accepting contributions not covered by an ICLA

2019-12-01 Thread Jan Lahoda
Hi, I have a question related to: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1559 I think the patch is good to be integrated, but I believe the author does not have an ICLA filled. What is our approach for such contributions? Is it OK to integrate? Thanks, Jan

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Dropping Installers from the Release Process leave that work to Third Party Distributors

2019-12-01 Thread Eric Bresie
Came in late on the discussion so sorry up front Think this goes down the installer downloading the dependency path but... Would some sort of package manager based solution which handles the dependency installation like apt-get (snap) or chocolatey.org (for Windows) with Netbeans dependencies

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Dropping Installers from the Release Process leave that work to Third Party Distributors

2019-12-01 Thread Emilian Bold
@Eric: I have a macOS DMG for OpenBeans, that could easily be adapted for NetBeans too. I didn't look into other native OS support. We have an official Snap image for Ubuntu (and whatever other distros support snap). We don't have official .deb/.rpm packages. --emi On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 5:20 P

Re: UI Unit Testing in Netbeans

2019-12-01 Thread Emilian Bold
Jemmy / Jelly and NbJunit are good http://bits.netbeans.org/dev/javadoc/org-netbeans-modules-nbjunit/org/netbeans/junit/package-summary.html --emi On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 5:14 PM Eric Bresie wrote: > > Was curious, I’m aware of all the good amount of unit tests present in > Netbeans but not an e

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Dropping Installers from the Release Process leave that work to Third Party Distributors

2019-12-01 Thread Eric Bresie
Just curious would/are non-Windows options also available? Eric Bresie ebre...@gmail.com > On November 28, 2019 at 4:24:53 PM CST, Emilian Bold > wrote: > Does this work: https://github.com/OpenBeans/NetBeans/releases/tag/11.2 ? > > --emi > > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 11:11 PM Geertjan Wielenga

UI Unit Testing in Netbeans

2019-12-01 Thread Eric Bresie
Was curious, I’m aware of all the good amount of unit tests present in Netbeans but not an expert in most areas of the specifics of them and was curious are there any UI level unit tests in the Netbeans test suite? I’m sure there are a few UI options out there [1] I thought I remember seeing so

Re: Statistics re Apache NetBeans

2019-12-01 Thread Emilian Bold
Oh, so the server was just renamed? Any of the older data available somewhere? --emi On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 12:06 PM Daniel Gruno wrote: > > On 01/12/2019 10.52, Emilian Bold wrote: > > Hello, > > > > As far as I can see https://blocky.apache.org/exports does not exist > > anymore. Any other pla

Re: Statistics re Apache NetBeans

2019-12-01 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 01/12/2019 10.52, Emilian Bold wrote: Hello, As far as I can see https://blocky.apache.org/exports does not exist anymore. Any other place for download statistics that one can access? https://uls.apache.org/exports/ I see COMDEV-310 is still open. Does NetBeans have a Snoot account? --e

Re: Statistics re Apache NetBeans

2019-12-01 Thread Emilian Bold
Hello, As far as I can see https://blocky.apache.org/exports does not exist anymore. Any other place for download statistics that one can access? I see COMDEV-310 is still open. Does NetBeans have a Snoot account? --emi On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 4:22 PM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > Hi all, > > @N

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache NetBeans 11.2-u1 update

2019-12-01 Thread Neil C Smith
Hi All, I've closed the vote on Apache NetBeans 11.2-u1 update with a result of 7 +1 binding votes and 2 +1 votes from community members. There were no 0 or -1 votes. Thanks everyone! I'll now progress with moving the updates to the release mirrors, after which we can push these updates to users

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.2-u1 update

2019-12-01 Thread Neil C Smith
+1 (binding) OK, thanks all, closing the vote now. Best wishes, Neil On Sun, 1 Dec 2019 at 00:14, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Checked: > > - checksums: Ok > - signatures: Ok > - build: Ok > - binary: Works > > I just played around it briefly it looked good. Not really felt the