Well,
There is a lengthy discussion on this issue:
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/issues/3962
We seems to have small wins, in whole, it's rather frustrating.
On 10/4/23 16:34, Kenneth Fogel wrote:
NetBeans 19 performs more poorly than 18. I can copy and paste one or two items to
an exte
NetBeans 19 performs more poorly than 18. I can copy and paste one or two items
to an external program before I need to do a Copy, Cut, & Restore. This will
work for about a half hour. It is also now refusing to accept pastes from
external programs. Then today it reported missing libraries in a
Hi,
I'm only creating repo and migrating history to be able to evaluate antora.
This CMS needs repo in place to get the more of it. If not conclusive I would
remove the repo. I prefer doing it under apache as I migrate history of the
website repo.
Consider the netbeans-antora-* just test for no
On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, 20:07 Matthias Bläsing,
wrote:
> I was asked to reply here:
>
> I'm irritated, that votes are called for packages, that violate Apache
> Release requirements (at least to my understanding).
>
> I will not vote on dlight.nativeexecution as I assume the reaction will
> also be j
Hi,
Am Montag, dem 02.10.2023 um 10:56 +0200 schrieb Eric Barboni:
>
> I'm a bit annoyed by the current gradle build and would like to migrate to
> antora, means one repo for UI (css, and so one) and 1 to more repository for
> the content (keeping adoc).
>
I don't understand why this question w
Hi,
I was asked to reply here:
I'm irritated, that votes are called for packages, that violate Apache
Release requirements (at least to my understanding).
I will not vote on dlight.nativeexecution as I assume the reaction will
also be just a shrug. The question that remains: Why call a vote then
This is a vote on the dlight.nativeexecution native binaries. As the
binary artefacts are consumed by the IDE build, we need to release
them separately when they need updating.
The main purpose of this version is to allow us to ship Apple Silicon
support for the terminal in NetBeans 20.
Primary v
+1 (binding)
I also wanted to point out that this artifact is for internal
consumption only. The reason it exists is to simplify the build - thats
it. The lib wrapper module which bundles the native libs already handles
the license, I did comment on the placeholder files on the PR too but it
+1 (binding)
Voting early to also respond to Matthias' point. I intend to keep the
vote open.
Without turning this too much into a discussion thread, both things
are ugly but intended at the moment. They need addressing, along with
a few other things, in the NB21 timeframe.
I would have more o
Hi,
Changing to -1,
I need to change glasses
Better cancel the vote and
rebuild with LICENSE NOTICE files in the binary artifacts as it also impact
the others "native build" worklow.
Best Regards
Eric
-Message d'origine-
De : Matthias Bläsing
Envoyé : mardi 3 octobre 2023 21:43
10 matches
Mail list logo
