Hi Neil,
I submitted the new PR https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1375 and Travis
fails on some external binaries that are not related to my changes.
BUILD FAILED
/home/travis/build/apache/netbeans/nbbuild/build.xml:1584: Failed
VerifyLibsAndLicenses test(s):
Some binaries were found outs
I am working on the repaired PR now...will be in touch soon. Thanks
Josh Juneau
juneau...@gmail.com
http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
https://www.apress.com/us/search?query=Juneau
> On Jul 12, 2019, at 5:09 AM, Neil C Smith wrote:
>
> On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 at 10:26, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>>
>
On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 at 11:32, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>
> I think the following should go in to beta-4:
>
> - Gaurav's fix for the Payara Micro issue that triggered the need for beta-4
> - Laszlo's license fixes
> - Josh's PR, if he can get to it in time,
> - Toni's PR about the DukeScript suppop
I think the following should go in to beta-4:
- Gaurav's fix for the Payara Micro issue that triggered the need for beta-4
- Laszlo's license fixes
- Josh's PR, if he can get to it in time,
- Toni's PR about the DukeScript suppoprt and JDK 11
That's all, I think.
Gj
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 12:0
On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 at 10:26, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>
> Excellent, great, thank you!
>
Just waiting to hear if Josh can look at fixing the J2EE PR. Have
opened a sync PR to the release branch. Let me know if anything else
looks missing.
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1374
As an as
Excellent, great, thank you!
Gj
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:19 AM Neil C Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So, unfortunately a critical issue was picked up in NB 11.1-vc1, and
> voting on that has had to be cancelled. See
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2824 Despite
> downgrading to Crit
Hi,
So, unfortunately a critical issue was picked up in NB 11.1-vc1, and
voting on that has had to be cancelled. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2824 Despite
downgrading to Critical because there is a (horrible) workaround,
there's no way we should release NB 11.1 with it in.
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 22:00, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote:
> Having that in I cannot say +1 however I wish. I do not think that is a
> real blocker, so you can still overrule me with +1-s, as it seems to be
> a good release in every other aspect I've checked.
Well, as you've seen elsewhere, we have a c
On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 at 07:52, Alessandro wrote:
> Neil explained that the NOTICE file in the zip is generated by an Ant task
> that takes nbbuild/notice-stub.txt as a header, the NOTICE file in the root
> of the repo is not going to be distributed.
> Maybe it would be better to delete it?
No, it
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 23:54, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote:
>
> Here is it: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1370
Thanks!
> As of the date in the NOTICE file, we need to check the build as both on
> master and on release111 the NOTICE file is different than the one ended
> up in the zip and both
Hi Laszlo,
I already reported the NOTICE inconsistency.
Neil explained that the NOTICE file in the zip is generated by an Ant task
that takes nbbuild/notice-stub.txt as a header, the NOTICE file in the root
of the repo is not going to be distributed.
Maybe it would be better to delete it?
Greet
Here is it: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1370
As of the date in the NOTICE file, we need to check the build as both on
master and on release111 the NOTICE file is different than the one ended
up in the zip and both has the correct year: 2019.
On 7/11/19 2:27 PM, Geertjan Wielenga w
Great, can you provide a PR to fix this, together with the PRs from Gaurav,
Josh, and Toni, we’ll enable Neil to create beta-4 in preparation for vc2
early next week, yes, small slip, but we’re learning and it’s a process.
Gj
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 23:00, Laszlo Kishalmi
wrote:
> -1 (binding)
-1 (binding)
Dear all,
You won't like me, as it is all my fault.
What was checked:
Checksum - OK
Signatures - OK
LICENSE, NOTICE, DEPENDENCIES - OK
NOTICE Year - FAIL
Build from Source - OK
Run on Ubuntu with OpenJDK8 - OK
Run on Ubuntu with OpenJDK11 - OK
Run on Ubuntu with OpenJDK12 - OK
Run
+1 (binding)
Sha512+asc check
Regards
Eric
(notice-stub.txt in nbbuild folder is used and not up to date)
-Message d'origine-
De : Alessandro
Envoyé : jeudi 11 juillet 2019 15:54
À : dev@netbeans.apache.org
Objet : Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.1 [vote candidate 1
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 14:54, Alessandro wrote:
> Don't know if this matters a lot but the NOTICE file in the source archive
> is completely different from that on the git repository (copyright end
> year, additional license statements for Kotlin, IntelliJ IDEA, Struts,
> Jakarta Validator).
This
+1
Don't know if this matters a lot but the NOTICE file in the source archive
is completely different from that on the git repository (copyright end
year, additional license statements for Kotlin, IntelliJ IDEA, Struts,
Jakarta Validator).
Steps:
- Verified sha512
- Unzipped source archives
- Ver
+1
Built it by success... no issues with 11.1-vc1!
Thanks!
Kai
On 7/10/2019 9:41 PM, Neil C Smith wrote:
Dear all,
This is our first voting candidate for the 11.1 release of Apache NetBeans.
Apache NetBeans 11.1 constitutes all clusters in the Apache NetBeans
Git repo, which together provide
+1 I have been using apache Netbeans 11.1 for sometime and its working as
expected.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019, 11:49 Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Me too. Built it successfully as well and will be voting +1 today.
>
> We also must remember this is not a LTS release, i.e., it will not be
> perfect and th
+1 ... The vc1 sources build without issue. Verified files and signature.
Thanks for the hard work!
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 2:41 PM Neil C Smith wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> This is our first voting candidate for the 11.1 release of Apache NetBeans.
>
> Apache NetBeans 11.1 constitutes all clusters
Me too. Built it successfully as well and will be voting +1 today.
We also must remember this is not a LTS release, i.e., it will not be
perfect and the better we can document that, the better. I.e., let's
provide a list of issues that we know are significant in the Java EE 8
world, since that's o
+1
I've been using netbeans 11.1 for a while, it's good and functioning smoothly,
I like it.
在2019年07月11，上午 3:41，Neil C Smith 写道：
Dear all, This is our first voting candidate for the 11.1 release of Apache
NetBeans. Apache NetBeans 11.1 constitutes all clusters in the Apache NetBeans
Git repo,
Dear all,
This is our first voting candidate for the 11.1 release of Apache NetBeans.
Apache NetBeans 11.1 constitutes all clusters in the Apache NetBeans
Git repo, which together provide the NetBeans Platform (i.e., the
underlying application framework), as well as all the modules that
provide t
23 matches
Mail list logo
