On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 09:22, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> 24. listopadu 2020 8:53:19 SEČ, John Mc napsal:
> >My main concern here and the reason for my -1 is that there seems to be
> >a
> >push for a convince binary without knowing if the main vote passes. If
> >it
> >doesn't then it's a waste of time an
Hi,
My personal opinion only:
24. listopadu 2020 8:53:19 SEČ, John Mc napsal:
>Hi Laszlo,
>
>It will probably be at the weekend when I can do the Mac installer. But
>yeah I've no problem doing it.
>
>My main concern here and the reason for my -1 is that there seems to be
>a
>push for a convince
Hi Laszlo,
It will probably be at the weekend when I can do the Mac installer. But
yeah I've no problem doing it.
My main concern here and the reason for my -1 is that there seems to be a
push for a convince binary without knowing if the main vote passes. If it
doesn't then it's a waste of time a
Well, I plan to close the VOTING round for 12.2 source Tomorrow morning
PST (That would be Tomorrow late afternoon in Europe). After that is out
I'd start a round for the Window and Linux binaries, also I'd ask John
to prepare the Mac binary. That would be the right time to start the VS
Code bi
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020, 21:01 Jaroslav Tulach,
wrote:
> It is my understanding that finishing source vote and only then starting
> vote
> on complementary binaries is not Apache policy, just a NetBeans project
> habit.
>
Not always, or by design - concurrency is hard! ;-)
Neil
>
> Well, it would have been nicer to wait the close of the 12.2 vote. I
> know it seems to be a matter of formality by now, but still..
The best time to object was on Thursday when I described the plan to vote in
parallel:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
r2c456e2ae9cde981e2027c9ac65ec9e6244
