Re: Improve indexing and file indentification?

2019-03-08 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
Regarding performance: In my experience part of the problem has been (historically) that the default -Xmx setting for NB IDE has simply been too low. People just don't go to etc/netbeans.conf on their own and change it. Anyway, when you compare the two IDEs remember to make sure they have been all

Re: How to work on Apache NetBeans sources

2018-11-24 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
ange, the modules were moved into a per-cluster directory. > > > > You need NetBeans 9 to open the modules. > > > > HTH > > > > Matthias > > > > Am Samstag, den 24.11.2018, 18:52 +0100 schrieb Lars Bruun-Hansen: > > > I'm an infrequent contr

How to work on Apache NetBeans sources

2018-11-24 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
I'm an infrequent contributor to Apache NetBeans. It has been a while, about 9 months, and I realize I no longer know how to open a specific NetBeans module and work on that. Here's what I do: 1. Clone Apache NetBeans from GitHub 2. Run "ant" from the root of the clone. It takes some 10 minutes t

Re: Amazon Corretto

2018-11-14 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
Not too impressed by Amazon Correto. So far they only provide .msi, .rpm, etc, with no .zip/.tgz in sight. If you look at their .msi it doesn't actually seem to be doing anything else than unpacking. Doesn't even set PATH. Then why distribute as an .msi ? I'm waiting for someone to provide JDK as

Re: Updater branding

2018-06-25 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
This is all documented in NETBEANS-146. It lists all the artwork, including that for the Updater Splash. It also lists the locations for both Platform and IDE (just hover over the links). IDE overrides Platform. I wouldn't close NETBEANS-146 just yet, as long as not everything mentioned is replace

Re: New NetBeans splash screen? :-)

2018-03-08 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
Question is how far you want to go in such a contest? There's NETBEANS-146 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-146) which lists all art work which needs to be touched in order for a complete re-branding to take place. By this, you'll learn that Platform and IDE has different splashes,

Re: [VOTE] Apache NetBeans Logo (NETBEANS-145)

2018-03-03 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
Logo id 2: +1. (I was concerned about scaling, so I've tried to look at in 16x16 in Inkscape's "Icon Preview" feature and it looks ok'ish. Check!) On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 1:31 AM, Wade Chandler wrote: > Logo ID 2 : +1 > > Wade > > > On Mar 1, 2018 07:32, "Antonio" wrote: > > > Hi all, > >

Re: Contributors & license headers

2018-01-14 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
ach it shows up in "Tools --> Templates --> Licenses" and it can be used just as well for those who use the NetBeans IDE to contribute to Tomcat, Cassandra, Maven, or whatever. I'll see if the two approaches can be merged so that we can get the best of both. Lars On Sun, Jan

Re: Contributors & license headers

2018-01-14 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
ment to the contributor guidelines. > > Regarding the license template for ASF header I think it's a great idea. > > Have a good sunday, > Antonio > > > On 14/01/18 10:17, Lars Bruun-Hansen wrote: > >> You are absolute right. Said contribution is using the standard AL v2

Re: Contributors & license headers

2018-01-14 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
You are absolute right. Said contribution is using the standard AL v2 license, not the ASF license header. Incorrect, but it is very easy to confuse the two. The latter is a special case of the former. Pull Requests are indeed "developed at the ASF" unless they contain third party code, so PRs must

Re: Newbie On Board!!!

2017-12-07 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
start' and make it clear that it includes only >> first steps, and then everything else can go somewhere else? >> >> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 11:25 PM, Lars Bruun-Hansen < >> lbruunhan...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Ioannis, >>> >

Re: Newbie On Board!!!

2017-12-06 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
Hi Ioannis, There's also this page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=74681408 which predates the "Development Environment" page. (we should make sure there's no overlap) As you can see, on the former page the plan was to document the most common tasks a PR author wi

Re: Readd Browser Icons (PR-251) (was: Re: AW: Status of Apache NetBeans (incubating) 9.0 Beta)

2017-12-05 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
I've taken up Neil's suggestion and opened LEGAL-353 ("Clarify fair use of trademarked logos"). The older issue, LEGAL-343, was poorly worded and is now closed. Feel free to edit LEGAL-353 if you feel the wording can be better. I agree with Matthias' suggestion to move forward wrt browser icons. E

Re: Status of Apache NetBeans (incubating) 9.0 Beta

2017-12-01 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
ct solution that we can merge right now today is in > my opinion far preferable to one that will require another 6 months of > investigation. > > Gj > > > > On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Lars Bruun-Hansen > wrote: > > > Yes, we are progressing. Every hour

Mailing lists

2017-12-01 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
This seems to cause problems for people. To be fair it was difficult to find information in the wiki on how to unsubscribe. (5 secs of Google would give the generic answer, but nevertheless) I've created a new wiki page solely on the topic of mailing lists, using Geertjan's wording. https://cwiki

Re: Status of Apache NetBeans (incubating) 9.0 Beta

2017-11-30 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
Yes, we are progressing. Every hour some progress can be seen. Check! > [...] what is there left to be done? (1) are we done with the module review process ? https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/List+of+Modules+to+Review (2) IMO, we still need a clearer view of the impact of the

Re: Small application for demoing the platform?

2017-11-19 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
Excellent work. I'll add some ideas for more Platform features to be highlighted in the demo app, ... as you suggest in README. On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Antonio wrote: > Hi all, > > I uploaded a small demo app here: > > https://github.com/vieiro/nbp-demo > > This is still a work in progr

Header on Java source code files

2017-11-18 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
I've noticed that AL2 license headers for Apache NetBeans in Java source code files start with the Javadoc introducer, i.e. "/**" rather than just "/*". Even on .c and .h files this is the case. I've checked how the IDE itself does it on a fresh project where you ask it to apply some type of licen

Re: Contributor and commiter guidelines (was Re: Committer guidelines)

2017-11-18 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
Slightly off topic because this is about contributors (not committers) to Apache NetBeans: There are some unfinished scribbles here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=74681408 Note comments from Jesse in the right hand margin. (scroll down) Feel free to amend, mov

Re: AW: NetBeans Logo (SVG)

2017-11-16 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
ote: > We should not merged them, as Bertrand said. We Need seperated tickets. > One for the Logo context, one for the splash Screen, one for the other > Branding stuff and what the others are. > > Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10 > > Von: Lars Bruun-Hansen > Gesendet: Donner

Re: AW: NetBeans Logo (SVG)

2017-11-16 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
Arghh. My JIRA ticket NETBEANS-146 was created at the same time when Antonio created NETBEANS-145. Didn't see that. On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Lars Bruun-Hansen wrote: > If you are serious about creating new art-work for NetBeans then you can > have a look at NETBEANS-

Re: AW: NetBeans Logo (SVG)

2017-11-16 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
If you are serious about creating new art-work for NetBeans then you can have a look at NETBEANS-146 ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-146). A complete proposal needs to include various splash images, about box images, frame icons, etc. It is all listed in the JIRA ticket. Click th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt

2017-11-16 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
Was about to create this when I saw that Antonio had already created it in JIRA. :-) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-144 On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Antonio wrote: > > The "About Dialog" of a NB RCP Appl

Re: nb-javac

2017-11-14 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
-forward as an acceptable solution for the next 1-2 years. On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Jan Lahoda wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Lars Bruun-Hansen > > wrote: > > > I think (a) is a major deviation from NetBeans' hallmark: plug-and-play, > > just in

Re: nb-javac

2017-11-14 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
I think (a) is a major deviation from NetBeans' hallmark: plug-and-play, just install it and start programming. It is exactly this kind of thing we've accused Eclipse for over the years. If NetBeans started on that path it would be ironic. I think it can only be justified if it is an intermediary

Re: How to analyse the debugger performance

2017-11-14 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
2GB sounds too little. What is the reason for being so stingy? Why not say 8GB? Jaroslav's suggestion will tell you if you have shortage of heap. On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 9:54 AM, John McDonnell wrote: > Hi, > > @Martin > I'm not noticing too slow of a Debugger startup time... around 10 > secs

Re: How to analyse the debugger performance

2017-11-13 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
In my experience working with many open projects is not per se something which is slowing NetBeans down. However, working with many open projects *and* not enough memory is. If NetBeans doesn't have enough memory to work with then things will become slow. Do you have enough RAM on your machine and

Re: Using the Autoupdate libraries in a non-Platform app (specifically, Apache JMeter)

2017-11-13 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
> The downside seems to be that the autoupdate code is really hairy and > more complex than what I need initially. True. But it is one of those modules where it - in my experience - pays off to read the arch doc. ( http://bits.netbeans.org/dev/javadoc/org-netbeans-modules-autoupdate-services/overv

Nightly build with downloadable packages and published javadoc?

2017-11-12 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
Just a few (possibly premature) questions: In the new Apache world, is there anything like a nightly build? Will there be? Along those lines: Is there anything like http://bits.netbeans.org/dev/javadoc/ ? Will there be?

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)

2017-11-07 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
+1 Remark: NOTICE file looks as if it could use some more line breaks. JUnit notice is duplicated. Perhaps NOTICE file was handcrafted for this release? Lars On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Sven Reimers wrote: > +1 > > Sven > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Josh Juneau wrote: > > > +1 on t

Re: Rat discrepancy

2017-11-07 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
Wouldn't know why you see what you see, but FYI this file is removed by PR 161 https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/161 .. but as this PR is not yet merged I cannot explain what you see. I hope it won't be long before PR161 is merged and then this file is history. On Tue, Nov 7, 201

Donation changes review

2017-11-06 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
Oracle had to do a number of changes (mostly stuff removed) to the donation to Apache compared to what was in NetBeans Mercurial. We need to go through these changes and evaluate their impact, if any. Your help is needed: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Donation+changes+to+be

Re: Changes done in 1st donation zip compared to NetBeans mainline

2017-11-05 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
disclaimers on it. On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 10:36 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Thanks for this investigation. > > Gj > > On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 at 22:32, Lars Bruun-Hansen > wrote: > > > I think we need this. > >

Changes done in 1st donation zip compared to NetBeans mainline

2017-11-05 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
I think we need this. The following URL is - to the best of my Hg knowledge* - a list of all changes done specifically to the donation.zip. (1st donation) .. before it was handed over to Apache NetBeans. http://hg.netbeans.org/releases/log?revcount=1500&rev=%28branch%28%27donation_review%27%29+

Re: Breaking change in donation vis-a-vis mainline Hg NetBeans

2017-11-04 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
; Gj > > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Matthias Bläsing < > mblaes...@doppel-helix.eu> > wrote: > > > Hey Lars, > > > > Am Samstag, den 04.11.2017, 15:48 +0100 schrieb Lars Bruun-Hansen: > > > The cause has been uncovered: it is due to a DTD file being remov

Breaking change in donation vis-a-vis mainline Hg NetBeans

2017-11-04 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
I've found a minor "bug" in the donation, documented in NETBEANS-112. Welcome page is broken and NetBeans attempts to download from aol.com. The cause has been uncovered: it is due to a DTD file being removed from Hg (on the donation branch) prior to the actual donation being made. I think I under

Re: 3rd party bundled binaries - what can we do and cannot do?

2017-11-02 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
2, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Lars Bruun-Hansen > wrote: > > it seems that for our release process to be > > approved, we must limit the location from where we fetch 3rd party libs > to > > th

3rd party bundled binaries - what can we do and cannot do?

2017-11-02 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
Hi all, (and possibly mentors in particular) As a module reviewer I'm uncertain/confused about how to deal with 3rd party libraries. Here's how I understand it: An Apache release need to comply with certain standards, one of them being that any bundled 3rd party binary must be duly vetted. We c

Re: Why are signed jars a problem?

2017-10-31 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
en Central. On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Matthias Bläsing < mblaes...@doppel-helix.eu> wrote: > Hey Lars, > > Am Dienstag, den 31.10.2017, 11:56 +0100 schrieb Lars Bruun-Hansen: > > > > Some external jars in the old NetBeans build have been stripped of their >

Why are signed jars a problem?

2017-10-31 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
Picking up some more modules to review and I can see some of you go to great length to find external binary in Maven Central (or elsewhere), even where an exact match doesn't exist. (by exact match I mean where the hash doesn't match) More specifically: Some external jars in the old NetBeans buil

Re: No more modules to review?

2017-10-31 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
ot;stealing". :-) On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Antonio Vieiro wrote: > > > El 30 oct 2017, a las 16:15, Lars Bruun-Hansen > escribió: > > > > I've done 5-6 modules. > > Now - for the first time - all modules have a name next to them. (except >

Re: No more modules to review?

2017-10-30 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
Thx. I'll look at Emilian's suggestion tonight. On 30 Oct 2017 17:12, "Emilian Bold" wrote: > There are some here https://github.com/emilianbold/incubator- > netbeans/issues with no progress for days. You could pick one (and > announce on the issue). > > --emi > > > Original Message

No more modules to review?

2017-10-30 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
I've done 5-6 modules. Now - for the first time - all modules have a name next to them. (except a few o.eclipse but I'm under that Antonio Vieiro is looking at those?). I'll be happy to do more if someone has signed up for more than they can chew. :-) Let me know.

Re: Do not use java.net.URL as keys in Maps

2017-10-29 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
Thank you for this. Much appreciated. I for one wasn't aware of this. I had to look into the JDK source because I refused to believe you :-) You are right. I've done some basic grepping for "Map[:space:]*<[:space:]*URL" on the NetBeans source code and as I feared this pattern appears all over th

Module review - yet another helper

2017-10-24 Thread Lars Bruun-Hansen
Hi I would like to help out with the last bits of the module review. I see there are still a few modules without names on them (servletapi,swing.validation, etc). I'll grab those and get right on it. I'll need Confluence edit rights. My Confluence id: lbruun Thanks Lars