On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 3:39 PM Gregory Nutt wrote:
>
> >> it seems because ARCHINCLUDES try to figure out the search path by
> >> invoking shell script:
> >
> > But wouldn't that affect all platforms proportionally? Why would that
> > cause such a huge increase on MSYS2.
> >
> > I saw a 7
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:15 PM Gregory Nutt wrote:
>
> > Well, it could be a gift certificate of some kind. Seems like it must
> > be embedded RTOS themed in some way, however.
> >
> > Or maybe a trophy?
>
> Better... a T-shirt or hoody with the selected logo on it.
That's a neat idea!
Well, it could be a gift certificate of some kind. Seems like it must
be embedded RTOS themed in some way, however.
Or maybe a trophy?
Better... a T-shirt or hoody with the selected logo on it.
it seems because ARCHINCLUDES try to figure out the search path by
invoking shell script:
But wouldn't that affect all platforms proportionally? Why would
that cause such a huge increase on MSYS2.
I saw a 7 minute build time on Cygwin. That is also very high, but
not at all the kind
it seems because ARCHINCLUDES try to figure out the search path by
invoking shell script:
But wouldn't that affect all platforms proportionally? Why would that
cause such a huge increase on MSYS2.
I saw a 7 minute build time on Cygwin. That is also very high, but
not at all the kind of
it seems because ARCHINCLUDES try to figure out the search path by
invoking shell script:
But wouldn't that affect all platforms proportionally? Why would that
cause such a huge increase on MSYS2.
I saw a 7 minute build time on Cygwin. That is also very high, but not
at all the kind of
A contest is fine, maybe we could even create a pool to purchase a
prize... like a nice, high end NuttX board? I would contribute.
That would provide more incentive to participate.
Let's find out if we can do this. Mentors? Is it allowed? Is there a
process we have to follow?
I wonder if
I tried to summarize the discussion of PR 1099 in a Wiki page. The PR
comments got messy and unreadable, here is a cleaned up version:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Kernel+Threads+with+Custom+Stacks
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 11:45 AM Gregory Nutt wrote:
> A contest is fine, maybe we could even create a pool to purchase a
> prize... like a nice, high end NuttX board? I would contribute.
That would provide more incentive to participate.
Let's find out if we can do this. Mentors? Is it
In my opinion there should be a poll (on the same page) so that people can
vote the one that they like
Thanks
Alin
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 9:47 AM Alan Carvalho de Assis
wrote:
> Good point David!
>
> I got all logos from PDF and put it publicly visible:
>
>
I want to ask a question based on the draft proposals. Are we allowed to
think broader? :) For instance, I wonder what the community would think
about using a mascot.
I am open to that idea myself.. like Linux' penguin? Such a mascot
would need to have wide appeal and acceptance, I think a
On 5/27/2020 8:53 AM, Nathan Hartman wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:45 AM Gregory Nutt wrote:
The new logo could be viewed online here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/New+Apache+Nuttx+Logo
Please give your feedback and suggestoion.
Are there any updates on the proposed
I want to ask a question based on the draft proposals. Are we allowed to
think broader? :) For instance, I wonder what the community would think
about using a mascot.
Erdem
Gregory Nutt , 27 May 2020 Çar, 16:45 tarihinde şunu
yazdı:
>
> > The new logo could be viewed online here:
> >
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:45 AM Gregory Nutt wrote:
> > The new logo could be viewed online here:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/New+Apache+Nuttx+Logo
> > Please give your feedback and suggestoion.
>
> Are there any updates on the proposed new NuttX logos? We stopped
>
The new logo could be viewed online here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/New+Apache+Nuttx+Logo
Please give your feedback and suggestoion.
Are there any updates on the proposed new NuttX logos? We stopped
discussing this with no follow through plan.
I suppose that with
Hi Johannes,
Did you try to reverse this commit to see if the problem goes away?
BR,
Alan
On 5/27/20, Schock, Johannes - NIVUS GmbH wrote:
> If I have done everything right with usage of git bisect, the below commit
> increased build time by factor 7 for MSYS2.
> Since this is a rather huge
it seems because ARCHINCLUDES try to figure out the search path by
invoking shell script:
diff --git a/boards/arm/stm32/stm32f4discovery/configs/cxxtest/Make.defs
b/boards/arm/stm32/stm32f4discovery/configs/cxxtest/Make.defs
index 35cdb5ab6a..f60d2d9e31 100644
---
If I have done everything right with usage of git bisect, the below commit
increased build time by factor 7 for MSYS2.
Since this is a rather huge commit, I think I can't be helpful figuring out the
actual reason.
And I'm not sure if this is perhaps even considered acceptable.
Regards, Johannes
Just as an intermediate result:
MSYS2
make distclean
tools/configure.sh stm32f4discovery/nsh
time make
current master
real35m54,957s
user2m29,879s
sys 6m31,525s
releases/9.0
real4m39,324s
user0m28,553s
sys 1m23,113s
The build is much slower than it used to be.
Does
Your interpretation is correct From my C knowledge.
> -Original Message-
> From: Takashi Yamamoto
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2020 1:22 PM
> To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
> Subject: Re: FAR for pointer to pointer
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 8:05 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis
> wrote:
> >
> >
20 matches
Mail list logo
