Re: Article: ST7789 Display with LVGL Graphics

cool! congratz! :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info

Re: Build Nuttx on MAC

macOS is a BSD.. very close to FreeBSD: 1. Use gmake. 2. Make sure you have the right version of kconfig-frontends package installed. If you installed it locally make sure path to your local binary is in the first place. -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info

Re: Article: Auto Flash and Test NuttX on RISC-V BL602

On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 12:30 AM Lee, Lup Yuen wrote: > This article explains how I created a Linux script to flash and test NuttX > automatically on the BL602 RISC-V SoC... > https://lupyuen.github.io/articles/auto > Lup CONGRATZ! OPEN SOURCE RISC-V IS THE FUTURE! =) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ,

Re: Alternatives to FAT for msd

Maybe LittleFS? Embedded, wear level and power failure resistant by design :-) https://github.com/littlefs-project/littlefs -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info

Re: Support of SPARC architecture

Hello Zou! Congratulations!! You did amazing work.. I know ESA is using LEON in their projects.. having NuttX support there would be a great benefit and prove that NuttX really can run anywhere :-) Also this would highly benefit to the academic community of space engineering students and

Re: kconfig-frontends upstream

On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 10:55 PM Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 8:19 AM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > > Hello Yann, > > You are marked as the author of the kconfig-frontends in a release > > package AUTHORS file. This package is a core dependency of the Nut

Re: Move to C99 for common code

On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 1:53 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > z80 holds all 8-bit ZiLOG architectures. That means > > z80 using the SDCC compiler > z180 using the SDCC compiler > ez80 which normally uses the ZiLOG compiler, but there is an experimental > version of GCC for the ez80 > > z16 uses only ZiLOG

Re: Article: SPI on BL602 and ESP32

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 2:57 AM Lee, Lup Yuen wrote: > > Here's my new article about NuttX SPI on BL602 and ESP32... > > https://lupyuen.github.io/articles/spi2 > > Now that NuttX is talking OK to Semtech SX1262 (LoRa Transceiver), I'll > start porting the LoRaWAN Stack to NuttX. Thanks :-)

Re: cycle resolution timing

On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 4:25 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote: > Seams like the Tickless mode of NuttX and Linux. > "Just a fancy name to let them make more money." TM > BR, > Alan Hahahah I thought so! Thank you Alan! :-) :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info

cycle resolution timing

Hello world :-) I just saw this post about Cycle Resolution Timing in Segger embOS. That allows going beyond SysTick in order to achieve better timings and reduce power consumption.

Re: Simulator - UART

On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 11:19 AM Fotis Panagiotopoulos wrote: > > No, The emulated UART is designed to work with the real UART on host. > Oh, now I understand how it works! > > In my case, however, I also wanted a "simulated" UART, not a physical one. > So I run: > > socat PTY,link=/dev/ttySIM0

Re: Simulator - UART

On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 11:37 AM Fotis Panagiotopoulos wrote: > I am working on a new NuttX-based firmware. > On this application a hardware board will be able to communicate through > UART with a Linux system. > > There is still some testing and development to be done on this Linux > program, so I

Re: NuttX + MicroPython + ESP32 / ESP32-C3

On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 7:45 PM Xiang Xiao wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 11:37 PM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 4:44 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote: > > > Hi Tomasz, > > > MicroPython was integrated in NuttX at some time ago, but it started >

Re: NuttX + MicroPython + ESP32 / ESP32-C3

On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 5:28 PM Simon Filgis wrote: > (..) > ...but I have the mission micropython in the back of my head. > Looking forward to more discussion wherever (discord or mail, I don't > care), but please keep me in the loop ;) > Thank you, > Simon Yup, having out of the box MicroPython

Re: NuttX + MicroPython + ESP32 / ESP32-C3

On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 4:58 PM Xiang Xiao wrote: > McKay made a new porting here: > Pull requests · apache/incubator-nuttx-apps (github.com) > > Maybe, you could work with him to boost the porting. Awsome! Thank you for the hint Xiang

Re: NuttX + MicroPython + ESP32 / ESP32-C3

On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 4:44 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote: > Hi Tomasz, > MicroPython was integrated in NuttX at some time ago, but it started > to crash and was removed. Yup, I saw some websites stating it work here but I could not find among interpreters. Thanks for the hint Alan :-) > I

NuttX + MicroPython + ESP32 / ESP32-C3

Hello world :-) I am considering MicroPython as the rapid development platform. It seems well developed already, allows simple tasks extremely fast, also allows client to develop firmware on their own relatively easy without rebuilding whole firmware, getting into details, drivers, etc. I would

Re: FreeBSD/BSD: tools/configure.sh + make vs gmake

On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 4:22 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > Off Topic: Tomasz, did you notice this: > https://www.hackster.io/news/65f02-is-a-100-mhz-drop-in-replacement-for-vintage-8-bit-computers-ef667b0ebed3?mc_cid=371311109e_eid=524337f8e9 > > That would beef up your Commodore C64! Whoah thanks

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 8:31 PM Bernd Walter wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 07:16:14AM +0200, Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > > Sorry for yesterday, I just need to remember about zfs snap before > > root experiments or simply experiment in vm ;-) > > I'm using sysutils/zfs-per

Re: esp32c3-devkit:ble boot loop

nutt-bootloader and then from NuttX you can flash > with make download ESPTOOL_BINDIR=... > You can also build it yourself if you want. Please check the > documentation, there should be direct links. (Using just a phone now sorry) > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021, 01:22 Tomasz C

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

Sorry for yesterday, I just need to remember about zfs snap before root experiments or simply experiment in vm ;-) kconfig-frontends port for FreeBSD is ready: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259256 Port allows selection of frontend: curses, gtk, qt. By default only curses is

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 4:57 AM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > Wow, that change has been in the Makefile for 20 years. > > Here is the original bugfix: > https://github.com/chexum/genromfs/commit/6d1b1e46bb7dbc25ca521c5dfcdc37d17dca8615 > > The bug was: > > -mkdir -p $(PREFIX)$(mandir) > +mkdir

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 4:31 AM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > > > By the way, did anyone since 1998 of genromfs existence notice this > > > > part of Makefile that may cripple your system files ?! > > > > > > > > install-man: > > > > # genromfs 0.5 installed the man page in this file, > > > >

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

genromfs 0.5.7 port has been submitted, with local patch until upstream gets updated :-) https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259242 -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 4:11 AM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > By the way, did anyone since 1998 of genromfs existence notice this > > part of Makefile that may cripple your system files ?! > > > > install-man: > > # genromfs 0.5 installed the man page in this file, > > # remove it before

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 4:03 AM Nathan Hartman wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 9:32 PM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > > > By the way, did anyone since 1998 of genromfs existence notice this > > part of Makefile that may cripple your system files ?! > > > > instal

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

By the way, did anyone since 1998 of genromfs existence notice this part of Makefile that may cripple your system files ?! install-man: # genromfs 0.5 installed the man page in this file, # remove it before someone notices :) if [ -f $(PREFIX)$(bindir)/man8 ]; then \

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 1:27 AM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > > I have managed to build and flash esp32c3-devkit:ble on FreeBSD :-) > > It gets a boot loop problem but the build seem to have worked just the > same as on Linux Debian :-) > > I have tried `./tools/configure.sh -B si

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

I have managed to build and flash esp32c3-devkit:ble on FreeBSD :-) It gets a boot loop problem but the build seem to have worked just the same as on Linux Debian :-) I have tried `./tools/configure.sh -B sim:nsh` but that needs porting `genromfs` to FreeBSD. work in progres.. -- CeDeROM,

esp32c3-devkit:ble boot loop

Hello world :-) By selecting toolkit by hand (make CROSSDEV=riscv32-esp-elf-) I made it to build the esp32c3-devkit:ble example. Both on FreeBSD and Linux. I am using ESP-IDF toolchain. After flashing I can see on terminal emulator that device is locked in a boot loop :-( Is there any

Re: ESP32-C3 RISC-V

On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 12:30 PM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 1:06 AM Abdelatif Guettouche wrote: > > The CROSSDEV variable will just have the name of the toolchain. If we want > > to add another toolchain we add another ifeq in > > riscv/rv32im/Toolchain

Re: github nuttx/nuttx vs apache/incubator-nuttx

TANK U SIR! =) On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 8:17 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > All of the junk repositories are gone (that is a good thing to do > regardless of what we decide to do with the directory). The > github.com/nuttx directory still exists. The following people have write > access: > >-

Re: menuconfig

On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 4:33 PM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > What I really like in NuttX that menuconfig has all available options > in one place so newcomer can see how many possible choices are out > there! :-) Just an idea: would it be possible to estimate final firmware size based on

menuconfig

What I really like in NuttX that menuconfig has all available options in one place so newcomer can see how many possible choices are out there! :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info

Re: ESP32-C3 RISC-V

On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 1:06 AM Abdelatif Guettouche wrote: > There isn't really a big difference between IDF's toolchain and the one > from Sifive, this is why we didn't add both. > Are you having issues running the one from SiFive? I know SiFive, I am following them directly at RISC-V lists, I

Re: What's the AVR32 GCC in Microchip Studio and where's its source code?

On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 12:15 PM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 2:15 AM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > > > Those are pretty old. These are old too: > > http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/archive/avr32-gnu-toolchain-3.4.0.332-source.zip > > > > There

Re: What's the AVR32 GCC in Microchip Studio and where's its source code?

On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 2:15 AM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > Those are pretty old. These are old too: > http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/archive/avr32-gnu-toolchain-3.4.0.332-source.zip > > There are even old sources here: >

Re: FreeBSD/BSD: tools/configure.sh + make vs gmake

On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 6:37 PM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 6:23 PM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > > > > I have managed to build and install Debian version of > > kconfig-frontends. Local testing for now. > > > > The problem I have encountered

Re: ESP32-C3 RISC-V

On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 6:15 PM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 6:11 PM Abdelatif Guettouche > wrote: > > > > > I could not find detailed information on how to setup RISC-V toolchain > > except just using "generic toolchain": > > https

FreeBSD/BSD: esp32-c3 / risc-v + compiler problem

After fixing the kconfig and tools/configure problem now we need to fix the compiler / toolchain detection issue on esp32-c3 risc-v. (venv38zephyr) ./tools/configure.sh esp32c3-devkit:ble No configuration change. (venv38zephyr) gmake Create .version Create version.h gmake[1]: Entering directory

Re: FreeBSD/BSD: tools/configure.sh + make vs gmake

On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 6:23 PM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > > I have managed to build and install Debian version of > kconfig-frontends. Local testing for now. > > The problem I have encountered now is the `tools/configure.sh` uses > `make` for builds. On BSD systems BSD version

FreeBSD/BSD: tools/configure.sh + make vs gmake

I have managed to build and install Debian version of kconfig-frontends. Local testing for now. The problem I have encountered now is the `tools/configure.sh` uses `make` for builds. On BSD systems BSD version of `make` is used by default. GNU make is named `gmake` here. Will try to patch that

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

I have managed to build and install Debian version of kconfig-frontends on FreeBSD. Will try that one out and report back in dedicated threads :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info

Re: ESP32-C3 RISC-V

On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 6:11 PM Abdelatif Guettouche wrote: > > > I could not find detailed information on how to setup RISC-V toolchain > except just using "generic toolchain": > https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/platforms/risc-v/esp32c3/index.html > > There is a link there to download the

Re: github nuttx/nuttx vs apache/incubator-nuttx

es. > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 9:09 AM Abdelatif Guettouche < > > > > abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > People who have admin access to that org are all committers/PPMC > > members. > &

Re: ESP32-C3 RISC-V

Allright, except for the FreeBSD works, I would like to have a working reference point based on Linux Debian 10.10, so I have created a VM. I could not find detailed information on how to setup RISC-V toolchain except just using "generic toolchain":

Re: github nuttx/nuttx vs apache/incubator-nuttx

; On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 8:27 AM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > > > Maybe you could re-gain access Gregory manage users and put it in an > > "archived state" with a note that the project moved to Apache > > organization? :-) > > > > That way nothing will b

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 10:44 PM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > > Returning to KCONFIG :-) > > I have talked to Debian kconfig-frontends maintainer Philippe Thierry: > > https://packages.debian.org/stable/kconfig-frontends > > He confirmed that kconfig-frontends is abandoned. They

Re: github nuttx/nuttx vs apache/incubator-nuttx

> A problem now is that many people have access to the repository and it is > not under the control of any project. > > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 7:53 AM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > > > Hello world :-) > > > > Another thing I found confusing a bit for a newcomer is the dual &g

github nuttx/nuttx vs apache/incubator-nuttx

Hello world :-) Another thing I found confusing a bit for a newcomer is the dual repository model: 1. https://github.com/NuttX/nuttx 2. https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx There is not information or redirect on 1 that development takes place on 2. Is 2 going to become 1 back again when

kconfig-frontends upstream

Hello Yann, You are marked as the author of the kconfig-frontends in a release package AUTHORS file. This package is a core dependency of the NuttX RTOS. It seems that development of the package has been abandoned..? Can you please confirm if the maintenance of the package has been abandoned? If

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

Returning to KCONFIG :-) I have talked to Debian kconfig-frontends maintainer Philippe Thierry: https://packages.debian.org/stable/kconfig-frontends He confirmed that kconfig-frontends is abandoned. They use own git repository with version 4.11.0.1 as current:

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 9:11 PM Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 12:23 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > >> The Linux Foundation and the ASF are both not-for-profit > > >> organizations, but they different significantly in their legal > > >> organizations. I forget the non-project

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 5:56 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > >> Being member of PMC / PPMC seems to be the kind of Voting Rank I was > >> describing.. except it is more bureaucratic / social based rather than > >> result based.. because it depends on the membership rather than > >> overall lines of code

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 5:48 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > Being member of PMC / PPMC seems to be the kind of Voting Rank I was > > describing.. except it is more bureaucratic / social based rather than > > result based.. because it depends on the membership rather than > > overall lines of code

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 4:48 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > >> Democracy as we see today is vulnerable to manipulation by "mass > >> migration". I saw many good open-source projects being hurt by "new > >> fancy trends" to the point where solid old developers left the project > >> and it was taken over

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 4:14 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote: > On 10/14/21, Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 3:15 PM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 2:28 AM Nathan Hartman wrote: > >> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 12:49 PM Gregory Nutt wr

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 3:15 PM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 2:28 AM Nathan Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 12:49 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > > > Matias N. made some progress before; > > > > Unified device interface, callback ba

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 2:28 AM Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 12:49 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > > Matias N. made some progress before; > > > Unified device interface, callback based initialization and devicetree > > > (DTS) · Issue #3031 · apache/incubator-nuttx (github.com) > > >

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

On Sun, Oct 10, 2021, 18:36 Gregory Nutt wrote: > Device tree is another technology that has been advocated for NuttX with > a few strong advocates but with no clear mandate from the community. > Linux and Zephyr RTOS uses DTS to desrbibe hardware: cpu, memory, peripherals, soc, boards, etc.

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 8:38 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > I don't think that there is any particular reason to "forbid" Python in the > build. The current build does not depend on Python and, hence, adding the > requirement for Python would probably affect many people in the community. >

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 3:14 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote: > > Hi Tomasz, > > On 10/8/21, Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 6:45 AM Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > sic > >> i guess "we are maintaining the fork by ourselves" is a better &

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 2:53 PM Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 11:51 PM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > (..) > > Can anyone point me to the official `kconfig-frontends` website and > > source code repository? > > > > I can find 28 repositories on GitHub

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 11:11 AM Bernd Walter wrote: > I'm using kconfig-frontends build from source, which I don't remember > how I got it. > It requires bash to be installed, since kconfig itself is a bash script. > Unfortunately I can't figure out which version it was. > I have sourcecode for

Re: ESP32-C3 RISC-V

On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 2:33 PM Abdelatif Guettouchewrote: > > When is next release planned with ESP32-C3 already included? > > NuttX 10.1.0 already includes support for ESP32-C3 with a fair amount > of drivers including Wifi. BLE is on master however, and will be part > of the next release.

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 8:11 AM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > I saw Espressif have their own modified fork of kconfig-frontend that > is updated to work with CMake (that fixes GNU Make vs BSD Make problem > as well): > https://github.com/espressif/kconfig-frontends Things get clear now, even

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 7:49 AM Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 2:25 PM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 6:45 AM Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 12:51 PM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > > > > >

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 6:45 AM Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 12:51 PM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 5:15 AM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 4:47 AM Nathan Hartman wrote: > > > > There is a NuttX Tool

Re: ESP32-C3 RISC-V

On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 5:33 AM Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > > I can see some "bashisms" in the shell scripts, did you consider using > > raw /bin/sh or is it too much work and `bash` is the best way already? > > I am asking because on Linux `/bin/sh` is `/bin/bash` while on BSD > > `/bin/sh` is

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 5:15 AM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 4:47 AM Nathan Hartman wrote: > > There is a NuttX Tools repo at > > https://bitbucket.org/nuttx/tools/downloads/ > > > > I think I built the kconfig-frontends from there a long time ago. &g

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 4:47 AM Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 10:29 PM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > > (..) > > There is no such package kconfig on FreeBSD. But I was working with > > Zephyr KConfig somehow. > > Maybe Zephyr is providing its own kconfig

Re: FreeBSD / BSD

Here goes the GitHub Issue - its better to work close to the source code :-) https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/issues/4648 -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info

FreeBSD / BSD

Hello world :-) My first steps with NuttX on FreeBSD. I will ask some questions here for support and make it working on BSD :-) First one: % ./tools/configure.sh esp32c3-devkit:ble Copy files /home/cd/cederom/work/CeDeROM/lab/embedded/nuttx/nuttx.git/nuttx/tools/../tools/sethost.sh: line 129:

Re: ESP32-C3 RISC-V

Yet another crucial question for my application: has ESP32-C3 port of NuttX BLE NSH available? -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info

Re: ESP32-C3 RISC-V

Sorry, I was looking at nuttx-10.0.1 branch, in master I can see some `esp32c3-devkit` stuff :-) Is ESP32-C3 production ready? When is next release planned with ESP32-C3 already included? I can see some "bashisms" in the shell scripts, did you consider using raw /bin/sh or is it too much work

ESP32-C3 RISC-V

Hello NuttX World :-) I have just started a project that I want to implement using ESP32-C3 MINI/WROOM module. I have the modules already, DevelKits are on the way. Alan convinced me to try NuttX in place of Zephyr, but the time is short and I need to deliver a working design until end of year.