Re: Dojo vs. Prototype vs. whatever

2007-09-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
I don't know much about JQuery, but philosophically yes +1 Jacques De : Raj Saini [EMAIL PROTECTED] I second, JQuery is lightweight and can work with other Widget toolkits such as yahoo. Thanks, Raj Ean Schuessler wrote: On Tuesday 11 September 2007 07:10:49 pm Anil K Patel wrote:

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-1232) Data filtering in entity views

2007-09-12 Thread Oscar Pablo (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526696 ] Oscar Pablo commented on OFBIZ-1232: By using the tag filter to enter filter conditions, we are not binding the

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-44) Add capability to call java functions directly from actions in screen widgets

2007-09-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-44?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-44. Resolution: Won't Fix Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Closed as Won't fix since concensus. Still

Re: Dojo vs. Prototype vs. whatever

2007-09-12 Thread guo weizhan
Hi Jonathon, How do you built dojo into the Widget Engine? Is there any code I can reuse? And I think Dojo it's powerfull, I like dojo to deal js as the div. Thanks, Jack Guo 2007/9/12, Jonathon -- Improov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Al, I had built Dojo into the Widget Engine already, in one of

RE: Dojo vs. Prototype vs. whatever

2007-09-12 Thread Mike Wong
How about EXT http://extjs.com/ I've used this to turn all the OFBiz table into a data grid. -Original Message- From: Jacques Le Roux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 14:50 To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: Dojo vs. Prototype vs. whatever I don't know

Re: Dojo vs. Prototype vs. whatever

2007-09-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
LGPL 3.0 : can be used in OFBiz but no changes to the lib are authorised. If they are issues you are trapped ! Jacques De : Mike Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] How about EXT http://extjs.com/ I've used this to turn all the OFBiz table into a data grid. -Original Message- From: Jacques

Re: Dojo vs. Prototype vs. whatever

2007-09-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Mmm, actually it's the same for JQyery. Dojo is Apache licence compliant (Academic Free Licence, BSD Licence). I suppose it's the main reason we can find Dojo in OFBiz... Jacques De : Jacques Le Roux [EMAIL PROTECTED] LGPL 3.0 : can be used in OFBiz but no changes to the lib are authorised.

Re: Dojo vs. Prototype vs. whatever

2007-09-12 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
I'd say that we should consider only the toolkits that are released in a 100% compatible license... OFBiz must work properly out of the box and it would be a pain to ask users to download a separate library. Jacopo Jacques Le Roux wrote: Mmm, actually it's the same for JQyery. Dojo is

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-1232) Data filtering in entity views

2007-09-12 Thread Jonathon Wong (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526724 ] Jonathon Wong commented on OFBIZ-1232: -- By using the tag filter to enter filter conditions, we are not binding

Re: Dojo vs. Prototype vs. whatever

2007-09-12 Thread Jonathon -- Improov
Hi Jack, I integrated the AJAX aspects of Dojo into the Widget Engine. Haven't done much with the Dojo widgets. Check out the Form Widget elements like field and attributes like action, the ideas are there. At the simplest level, my integration merely makes it unnecessary for you to write any

Re: Dojo vs. Prototype vs. whatever

2007-09-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
I totally agree, we can't mortgage the future... Jacques De : Jacopo Cappellato [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd say that we should consider only the toolkits that are released in a 100% compatible license... OFBiz must work properly out of the box and it would be a pain to ask users to download a

Re: Mopping up the outstanding JIRA issues best as we can?

2007-09-12 Thread Jonathon -- Improov
Ok, then. I'll test the patches, review them, and possibly even clean them up for commit. Jonathon David E Jones wrote: The biggest thing the committers need help with is testing and review. In other words, just try out the patches (or add patches ;) ) and comment on what you tested and

Re: svn commit: r574259 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order: config/ data/ src/org/ofbiz/order/shoppingcart/ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/actions/entry/ webapp/ordermgr/entry/

2007-09-12 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Bilgin, about the Ship to Another Party feature already available in the standard checkout process: there is actually a remarkable difference from what I have implemented in the quickcheckout page. In the quickcheckout, you really change the party in the SHIP_TO_CUSTOMER role (stored in the

Re: svn commit: r574259 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order: config/ data/ src/org/ofbiz/order/shoppingcart/ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/ webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/actions/entry/ webapp/ordermgr/entry/

2007-09-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Jacopo, Yes I agree, we should be able to trace that change easily. Jacques De : Jacopo Cappellato [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bilgin, about the Ship to Another Party feature already available in the standard checkout process: there is actually a remarkable difference from what I have implemented

Re: Dojo vs. Prototype vs. whatever

2007-09-12 Thread guo weizhan
Hi Jonathon, What I need is like the struts2 integrate with dojo, when you want to use the AJAX function just add theme='ajax' in the form elements. and then the form have the AJAX function like submit it without refresh all page, auto validation the input, make the table pages AJAXed and so

[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-1235) Widget Engine integrate with dojo

2007-09-12 Thread jack_guo (JIRA)
Widget Engine integrate with dojo - Key: OFBIZ-1235 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1235 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: New Feature Environment: all the platform Reporter:

Re: Dojo vs. Prototype vs. whatever

2007-09-12 Thread guo weizhan
The jira url: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1235 2007/9/12, guo weizhan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Jonathon, What I need is like the struts2 integrate with dojo, when you want to use the AJAX function just add theme='ajax' in the form elements. and then the form have the AJAX

Re: Dojo vs. Prototype vs. whatever

2007-09-12 Thread Al Byers
I found this comparison - http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/UP3/Javascript+Toolkit+Comparison Also: http://jonaquino.blogspot.com/2006/04/comparison-of-dojo-and-prototype.html http://summerofcode.wordpress.com/2006/07/01/ajax-toolkit-shootout/ http://www.sitepoint.com/article/javascript-library

Re: svn commit: r574962 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting: script/org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/PaymentServices.xml servicedef/services_payment.xml webapp/accounting/WEB-INF/controller.xml widg

2007-09-12 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Rashko, you are right. This is now fixed in rev. 574988 Thanks, Jacopo Rashko Rejmer wrote: Hi Jacopo, This services is very handy - it helps a lot to clarify the way of using billing accounts. The only problem that I encountered is that if the payment that is applied to the billing

Re: Dojo vs. Prototype vs. whatever

2007-09-12 Thread Raj Saini
JQuery is also available under MIT license. Is it compatible with Apache license? http://docs.jquery.com/Licensing Thanks, Raj Jacques Le Roux wrote: LGPL 3.0 : can be used in OFBiz but no changes to the lib are authorised. If they are issues you are trapped ! Jacques De : Mike Wong

Re: Asset Maintenance Permissions Problems

2007-09-12 Thread Adrian Crum
David, I have the Fixed Asset permission checking extended as you described. It was incredibly easy. One problem though - when the user doesn't have the required permission, the fail message that is displayed is from the original service, not the one invoked by the ECA. Any ideas for that?

Re: Asset Maintenance Permissions Problems

2007-09-12 Thread David E Jones
Adrian Crum wrote: One problem though - when the user doesn't have the required permission, the fail message that is displayed is from the original service, not the one invoked by the ECA. Any ideas for that? I haven't looked at how you implemented it, but if the ECA returns a message then

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-1236) Implement Asset Maintenance Permission checking by extending existing Fixed Asset permission checking

2007-09-12 Thread Adrian Crum (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adrian Crum updated OFBIZ-1236: --- Attachment: extend_permissions.patch The attached patch attempts to get this to work using the

[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-1236) Implement Asset Maintenance Permission checking by extending existing Fixed Asset permission checking

2007-09-12 Thread Adrian Crum (JIRA)
Implement Asset Maintenance Permission checking by extending existing Fixed Asset permission checking - Key: OFBIZ-1236 URL:

Re: Dojo vs. Prototype vs. whatever

2007-09-12 Thread Chris Howe
This is strange. It is only possible (methinks) if John Resig has copyright ownership of every part of JQuery. And if he does, then the MIT license invalidates the GPL license. If he does not have copyright ownership of every part of JQuery, then if any contributions were added through the

Re: Dojo vs. Prototype vs. whatever

2007-09-12 Thread Al Byers
This seems to be two issues - what javascript toolkit core platform to use and what platform will more easily integrate with OFBiz Screen Widgets. I don't see any point in trying to standardize on a core platform as I do not think we could come to any sort of agreement. But I do think that we can

Re: Dojo vs. Prototype vs. whatever

2007-09-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Yes strange indeed ! The only way is to write him I guess (and hoping he will reply ;o) Jacques De : Chris Howe [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is strange. It is only possible (methinks) if John Resig has copyright ownership of every part of JQuery. And if he does, then the MIT license invalidates

[jira] Assigned: (OFBIZ-1236) Implement Asset Maintenance Permission checking by extending existing Fixed Asset permission checking

2007-09-12 Thread Anil K Patel (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anil K Patel reassigned OFBIZ-1236: --- Assignee: Anil K Patel Implement Asset Maintenance Permission checking by extending

Re: svn commit: r575113 - in /ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/assetmaint: data/ data/AssetMaintSecurityData.xml ofbiz-component.xml script/org/ofbiz/assetmaint/FixedAssetMaintEvents.xml servicedef/secas.xm

2007-09-12 Thread Adrian Crum
Did you get it to work? David is supposed to be looking at this to help me debug it. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: apatel Date: Wed Sep 12 15:47:44 2007 New Revision: 575113 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=575113view=rev Log: Applying patch from Adrian with some improvements. Thanks

Re: svn commit: r575113 - in /ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/assetmaint: data/ data/AssetMaintSecurityData.xml ofbiz-component.xml script/org/ofbiz/assetmaint/FixedAssetMaintEvents.xml servicedef/secas.xm

2007-09-12 Thread Anil K Patel
Adrian, I am looking at it. Just got the basic permission data added. Regards Anil Patel Adrian Crum wrote: Did you get it to work? David is supposed to be looking at this to help me debug it. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: apatel Date: Wed Sep 12 15:47:44 2007 New Revision: 575113

Re: svn commit: r575113 - in /ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/assetmaint: data/ data/AssetMaintSecurityData.xml ofbiz-component.xml script/org/ofbiz/assetmaint/FixedAssetMaintEvents.xml servicedef/secas.xm

2007-09-12 Thread Adrian Crum
Anil, The concept is to have the component use its own permissions - not the accounting permissions. So, the AssetMaintSecurityData.xml file should NOT contain any ACCOUNTING_xxx permissions. Also, the ASSETMAINT_ADMIN permission grants permission to ALL operations, so there is no need to

Re: svn commit: r575113 - in /ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/assetmaint: data/ data/AssetMaintSecurityData.xml ofbiz-component.xml script/org/ofbiz/assetmaint/FixedAssetMaintEvents.xml servicedef/secas.xm

2007-09-12 Thread David E Jones
I'm not sure what you mean by supposed to be looking at this... but I think I phrased to things to make it clear that I or someone COULD look at it... I'm still pushing 80-90 hour weeks so I'm afraid until things lighten up for me I'm mostly stuck with helping from the peanut gallery... ;)

Re: svn commit: r575113 - in /ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/assetmaint: data/ data/AssetMaintSecurityData.xml ofbiz-component.xml script/org/ofbiz/assetmaint/FixedAssetMaintEvents.xml servicedef/secas.xm

2007-09-12 Thread Adrian Crum
Understood. We can leave the permissions as-is until someone has time to help me with it. -Adrian David E Jones wrote: I'm not sure what you mean by supposed to be looking at this... but I think I phrased to things to make it clear that I or someone COULD look at it... I'm still pushing

Re: Asset Maintenance Permissions Problems

2007-09-12 Thread Adrian Crum
I figured out the problem. The service dispatcher uses the result Map from the initial service invoked and it ignores the result Map of any ECAs that are invoked. So, any values that an ECA service attempts to return are ignored. -Adrian Adrian Crum wrote: David,

Re: Asset Maintenance Permissions Problems

2007-09-12 Thread David E Jones
Are you using the result-to-context=true attribute on the action element of your eca def? -David Adrian Crum wrote: I figured out the problem. The service dispatcher uses the result Map from the initial service invoked and it ignores the result Map of any ECAs that are invoked. So, any

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-1236) Implement Asset Maintenance Permission checking by extending existing Fixed Asset permission checking

2007-09-12 Thread Adrian Crum (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adrian Crum updated OFBIZ-1236: --- Attachment: untested_and_dangerous.patch Attached patch solves the problem, but as its name makes

Re: Asset Maintenance Permissions Problems

2007-09-12 Thread Adrian Crum
Yes, but that copies the result to the context, not to the result Map. I just attached a patch to the Jira issue - take a look. David E Jones wrote: Are you using the result-to-context=true attribute on the action element of your eca def? -David Adrian Crum wrote: I figured out the

[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-1237) Add the ability to copy ECA action result Map to the service result Map

2007-09-12 Thread Adrian Crum (JIRA)
Add the ability to copy ECA action result Map to the service result Map --- Key: OFBIZ-1237 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1237 Project: OFBiz Issue Type:

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-1237) Add the ability to copy ECA action result Map to the service result Map

2007-09-12 Thread Adrian Crum (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adrian Crum updated OFBIZ-1237: --- Attachment: ServiceEcaAction.patch Attached patch adds a result-to-result attribute to the action

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-1237) Add the ability to copy ECA action result Map to the service result Map

2007-09-12 Thread Anil K Patel (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526971 ] Anil K Patel commented on OFBIZ-1237: - Tested, Works. Add the ability to copy ECA action result Map to the