That would mean changing the original screen widgets, possibly scores of them, to use component
URLs. If I understand you correctly by screen's URL...
Jonathon
Adrian Crum wrote:
If all BJ wants to do is display an existing screen with its existing
main decorator, then he can just use the
Also in response to BJ's been through this umteem times...
The idea is to provide neat encapsulation for screen widgets and their required mainDecorator
params. Have a clean wrap around the 2.
When including (include) controller.xml of a component say party, we would also be including
all
Why was the 1-liner code removed? The original was concise, and was able to take null values
without blowing up.
Or if we're worried about class cast exceptions:
return TRUE.equals(AIMProperties.get(testReq));
Jonathon
David E Jones wrote:
1. Bad code formating
2. Makes the default true, is
Jacques, BJ,
after having read the comments in the issue and the commit logs I really
don't understand what was the bug and how this patch is going to fix it.
Please, see my comments below:
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
David,
1. I had already refactored the code, please see trunk rev. 605190 and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hans Bakker reassigned OFBIZ-1513:
--
Assignee: Hans Bakker
add a resource manager
--
Key:
Big +1 here, we should never commit anything that we don't completely
understand, it should almost be as if we had written the code ourselves. A
committer is answerable for his commits not the contributor.
Regards
Scott
On 19/12/2007, Jacopo Cappellato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jacques Le Roux
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya reassigned OFBIZ-1506:
--
Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya
UI: Add a column with the default account id to
Improve the timsheet tab in projectmanager
--
Key: OFBIZ-1534
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1534
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: projectmgr
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12553305
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-1250:
Marco,
Are you sure ? I have no problems after an ant clean...
add a task find function in the projectmanager
---
Key: OFBIZ-1535
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1535
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: projectmgr
replace the project find function in the projectmanager
---
Key: OFBIZ-1536
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1536
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hans Bakker updated OFBIZ-1536:
---
Component/s: projectmgr
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Affects Version/s: SVN trunk
first, the orgninal code would never evaluate since lowercase true is
correct.
return (TRUE.equals((String) should be return (true.equals((String)
second if the properties is null it would not evaluate correct, and
there is not use using more cpu cycles to evaluate.
if(testReq.equals(TRUE)) this
The main motivation was that this would never evaluate to test mode,
which is import when first bringin this code online.
Jacopo Cappellato sent the following on 12/19/2007 2:09 AM:
Jacques, BJ,
after having read the comments in the issue and the commit logs I really
don't understand what
BJ Freeman wrote:
first, the orgninal code would never evaluate since lowercase true is
correct.
return (TRUE.equals((String) should be return (true.equals((String)
ok
second if the properties is null it would not evaluate correct, and
there is not use using more cpu cycles to evaluate.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12553307
]
Marco Risaliti commented on OFBIZ-1250:
---
Sorry Jacques,
I was not very clear I'm not spoken about ant build
Why not this?
true.equalsIgnoreCase(AIMProperties.get(testReq));
That would work no matter what case, upper or lower or mixed. Unless we don't
want case to be ignored?
The above is also better than:
testReq.equalsIgnoreCase(true);
The 1st statement doesn't require any testing of testReq for
Jacopo Cappellato sent the following on 12/19/2007 3:18 AM:
BJ Freeman wrote:
first, the orgninal code would never evaluate since lowercase true is
correct.
return (TRUE.equals((String) should be return (true.equals((String)
ok
second if the properties is null it would not evaluate
Perfect, could someone commit it and put this poor thread out of it's misery
:-)
Scott
On 20/12/2007, Jonathon -- Improov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not this?
true.equalsIgnoreCase(AIMProperties.get(testReq));
That would work no matter what case, upper or lower or mixed. Unless we
don't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12553311
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-1250:
You were quite clear Marco, I mean it's ok in Eclipse for me, what
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya closed OFBIZ-1506.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Ratnesh and Jyotsna for your valuable patch.
Your patch is in
Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
Why not this?
true.equalsIgnoreCase(AIMProperties.get(testReq));
+1
That would work no matter what case, upper or lower or mixed. Unless we
don't want case to be ignored?
Yes, this is one doubt I have: who is setting the testReq parameter?
Why it was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_1255
]
Marco Risaliti commented on OFBIZ-1250:
---
into the build.xml of webapp application there are two new classes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12553336
]
Marco Risaliti commented on OFBIZ-1116:
---
Hi David,
I have done some searching on google about this problem
De : Jacopo Cappellato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
Why not this?
+1
I will dot it soon using my preferred one (mix of Jonathon's and Adrian's)
return testReq == null ? false :
true.equalsIgnoreCase(AIMProperties.get(testReq));
That would work no matter what case, upper or
I find it quite intersting :p
Jacques
De : Scott Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perfect, could someone commit it and put this poor thread out of it's misery
:-)
Scott
On 20/12/2007, Jonathon -- Improov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not this?
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
De : Jacopo Cappellato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
Why not this?
+1
I will dot it soon using my preferred one (mix of Jonathon's and Adrian's)
return testReq == null ? false :
true.equalsIgnoreCase(AIMProperties.get(testReq));
You can do the same
Yes, true. I saw it when Jonathon send his message and then forgot. So it will
simpley be
return true.equalsIgnoreCase(AIMProperties.get(testReq));
Finally Scoot was right : a bit miserable :o) Though, I was not aware of
equalsIgnoreCase... Lesson learned...
Jacques
De : Jacopo Cappellato
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12553380
]
Joe Eckard commented on OFBIZ-1116:
---
I just tried adding framework/base/cert/demoCA/cacert.pem to my X509Anchors
BJ,
I can't see what you mean by configname=
Jacques
De : Jacques Le Roux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I will look at configname= tomorrow...
Jacques
I agree
plus
configname=
so we can check if it is null.
see my other email\Re: svn commit: r604632
dated 12/16/2007 7:42 AM
Jacopo
OK, done finally, needed a cast
return true.equalsIgnoreCase((String)AIMProperties.get(testReq));
When there are no conventions, it's always a trade off between readability
(using more verbose forms) and conciness. Sometime
conciness is better, it's the case here
BTW, I found this advice
BTW, I found this advice
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-3681/abebf?a=view#abebm is there any
performance advantages (I
reckon
it's would anyway be marginal) ?
Ok, forget it :
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jtp1029.html
Jacques
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-1525:
---
Component/s: INCORPORATING ISSUE
Issue to group current existing security concerns
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12553397
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-1151:
Marco,
Done, was a good idea, at least I hope everybody will think
Anil,
if the GL auto posting services are still causing issues (because they
are in alpha and because seed data is not completely implemented) we can
disable them all in the accounting/ofbiz-component.xml file.
I was the one that activated them all some time ago, but maybe it was
too early.
Jacopo,
I think I'll first try to fix data in my app and see if its possible to
live with it. I understand, Its important to keep these services active
in order to get it tested better.
Regards
Anil Patel
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 18:06 +0100, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Anil,
if the GL auto
My apologies. bad choice of words
configname=
should be
propertyname=
the code submitted with the orginal patch, looks for nulll from the
property .
so
in the property file
payment.paypal.notify=
returns a null.
so put a comment in the property file that has the suggested
line
Adrian,
thanks for the details; I'd say that an example for one of the auto
posting services (for example
createAcctgTransForSalesShipmentIssuance) that are triggered by
'external' actions by the secas defined in secas_ledger.xml would really
help.
Jacopo
Adrian Crum wrote:
Ideally,
One more thing to keep in mind with the GL posting SECAs - I changed the permissions a little in the
accounting component.
When I worked on converting permission checking to the permission service, I kept all permissions
the same except two. One of them was called ACCOUNTING_ATX_POST or
Jacopo,
I looked at that example. You have things set up a little differently than I pictured. I'll get back
to you in a little while.
-Adrian
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Adrian,
thanks for the details; I'd say that an example for one of the auto
posting services (for example
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12553457
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-1533:
---
I can give you the code that I use
I have clients that have a seperate
Thanks.
By the way, if it is going to be too complex, of course we can also run
all the GL auto posting services with the system user.
Jacopo
Adrian Crum wrote:
Jacopo,
I looked at that example. You have things set up a little differently
than I pictured. I'll get back to you in a little
Hi,
I'm evaluating an ecommerce solution for a client. I installed ofbiz
and the demo looks great. It has all the feature that my client needs.
Then I asked myself what if I needed to customize and modify the
code... so I looked at the code.
I realize ofbiz was started a few years ago and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-274:
-
Attachment: AIMProperites.patch
did not want to open a new jira so put it here.
this is what I think is
Nope, I dumped hibernate for ofbiz
would not go back.
first you need to stop thinking in object logic
The you need to look at the multitude of UI that have been added besides
the widgets.
and yes you need to spend a lot of time getting to know ofbiz.
starting here
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12553492
]
Marco Risaliti commented on OFBIZ-1151:
---
Also I like this workaround to see how many INCORPORATING ISSUE are
Thanks a lot Jacques
Marco
-
Author: jleroux
Date: Wed Dec 19 08:28:30 2007
New Revision: 605606
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=605606view=rev
Log:
Classes
JasperReportsJXlsViewHandler.java
JasperReportsPoiXlsViewHandler.java
were missing, at Marco Risaliti demand,
Hello , in Peru, we have only a tax authority (SUNAT).
In our case for sales, we apply the 19% of tax.
It configured ofbiz for that when I do a transaction , it tax will be executed
automatically.
In other words, three transaction entries, one for the tax.
Jose.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya reassigned OFBIZ-1482:
--
Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya (was: Anil K Patel)
Auto posting: Implement an
I want to give Chris Howe a big thanks for taking the time to show me my
errors.
he has a single app which does not take in to some other criteria for
accessing multiple apps.
so He did one for multiple apps.
I plan to submit the basic parts as a template patch unless someone
would rather have it
this should be brought over when the multiple example is done.
http://ofbizwiki.go-integral.com/Wiki.jsp?page=FAQ21
BJ Freeman sent the following on 12/19/2007 4:15 PM:
I want to give Chris Howe a big thanks for taking the time to show me my
errors.
he has a single app which does not take in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12553571
]
Raj Saini commented on OFBIZ-1533:
--
I don't think zip code is the right way to go. If someone can find the party id
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hans Bakker reassigned OFBIZ-1534:
--
Assignee: Hans Bakker
Improve the timsheet tab in projectmanager
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hans Bakker reassigned OFBIZ-1515:
--
Assignee: Hans Bakker
add an assignment function to a task.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12553572
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-1533:
---
hmmm how do you deal with customer that has no login information.
there for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hans Bakker reassigned OFBIZ-1535:
--
Assignee: Hans Bakker
add a task find function in the projectmanager
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hans Bakker reassigned OFBIZ-1536:
--
Assignee: Hans Bakker
replace the project find function in the projectmanager
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-841.
-
Resolution: Invalid
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Due to the last css changes the calendar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12553573
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-1154:
Hi Bilgin,
You are now able to commit it ;o) Maybe your question
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12553580
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-1453:
--
Bilgin,
I did a quick review of your code (no tests) and it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
JyotsnaRathore updated OFBIZ-1529:
--
Attachment: globalGlSetting.patch
UI: Create a new top level menu item in the accounting
Can I ask the community to check the last project Task status proposal?
If there are no further comments i will implement the proposal below in
a couple of days in the special component 'project manager'
The final proposal about the project task status was:
The status on a task is largely system
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hans Bakker closed OFBIZ-1515.
--
Resolution: Fixed
this issue is largely implemented. Tasks 1 week before the completion date with
no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hans Bakker reassigned OFBIZ-1509:
--
Assignee: Hans Bakker
Allow for more status values for a task in the project.
This is a short update on the status of the GL accounting development
effort.
With reference to:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1434
We will probably complete the subtasks 11, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35 by the end of the year: after they are completed, the GL
accounting
What about adding the ability to define mappings for
GlAccountTypeId--GlAccountId, within the context of an organization,
specific for parties (or party groups/party classifications?) in a
specified role?
The idea is to define a mapping like these:
* sales invoice transactions for the
Woow Jacopo and others participating in this effort.
This is a key effort of making OFBiz complete and making it a true ERP
system. I myself will try to use the new accounting component in my
company in the beginning of next year and helping you in testing and
debugging it.
very impressive!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12553592
]
Raj Saini commented on OFBIZ-1533:
--
I am new to this but I don't think anonymous users are allowed to view their
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12553600
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-1533:
---
https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/partymgr/control/viewprofile?partyId=admin
look
69 matches
Mail list logo
