From: Adrian Crum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Adrian Crum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Jones wrote:
On Fri, 08 Aug 2008 07:44:08 -0700, Adrian Crum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
On Aug 7, 2008, at 3:57 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Yes
To answer you question you have only to have a look at the PostalAddress
definition
There are specific fields there like toName and attnName which can't shared. A PostalAddress is only an administrative mean to
contact, not to locate
Jacques
From: BJ Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
so when
On Aug 9, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
OK it's your opininon. Note however that you will need another mean
to make a contact wih them (like speaking or something :o). The
terrestial position has only allowed you to locate them, not to send
them any kind of signal.
Terrestrial
I agree that addresses should not be specific to a party and could be shared. Let see what other think. There may be a good reason
it's build like that... It introduces some redundancy but maybe save programming efforts...
Jacques
From: BJ Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ah, well I am working a
to complete my thoughts
TerrestialPositiontoPostalAddress
TerrestialPosition TerrestialPositionID
PostalAddressID --PostalAddress
and
TerrestialPositiontoContactMech
Yes it save a lot of programming. mostly in matching the stored address
with the with the user input.
that is part of the change plan to to implement that.
the stored postal address, would be already postoffice formatted for the
country. so the matching algorithm for the user input and the screen
Hi Bruno
Yes it was a bug, fixed in rev. 684244
Regards
Scott
2008/7/10 Bruno Busco [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Trying to work out how to move application related labels that are now
located in ofbiz\framework\security\config\SecurityEntityLabels.xml I found
out that in screen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12621148#action_12621148
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-1912:
Hi Bilgin,
I hope to do a complete review
From: BJ Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes it save a lot of programming. mostly in matching the stored address
with the with the user input.
that is part of the change plan to to implement that.
the stored postal address, would be already postoffice formatted for the
country. so the matching
BJ,
Could you please use the convention for Entity and field like Entity.field to
describe your plan (like I corrected myself below) ?
It's hard to be sure of what you mean from your diagram.
I guess you want to add 2 new entities TerrestialPositiontoPostalAddress and
I have not written much on the wiki yet because is very complicated.
however part of the proposal is the stages and sequence to get this done
so people that have data already in use will not suffer.
in the light
yes there will be a series of patches probably under different task in
the same jira.
sorry thought the diagram would infer the entities were associations.
probably should have named them TerrestialPositiontoPostalAddressAssoc
and TerrestialPositiontoContactMechAssoc. Yes they are new entities.
they are a way to connect TerrestialPosition and ContactMech
there would be no added
Unless someone objects, I plan on fleshing out the Address map in
parties to be used as a manual way to verify addresses under the new
stuff I am adding.
On Aug 9, 2008, at 2:40 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Aug 9, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
OK it's your opininon. Note however that you will need another mean
to make a contact wih them (like speaking or something :o). The
terrestial position has only allowed you to locate
On Aug 8, 2008, at 3:33 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: BJ Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
contact mech may not always be the same address and geopoint
for an address it will always have the same geopoint
1) how do you connect an address that already exists with a New
ConactMech.
2) how do you
From: BJ Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
my bad. It is the way I think.
let me try to make this clearer.
code that interacts with external websites or webservices, for sake of
better description, that are components, need someway to link that
website, or webservice to ofbiz.
in the case of ebay you
Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 8/9/2008 11:27 AM:
From: BJ Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
my bad. It is the way I think.
let me try to make this clearer.
code that interacts with external websites or webservices, for sake of
better description, that are components, need someway to link
--- On Sat, 8/9/08, David E Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David E Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Latitude, Longitude in PostalAdress
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Saturday, August 9, 2008, 11:27 AM
On Aug 8, 2008, at 3:33 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: BJ Freeman
[EMAIL
think facilities should also have a geopoint along with a postal address
then the moving asset can be tracked relative to is origin or destination.
David E Jones sent the following on 8/9/2008 12:44 PM:
On Aug 9, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Sat, 8/9/08, David E Jones [EMAIL
Ha yes, I have already read some lines in OFBIZ-1899, I see now.
Jacques
Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 8/9/2008 11:27 AM:
From: BJ Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
my bad. It is the way I think.
let me try to make this clearer.
code that interacts with external websites or webservices, for
OK, thanks for the link, I will study...
Jacques
From: BJ Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have not written much on the wiki yet because is very complicated.
however part of the proposal is the stages and sequence to get this done
so people that have data already in use will not suffer.
in the
+1
Jacques
From: BJ Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
think facilities should also have a geopoint along with a postal address
then the moving asset can be tracked relative to is origin or destination.
David E Jones sent the following on 8/9/2008 12:44 PM:
On Aug 9, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Adrian Crum
--- On Sat, 8/9/08, David E Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David E Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Latitude, Longitude in PostalAdress
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Saturday, August 9, 2008, 12:44 PM
On Aug 9, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Sat, 8/9/08, David E
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12621176#action_12621176
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-1738:
Vu,
This is not how things works. To
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux reassigned OFBIZ-1899:
--
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Product Store WebSites Change from New Product Storeto
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux reassigned OFBIZ-1911:
--
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Integration with eBay (Adding ebay services and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12621179#action_12621179
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-1899:
BJ,
Is it ready for commiting ?
Product
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12621180#action_12621180
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-1911:
Bj,
Is it ready for commiting or just for
I don't think any code exists for that. Following the guidance in this page I
guess it had to be written for each new case.
Jacques
From: BJ Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reading, again, the
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/General+Entity+Overview
it struck me that adding in a method that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12621184#action_12621184
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-1899:
---
yes I tested it
however there is the note about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12621185#action_12621185
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-1911:
---
these were submitted now for any possible feed back
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Crum updated OFBIZ-1885:
---
Attachment: visualtheme_merged.patch
Updated visualtheme_merged.patch file.
Converted the Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-1899.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks BJ,
Your patch is in trunk revision: 684348.
As suggested Scott, I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-1908.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Thanks
There is no need to have a key like
ProductCreateNewProductStoreWebSite for a simple label like New Web
Site (which is what it should be, BTW, instead of Web Site). In fact,
there should be a label for that in the content component (where the
WebSite entity lives) and that should be
I don't think the label change you did will make since for the ftl patch
I did
if your going to change it to what you have might as well use the one in
content for the add website and remove the Store ID from the ftl.
I had
Create WebSite For Store then in the ftl I have the Store ID.
[EMAIL
sorry hit reply to the wrong one.
BJ Freeman sent the following on 8/9/2008 2:43 PM:
I don't think the label change you did will make since for the ftl patch
I did
if your going to change it to what you have might as well use the one in
content for the add website and remove the Store ID
From: David E Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is no need to have a key like ProductCreateNewProductStoreWebSite for a simple label like New Web Site (which is what
it should be, BTW, instead of Web Site). In fact, there should be a label for that in the content component (where the WebSite
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-1903.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Release Branch 4.0
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
guess there is more to correct since I copied requestAttributes from
another line in the ftl.
David E Jones sent the following on 8/9/2008 2:41 PM:
There is no need to have a key like
ProductCreateNewProductStoreWebSite for a simple label like New Web
Site (which is what it should be, BTW,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12621194#action_12621194
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-1903:
Looks like, with last Jira enhancements,
certian operation can not be performed with out a valid CA cert Self Cert does
not work
---
Key: OFBIZ-1913
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1913
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12621197#action_12621197
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-1913:
---
2008-07-29 14:24:31,312 (http-0.0.0.0-8443-2) [
form 'extend' will can bring system in a loop
-
Key: OFBIZ-1914
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1914
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: framework
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hans Bakker updated OFBIZ-1914:
---
Description:
If a form xml extends a form from a second form xml file and that second form
xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12621202#action_12621202
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-1914:
---
Is there a way to reproduce this in the
would not this go under a contribution instead of under the trunk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent the following on 8/9/2008 5:35 PM:
Author: doogie
Date: Sat Aug 9 17:35:11 2008
New Revision: 684387
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=684387view=rev
Log:
Debian work; have *not* done an install
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12621204#action_12621204
]
Hans Bakker commented on OFBIZ-1914:
Yes sure david, there is a way to test if you have
BJ Freeman wrote:
would not this go under a contribution instead of under the trunk
Unfortunately, no, they have to exist at the top-level for them to work.
In the LICENSE file at the top of the ofbiz tree, there is a segment of
files that are under a BSD license. However, what follows is *NOT* the
actual license they are under, but a generic BSD-template. This means
we are not actually including the license each of those files is under.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12621211#action_12621211
]
Bruno Busco commented on OFBIZ-1885:
Adrian,
I cannot find the listVisualThemes.ftl
51 matches
Mail list logo
